Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2015

01.10.2015 | Dynamic Manuscript

A pilot study assessing tolerance safety and feasibility of diagnostic transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an improved larger caliber endoscope and an adapted topical anesthesia

verfasst von: Valerio Balassone, Mario Dauri, Roberto Cappuccio, Mauro Di Camillo, Domenico Benavoli, Oreste Buonomo, Giuseppe Petrella, Italo Stroppa

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (TN-EGDS) is well tolerated by patients and the examination is perceived comfortable without the need of a sedative drug. Conversely, mainly in Western literature, some authors report limitations in illumination, image quality, and working channel as affecting TN-EGDS diffusion. To overcome these disadvantages, a new transnasal endoscope (TNE) was tested but, due to its larger diameter, we have no evidence of its clinical safety and tolerability. A new adapted nasal anesthesia could be useful to improve TNE tolerance. In an independent, not sponsored, pilot prospective study we enrolled, in a busy clinical hospital setting, 30 adult patients receiving nasal atomized Lidocaine and Xylometazoline (XAL) to undergo a diagnostic TN-EGDS with TNE to evaluate its tolerance, safety, and feasibility.

Methods

Three physicians enrolled inpatients and outpatients with indication to diagnostic EGDS during a 6-month period. Main outcome measures were cardio-pulmonary monitoring data and patients’ answers to an adapted questionnaire investigating pain, anxiety level, willingness to repeat the examination, operators’ scores about endoscopy quality, examination conduction and anesthesia-related complications.

