Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2023

Open Access 24.02.2023 | Review

A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Principles

verfasst von: Mathias Tremp, Jonas Schneider, Ram Badari Narayan Raghu, Abdulkadir Goksel, Yves Saban

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2023

Abstract

Background

A deviated nose is a common problem among patients for both cosmetic and functional reasons. The correction remains a major challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon. Unrecognized nasal septal deviations stand as the primary reason for failed rhinoplasty outcomes. There is a paucity of data in the literature about septoplasty classifications and technical details in preservation rhinoplasty (PR) for various crooked noses.

Materials and Methods

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the various septum deviations according to the nasal axis. Moreover, a treatment algorithm is suggested with technical details based on PR principles.

Results

The directions and curvature of the cartilaginous deviation of crooked nose such as C-shaped, reverse C-shaped, straight axis deviations (I-shaped), and S-shaped are described. According to the deviation, a septoplasty classification (Type 1–Type 4) is suggested.

Conclusions

On the basis of septal deviation, different PR techniques are proposed to achieve the desired straight nasal dorsum with an optimal functional outcome. Compared to the classical L-strut concept, the quadrangular cartilage remains preserved in the swinging door technique. The cartilage might be further used in the future for grafting in the hybrid structural/preservation technique if needed, ultimately saving rib cartilage and/or conchal cartilage. Finally, surgery time is reduced, and patient’s morbidity remains minimal.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Hinweise
Mathias Tremp and Jonas Schneider have contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

A deviated nose is a common problem among patients for both cosmetic and functional reasons. Various factors such as trauma, congenital causes, and iatrogenic causes may have a role in the etiology of crooked nose deformity [1]. Differentiation must be done between bony trauma that exert extrinsic forces on nasal septum and direct cartilaginous trauma that cause cartilaginous fractures. The resulting deviation can be C-shaped, reverse C-shaped, linear I-shaped, or S-shaped [2]. One side of the dorsum in a C-shaped nose/reverse C-shaped nose is concave and the other is convex. The dorsum and tip in an I-shaped crooked nose (linear) are shifted to one side of the vertical midline of the face [3]. Depending on the nasal tip position, the patients can present with a S-shaped deformity [4]. Often, patients presenting with straight axis deviation (I-shape deviation) are also presenting with facial asymmetry, the nose being generally deviated to the shorter facial side. That being said, maxillary hypoplasia is often observed, requiring specific surgical procedures such as premaxillary grafts.
Unrecognized internal nasal septal deviations stand as a major reason for failed rhinoplasty outcomes [5]. Hence, precise analysis of a deviated nose is a crucial step in determining optimal surgical management. In most cases, the septal condition directs the deviation [3]. This term encompasses all clinical conditions involving deviation of the nasal pyramid from the midline of the face.
In the classic L-strut concept [6], a “component composite septorhinoplasty” is proposed to offer stable results. However, these procedures are usually done in an open approach and may require extracorporeal septoplasty with perpendicular plate transfer as graft supporting and straightening the anterior septum [4]. In addition, septal extension grafts may be required to support the tip, spreader grafts to stabilize the dorsum, asymmetric equalizing osteotomies, crisscross trans-osseous sutures to achieve a correct contour [7], and dorsal camouflage grafts. That being said, this approach with its associated procedures have their limitations and morbidities (“open roof syndrome”) [4, 8]. Thus, preservation rhinoplasty (PR) is suggested to be fast and potentially safer, without any loss of quality while achieving satisfactory results [4, 8]. Moreover, there is a paucity of data in the literature about septoplasty classifications and technical details in PR for various crooked noses.
The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the various septum deviations with a suggested treatment algorithm by using PR principles. A septoplasty classification is suggested, which may help the clinicians in their day-to-day clinical practice.

