Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 1/2018

27.09.2017 | Original Article

A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods

verfasst von: Roshni A. Parikh, Michael A. Wien, Ronald D. Novak, David W. Jordan, Paul Klahr, Stephanie Soriano, Leslie Ciancibello, Sheila C. Berlin

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) has emerged as an improved metric for use by medical physicists and radiologists for estimating individual patient dose. Several methods of calculating SSDE have been described, ranging from patient thickness or attenuation-based (automated and manual) measurements to weight-based techniques.

Objective

To compare the accuracy of thickness vs. weight measurement of body size to allow for the calculation of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in pediatric body CT.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 109 pediatric body CT examinations for SSDE calculation. We examined two automated methods measuring a series of level-specific diameters of the patient’s body: method A used the effective diameter and method B used the water-equivalent diameter. Two manual methods measured patient diameter at two predetermined levels: the superior endplate of L2, where body width is typically most thin, and the superior femoral head or iliac crest (for scans that did not include the pelvis), where body width is typically most thick; method C averaged lateral measurements at these two levels from the CT projection scan, and method D averaged lateral and anteroposterior measurements at the same two levels from the axial CT images. Finally, we used body weight to characterize patient size, method E, and compared this with the various other measurement methods. Methods were compared across the entire population as well as by subgroup based on body width.

Results

Concordance correlation (ρc) between each of the SSDE calculation methods (methods A–E) was greater than 0.92 across the entire population, although the range was wider when analyzed by subgroup (0.42–0.99). When we compared each SSDE measurement method with CTDIvol, there was poor correlation, ρc<0.77, with percentage differences between 20.8% and 51.0%.

Conclusion

Automated computer algorithms are accurate and efficient in the calculation of SSDE. Manual methods based on patient thickness provide acceptable dose estimates for pediatric patients <30 cm in body width. Body weight provides a quick and practical method to identify conversion factors that can be used to estimate SSDE with reasonable accuracy in pediatric patients with body width ≥20 cm.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady SL, Kaufman RA (2012) Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 265:832–840CrossRefPubMed Brady SL, Kaufman RA (2012) Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 265:832–840CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM task group 204. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM task group 204. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific dose estimation for CT: how should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 265:666–668CrossRefPubMed Brink JA, Morin RL (2012) Size-specific dose estimation for CT: how should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 265:666–668CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Mettler FA (2011) Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology 258:236–242CrossRefPubMed Huda W, Mettler FA (2011) Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology 258:236–242CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebert JA, Boone JM, Wootton-Gorges SL et al (2014) Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product. JACR 11:233–237 Siebert JA, Boone JM, Wootton-Gorges SL et al (2014) Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product. JACR 11:233–237
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II Process control system. Radiology 269:177–185CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II Process control system. Radiology 269:177–185CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268:208–218CrossRefPubMed Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP et al (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268:208–218CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Towbin AJ et al (2017) Pediatric chest CT diagnostic reference ranges: development and application. Radiology 284:219–227CrossRefPubMed Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Towbin AJ et al (2017) Pediatric chest CT diagnostic reference ranges: development and application. Radiology 284:219–227CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Christianson O, Li X, Frush D et al (2012) Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: assessing variability in CT dose. Med Phys 39:7131–7139CrossRefPubMed Christianson O, Li X, Frush D et al (2012) Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: assessing variability in CT dose. Med Phys 39:7131–7139CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikuta I, Warden G, Andriole KP et al (2014) Estimating patient dose from X-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates. Radiology 270:472–480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ikuta I, Warden G, Andriole KP et al (2014) Estimating patient dose from X-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates. Radiology 270:472–480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McCollough C, Bakalyar DM, Bostani M et al (2014) Use of water-equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. Report of AAPM task group 220. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park McCollough C, Bakalyar DM, Bostani M et al (2014) Use of water-equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. Report of AAPM task group 220. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Vettiyil B et al (2015) Simplifying size-specific radiation dose estimates in pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:167–176CrossRefPubMed Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Vettiyil B et al (2015) Simplifying size-specific radiation dose estimates in pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:167–176CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Menke I (2005) Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236:565–571CrossRefPubMed Menke I (2005) Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236:565–571CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin S, Weinert D, Vasavada P et al (2015) Successful dose reduction using reduced tube voltage with hybrid iterative reconstruction in pediatric abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:392–399CrossRefPubMed Berlin S, Weinert D, Vasavada P et al (2015) Successful dose reduction using reduced tube voltage with hybrid iterative reconstruction in pediatric abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:392–399CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Karmazyn B, Ai H, Klahr P et al (2016) How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations? Pediatr Radiol 46:1234–1240CrossRefPubMed Karmazyn B, Ai H, Klahr P et al (2016) How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations? Pediatr Radiol 46:1234–1240CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Leng S, Shiung M, Duan X et al (2015) Size-specific dose estimates for chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT: effect of intrapatient variability in water-equivalent diameter. Radiology 277:308–309CrossRefPubMed Leng S, Shiung M, Duan X et al (2015) Size-specific dose estimates for chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT: effect of intrapatient variability in water-equivalent diameter. Radiology 277:308–309CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X et al (2012a) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 39:6772–6778PubMed Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X et al (2012a) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 39:6772–6778PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2012b) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part 1. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 39:6764–6771PubMed Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2012b) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part 1. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 39:6764–6771PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods
verfasst von
Roshni A. Parikh
Michael A. Wien
Ronald D. Novak
David W. Jordan
Paul Klahr
Stephanie Soriano
Leslie Ciancibello
Sheila C. Berlin
Publikationsdatum
27.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3986-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Pediatric Radiology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Hermes

Hermes

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.