Results

The examination was completed by the transnasal route in 100 % of the enrolled patients, endoscopy satisfaction and feasibility were scored to nearly the highest levels by the three different physicians. A total of 29/30 patients (96.6 %) declared the willingness to repeat the same examination if needed. The mean patients’ score for overall pain was 3.7 ± 1 SD (range 1–10 by Visual Analog Scale). Mean endoscopy duration was 11.1 ± 2.6 min (range 5.0–19.0). In a total of 17/30 TN-EGDS that lasted more than 11 min, higher heart frequency variations and worse tolerance scores were found (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our pilot study demonstrates that TN-EGDS with TNE and NA is safe, well tolerated, and feasible. The best clinical tolerance is reached when TN-EGDS lasts <11 min.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ai ZL, Lan CH, Fan LL, Lan L, Cao Y, Li P, Song O, Chen DF (2012) Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 26:3565–3572CrossRef Ai ZL, Lan CH, Fan LL, Lan L, Cao Y, Li P, Song O, Chen DF (2012) Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 26:3565–3572CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe H, Watanabe N, Ogura R, Nishino N, Saifuku Y, Hitomi G, Okamoto Y, Tominaga K, Yoshitake N, Yamagata M, Orui M, Hiraishi H (2009) A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated endoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using 5.5-mm video endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 54:2155–2160CrossRefPubMed Watanabe H, Watanabe N, Ogura R, Nishino N, Saifuku Y, Hitomi G, Okamoto Y, Tominaga K, Yoshitake N, Yamagata M, Orui M, Hiraishi H (2009) A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated endoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using 5.5-mm video endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 54:2155–2160CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F, Pellissier PE, Leprince E, Pujol B, Ponchon T (2003) Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 57:198–204CrossRefPubMed Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F, Pellissier PE, Leprince E, Pujol B, Ponchon T (2003) Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 57:198–204CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H (2008) Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 67:1021–1027CrossRefPubMed Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H (2008) Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 67:1021–1027CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroppa I, Grasso E, Paoluzi OA, Razzini C, Tosti C, Andrei F, Biancone L, Palmieri G, Romeo F, Pallone F (2008) Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability. Dig Liver Dis 40:767–775CrossRefPubMed Stroppa I, Grasso E, Paoluzi OA, Razzini C, Tosti C, Andrei F, Biancone L, Palmieri G, Romeo F, Pallone F (2008) Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability. Dig Liver Dis 40:767–775CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Saeian K (2002) Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 4:213–217CrossRefPubMed Saeian K (2002) Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 4:213–217CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Alami RS, Schuster R, Friedland S, Curet MJ, Wren SM, Soetikno R, Morton JM, Safadi BY (2007) Transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy for preoperative evaluation of the high-risk morbidly obese patient. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:758–760CrossRef Alami RS, Schuster R, Friedland S, Curet MJ, Wren SM, Soetikno R, Morton JM, Safadi BY (2007) Transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy for preoperative evaluation of the high-risk morbidly obese patient. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:758–760CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DB, Block KP, Bosco JJ, Burdick JS, Curtis WD, Faigel DO, Greenwald DA, Kelsey PB, Rajan E, Slivka A, Smith P, Wassef W, VanDam J, Wang KK (2000) Technology status evaluation report: ultrathin endoscopes esophagogastroduodenoscopy: March 2000. Gastrointest Endosc 51:786–789CrossRefPubMed Nelson DB, Block KP, Bosco JJ, Burdick JS, Curtis WD, Faigel DO, Greenwald DA, Kelsey PB, Rajan E, Slivka A, Smith P, Wassef W, VanDam J, Wang KK (2000) Technology status evaluation report: ultrathin endoscopes esophagogastroduodenoscopy: March 2000. Gastrointest Endosc 51:786–789CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung J, Goodman K, Bailey R, Fedorak R, Morse J, Millan M, Guzowski T, van Zanten SV (2010) A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 24:317–321PubMedCentralPubMed Cheung J, Goodman K, Bailey R, Fedorak R, Morse J, Millan M, Guzowski T, van Zanten SV (2010) A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 24:317–321PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H (2009) Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc 21:141–146CrossRefPubMed Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H (2009) Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc 21:141–146CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai T, Yamamoto K, Fukuzawa M, Sakai Y, Moriyasu F (2010) Ultra-thin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Nippon rinsho Jpn J Clin Med 68:1264–1267 Kawai T, Yamamoto K, Fukuzawa M, Sakai Y, Moriyasu F (2010) Ultra-thin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Nippon rinsho Jpn J Clin Med 68:1264–1267
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Suganuma T, Okada K, Nego M, Imada S-I, Imai M, Yoshimoto K, Ueki N, Hirasawa T, Uragami N, Tsuchida T, Fujisaki J, Hoshino E, Takahashi H, Igarashi M (2009) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the ultrathin endoscope and the conventional endoscope in early gastric cancer screening. Dig Endosc 21:116–121CrossRefPubMed Hayashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Suganuma T, Okada K, Nego M, Imada S-I, Imai M, Yoshimoto K, Ueki N, Hirasawa T, Uragami N, Tsuchida T, Fujisaki J, Hoshino E, Takahashi H, Igarashi M (2009) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of the ultrathin endoscope and the conventional endoscope in early gastric cancer screening. Dig Endosc 21:116–121CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CY, O’Rourke RW, Chang EY, Jobe BA (2006) Unsedated small-caliber upper endoscopy: an emerging diagnostic and therapeutic technology. Surg Innov 13:31–39CrossRefPubMed Kim CY, O’Rourke RW, Chang EY, Jobe BA (2006) Unsedated small-caliber upper endoscopy: an emerging diagnostic and therapeutic technology. Surg Innov 13:31–39CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadayifci A, Atar M, Parlar S, Balkan A, Koruk I, Koruk M (2014) Transnasal endoscopy is preferred by transoral endoscopy experienced patients. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 23:27–31 Kadayifci A, Atar M, Parlar S, Balkan A, Koruk I, Koruk M (2014) Transnasal endoscopy is preferred by transoral endoscopy experienced patients. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 23:27–31
