Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2019

21.05.2019 | Otology

Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system

verfasst von: Zahra Ghasemahmad, Saeid Farahani

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Even though many patients undergoing auditory steady-state response (ASSR) testing have some degree of hearing loss, some have normal hearing and ASSR often overestimates the behavioral thresholds in this group. In most commercial ASSR systems such as Chartr EP, a default correction factor is applied to compensate for this difference. Little is known, however, as how the correction factor compensates for the difference between ASSR and pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds as a function of carrier or modulation frequency (MF) in a commercial ASSR system. Our goal is to evaluate this relationship.

Methods

Twenty-four normal hearing adults were examined for both PTA and ASSR (Chartr EP system, GN Otometrics). ASSR thresholds were obtained at three MFs (20, 40, and 80 Hz). The difference scores were obtained by subtracting PTA from ASSR thresholds at each frequency for each subject. The corrected ASSR thresholds, then, were compared with the PTA thresholds across MFs and carrier frequencies.

Results

The default correction factors in the ASSR equipment differed significantly from the difference scores at all MFs and carrier frequencies (n = 24, p < 0.005). The correlation between corrected ASSR and PTA thresholds at most MFs and carrier frequencies were medium to poor.

Conclusions

At most MFs and carrier frequencies, the default correction factors defined by the manufacturer do not compensate for the difference between ASSR and PTA thresholds in normal hearing adults. The use of the default correction factors in Chartr EP system for the normal hearing adults needs special considerations.
Fußnoten
1
Correction factors are measured based on the difference between ASSR and PTA thresholds in subjects with a wide age and hearing range.
 