Materials and Methods

Literature Search Strategy

A literature review was performed from 1982 to 2022 using the US National Institutes of Health’s PubMed database. The reference lists of all selected papers were further reviewed for potentially relevant analysis. Eligible reports were full papers written in
English language reporting on septal deviation. On the basis of septal deviation according to the nasal axis, we suggest a septoplasty classification Type 1–4 with various PR techniques (Table 1) [911] to achieve the desired straight nasal dorsum and optimal function.
Table 1
Septoplasty classification and technical details of deviated noses
Axial deviation
Septum deviation
Level of deviation
Surgical correction
C-shaped
Septum follows the dorsum on the same side with left-sided concavity
Left-sided concavity
Type 1: Modified swinging door endonasal technique: Disarticulation of the quadrangular cartilage, partial resection of the bony septum, repositioning of the quadrangular cartilage on the midline. Rasping on a convex bony cap [4] Type 2: Type 1 + septal subdorsal strip in more convex dorsum or in high straight deviated noses [4]
Reverse C-shaped
Septum follows the dorsum on the same side with right-sided concavity
Right-sided concavity
Type 1 Type 1: Swinging door technique [56] Type 2: Type 1 + septal subdorsal strip in more convex dorsum or in high straight deviated noses [4]
Linear (I-shaped)
Septum lies in opposite nasal fossa
The I-shaped deviation angle is measured as the angle between the vertical line drawn between the mid-point of the upper lip and the glabella mid-point and the line extending from the nasion to the nasal tip, representing the nasal dorsal axis[1]
Type 1: Swinging door technique [56] Asymmetric bony wedge resection (“Pisa Tower Concept”) [10, 13] Inferior removal of cartilaginous septal striprelease of the pyriform ligament and adjacent upper lateral/nasal junction on the short side of the nose [7] “Ballerina maneuver” [17] Excision of the sesamoid cartilages in the scroll area, no reattachment of the ligament on the shorter side [7]
S-shaped
Anteroposterior S-shape or cephalocaudal S-shape.[19]
Concave/convex deformity with bony pyramid deviations
Type 1: Swinging door technique [56] Type 2: Type 1 + septal subdorsal strip in more convex dorsum or in high straight deviated noses [4] Type 3 (Cottle’s technique): Mucoperichondrium and periosteum are undermined on both sides of the septum. Complete disarticulation of the cartilaginous septum from the bony septum is performed under video endoscopic vision. Anteroration of the quadrangular cartilage allows for dorsum lowering [4, 22, 23, 25, 26] Type 4: Complete radical excision and reinsertion after corrections in an extracorporeal way (endonasal total reconstruction, endonasal dorsum preservation rhinoplasty) [4]

Results

The C-Shaped Nose Deformity

The C-shaped crooked nose is defined by the presence of a single concavity (and convexity on the opposite side) [1]. The septum and bones are deviated in the opposite direction [4], the cartilaginous nasal dorsum has left-sided concavity in line with the dorsum (Fig. 1) [12]. The modified swinging door endonasal technique can be applied (Type 1) [4]. The quadrangular cartilage is disarticulated from the bony septum, followed by partial resection of the bony septum and sagittal repositioning of the quadrangular cartilage to the midline, affixing it to the spine with a secure suture through a drill hole [4, 7]. The mucoperichondrium is kept attached on the left side, acting as a central pillar and preserving vascularization [4]. If required, rasping can be performed on a convex bony cap [4]. No septum upper lateral cartilage (ULC) division is required. Lateral osteotomies are done after inner and outer subperiosteal elevation on the long side if required (“Pisa Tower Concept”) [13]. Direct percutaneous lateral osteotomies are performed on the short side, as well as transverse on both sides and radix osteotomies [4]. Some severe C-shaped deviations need extracorporeal septal correction and could be combined with spreader graft and osteotomies, if required (Table 1). However, very experienced surgeons can perform total septal extracoporeal reconstruction, even endonasally, together with dorsum PR [4, 14].

The Reverse C-shaped Nose Deformity

As in the C-shaped nose deformity, the septum and bones are deviated in the opposite direction [4], but the cartilaginous nasal dorsum has right-sided concavity (Fig. 2) [12]. Karaca described the septal shift technique to correct crooked nose deformity, among also the reverse C-shaped nose deformity [15]. The modified swinging door technique can be applied as in the C-shaped nose deformity [4]. In cases of kyphotic noses or in high straight deviated noses, septal subdorsal strip resection can be performed (Type 2, Table 1) [4]. Otherwise, the principles of preservation by minimum cephalic resection, lateral crural underlay techniques, dome suturing, and lateral crural flare sutures are used to build a symmetric tip on a stable midline medial crural column [7].

The I-Shaped Nose Deformity

The I-shaped crooked nose is the linear deviation of the septum to one side [1]. In this straight deviated noses (an ipsilateral deviation), the bony and cartilaginous deviations are on the same side (Fig. 3) [4]. The I-shaped deviation angle is measured as the angle between the vertical line drawn between the mid-point of the upper lip and the glabella mid-point and the line extending from the nasion to the nasal tip, representing the nasal dorsal axis [16]. By using the dorsal preservation principles, an asymmetric bony wedge resection with lowering of the bony pyramid onto the frontal process of the maxilla (the let-down osteotomy) can be performed (“Pisa Tower concept”) [10, 13]. A cartilaginous septal strip can be removed inferiorly to lower the dorsum together with the septum [4]. Release of the pyriform ligament and adjacent upper lateral/nasal junction on the short side of the nose should be performed, also described as the “Ballerina maneuver” [7, 17]. Excision of the sesamoid cartilages in the scroll area is recommended, and the ligament should not be reattached on the shorter side [7].

