nach oben

Neuropsychology Review

Erschienen in:

01.06.2013 | Review

What is Overt and what is Covert in Congenital Prosopagnosia?

verfasst von: Davide Rivolta, Romina Palermo, Laura Schmalzl

Erschienen in: Neuropsychology Review | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The term covert recognition refers to recognition without awareness. In the context of face recognition, it refers to the fact that some individuals show behavioural, electrophysiological or autonomic indices of recognition in the absence of overt, conscious recognition. Originally described in cases of people that have lost their ability to overtly recognize faces (acquired prosopagnosia, AP), covert face recognition has more recently also been described in cases of congenital prosopagnosia (CP), who never develop typical overt face recognition skills. The presence of covert processing in a developmental disorder such as CP is a particularly intriguing phenomenon, and its investigation is relevant for a variety of reasons. From a theoretical point of view, it is useful to help shed light on the cognitive and neural underpinnings of face recognition deficits. From a clinical point of view, it has the potential to aid the design of rehabilitation protocols aimed at improving face recognition skills in this population. In the current review we selectively summarize the recent literature on covert face recognition in CP, highlight its main findings, and provide a theoretical interpretation for them.

Anderson, M. J., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2003). Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 78, 85–113.CrossRef

Avidan, G., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Implicit familiarity processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 141–164.PubMedCrossRef

Avidan, G., & Behrmann, M. (2009). Functional MRI reveals compromised neural integrity of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia. Current Biology, 19, 1–5.CrossRef

Avidan, G., Hasson, U., Malach, R. L., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1150–1167.PubMedCrossRef

Avidan, G., Tanzer, M., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2541–2552.PubMedCrossRef

Barton, J. J. (2008). Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lesson from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 197–225.

Barton, J. J., Cherkasova, M., & O'Connor, M. (2001). Covert recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia. Neurology, 57, 1161–1168.

Bate, S., Haslam, C., Tree, J. J., & Hodgson, T. L. (2008). Evidence of an eye movement-based effect in congenital prosopagnosia. Cortex, 44, 806–819.PubMedCrossRef

Bate, S., Haslam, C., Jansari, A., & Hodgson, T. L. (2009). Covert face recognition relies on affective valence in congenital prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 391–411.PubMedCrossRef

Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 180–187.CrossRef

Behrmann, M., Avidan, G., Marotta, J. J., & Kimchi, R. (2005). Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1130–1149.PubMedCrossRef

Bentin, S., Deouell, L. Y., & Soroker, N. (1999). Selective visual streaming in face recognition: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport, 10, 823–827.PubMedCrossRef

Bentin, S., Deouell, & Leon, Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35–55.PubMedCrossRef

Bodamer, J. (1947). Die Prosop-agnosie. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervkrankheiten, 179, 6–53.CrossRef

Breen, N., Caine, D., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Models of face recognition and delusional misidentification: A critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 55–71.PubMedCrossRef

Catani, M., & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. T. (2008). A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex, 44, 1105–1132.PubMedCrossRef

Davis, J. M., McKone, E., Dennett, H., O’Connor, K. L., O’Kearney, R., & Palermo, R. (2011). Individual differences in face recognition ability are associated with social anxiety. PLoS One, 12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028800.

De Haan, E. H., Edward, H. F., & Campbell, R. (1991). A 15 year follow-up of a case of developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 27, 489–509.PubMedCrossRef

De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Grossi, D., & Nichelli, P. (1991). Apperceptive and associative forms of prosopagnosia. Cortex, 27, 213–221.PubMedCrossRef

Della Sala, S., & Young, A. W. (2003). Quaglino’s 1867 case of prosopagnosia. Cortex, 39, 533–540.PubMedCrossRef

Dobel, C., Bolte, J., Aicher, M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2007). Prosopagnosia without apparent cause: Overview and diagnosis of six cases. Cortex, 43, 718–733.PubMedCrossRef

Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 249–261.PubMedCrossRef

Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006a). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44, 576–585.PubMedCrossRef

Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006b). Developmental prosopagnosia: A window to content-specific face processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 166–173.PubMedCrossRef

Duchaine, B., Parker, H., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Normal recognition of emotion in a prosopagnosic. Perception, 32, 827–838.PubMedCrossRef

Duchaine, B., Germine, L., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 419–430.PubMedCrossRef

Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694–705.PubMedCrossRef

Eimer, M., Gosling, A., and Duchaine, B. (2012). Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Brain, doi:10.1093/brain/awr1347.

Ewbank, M. P., Henson, R. N., Rowe, J. B., Stoyanova, R. S., and Calder, A. J. (2012). Different neural mechanisms within occipitotemporal cortex underlie repetition suppression across same and different-size faces. Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs1070.

Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. J. (2008). Disconnection in prosopagnosia and face processing. Cortex, 44, 996–1009.PubMedCrossRef

Furl, N., Garrido, L., Dolan, R. J., Driver, J., & Duchaine, B. C. (2011). Fusiform gyrus face selectivity relates to individual differences in facial recognition ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1723–1740.PubMedCrossRef

Gainotti, G. (2007a). Different patterns of famous people recognition disorders in patients with right and left anterior temporal lesions: A systematic review. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1591–1607.PubMedCrossRef

Gainotti, G. (2007b). Face familiarity feelings, the right temporal lobe and the possible underlying neural mechanisms. Brain Research Reviews, 56, 214–235.PubMedCrossRef

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495–504.PubMedCrossRef

Gosling, A., & Eimer, M. (2011). An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2736–2745.

Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223–233.PubMedCrossRef

Humphreys, K., Avidan, G., & Behrmann, M. (2007). A detailed investigation of facial expression processing in congenital prosopagnosia as compared to acquired prosopagnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 356–373.CrossRef

Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D. (2001). Severe developmental prosopagnosia in a child with superior intellect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 265–273.PubMedCrossRef

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.PubMed

Lee, Y., Duchaine, B. C., Wilson, H. R., & Nakayama, K. (2010). Three cases of developmental prosopagnosia from one family: Detailed neuropsychological and psychophysical investigation of face processing. Cortex, 46, 949–964.PubMedCrossRef

Osternhout, P., & Holcomb, P. (1993). Event-related potentials and synctactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 413–437.CrossRef

Palermo, R., Willis, M. L., Rivolta, D., McKone, E., Wilson, C. E., & Calder, A. J. (2011). Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1226–1235.PubMedCrossRef

Rivolta, D., Schmalzl, L., Coltheart, M., & Palermo, R. (2010). Semantic information can facilitate covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 1002–1016.PubMedCrossRef

Rivolta, D., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L., & Coltheart, M. (2012a). Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study. Cortex, 48, 344–352.CrossRef

Rivolta, D., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L., & Williams, M. A. (2012b). An early category-specific neural response for the perception of both places and faces. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 45–51.CrossRef

Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., & Crommelinck, M. (2003). The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces. NeuroImage, 19, 877–883.PubMedCrossRef

Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Goebel, R., & Busigny, T. (2011). Holistic face categorization in higher order visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: toward a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–3.CrossRef

Rousselet, G. A., and Pernet, C. R. (2011). Quantifying the time course of visual object processing using ERPs: It’s time to up the game. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, doi:10.339/fpsyg.2011.00107.

Rousselet, G. A., Pernet, C. R., Caldara, R., & Schyns, P. G. (2011). Visual object categorization in the brain: What can we really learn from ERP peaks? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–3.CrossRef

Schmalzl, L., Palermo, R., Green, M., Brunsdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2008). Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 704–729.PubMedCrossRef

Thomas, C., Avidan, G., Humphreys, K., Jung, K., & Behrmann, M. (2009). Reduced structural connectivity in ventral visual cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 29–31.

Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of electrodermal skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology, 31, 427–438.PubMedCrossRef

Tsukiura, T., Suzuki, C., Shigemune, Y., & Mochizuki-Kawai, H. (2008). Different contributions of the anterior temporal and medial temporal lobe to the retrieval of memory for person identity information. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 1343–1354.PubMedCrossRef

Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M., Quinones, I., Garcia, L., Valdes-Hernandez, P. A., Iturria, Y., et al. (2011). Covert face recognition without the fusiform-temporal pathways. NeuroImage, 57, 1162–1176.PubMedCrossRef

Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432.PubMedCrossRef

Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291–298.CrossRef

Wilson, C. E., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L., & Brock, J. (2010). Specificity of impaired facial identity recognition in children with suspected developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 30–45.PubMedCrossRef

Yardley, L., McDermott, L., Pisarski, S., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: A problem of recognition. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65, 445–451.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: What is Overt and what is Covert in Congenital Prosopagnosia?
verfasst von: Davide Rivolta
Romina Palermo
Laura Schmalzl
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Neuropsychology Review / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1040-7308
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6660
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-012-9223-0

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Autobiographical Memory, Self, and Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders: Which Implications in Cancer Patients?

Effects of Cannabis on Neurocognitive Functioning: Recent Advances, Neurodevelopmental Influences, and Sex Differences

Systematic Review: Are Overweight and Obese Individuals Impaired on Behavioural Tasks of Executive Functioning?