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez SA, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kaul V, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Pedrosa MC, Varadarajulu S, Song LM, Tierney WM (2010) Ultrathin endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 71:893–898CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez SA, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, Kaul V, Kwon RS, Mamula P, Pedrosa MC, Varadarajulu S, Song LM, Tierney WM (2010) Ultrathin endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 71:893–898CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho S, Arya N, Swan K, Cirocco M, Kandel G, Kortan P, Marcon N (2008) Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice. Can J Gastroenterol 22:243–246PubMedCentralPubMed Cho S, Arya N, Swan K, Cirocco M, Kandel G, Kortan P, Marcon N (2008) Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice. Can J Gastroenterol 22:243–246PubMedCentralPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yücel Üstündag, Saritafi Ü, Ponchon T (2011) Unsedated small caliber espophagogastroduodenoscopy: can we trust this technique. Turk J Gastroenterol 22:237–242 Yücel Üstündag, Saritafi Ü, Ponchon T (2011) Unsedated small caliber espophagogastroduodenoscopy: can we trust this technique. Turk J Gastroenterol 22:237–242
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Pereira A, Lagarrigue JP, Chavaillon A, Ponchon T (2004) Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc 59:54–57CrossRefPubMed Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Pereira A, Lagarrigue JP, Chavaillon A, Ponchon T (2004) Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc 59:54–57CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroppa I, Lionetti R, Cocco A, Andrei F, Erboso M, Pallone F (2009) Transnasal versus oral PEG placement in unselected patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 69:Ab216–Ab216CrossRef Stroppa I, Lionetti R, Cocco A, Andrei F, Erboso M, Pallone F (2009) Transnasal versus oral PEG placement in unselected patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 69:Ab216–Ab216CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu C-T (2010) Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 71:11–20CrossRefPubMed Hu C-T (2010) Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 71:11–20CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharmacy VHA, Management B, Healthcare S, Panel MA, Safety P, Topical I, Mhb B, Mhb C, Affairs V (2006) A Guidance on the Use of Topical Anesthetics for Naso/Oropharyngeal and Laryngotracheal Procedures Pharmacy VHA, Management B, Healthcare S, Panel MA, Safety P, Topical I, Mhb B, Mhb C, Affairs V (2006) A Guidance on the Use of Topical Anesthetics for Naso/Oropharyngeal and Laryngotracheal Procedures
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Knottnerus JA, Muris JW (2003) Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1118–1128CrossRefPubMed Knottnerus JA, Muris JW (2003) Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1118–1128CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataoka H, Hayano J, Mizushima T, Tanaka M, Kubota E, Shimura T, Mizoshita T, Tanida S, Kamiya T, Nojiri S, Mukai S, Mizuno K, Joh T (2011) Cardiovascular tolerance and autonomic nervous responses in unsedated upper gastrointestinal small-caliber endoscopy: a comparison between transnasal and peroral procedures with newly developed mouthpiece. Dig Endosc 23:78–85CrossRefPubMed Kataoka H, Hayano J, Mizushima T, Tanaka M, Kubota E, Shimura T, Mizoshita T, Tanida S, Kamiya T, Nojiri S, Mukai S, Mizuno K, Joh T (2011) Cardiovascular tolerance and autonomic nervous responses in unsedated upper gastrointestinal small-caliber endoscopy: a comparison between transnasal and peroral procedures with newly developed mouthpiece. Dig Endosc 23:78–85CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Murata A, Akahoshi K, Motomura Y, Matsui N, Kubokawa M, Kimura M, Ouchi J, Honda K, Endo S, Nakamura K, Takayanagi R (2008) Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:965–968CrossRefPubMed Murata A, Akahoshi K, Motomura Y, Matsui N, Kubokawa M, Kimura M, Ouchi J, Honda K, Endo S, Nakamura K, Takayanagi R (2008) Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:965–968CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaman a, Hahn M, Hapke R, Knigge K, Fennerty MB, Katon RM (1999) A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 49:279–284CrossRefPubMed Zaman a, Hahn M, Hapke R, Knigge K, Fennerty MB, Katon RM (1999) A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 49:279–284CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi T, Nomura M, Honda H, Tezuka K, Torisu R, Takeuchi Y, Nakaya Y, Ito S (2000) Evaluation of autonomic nervous function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using heart rate variability. J Gastroenterol 35:815–823CrossRefPubMed Hayashi T, Nomura M, Honda H, Tezuka K, Torisu R, Takeuchi Y, Nakaya Y, Ito S (2000) Evaluation of autonomic nervous function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using heart rate variability. J Gastroenterol 35:815–823CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori A, Ohashi N, Tatebe H, Maruyama T, Inoue H, Takegoshi S, Kato T, Okuno M (2008) Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J Gastroenterol 43:38–44CrossRefPubMed Mori A, Ohashi N, Tatebe H, Maruyama T, Inoue H, Takegoshi S, Kato T, Okuno M (2008) Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J Gastroenterol 43:38–44CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M (2013) Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:346–351PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M (2013) Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 5:346–351PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Massimo Maffei J-MD (2008) Transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): comparison with conventional EGD and new applications. SWiSS Med Wkly 138:658–664 Massimo Maffei J-MD (2008) Transnasal esogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): comparison with conventional EGD and new applications. SWiSS Med Wkly 138:658–664
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikonomidou E, Anastasiou F, Pilpilidis I, Kouroumalis E, Lionis C (2011) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspepsia: exploratory study of factors influencing patient compliance in Greece. BMC Gastroenterol 11:11PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Oikonomidou E, Anastasiou F, Pilpilidis I, Kouroumalis E, Lionis C (2011) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspepsia: exploratory study of factors influencing patient compliance in Greece. BMC Gastroenterol 11:11PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Hidaka N, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N (2009) Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study. Dig Endosc 21:24–28CrossRefPubMed Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Hidaka N, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N (2009) Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study. Dig Endosc 21:24–28CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A pilot study assessing tolerance safety and feasibility of diagnostic transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an improved larger caliber endoscope and an adapted topical anesthesia
verfasst von
Valerio Balassone
Mario Dauri
Roberto Cappuccio
Mauro Di Camillo
Domenico Benavoli
Oreste Buonomo
Giuseppe Petrella
Italo Stroppa
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4025-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.