The S-Shaped Nose Deformity

S-shaped crooked nose is the repetition of this deformity more than once depending on the tip position [12]—causing multiple concave/convex areas (Fig. 4) [1]. The S-shaped nose deformity is the least common type within the septal deviation classification [18]. The deviation can be classified as anteroposterior S-shape or cephalocaudal S-shape [19]. Mobilization and straightening of the septum (caudal and dorsal aspect of the cartilaginous septum) can be technically difficult. Either endoscopic preservation septoplasty Type 1 or the Cottle’s technique can be performed (Type 3): [4, 8, 20, 21] Mucoperichondrium and periosteum are undermined on both sides of the septum. Then, complete disarticulation of the cartilaginous septum from the bony septum is performed under video endoscopic vision. Anteroration of the quadrangular cartilage allows for dorsum lowering [4]. Many variations following Cottle’s technique have been described that are reliable procedures, such as the SPAR (= Septum Pyramidal Adjustment and Repositioning) technique by Dewes [22] and the Tetris procedure by Neves [23]. Most [24] introduced an intermediate flap, whereas Neves described a squared high septal flap, allowing for stable dorsum lowering and fixation [23]. Finocchi repopularises the original Cottle’s technique called “SPQR” (= Simplified Preservation of Quick Rhinoplasty) [25]. Kovacevic designed a septal triangular Z-plasty section that he named “subdorsal Cottle” [26]. The maxillary crest is resected using a fine bone rongeur. In cases where the septum distortions do not allow any conservation nor direct repositioning, a complete radical excision and reinsertion after correction in an extracorporeal way is suggested (endonasal total reconstruction, endonasal dorsum PR, and Type 4 septoplasty) [4, 2731]. Even in these difficult cases, it is possible to preserve the vaults [4, 8]. Keeping intact the quadrangular cartilage allows either for further subdorsal septal strip resection if a hump reduction is planned, or for only direct reposition on the midline if no profile lowering is desired. In severe septal deformities, the perpendicular plate of ethmoid can be harvested and used to stabilize the anterior septum, with a fixation on the anterior nasal spine [4, 27, 32]. After septal correction, other procedures might be needed to straighten the crooked nose (medial and/or lateral osteotomies, full or hinge radix osteotomies, and splints) (Table 1). An oblique radix cut may be used to create a rotational hinge of the dorsum, therefore preventing posteriorly displacement of the radix point [7].

