nach oben

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Erschienen in:

01.03.2020 | Reports of Original Investigations

Acceptability of cardiac donation after circulatory determination of death: a survey of the Canadian public

verfasst von: Kimia Honarmand, MD, MSc, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, PhD, Claudio M. Martin, MD, MSc, Robert Sibbald, MSc, Dave Nagpal, MD, MSc, Vince Lau, MD, Fran Priestap, MSc, Sabe De, MD, John Basmaji, MD, Andrew Healey, MD, Sonny Dhanani, MD, Matthew J. Weiss, MD, Sam Shemie, MD, Ian M. Ball, MD, MSc

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiac transplantation is a definitive therapy for end-stage heart failure, but demand exceeds supply. Cardiac donation after circulatory determination of death (cardiac DCDD) can be performed using direct procurement and perfusion (DPP), where cardiac activity is restored after heart recovery, or (NRP), where brain blood supply is surgically interrupted, circulation to the thoraco-abdominal organs is restored within the donor’s body, followed by heart recovery. While cardiac DCDD would increase the number of heart donors, uptake of programs has been slowed in part because of ethical concerns within the medical community. These debates have been largely devoid of discussion regarding public perceptions. We conducted a national survey of public perceptions regarding cardiac DCDD.

Methods

We surveyed 1,001 Canadians about their attitudes towards cardiac DCDD using a rigorously designed and pre-tested survey.

Results

We found that 843 of 1,001 respondents (84.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.8 to 86.3) accepted the DPP approach, 642 (64.1%; 95% CI, 61.1 to 67.0) would agree to donate their heart using DPP, and 696 (69.5%; 95% CI, 66.6 to 72.3) would consent to the same for a family member. We found that 779 respondents of 1,001 respondents (77.8%; 95% CI, 75.1 to 80.3) accepted the NRP approach, 587 (58.6%; 95% CI, 55.5 to 61.6) would agree to donate their heart using NRP, and 636 (63.5%; 95% CI, 60.5 to 66.4) would consent to the same for a family member. Most respondents supported the implementation of DPP (738 respondents or 73.7%; 95% CI, 70.9 to 76.3) and NRP (655 respondents or 65.4%; 95% CI, 62.4 to 68.3) in Canada.

Conclusion

The results of this national survey of public attitudes towards cardiac DCDD will inform the implementation of cardiac DCDD programs in a manner that is consistent with public values.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Canadian Institute for Health Information. e-Statistics Report on Transplant, Waiting List and Donor Statistics; 2013 summary statistics – January 1 to December 31, 2013. Available from URL: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/2013_estatsinnewtemplate_en-web.pdf (accessed August 2019).

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients; Health Resources and Services Administration. The 2016 Annual Data Report. OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report. Am J Transplant 2018; 18(S1): 1-503. Available from URL: https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/Default.aspx (accessed August 2019).

Statistics and Clinical Studies, NHS Blood and Transplant. Annual Report on Cardiothoracic Organ Transplantation: Report for 2017/2018. Available from URL: https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/12252/nhsbt-cardiothoracic-transplantation-annual-report-2017-2018.pdf (accessed August 2019).

Canadian Blood Services. Organ Donation and Transplantation in Canada. System Progress Report 2006-2015. Available from URL: https://blood.ca/sites/default/files/ODT_Report.pdf (accessed August 2019).

Rao V, Dhanani S, MacLean J, et al. Effect of organ donation after circulatory determination of death on number of organ transplants from donors with neurologic determination of death. CMAJ 2017; 189: E1206-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Messer S, Page A, Axell R, et al. Outcome after heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death donors. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017; 36: 1311-8.CrossRefPubMed

Messer SJ, Axell RG, Colah S, et al. Functional assessment and transplantation of the donor heart after circulatory death. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35: 1443-52.CrossRefPubMed

Kumar R, Shekar K, Widdicombe N, Fraser JF. Donation after cardiac death in Queensland: review of the pilot project. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 517-22.CrossRefPubMed

Dhital KK, Iyer A, Connellan M, et al. Adult heart transplantation with distant procurement and ex-vivo preservation of donor hearts after circulatory death: a case series. Lancet 2015; 385: 2585-91.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Noterdaeme T, Detry O, Hans MF, et al. What is the potential increase in the heart graft pool by cardiac donation after circulatory death? Transpl Int 2013; 26: 61-6.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Boucek MM, Mashburn C, Dunn SM, et al. Pediatric heart transplantation after declaration of cardiocirculatory death. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 709-14.CrossRefPubMed

12.

White CW, Messer SJ, Large SR, et al. Transplantation of hearts donated after circulatory death. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Joffe AR, Carcillo J, Anton N, et al. Donation after cardiocirculatory death: a call for a moratorium pending full public disclosure and fully informed consent. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-6-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Eynon CA, Murphy PG, Smith M, Danbury C, Manara AR. Heart transplantation after declaration of death by cardiorespiratory criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29: 232-3.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Tibballs J, Bhatia N. Transplantation of the heart after circulatory death of the donor: time for a change in law? Med J Aust 2015; 203(268–70): e1.

16.

Veatch R. Donating hearts after cardiac death — reversing the irreversible. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 672-3.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Burns KE, Duffet M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008; 179: 245-52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Willis G. Cognitive Interviewing in survey design: state of the science and future directions. In: Vannette DL, Krosnick JA, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 103-7.CrossRef

19.

Ipsos. Available from URL: https://www.ipsos.com (accessed August 2019).

20.

Braun V, Clarke V. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Studies Health Well-being 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.CrossRef

21.

Honarmand K, Parsons Leigh J, Basmaji J, et al. Attitudes of healthcare providers towards cardiac donation after circulatory determination of death: a Canadian nation-wide survey. Can J Anesth 2020; 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01559-6.

Titel: Acceptability of cardiac donation after circulatory determination of death: a survey of the Canadian public
verfasst von: Kimia Honarmand, MD, MSc
Jeanna Parsons Leigh, PhD
Claudio M. Martin, MD, MSc
Robert Sibbald, MSc
Dave Nagpal, MD, MSc
Vince Lau, MD
Fran Priestap, MSc
Sabe De, MD
John Basmaji, MD
Andrew Healey, MD
Sonny Dhanani, MD
Matthew J. Weiss, MD
Sam Shemie, MD
Ian M. Ball, MD, MSc
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01560-z

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Acceptability of cardiac donation after circulatory determination of death: a survey of the Canadian public