Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2012

01.10.2012

Verification of DICOM GSDF in Complex Backgrounds

verfasst von: David L. Leong, Louise Rainford, Tamara Miner Haygood, Gary J. Whitman, Philip M. Tchou, William R. Geiser, Selin Carkaci, Patrick C. Brennan

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

While previous research has determined the contrast detection threshold in medical images, it has focused on uniform backgrounds, has not used calibrated monitors, or has involved a low number of readers. With complex clinical images, how the Grayscale Standard Display Function (GSDF) affects the detection threshold and whether the median background intensity shift has been minimized by GSDF remains unknown. We set out to determine if the median background affected the detection of a low-contrast object in a clustered lumpy background, which simulated a mammography image, and to define the contrast detection threshold for these complex images. Clustered lumpy background images were created of different median intensities and disks of varying contrasts were inserted. A reader study was performed with 17 readers of varying skill level who scored with a five-point confidence scale whether a disk was present. The results were analyzed using reader operating characteristic (ROC) methodology. Contingency tables were used to determine the contrast detection threshold. No statistically significant difference was seen in the area under the ROC curve across all of the backgrounds. Contrast detection fell below 50 % between +3 and +2 gray levels. Our work supports the conclusion that Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine GSDF calibrated monitors do perceptually linearize detection performance across shifts in median background intensity. The contrast detection threshold was determined to be +3 gray levels above the background for an object of 1° visual angle.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, 2008 National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, 2008
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley-Stevens DM, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff RA, Wang J, Willis CE: Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225, 2005PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, Compton K, Cornelius C, Corrigan K, Flynn MJ, Hemminger B, Hangiandreou N, Johnson J, Moxley-Stevens DM, Pavlicek W, Roehrig H, Rutz L, Shepard J, Uzenoff RA, Wang J, Willis CE: Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225, 2005PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology: Practice guideline for digital radiography. Reston: 2007 American College of Radiology: Practice guideline for digital radiography. Reston: 2007
4.
Zurück zum Zitat IHE Technical Framework volume I Integration profiles. Chicago: 2007 IHE Technical Framework volume I Integration profiles. Chicago: 2007
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barten PGJ: Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, 1999CrossRef Barten PGJ: Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, 1999CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Langer S: A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems. J Digit Imaging 10:158–168, 1997PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Langer S: A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems. J Digit Imaging 10:158–168, 1997PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelli DG: Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. J Opt Soc Am A 2:1508–1532, 1985PubMedCrossRef Pelli DG: Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. J Opt Soc Am A 2:1508–1532, 1985PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rovamo J, Luntinen O, Nasanen R: Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency. Vision Res 33:2773–2788, 1993PubMedCrossRef Rovamo J, Luntinen O, Nasanen R: Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency. Vision Res 33:2773–2788, 1993PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nachmias J, Sansbury RV: Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. Vision Res 14:1039–1042, 1974PubMedCrossRef Nachmias J, Sansbury RV: Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. Vision Res 14:1039–1042, 1974PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437, 2001PubMedCrossRef Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437, 2001PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess AE, Jacobson F, Judy P: Mass discrimination in mammography: experiments using hybrid images. Acad Radiol 10:1247–1256, 2003PubMedCrossRef Burgess AE, Jacobson F, Judy P: Mass discrimination in mammography: experiments using hybrid images. Acad Radiol 10:1247–1256, 2003PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Peli E: Suprathreshold contrast perception across differences in mean luminance: effects of stimulus size, dichoptic presentation, and length of adaptation. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 12:817–823, 1995PubMedCrossRef Peli E: Suprathreshold contrast perception across differences in mean luminance: effects of stimulus size, dichoptic presentation, and length of adaptation. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 12:817–823, 1995PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Peli E, Arend L, Labianca AT: Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 13:1953–1959, 1996PubMedCrossRef Peli E, Arend L, Labianca AT: Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 13:1953–1959, 1996PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Xu J, Baladandayuthapani V: Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS. Med Phys 36:3682–3692, 2009PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Xu J, Baladandayuthapani V: Contrast sensitivity of digital imaging display systems: contrast threshold dependency on object type and implications for monitor quality assurance and quality control in PACS. Med Phys 36:3682–3692, 2009PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bochud F, Abbey C, Eckstein M: Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. Opt Express 4:33–42, 1999PubMedCrossRef Bochud F, Abbey C, Eckstein M: Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. Opt Express 4:33–42, 1999PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Barten PGJ: Formula for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye. SPIE, San Jose, 2004 Barten PGJ: Formula for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye. SPIE, San Jose, 2004
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan JT, Haygood TM, Yamal J-M, Evanoff M, O’Sullivan P, McEntee M, Brennan PC: The “memory effect” for repeated radiological observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W985–W991, 2011PubMedCrossRef Ryan JT, Haygood TM, Yamal J-M, Evanoff M, O’Sullivan P, McEntee M, Brennan PC: The “memory effect” for repeated radiological observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W985–W991, 2011PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Borjesson S, Hakansson M, Bath M, Kheddache S, Svensson S, Tingberg A, Grahn A, Ruschin M, Hemdal B, Mattsson S, Mansson LG: A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:45–52, 2005PubMedCrossRef Borjesson S, Hakansson M, Bath M, Kheddache S, Svensson S, Tingberg A, Grahn A, Ruschin M, Hemdal B, Mattsson S, Mansson LG: A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:45–52, 2005PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Lenth RV, Chen YF, Donaghy BA: Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design. Acad Radiol 5:591–602, 1998PubMedCrossRef Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Lenth RV, Chen YF, Donaghy BA: Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design. Acad Radiol 5:591–602, 1998PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731, 1992PubMedCrossRef Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 27:723–731, 1992PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis SL: A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med 26:596–619, 2007PubMedCrossRef Hillis SL: A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med 26:596–619, 2007PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis SL, Berbaum KS: Power estimation for the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz method. Acad Radiol 11:1260–1273, 2004PubMedCrossRef Hillis SL, Berbaum KS: Power estimation for the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz method. Acad Radiol 11:1260–1273, 2004PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis SL, Berbaum KS: Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification. Acad Radiol 12:1534–1541, 2005PubMedCrossRef Hillis SL, Berbaum KS: Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification. Acad Radiol 12:1534–1541, 2005PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Recent developments in the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 15:647–661, 2008PubMedCrossRef Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE: Recent developments in the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 15:647–661, 2008PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis SL, Obuchowski NA, Schartz KM, Berbaum KS: A comparison of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz and Obuchowski–Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat Med 24:1579–1607, 2005PubMedCrossRef Hillis SL, Obuchowski NA, Schartz KM, Berbaum KS: A comparison of the Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz and Obuchowski–Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat Med 24:1579–1607, 2005PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ: Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 116:533–538, 1975PubMed Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ: Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 116:533–538, 1975PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Verification of DICOM GSDF in Complex Backgrounds
verfasst von
David L. Leong
Louise Rainford
Tamara Miner Haygood
Gary J. Whitman
Philip M. Tchou
William R. Geiser
Selin Carkaci
Patrick C. Brennan
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9478-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Journal of Digital Imaging 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.