Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2017

01.09.2017 | Editorial (by Invitation)

Why critical appraisal is so important these days

verfasst von: Bernhard Meyer

Erschienen in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The paper by Donk et al. serves two purposes, none of which are intended by the authors themselves. It teaches us that (1) critical appraisal of studies is extremely important and (2) journals accepting randomized controlled trials should make a CONSORT checklist mandatory and refute studies like this initially without further review. The reason to publish this manuscript lies solely in the above, and by far not in its content, which would certainly not merit publication. This is especially true because this study here comes in the disguise of good clinical science, i.e., having the magic label of an RCT, luring the reader—or even the reviewer—into the belief of having reliable and valid data at his/her hands. In my opinion, the opposite is true here. …
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT Group (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148(4):295–309CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT Group (2008) Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148(4):295–309CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT Group (2008) Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med 148(4):W60CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, CONSORT Group (2008) Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med 148(4):W60CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartels RH, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, Grotenhuis JA, Venderink D (2006) Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi-center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bartels RH, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, Grotenhuis JA, Venderink D (2006) Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi-center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Why critical appraisal is so important these days
verfasst von
Bernhard Meyer
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Elektronische ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3313-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Acta Neurochirurgica 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.