Erschienen in:
01.04.2006 | Original Article
Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction
verfasst von:
Agnaldo L. Silva-Filho, Rogéria Andrade Werneck, Rúbia Sena de Magalhães, Andrezza V. Belo, Sérgio A. Triginelli
Erschienen in:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
|
Ausgabe 1/2006
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Objective: To compare the short-term results of the quality of life and satisfaction of patients submitted to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for benign uterine disease. Methods: Women referred for hysterectomy for uterine myoma were randomized to TAH (n=30) or VH (n=30). The exclusion criteria were uterine prolapse, indication associated surgical procedures and uterine size ≥300 cm3. After a month, follow-up questionnaires had a response rate of 100%, and consisted of an interview with application of SF-36 questionnaire (functional capacity, physical aspect and pain) and evaluation of satisfaction rate. Results: There were no differences in the patients’ mean age, parity, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin levels and uterine size between groups. Lower postoperative quality-of-life scores were found in the TAH group when compared to the VH group in functional capacity (P=0.002), physical aspect (P=0.008) and pain (P=0.002). The general satisfaction rate with the surgery was similar in the two groups of patients (P=0.147). However, a higher rate of patients submitted to VH would choose the same therapeutic modality (65.5 vs 90%; P=0.021). Conclusions: A better postoperative quality of life (functional capacity, physical aspect and pain) and higher satisfaction rate was found in the VH when compared to TAH.