Discussion

The deviated nose represents a complex cosmetic and functional problem [33]. Thus, correction of the crooked nose with long-term functional and aesthetic success remains a major challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon [1]. Crooked nose deformity can be defined as the deviation of the nasal bone and cartilage pyramid relative to the facial sagittal plane [34]. Therefore, treatment of the deviated nose should involve the recognition and correction of all underlying pathologies, and careful preoperative analysis and planning are mandatory. For the permanent correction of a crooked nose, it is necessary to release all the relevant intrinsic and extrinsic pathological subunits and to relocate them appropriately [35].
A simple and descriptive classification of the deviated nose would be of great benefit to the analysis and characterization of the pathologic abnormalities. Clearly, there is a paucity of data in the literature about its classification and treatment, especially using PR principles. Four types of crooked nose deformity are defined based on the direction of curvature of the deviation: A C-shaped or reverse C-shaped deviation, which are concave and convex deviations of the nasal pyramid; an I-shaped deviation, which is a linear deviation of the nasal pyramid; and an S-shaped deviation, in which concavity and convexity are on the same side of the nasal pyramid [2]. Ellis and Gilbert [36] used three categories of nasal deviation: (1) At the nasion, (2) at the level of the rhinion, and (3) combinations of the two. Rohrich et al. [18] also suggested three basic types of nasal deviation: (1) Caudal septal deviations, (2) concave dorsal deformities, and (3) concave/convex dorsal deformities. The most common type of dorsal deviation in their study was their type 2, of which there were 2 subtypes: C-shaped deformity, with left-sided concavity, and reverse C-shaped deformity, with right-sided concavity. The least common type in their classification was the S-shaped dorsal deformity with bony pyramid deviations with concave/convex deformity [18]. According to Neves’ analysis, three main dorsal segments are critical [23]. These include three options for the radix (normal, high, and low), three options for the keystone area (straight, convex, kyphotic including Lazovic [37] S-shaped nasal bones), and two options for the supratip segment (straight or curved), producing a complex of 18 variations in dorsum profile lines (DPL) [11].
Congenital anomalies, trauma (especially during childhood), and iatrogenic causes may play a role in the etiology of crooked nose. A partial or complete destruction and absorption of the nasal bones may occur after childhood injuries and infections, and this may be accompanied by normal or accelerated growth of the septum and its associated structures [8].
Surgical management of the deviated nose involves septal correction and bony pyramid manipulation after osteotomies. A cone beam CT scan should be performed routinely preoperatively to allow 3-D examination, nasal valve analysis, and facial reconstruction layer by layer [4]. Moreover, looking at the septoplasty procedure’s safety, one can measure the distance between the rhinion and the skull base, the lamina cribriformis aspect, asymmetry and partial dehiscence [4].
The principles of PR are to respect, conserve or restore the soft tissue envelope ligaments, to minimize the resection of cartilage through reorientation and to keep the dorsal continuity of the patient’s own bridge, hence minimizing the “open roof syndrome” [7, 8]. Although initially described as an endonasal procedure, PR can be performed via open or closed approaches [7]. With the widespread adoption of PR techniques, surgeons began to realize the importance of dorsal hump configuration and the aesthetic and functional consequences of modifying the K-area [10, 38]. Hence, PR is a more conservative and much less aggressive approach. The possibility of obtaining a totally smooth nasal contour after the correction of a hump, leaving this area intact, was championed by Saban [4, 10, 11] and Cakir [39] and has garnered the enthusiasm of many surgeons around the world. This goes in line with recent publications, where it has been shown that a high patient satisfaction can be achieved after PR as evaluated by the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire (= ROE) [4043]. Nevertheless, hybridization between preservation and structural rhinoplasty can be performed including septal extracorporeal reconstruction or the swinging door technique together with dorsum PR (“hybrid operation”) [4, 7].
In practice, surgical procedures are performed “from depth to surface” to avoid the bleeding related to the rhinoplasty which makes video endoscopic surgery difficult. The recommended surgical sequence is: endonasal endoscopic procedures; “preservation” septoplasty; asymmetric dorsum–“lateral push over”; tip surgery, if required, and ancillary procedures [4]. Deviated noses may also involve the turbinates, which should be addressed accordingly [4]. Although it may be possible to preserve many of the ligaments in deviated noses, some may have to be modified or even released. In particular, the position of insertion of the vertical scroll ligament on the short side of the deviated nose will be different with the repositioned nasal pyramid [7]. Sharp dissection of the upper lateral, nasal bone overlap parallel to the upper lateral cartilage and extending up to within 5 mm of the dorsum will allow the vertically short side to elongate, hereby minimizing the risk of redeviation (“Ballerina maneuver”) [7, 17]. Moreover, it has been suggested to excise the sesamoid cartilages in the scroll area and not to reattach the ligament particularly on the shorter side [7]. This is due to the fact that discrepancy in the skin envelope may recreate a deformity and consequently, the scroll cartilages may displace cranially, producing an unfavorable supratip bulge [7]. Hereby, a rotational lengthening of the short middle third is achieved without requiring to reattach the scroll area on the longer side. Lastly, there may be pre-existing nostril asymmetry and a need for differential alar base reduction. In principle, the more vertical side of the nasal tip will need to be lengthened to allow the dome to be approximated in the midline with its opposite side [7]. Release of the nasal tip from the muscles around the piriform aperture may be also required together with augmentation of the premaxilla under the alar using free segments of cartilage or diced cartilage injected via an incision in the floor of the nasal vestibule in a similar fashion to augmenting a depressed alar sidewall in a cleft nose [7].