2
Static compliance less than 0.3 or more than 1.6 cc and middle ear pressure less than -100 or more than + 50 dapa.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobie RA, Van Hemel S (2004) Testing adult hearing: conclusions and recommendations. In: Hearing loss: determining eligibility for social security benefits. National Academies Press, Washington Dobie RA, Van Hemel S (2004) Testing adult hearing: conclusions and recommendations. In: Hearing loss: determining eligibility for social security benefits. National Academies Press, Washington
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sininger YS, Abdala C (1996) Hearing threshold as measured by auditory brain stem response in human neonates. Ear Hear 17:395–401CrossRefPubMed Sininger YS, Abdala C (1996) Hearing threshold as measured by auditory brain stem response in human neonates. Ear Hear 17:395–401CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall JW, Rupp KA (1997) Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 53:21–45PubMed Hall JW, Rupp KA (1997) Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 53:21–45PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stapells DR, Oates P (1997) Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 2:257–280CrossRefPubMed Stapells DR, Oates P (1997) Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 2:257–280CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner W, Plinkert PK (1999) The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Eur arch otorhinolaryngol 256:177–188CrossRefPubMed Wagner W, Plinkert PK (1999) The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Eur arch otorhinolaryngol 256:177–188CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Van Roon P et al (2002) Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 13:205–224PubMed Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Van Roon P et al (2002) Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 13:205–224PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Purcell DW, John SM, Schneider SM, Picton TW (2004) Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3581–3593CrossRefPubMed Purcell DW, John SM, Schneider SM, Picton TW (2004) Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3581–3593CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177–219CrossRef Picton TW, John MS, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell D (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177–219CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Petitot C, Collett L, Durrant JD (2005) Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR): effects of modulation and carrier frequencies. Int J Audiol 44:567–573CrossRefPubMed Petitot C, Collett L, Durrant JD (2005) Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR): effects of modulation and carrier frequencies. Int J Audiol 44:567–573CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdek A, Karacay M et al (2010) Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:43–49CrossRefPubMed Ozdek A, Karacay M et al (2010) Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:43–49CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2003) Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 42:237–248CrossRefPubMed Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2003) Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 42:237–248CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, Perez-Abalo MC, Van Roon P (2005) Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 16:140–156CrossRefPubMed Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, Perez-Abalo MC, Van Roon P (2005) Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 16:140–156CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MY, Ahn SY et al (2016) Narrow band CE-Chirp auditory steady-state response is more reliable than the conventional ASSR in predicting the behavioral hearing threshold. Auris Nasus Larynx 43:259–268CrossRefPubMed Lee MY, Ahn SY et al (2016) Narrow band CE-Chirp auditory steady-state response is more reliable than the conventional ASSR in predicting the behavioral hearing threshold. Auris Nasus Larynx 43:259–268CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jalaei B, Shaabani M, Zakaria MN (2017) Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 83:10–15CrossRefPubMed Jalaei B, Shaabani M, Zakaria MN (2017) Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 83:10–15CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S et al (2010) Threshold estimation in adult normal-and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses. Med Sci Monit 16:21–27 Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S et al (2010) Threshold estimation in adult normal-and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses. Med Sci Monit 16:21–27
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J et al (2012) Hearing threshold prediction with Auditory Steady State Responses and estimation of correction functions to compensate for differences with behavioral data, in adult subjects: Part 1: Audera and Chartr EP devices. Med Sci Monit 18:47–53CrossRef Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J et al (2012) Hearing threshold prediction with Auditory Steady State Responses and estimation of correction functions to compensate for differences with behavioral data, in adult subjects: Part 1: Audera and Chartr EP devices. Med Sci Monit 18:47–53CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Carhart R, Jerger JF (1959) Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J speech hear disord 24(4):330–345CrossRef Carhart R, Jerger JF (1959) Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J speech hear disord 24(4):330–345CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cone-Wesson B, Dowell RC, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming WJ (2002) The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:173–187PubMed Cone-Wesson B, Dowell RC, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming WJ (2002) The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 13:173–187PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat John MS, Lins OG, Boucher BL, Picton TW (1998) Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 37:59–82CrossRefPubMed John MS, Lins OG, Boucher BL, Picton TW (1998) Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 37:59–82CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Maanen A, Stapells DR (2005) Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 vs 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 44:613–624CrossRefPubMed Van Maanen A, Stapells DR (2005) Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 vs 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 44:613–624CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Savio G, Cardenas J, Perez Abalo M, Gonzalez A, Valdes J (2001) The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurotol 6:279–287CrossRef Savio G, Cardenas J, Perez Abalo M, Gonzalez A, Valdes J (2001) The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurotol 6:279–287CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross B, Draganova R, Picton TW, Pantev C (2003) Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 186:57–68CrossRefPubMed Ross B, Draganova R, Picton TW, Pantev C (2003) Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 186:57–68CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Picton TW, van Roon P, John MS (2009) Multiple auditory steady state responses (80–101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate. Ear Hear 30:100–109CrossRefPubMed Picton TW, van Roon P, John MS (2009) Multiple auditory steady state responses (80–101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate. Ear Hear 30:100–109CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scan Audiol 30:41–49CrossRef Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scan Audiol 30:41–49CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Komazec Z, Lemajić-Komazec S, Jović R, Nadj Č, Jovančević L, Savović S (2010) Comparison between auditory steady-state responses and pure-tone audiometry. Vojnosanit pregl 67:761–765CrossRefPubMed Komazec Z, Lemajić-Komazec S, Jović R, Nadj Č, Jovančević L, Savović S (2010) Comparison between auditory steady-state responses and pure-tone audiometry. Vojnosanit pregl 67:761–765CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sininger YS, Hunter LL, Hayes D, Roush PA, Uhler KM (2018) Evaluation of speed and accuracy of next-generation auditory steady state response and auditory brainstem response audiometry in children with normal hearing and hearing loss. Ear Hear 39:1207–1223CrossRef Sininger YS, Hunter LL, Hayes D, Roush PA, Uhler KM (2018) Evaluation of speed and accuracy of next-generation auditory steady state response and auditory brainstem response audiometry in children with normal hearing and hearing loss. Ear Hear 39:1207–1223CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Aimoni C, Crema L et al (2018) Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in children. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 38:361–368PubMedPubMedCentral Aimoni C, Crema L et al (2018) Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in children. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 38:361–368PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rance G, Rickards F (2002) Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 13:236–245PubMed Rance G, Rickards F (2002) Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol 13:236–245PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tlumak AI, Durrant JD, Delgado RE, Boston JR (2012) Steady-state analysis of auditory evoked potentials over a wide range of stimulus repetition rates: Profile in children vs adults. Int J Audiol 51:480–490CrossRefPubMed Tlumak AI, Durrant JD, Delgado RE, Boston JR (2012) Steady-state analysis of auditory evoked potentials over a wide range of stimulus repetition rates: Profile in children vs adults. Int J Audiol 51:480–490CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stapells DR (2011) Frequency-specific ABR and ASSR threshold assessment in young infants. In: Tharpe AM, Seewald R (eds) Comprehensive handbook of pediatric audiology, 1st edn. Plural Publishing, San Diego, pp 409–448 Stapells DR (2011) Frequency-specific ABR and ASSR threshold assessment in young infants. In: Tharpe AM, Seewald R (eds) Comprehensive handbook of pediatric audiology, 1st edn. Plural Publishing, San Diego, pp 409–448
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH (2006) The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Int J Audiol 45:281–286CrossRefPubMed Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH (2006) The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Int J Audiol 45:281–286CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system
verfasst von
Zahra Ghasemahmad
Saeid Farahani
Publikationsdatum
21.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05451-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.