Value of the color Doppler imaging mode in improving physicians’ diagnostic performance in patients with mid-ureteric stones larger than 5 mm: a retrospective study

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the value of the color Doppler flow imaging mode compared to the gray-scale mode for diagnosing mid-ureteric stones larger than 5 mm. We consecutively collected images from 79 patients possibly suffering from mid-ureteric stones under gray-scale and color Doppler flow imaging modes. Using computed tomography as the gold standard, all the included images were reviewed in a blinded manner for the confirmation of ureteral stones by 15 physicians divided into three groups according to their clinical experience level (resident, attending, and senior). During the evaluation process, the evaluation consistency was calculated and compared using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W). Moreover, diagnostic performance considering gray-scale and color imaging modes was compared. Especially for the diagnosis of mid-ureteric stones larger than 5 mm, the Kendall’s W for the combined gray-scale and color Doppler flow imaging ultrasound scanning modes was greater than that for the gray-scale mode (P < 0.05). Additionally, significant improvements in the diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were noted with color Doppler imaging (P < 0.05). Under isolated gray-scale mode, the resident group had reduced diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value and poorer accuracy compared with the attending and senior groups (P < 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences in the combined gray-scale and color Doppler flow imaging modes were noted among all groups (P > 0.05). In summary, the color Doppler flow imaging mode is useful for the diagnosis of mid-ureteric stones larger than 5 mm, especially in the resident group.