An important element toward correction of deviated nose is the caudal septoplasty, which involves a wide dissection and mobilization of the caudal septum to the midline in a “swinging door” fashion [44, 45], with excision of the overhanging part. General principles include preservation of the septal cartilage integrity where unnecessary cartilage resection is avoided and vitality by keeping intact the mucoperichondrium attachments on one side [4]. The osseocartilaginous junction should be freed to allow sagittal repositioning of the quadrangular cartilage on midline. Ultimately, the endoscope should be used for precise dissection in depth [4].
The described techniques call for creation of a wide pocket in the area of the anterior nasal spine and maxillary crest to allow the caudal septum to move toward the midline. Pastorek described his “modified swinging door” technique in which the caudal septum is flipped over the nasal spine, which acts as a doorstop holding the septum in the midline. Hereby, the main goal is to preserve as much as possible the whole quadrangular cartilage by just repositioning it on the midline onto the maxillary crest. Only partial resections are performed to allow for adjusting its height to the nasal height [4]. A suture is then used to secure the septum to the nasal spine [46].
To date, nose deviation seemed to be an exclusion criterion for the dorsal preservation technique. A septoplasty with an L-strut (L-strut concept [6]) is usually performed before a nasal osteotomy, but spreader graft, septal extension graft and suture in-placement should be done after the osteotomy for dorsal axis correction with a proper contour and tip position [47]. This method fundamentally serves to strengthen the middle nasal vault, and hence prevents postoperative collapse. It also proves immediately functionally better by broadening the angle of the internal nasal valve, thus increasing respiratory airflow [4143, 47, 48]. However, the “Pisa Tower concept” [13] helps to understand that septoplasty procedures can be adapted to the requirements for the bony and cartilaginous surgical procedures according to their difficulties, leading to a straight nose with a straight septum and sufficient ventilation. Eventually, the swinging door septoplasty preserves the quadrangular cartilage. It might be further used in the future for grafting in the hybrid structural/preservation technique if needed, ultimately saving rib cartilage and/or conchal cartilage. Finally, surgery time is reduced, and patient’s morbidity remains minimal.
It has been reported that the combination of asymmetric spreader grafts with spreader flaps might be successful in correction of the nasal deviation in C-shaped crooked nose surgery, but most significantly in I-shaped crooked nose surgery [49]. In situ septal corrections (ISSCs) are extremely effective approaches for the correction of the nasal septum and the external nose in patients with a deviated nose [1]. However, because of cartilage memory, these procedures may not always be sufficient for correction of severely deviated noses in particular. Therefore, extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS) has been suggested in rhinoplasty as a more basic correction method for severely deviated septum [1, 27, 28, 32]. However, some authors have claimed that this technique has a risk of long-term destabilization in the keystone area and may lead to aesthetic problems such as saddling in the nasal dorsum or irregularities [50]. Hence, in combination with swinging door septoplasty, the ”Pisa Tower Concept” is able to correct a difficult crooked nose without the need for an extracorporeal septoplasty [4, 10, 13].
Recently, surgeons have begun using piezoelectric-powered ultrasonic instruments (PEIs) for the management of the bony vault and lateral osteotomies [51, 52]. PR can be performed with piezoelectric instrumentation and different insets. PEIs act selectively on the bone and the fracture lines created by PEIs are very accurate and eliminate the risk of radiating fracture lines encountered with traditional instrumentation [53]. A big advantage of piezo-assisted septoplasty according to Gerbault et.al. [53] is the safe correction of high septal deviations. A small strip of perpendicular plate can be removed without twisting the septum. Also, there is a much less risk of a radiated fracture to the skull base. Once the bony excess of the septum is removed, the remaining part can be medialized [53].
When we correct the deviated nose, the general surgical principles suggested by previous rhinoplasty surgeons are followed accordingly [18, 54]. Nevertheless, a failure rate 4.76% [13] up to 11% [3] has been reported in the literature. Possible reasons for these failures may include improper preoperative evaluation, failure to understand and compensate for the dynamics of the cartilage, and faulty surgical execution [55]. Half of the failures were attributable to the conservatism of an endonasal approach. Thus, for the proper management of the deviated nose, Jang et al. [3] recommend a more aggressive approach through an open rhinoplasty incision, which provides for a better intraoperative diagnosis and more precise execution of the various maneuvers required to correct the deviated nose [3]. That being said, hybridization between preservation and structural rhinoplasty can be performed by an experienced PR surgeon (“hybrid operation”) [7].
Our article has limitations: There is a lack of objective measurements such as rhinomanometry and validated subjective patient reported outcome measures. Nevertheless, it has just recently been reported that a high patient satisfaction after PR can be achieved, as evaluated by the ROE, which goes in line with aesthetics and function [4143]. Lastly, further studies are needed by using also the septal extracorporeal reconstruction technique, even endonasally together with dorsum PR [4].

