Ausgabe 1/2016
Quality in Pathology: how good is good?
Inhalt (15 Artikel)
Proficiency testing in immunohistochemistry—experiences from Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control (NordiQC)
Mogens Vyberg, Søren Nielsen
Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers
Lien Tembuyser, Elisabeth M. C. Dequeker
Sense and nonsense in the process of accreditation of a pathology laboratory
Elodie Long-Mira, Kevin Washetine, Paul Hofman
Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets
D. W. Ellis, J. Srigley
Does everything a surgeon takes out have to be seen by a pathologist? A review of the current pathology practice
Ivan Damjanov, Semir Vranic, Faruk Skenderi
The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities
Jan G. van den Tweel, Christian Wittekind
Challenges for quality management in implementation, maintenance, and sustainability of research tissue biobanks
S. Schmitt, K. Kynast, P. Schirmacher, E. Herpel
Individualized medicine and demographic change as determining workload factors in pathology: quo vadis?
Arne Warth, Albrecht Stenzinger, Mindaugas Andrulis, Werner Schlake, Gisela Kempny, Peter Schirmacher, Wilko Weichert
Quality assurance in postgraduate pathology training the Dutch way: regular assessment, monitoring of training programs but no end of training examination
Paul van der Valk
Ensuring quality in postgraduate medical education: competency testing is the key
David Bailey