Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2022

03.08.2021 | Breast

Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography—a prospective study

verfasst von: Hye Mi Gweon, Na Lae Eun, Ji Hyun Youk, Joon Jeong, Soong June Bae, Sung Gwe Ahn, Jeong-Ah Kim, Eun Ju Son

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the added diagnostic value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspicious microcalcifications on screening mammography.

Methods

This prospective study included 80 patients with suspicious calcifications on screening mammography who underwent abbreviated MRI before undergoing breast biopsy between August 2017 and September 2020. The abbreviated protocol included one pre-contrast and the first post-contrast T1-weighted series. MRI examinations were interpreted as either positive or negative based on the visibility of any significant enhancement. The positive predictive value (PPV) was compared before and after the MRI.

Results

Of the 80 suspicious microcalcifications, 33.8% (27/80) were malignant and 66.2% (53/80) were false positives. Abbreviated MRI revealed 33 positive enhancement lesions, and 25 and two lesions showed true-positive and false-negative findings, respectively. Abbreviated MRI increased PPV from 33.8 (27 of 80 cases; 95% CI: 26.2%, 40.8%) to 75.8% (25 of 33 cases; 95% CI: 62.1%, 85.7%). A total of 85% (45 of 53) false-positive diagnoses were reduced after abbreviated MRI assessment.

Conclusions

Abbreviated MRI added significant diagnostic value in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on screening mammography, as demonstrated by a significant increase in PPV with a potential reduction in unnecessary biopsy.

Key Points

Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging increased the positive predictive value of suspicious microcalcifications on screening mammography from 33.8 (27/80 cases) to 75.8% (25/33 cases) (p < .01).
Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging helped avoid unnecessary benign biopsies in 85% (45/53 cases) of lesions without missing invasive cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30CrossRef Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13–30CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology (2013) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (2013) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395CrossRef Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383CrossRef Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW (2010) The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1378–1383CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2008) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:461–474CrossRef Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2008) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:461–474CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S et al (2010) Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1450–1457CrossRef Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S et al (2010) Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1450–1457CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1723–1732CrossRef Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1723–1732CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:269–281CrossRef Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:269–281CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, Kameyama K, Kuribayashi S (2009) The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography? Eur Radiol 19:2089–2096CrossRef Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, Kameyama K, Kuribayashi S (2009) The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography? Eur Radiol 19:2089–2096CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stehouwer BL, Merckel LG, Verkooijen HM et al (2014) 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 24:603–609CrossRef Stehouwer BL, Merckel LG, Verkooijen HM et al (2014) 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 24:603–609CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eun NL, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Youk JH, Kim JA (2018) The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5(th) edition of BI-RADS. Clin Radiol 73:750–755CrossRef Eun NL, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Youk JH, Kim JA (2018) The value of breast MRI for BI-RADS category 4B mammographic microcalcification: based on the 5(th) edition of BI-RADS. Clin Radiol 73:750–755CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA (2017) MR imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in mammographic microcalcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 283:692–701CrossRef Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA (2017) MR imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in mammographic microcalcifications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 283:692–701CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennani-Baiti B, Dietzel M, Baltzer PA (2017) MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications. PLoS One 12:e0188679CrossRef Bennani-Baiti B, Dietzel M, Baltzer PA (2017) MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications. PLoS One 12:e0188679CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernic D, Brnic D, Simundic I, Vanjaka Rogosic L, Tadic T (2016) MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications? Acta Radiol 57:413–421CrossRef Bernic D, Brnic D, Simundic I, Vanjaka Rogosic L, Tadic T (2016) MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications? Acta Radiol 57:413–421CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel K, Schrading S, Hansen NL, Barabasch A, Kuhl CK (2015) Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging. Radiology 274:343–351CrossRef Strobel K, Schrading S, Hansen NL, Barabasch A, Kuhl CK (2015) Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging. Radiology 274:343–351CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li E, Li J, Song Y, Xue M, Zhou C (2014) A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications. PLoS One 9:e111217CrossRef Li E, Li J, Song Y, Xue M, Zhou C (2014) A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications. PLoS One 9:e111217CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey SC, Di Carlo PA, Lee B, Obadina E, Sippo D, Mullen L (2016) An abbreviated protocol for high-risk screening breast MRI saves time and resources. J Am Coll Radiol 13:374–380CrossRef Harvey SC, Di Carlo PA, Lee B, Obadina E, Sippo D, Mullen L (2016) An abbreviated protocol for high-risk screening breast MRI saves time and resources. J Am Coll Radiol 13:374–380CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM et al (2020) Comparison of abbreviated breast MRI vs digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection among women with dense breasts undergoing screening. JAMA 323:746–756CrossRef Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM et al (2020) Comparison of abbreviated breast MRI vs digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection among women with dense breasts undergoing screening. JAMA 323:746–756CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Taskin F, Kalayci CB, Tuncbilek N et al (2021) The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol 31:1718–1726CrossRef Taskin F, Kalayci CB, Tuncbilek N et al (2021) The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol 31:1718–1726CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography—a prospective study
verfasst von
Hye Mi Gweon
Na Lae Eun
Ji Hyun Youk
Joon Jeong
Soong June Bae
Sung Gwe Ahn
Jeong-Ah Kim
Eun Ju Son
Publikationsdatum
03.08.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08196-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

European Radiology 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.