Conclusion

The nasal septum deviation condition in crooked noses is a very widespread pathology, which often leads to nasal airway obstruction. We provide a septoplasty classification with technical details of the various septum deformities according to the nasal axis. By applying a treatment algorithm respecting the PR principles, a satisfactory outcome can be achieved with low morbidity. Compared to the L-strut concept, the osseocartilaginous vault and quadrangular septum remain largely preserved in the swinging door technique.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Dent – Das Online-Abo der Zahnmedizin

Online-Abonnement

Mit e.Dent erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen zahnmedizinischen Fortbildungen und unseren zahnmedizinischen und ausgesuchten medizinischen Zeitschriften.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavuzlu A, Sahin E (2022) A useful approach to I-shaped crooked nose correction: cross-spreader graft technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:833–840 Kavuzlu A, Sahin E (2022) A useful approach to I-shaped crooked nose correction: cross-spreader graft technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:833–840
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocak I, Gokler O, Senturk E (2018) Is osteoplasty with unilateral osteotomy effective in the correction of the crooked nose? J Craniofac Surg 29:491–494PubMed Kocak I, Gokler O, Senturk E (2018) Is osteoplasty with unilateral osteotomy effective in the correction of the crooked nose? J Craniofac Surg 29:491–494PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ (2008) Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:311–315PubMed Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ (2008) Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:311–315PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Saban Y (2018) Preservation septoplasty & rhinoplasty in deviated noses. In: Cakir B, Saban Y, Daniel R, Palhazi P (eds) Preservation rhinoplasty, 3rd ed. Septum Ed, Turkey Saban Y (2018) Preservation septoplasty & rhinoplasty in deviated noses. In: Cakir B, Saban Y, Daniel R, Palhazi P (eds) Preservation rhinoplasty, 3rd ed. Septum Ed, Turkey
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira J, Certal V, Chang ET, Camacho M (2016) Nasal septal deviations: a systematic review of classification systems. Plast Surg Int. 2016:7089123PubMedPubMedCentral Teixeira J, Certal V, Chang ET, Camacho M (2016) Nasal septal deviations: a systematic review of classification systems. Plast Surg Int. 2016:7089123PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JS, Lee DC, Ha DH, Kim SW, Cho DW (2016) Redefining the septal L-strut to prevent collapse. PLoS ONE 11:e0153056PubMedPubMedCentral Lee JS, Lee DC, Ha DH, Kim SW, Cho DW (2016) Redefining the septal L-strut to prevent collapse. PLoS ONE 11:e0153056PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat East C (2021) Preservation rhinoplasty and the crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 29:123–130PubMed East C (2021) Preservation rhinoplasty and the crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 29:123–130PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottle MH (1954) Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 60:408–414PubMed Cottle MH (1954) Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 60:408–414PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saban Y (2021) Commentary on: expanding indications for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with cartilage conversion techniques. Aesthet Surg J 41:185–188PubMed Saban Y (2021) Commentary on: expanding indications for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with cartilage conversion techniques. Aesthet Surg J 41:185–188PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P (2018) Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 38:117–131PubMed Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P (2018) Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 38:117–131PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Saban Y, de Salvador S (2021) Guidelines for dorsum preservation in primary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 37:53–64PubMed Saban Y, de Salvador S (2021) Guidelines for dorsum preservation in primary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 37:53–64PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang YS, Wang GM, Wu YL et al (2010) Classification and surgical treatment of the deviated nose with unilateral cleft lip. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 45:581–583PubMed Yang YS, Wang GM, Wu YL et al (2010) Classification and surgical treatment of the deviated nose with unilateral cleft lip. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 45:581–583PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Finocchi V, Vellone V, Ramieri V, de Angelis F, Marianetti TM (2021) Pisa tower concept: a new paradigm in crooked nose treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:66–70PubMed Finocchi V, Vellone V, Ramieri V, de Angelis F, Marianetti TM (2021) Pisa tower concept: a new paradigm in crooked nose treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:66–70PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao YC, Kao CH, Wang HW, Moe KS (2007) A surgical algorithm using open rhinoplasty for correction of traumatic twisted nose. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:250–258 Hsiao YC, Kao CH, Wang HW, Moe KS (2007) A surgical algorithm using open rhinoplasty for correction of traumatic twisted nose. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:250–258
