Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 5/2021

17.02.2021 | Original Paper

Emergency department and hospital revisits after ambulatory surgery for kidney stones: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

verfasst von: Katharine F. Michel, Hiten D. Patel, Justin B. Ziemba

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Our objective was to identify the rate of revisit to either emergency department (ED) or inpatient (IP) following surgical stone removal in the ambulatory setting, and to identify factors predictive of such revisits. To this end, the AHRQ HCUP ambulatory, IP, and ED databases for NY and FL from 2010 to 2014 were linked. Cases were selected by primary CPT for shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with accompanying ICD-9 for nephrolithiasis. Cystoscopy (CYS) was selected as a comparison group. The risk of revisit was explored using multivariate models. The overall unplanned revisit rate following stone removal was 6.4% (4.2% ED and 2.2% IP). The unadjusted revisit rates for SWL, URS, and PNL are 5.9%, 6.8%, and 9.0%, respectively. The adjusted odds of revisit following SWL, URS, and PNL are 1.93, 2.25, and 2.70 times higher, respectively, than cystoscopy. The majority of revisits occurred within the first two weeks of the index procedure, and the most common reasons for revisit were due to pain or infection. Younger age, female sex, lower income, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, a higher number of chronic medical conditions, and hospital-owned surgery centers were all associated with an increased odds of any revisit. The most important conclusions were that ambulatory stone removal has a low rate of post-operative revisits to either the ED or IP, there is a higher risk of revisit following stone removal as compared to urological procedures that involve only the lower urinary tract, and demographic factors appear to have a moderate influence on the odds of revisit.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM et al (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62:160–165CrossRef Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM et al (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62:160–165CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollingsworth JM, Saigal CS, Lai JC et al (2012) Surgical quality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 188:1274–1278CrossRef Hollingsworth JM, Saigal CS, Lai JC et al (2012) Surgical quality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 188:1274–1278CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Raheem OA, Mirheydar HS, Miller DL et al (2015) Contemporary trends in the ambulatory surgical treatment of urolithiasis: population-based analysis. J Endourol 29:1189–1192CrossRef Raheem OA, Mirheydar HS, Miller DL et al (2015) Contemporary trends in the ambulatory surgical treatment of urolithiasis: population-based analysis. J Endourol 29:1189–1192CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel HD, Matlaga BR, Ziemba JD (2019) Trends in the setting and cost of ambulatory urological surgery: an analysis of 5 states in the healthcare cost and utilization project. Urol Pract 6:79–85CrossRef Patel HD, Matlaga BR, Ziemba JD (2019) Trends in the setting and cost of ambulatory urological surgery: an analysis of 5 states in the healthcare cost and utilization project. Urol Pract 6:79–85CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bas O, Bakirtas H, Sener NC et al (2014) Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones. Urolithiasis 42:115–120CrossRef Bas O, Bakirtas H, Sener NC et al (2014) Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones. Urolithiasis 42:115–120CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinclair AM, Gunendran T, Pearce I (2007) Day-case urological surgery: are we improving? BJU Int 99:491–493CrossRef Sinclair AM, Gunendran T, Pearce I (2007) Day-case urological surgery: are we improving? BJU Int 99:491–493CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rambachan A, Matulewicz RS, Pilecki M et al (2014) Predictors of readmission following outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 192:183–188CrossRef Rambachan A, Matulewicz RS, Pilecki M et al (2014) Predictors of readmission following outpatient urological surgery. J Urol 192:183–188CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Scales CD, Saigal CS, Hanley JM et al (2014) The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones. Surgery 155:769–775CrossRef Scales CD, Saigal CS, Hanley JM et al (2014) The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones. Surgery 155:769–775CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bechis SK, Han DS, Abbott JE et al (2018) Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the UC San Diego health experience. J Endourol 32:394–401CrossRef Bechis SK, Han DS, Abbott JE et al (2018) Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the UC San Diego health experience. J Endourol 32:394–401CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A et al (2015) Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission? J Endourol 29:410–414CrossRef Beiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A et al (2015) Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission? J Endourol 29:410–414CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoenfeld D, Zhou T, Stern JM (2019) Outcomes for patients undergoing ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 33:189–193CrossRef Schoenfeld D, Zhou T, Stern JM (2019) Outcomes for patients undergoing ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 33:189–193CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom J, Matthews G, Phillips J (2016) Factors influencing readmission after elective ureteroscopy. J Urol 195:1487–1491CrossRef Bloom J, Matthews G, Phillips J (2016) Factors influencing readmission after elective ureteroscopy. J Urol 195:1487–1491CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghosh A, Oliver R, Way C et al (2017) Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years. World J Urol 35:1757–1764CrossRef Ghosh A, Oliver R, Way C et al (2017) Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years. World J Urol 35:1757–1764CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu CH, Kuo JY, Lin TP et al (2017) Clinical analysis of 48-h emergency department visit post outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis. J Chin Med Assoc 80:551–557CrossRef Lu CH, Kuo JY, Lin TP et al (2017) Clinical analysis of 48-h emergency department visit post outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis. J Chin Med Assoc 80:551–557CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat HCUP State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases (SASD) (2018) File composition: healthcare cost and utilization project HCUP State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases (SASD) (2018) File composition: healthcare cost and utilization project
18.
Zurück zum Zitat HCUP (2018) Supplemental variables for revisit analyses: healthcare cost and utilization project HCUP (2018) Supplemental variables for revisit analyses: healthcare cost and utilization project
19.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28:131–139CrossRef de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P et al (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28:131–139CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP et al (2020) Care setting as a modifiable predictor of perioperative cost and outcomes following elective urinary stone surgery. Urol Pract 7:259–265CrossRef Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP et al (2020) Care setting as a modifiable predictor of perioperative cost and outcomes following elective urinary stone surgery. Urol Pract 7:259–265CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Armitage JN, Withington J, van der Meulen J et al (2014) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int 113:777–782CrossRef Armitage JN, Withington J, van der Meulen J et al (2014) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. BJU Int 113:777–782CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Buldu I, Tepeler A, Karatag T et al (2016) Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone? World J Urol 34:1291–1295CrossRef Buldu I, Tepeler A, Karatag T et al (2016) Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone? World J Urol 34:1291–1295CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar M, Pandey S, Aggarwal A et al (2018) Unplanned 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing endo-urological surgeries for upper urinary tract calculi. Investig Clin Urol 59:321–327CrossRef Kumar M, Pandey S, Aggarwal A et al (2018) Unplanned 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing endo-urological surgeries for upper urinary tract calculi. Investig Clin Urol 59:321–327CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tepeler A, Karatag T, Tok A et al (2016) Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 34:69–73CrossRef Tepeler A, Karatag T, Tok A et al (2016) Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 34:69–73CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Keskin SK, Danacioglu YO, Turan T et al (2019) Reasons for early readmission after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 14:271–277PubMed Keskin SK, Danacioglu YO, Turan T et al (2019) Reasons for early readmission after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 14:271–277PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Emergency department and hospital revisits after ambulatory surgery for kidney stones: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
verfasst von
Katharine F. Michel
Hiten D. Patel
Justin B. Ziemba
Publikationsdatum
17.02.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01252-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Urolithiasis 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.