Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2020

21.04.2020 | Original Article

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up

verfasst von: L. Regusci, F. Fasolini, P. Meinero, G. Caccia, G. Ruggeri, M. Serati, A. Braga

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the 3-year objective and subjective outcomes of patients with complex anorectal fistula treated with Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT). Furthermore, we evaluated the risk factors associated with recurrence.

Methods

All consecutive patients with complex anorectal fistula who underwent VAAFT in Beata Vergine Hospital of Mendrisio, Switzerland, from January 2013 to January 2016, were enrolled. Patients with suspicion or diagnosis of Crohn’s disease, malignancy, previous history of radiotherapy or radical pelvic surgery were excluded. Preoperative clinical assessment based upon medical history, physical examination and endosonography, was performed in all patients. Data regarding subjective outcomes (the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, patient satisfaction scores and Wexner score), objective cure rate (absence of fistula at clinical examination), and adverse events were collected during follow-up. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate outcomes.

Results

One hundred and four patients had VAAFT. At 3-year follow-up, 96 patients (92.3%) were available for the evaluation. At 3 years after surgery, 81 of 96 patients (84.4%) declared themselves cured (p = 0.60). Similarly, at 3-year evaluation, 80 of 96 patients (83.3%) were objectively cured (p = 0.52). No serious intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. All recurrences were treated with a repeat VAAFT procedure resulting in a complete healing. Uni and multivariate analysis of variables potentially involved in the failure of VAAFT showed that age ≥ 50 years was the only factor associated at risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

VAAFT is a highly effective safe procedure for the treatment of anorectal fistula, with a low recurrence rate at 3-year follow-up. However, our study demonstrated that age ≥ 50 years is a risk factor for failure of VAAFT.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanujam PS et al (1984) Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 27(9):593CrossRefPubMed Ramanujam PS et al (1984) Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 27(9):593CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15(4):417–422CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15(4):417–422CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojanasakul A (2009) LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 13:237–240CrossRefPubMed Rojanasakul A (2009) LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 13:237–240CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lupinacci RM, Vallet C, Parc Y, Chafai N, Tiret E (2010) Treatment of fistula-in-ano with the Surgisis AFP(TM) anal fistula plug. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34:549–553CrossRefPubMed Lupinacci RM, Vallet C, Parc Y, Chafai N, Tiret E (2010) Treatment of fistula-in-ano with the Surgisis AFP(TM) anal fistula plug. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34:549–553CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39(7):723–729CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39(7):723–729CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). Surg Endosc 32:2084–2093CrossRefPubMed Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). Surg Endosc 32:2084–2093CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101CrossRefPubMed Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):98–101CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi-Monroy T, Morales M, Garcia-Osogobio S et al (2008) SECCA(R) procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 51:355CrossRefPubMed Takahashi-Monroy T, Morales M, Garcia-Osogobio S et al (2008) SECCA(R) procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 51:355CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin GK et al (2011) For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still a good option. Tech Coloproctol 15:143–150CrossRefPubMed Atkin GK et al (2011) For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still a good option. Tech Coloproctol 15:143–150CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O, Da Silva G, Efron J, Weiss EG, Vernava AM 3rd, Nogueras JJ (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1616–1621CrossRefPubMed Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O, Da Silva G, Efron J, Weiss EG, Vernava AM 3rd, Nogueras JJ (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1616–1621CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR, Fazio VW (2002) Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1622CrossRefPubMed Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR, Fazio VW (2002) Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1622CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentes BB et al (2004) Elastic one-stage cutting seton for the treatment of high anal fistulas: preliminary results. Tech Coloproctol 8(3):159–162CrossRefPubMed Mentes BB et al (2004) Elastic one-stage cutting seton for the treatment of high anal fistulas: preliminary results. Tech Coloproctol 8(3):159–162CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shanwani A et al (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39–42CrossRefPubMed Shanwani A et al (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39–42CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunniss PJ (2009) LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula in ano. Tech Coloproctol 13(3):241–242CrossRefPubMed Lunniss PJ (2009) LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula in ano. Tech Coloproctol 13(3):241–242CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):498–502CrossRefPubMed Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):498–502CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Christoforidis D et al (2008) Treatment of complex anal fistulas with the collagen fistula plug. Dis Colon Rectum 51(10):1482–1487CrossRefPubMed Christoforidis D et al (2008) Treatment of complex anal fistulas with the collagen fistula plug. Dis Colon Rectum 51(10):1482–1487CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449CrossRefPubMed Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang D et al (2014) Risk factors for anal fistula: a case–control study. Tech Coloproctol 18(7):635–639CrossRefPubMed Wang D et al (2014) Risk factors for anal fistula: a case–control study. Tech Coloproctol 18(7):635–639CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up
verfasst von
L. Regusci
F. Fasolini
P. Meinero
G. Caccia
G. Ruggeri
M. Serati
A. Braga
Publikationsdatum
21.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02213-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Author's Reply

Goodsall’s flaw

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.