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaca H (2022) Using the septal shift technique to correct crooked nose deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 150:300e–306ePubMed Karaca H (2022) Using the septal shift technique to correct crooked nose deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 150:300e–306ePubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdem T, Ozturan O (2008) Objective measurement of the deviated nose and a review of surgical techniques for correction. Rhinology 46:56–61PubMed Erdem T, Ozturan O (2008) Objective measurement of the deviated nose and a review of surgical techniques for correction. Rhinology 46:56–61PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Goksel A, Saban Y (2019) Open piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 35:113–118PubMed Goksel A, Saban Y (2019) Open piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 35:113–118PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP Jr (2002) The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1509–1523PubMed Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Deuber MA, Adams WP Jr (2002) The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1509–1523PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H (1999) A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2202–2209PubMed Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H (1999) A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2202–2209PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottle MH, Loring RM, Fischer GG, Gaynon IE (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 68:301–313PubMed Cottle MH, Loring RM, Fischer GG, Gaynon IE (1958) The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 68:301–313PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottle MH (1955) The structure and function of the nasal vestibule. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 62:173–181PubMed Cottle MH (1955) The structure and function of the nasal vestibule. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 62:173–181PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewes W, Zappelini CEM, Ferraz MBJ, Neves JC (2021) Conservative surgery of the nasal dorsum: septal pyramidal adjustment and repositioning. Facial Plast Surg 37:22–28PubMed Dewes W, Zappelini CEM, Ferraz MBJ, Neves JC (2021) Conservative surgery of the nasal dorsum: septal pyramidal adjustment and repositioning. Facial Plast Surg 37:22–28PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Neves JC, Arancibia-Tagle D, Dewes W, Ferraz M (2021) The segmental preservation rhinoplasty: the split tetris concept. Facial Plast Surg 37:36–44PubMed Neves JC, Arancibia-Tagle D, Dewes W, Ferraz M (2021) The segmental preservation rhinoplasty: the split tetris concept. Facial Plast Surg 37:36–44PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelwahab MA, Neves CA, Patel PN, Most SP (2020) Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthet Plast Surg 44:879–887 Abdelwahab MA, Neves CA, Patel PN, Most SP (2020) Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthet Plast Surg 44:879–887
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Finocchi V (2019) SPQR technique. Preservation Rhinoplasty Meeting, 2019, Nice, France Finocchi V (2019) SPQR technique. Preservation Rhinoplasty Meeting, 2019, Nice, France
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacevic M, Veit JA, Toriumi DM (2021) Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 29:244–251PubMed Kovacevic M, Veit JA, Toriumi DM (2021) Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 29:244–251PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W (2005) Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:218–226PubMed Gubisch W (2005) Extracorporeal septoplasty for the markedly deviated septum. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:218–226PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W (2006) Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 22:230–239PubMed Gubisch W (2006) Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 22:230–239PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W (2015) Treatment of the scoliotic nose with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 23:11–22PubMed Gubisch W (2015) Treatment of the scoliotic nose with extracorporeal septoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 23:11–22PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W, Hacker S (2022) Invited discussion on: a useful approach to i-shaped crooked nose correction-cross-spreader graft technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:841–842 Gubisch W, Hacker S (2022) Invited discussion on: a useful approach to i-shaped crooked nose correction-cross-spreader graft technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:841–842
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W, Sinha V (2008) Extracorporeal septoplasty-how we do it at marienhospital stuttgart germany. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 60:16–19PubMedPubMedCentral Gubisch W, Sinha V (2008) Extracorporeal septoplasty-how we do it at marienhospital stuttgart germany. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 60:16–19PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gubisch W (1995) The extracorporeal septum plasty: a technique to correct difficult nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:672–682PubMed Gubisch W (1995) The extracorporeal septum plasty: a technique to correct difficult nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:672–682PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Foda HM (2010) The crooked nose: correction of dorsal and caudal septal deviations. HNO 58:899–906PubMed Foda HM (2010) The crooked nose: correction of dorsal and caudal septal deviations. HNO 58:899–906PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Akif KM (2004) Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: an objective method of evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:203–207 Okur E, Yildirim I, Aydogan B, Akif KM (2004) Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: an objective method of evaluation. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:203–207
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Boccieri A, Pascali M (2003) Septal crossbar graft for the correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:629–638PubMed Boccieri A, Pascali M (2003) Septal crossbar graft for the correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:629–638PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis DA, Gilbert RW (1991) Analysis and correction of the crooked nose. J Otolaryngol 20:14–18PubMed Ellis DA, Gilbert RW (1991) Analysis and correction of the crooked nose. J Otolaryngol 20:14–18PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazovic GD, Daniel RK, Janosevic LB et al (2015) Rhinoplasty: the nasal bones-anatomy and analysis. Aesthet Surg J 35:255–263PubMed Lazovic GD, Daniel RK, Janosevic LB et al (2015) Rhinoplasty: the nasal bones-anatomy and analysis. Aesthet Surg J 35:255–263PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuncel U, Kurt A, Saban Y (2022) Dorsal preservation surgery: a novel modification for dorsal shaping and hump reduction. Aesthet Surg J 42:1252–1261PubMed Tuncel U, Kurt A, Saban Y (2022) Dorsal preservation surgery: a novel modification for dorsal shaping and hump reduction. Aesthet Surg J 42:1252–1261PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Cakir B, Genc B, Finocchi V, Haack S (2023) My Approach to preservation rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 31:25–43PubMed Cakir B, Genc B, Finocchi V, Haack S (2023) My Approach to preservation rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 31:25–43PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruber RP, Deptula P, Conkling N (2022) Invited discussion on: quality of life and outcome after preservation rhinoplasty using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:1780–1782 Gruber RP, Deptula P, Conkling N (2022) Invited discussion on: quality of life and outcome after preservation rhinoplasty using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:1780–1782
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Stergiou G, Fortuny CG, Schweigler A et al (2022) A multivariate analysis after preservation rhinoplasty (PR)-a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75:369–373PubMed Stergiou G, Fortuny CG, Schweigler A et al (2022) A multivariate analysis after preservation rhinoplasty (PR)-a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75:369–373PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Stergiou G, Schweigler A, Finocchi V et al (2022) Quality of life (QoL) and outcome after preservation rhinoplasty (PR) using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire-a prospective observational single-centre study. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:1773–1779 Stergiou G, Schweigler A, Finocchi V et al (2022) Quality of life (QoL) and outcome after preservation rhinoplasty (PR) using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire-a prospective observational single-centre study. Aesthet Plast Surg 46:1773–1779
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Stergiou G, Tremp M, Finocchi V, Saban Y (2020) Functional and radiological assessment after preservation rhinoplasty-a clinical study. In Vivo 34:2659–2665PubMedPubMedCentral Stergiou G, Tremp M, Finocchi V, Saban Y (2020) Functional and radiological assessment after preservation rhinoplasty-a clinical study. In Vivo 34:2659–2665PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Metzenbaum M (1936) Dislocation of the lower end of the nasal septum cartilage. Arch Otolarynlol 24:78 Metzenbaum M (1936) Dislocation of the lower end of the nasal septum cartilage. Arch Otolarynlol 24:78
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright WK (1969) Principles of nasal septum reconstruction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 73:252–255PubMed Wright WK (1969) Principles of nasal septum reconstruction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 73:252–255PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Pastorek NJ, Becker DG (2000) Treating the caudal septal deflection. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:217–220PubMed Pastorek NJ, Becker DG (2000) Treating the caudal septal deflection. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:217–220PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbasi R, Dowlati A, SeifRabiei MA, Hashemian F (2019) Correction of severe deviated nose by intermediate short osteotomy. World J Plast Surg. 8:208–212PubMedPubMedCentral Abbasi R, Dowlati A, SeifRabiei MA, Hashemian F (2019) Correction of severe deviated nose by intermediate short osteotomy. World J Plast Surg. 8:208–212PubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R et al (2019) Role of spreader flaps in rhinoplasty: analysis of patients undergoing correction for severe septal deviation with long-term follow-up. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:1006–1013 Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R et al (2019) Role of spreader flaps in rhinoplasty: analysis of patients undergoing correction for severe septal deviation with long-term follow-up. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:1006–1013
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaeian F, Gubisch W, Janku D, Haack S (2016) New suturing techniques to reconstruct the keystone area in extracorporeal septoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:374–382PubMed Rezaeian F, Gubisch W, Janku D, Haack S (2016) New suturing techniques to reconstruct the keystone area in extracorporeal septoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:374–382PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Cochran CS, Roostaeian J (2013) Use of the ultrasonic bone aspirator for lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1430–1433PubMed Cochran CS, Roostaeian J (2013) Use of the ultrasonic bone aspirator for lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1430–1433PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M (2007) Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1035–1038PubMed Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M (2007) Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1035–1038PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM (2016) The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 36:21–34PubMed Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM (2016) The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 36:21–34PubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrd HS, Salomon J, Flood J (1998) Correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2148–2157PubMed Byrd HS, Salomon J, Flood J (1998) Correction of the crooked nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2148–2157PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucker FJ Jr (1982) Management of the scoliotic nose. Laryngoscope 92:128–134PubMed Stucker FJ Jr (1982) Management of the scoliotic nose. Laryngoscope 92:128–134PubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu El-Wafa AM, Emara SS (2020) Deviated Nose: a systematic approach for correction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8:e3078PubMedPubMedCentral Abu El-Wafa AM, Emara SS (2020) Deviated Nose: a systematic approach for correction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8:e3078PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Analysis of the Nasal Septum in Crooked Noses and Suggested Treatment Algorithm According to Preservation Rhinoplasty (PR) Principles
verfasst von
Mathias Tremp
Jonas Schneider
Ram Badari Narayan Raghu
Abdulkadir Goksel
Yves Saban
Publikationsdatum
24.02.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03293-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.