Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 6/2018

12.01.2018 | Breast

Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis

verfasst von: Joao V. Horvat, Manuela Durando, Soledad Milans, Sujata Patil, Jessica Massler, Girard Gibbons, Dilip Giri, Katja Pinker, Elizabeth A. Morris, Sunitha B. Thakur

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the impact of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and menopausal status on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions.

Methods

In this HIPAA-compliant study, mean ADC values of 218 malignant and 130 benign lesions from 288 patients were retrospectively evaluated. The differences in mean ADC values between benign and malignant lesions were calculated within groups stratified by BPE level (high/low), amount of FGT (dense/non-dense) and menopausal status (premenopausal/postmenopausal). Sensitivities and specificities for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions within different groups were compared for statistical significance.

Results

The mean ADC value for malignant lesions was significantly lower compared to that for benign lesions (1.07±0.21 x 10−3 mm2/s vs. 1.53±0.26 x 10−3 mm2/s) (p<0.0001). Using the optimal cut-off point of 1.30 x 10−3 mm2/s, an area under the curve of 0.918 was obtained, with sensitivity and specificity both of 87 %. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivities and specificities of ADC values between different groups stratified by BPE level, amount of FGT or menopausal status.

Conclusions

Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions on ADC values is not significantly affected by BPE level, amount of FGT or menopausal status.

Key Points

ADC allows differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
ADC is useful for breast cancer diagnosis despite different patient characteristics.
BPE, FGT or menopause do not significantly affect sensitivity and specificity.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, Leutner C, Schild HH, Schrading S (2017) Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology 283:361–370CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, Leutner C, Schild HH, Schrading S (2017) Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology 283:361–370CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Smith RA (2009) The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7:1109–1115CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Smith RA (2009) The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7:1109–1115CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lourenco AP, Donegan L, Khalil H, Mainiero MB (2014) Improving outcomes of screening breast MRI with practice evolution: initial clinical experience with 3T compared to 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:535–539CrossRefPubMed Lourenco AP, Donegan L, Khalil H, Mainiero MB (2014) Improving outcomes of screening breast MRI with practice evolution: initial clinical experience with 3T compared to 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:535–539CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722CrossRefPubMed Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, Eby PR, White SW, Lehman CD (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker K, Helbich TH, Morris EA (2017) The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 90:20160715CrossRefPubMed Pinker K, Helbich TH, Morris EA (2017) The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 90:20160715CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of R (2010) White paper on imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 1:42–45CrossRef European Society of R (2010) White paper on imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 1:42–45CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan SL, Rahmat K, Rozalli FI et al (2014) Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 69:63–71CrossRefPubMed Tan SL, Rahmat K, Rozalli FI et al (2014) Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 69:63–71CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178CrossRefPubMed Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat White NS, McDonald CR, Farid N et al (2014) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Cancer: Physical Foundations and Applications of Restriction Spectrum Imaging. Cancer Res 74:4638–4652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White NS, McDonald CR, Farid N et al (2014) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Cancer: Physical Foundations and Applications of Restriction Spectrum Imaging. Cancer Res 74:4638–4652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Martincich L, Deantoni V, Bertotto I et al (2012) Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers. Eur Radiol 22:1519–1528CrossRefPubMed Martincich L, Deantoni V, Bertotto I et al (2012) Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers. Eur Radiol 22:1519–1528CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Rahman AR et al (2011) On the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and extravascular extracellular volume fraction in human breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 29:630–638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Rahman AR et al (2011) On the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and extravascular extracellular volume fraction in human breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 29:630–638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673CrossRefPubMed Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Caivano R, Villonio A, D’ Antuono F et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions. Cancer Invest 33:159–164CrossRefPubMed Caivano R, Villonio A, D’ Antuono F et al (2015) Diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions. Cancer Invest 33:159–164CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Suo S, Cheng F, Cao M et al (2017) Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:740–750CrossRefPubMed Suo S, Cheng F, Cao M et al (2017) Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:740–750CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:249–255CrossRefPubMed Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:249–255CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:1158–1164CrossRefPubMed Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:1158–1164CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256:64–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Suh HB, Kang HJ et al (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient of breast cancer and normal fibroglandular tissue in diffusion-weighted imaging: the effects of menstrual cycle and menopausal status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157:31–40CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Suh HB, Kang HJ et al (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient of breast cancer and normal fibroglandular tissue in diffusion-weighted imaging: the effects of menstrual cycle and menopausal status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157:31–40CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho GY, Moy L, Kim SG et al (2015) Comparison of contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in healthy and cancerous breast tissue. Eur J Radiol 84:1888–1893CrossRefPubMed Cho GY, Moy L, Kim SG et al (2015) Comparison of contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in healthy and cancerous breast tissue. Eur J Radiol 84:1888–1893CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi YJ, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Li Y, Su MY (2017) Impact of Different Analytic Approaches on the Analysis of the Breast Fibroglandular Tissue Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging. Biomed Res Int 2017:1094354PubMedPubMedCentral Choi YJ, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Li Y, Su MY (2017) Impact of Different Analytic Approaches on the Analysis of the Breast Fibroglandular Tissue Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging. Biomed Res Int 2017:1094354PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Clendenen TV, Kim S, Moy L et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hormone-induced breast changes in young premenopausal women. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1–9CrossRefPubMed Clendenen TV, Kim S, Moy L et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hormone-induced breast changes in young premenopausal women. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1–9CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacconi C, Thakur SB, Dershaw DD, Brooks J, Fry CW, Morris EA (2014) Impact of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 83:2137–2143CrossRefPubMed Iacconi C, Thakur SB, Dershaw DD, Brooks J, Fry CW, Morris EA (2014) Impact of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 83:2137–2143CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawamura A, Satake H, Ishigaki S et al (2015) Prediction of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using mammography, ultrasonography, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Nagoya J Med Sci 77:425–437PubMedPubMedCentral Kawamura A, Satake H, Ishigaki S et al (2015) Prediction of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using mammography, ultrasonography, and diffusion-weighted imaging. Nagoya J Med Sci 77:425–437PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald ES, Schopp JG, Peacock S et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI: association between patient characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficients of normal breast fibroglandular tissue at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W496–W502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald ES, Schopp JG, Peacock S et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI: association between patient characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficients of normal breast fibroglandular tissue at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W496–W502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Flynn EA, Wilson RM, Allen SD, Locke I, Scurr E, deSouza NM (2014) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the high-risk breast: Apparent diffusion coefficient values and their relationship to breast density. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:805–811CrossRefPubMed O'Flynn EA, Wilson RM, Allen SD, Locke I, Scurr E, deSouza NM (2014) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the high-risk breast: Apparent diffusion coefficient values and their relationship to breast density. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:805–811CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Partridge SC, Singer L, Sun R et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted MRI: influence of intravoxel fat signal and breast density on breast tumor conspicuity and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 29:1215–1221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Partridge SC, Singer L, Sun R et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted MRI: influence of intravoxel fat signal and breast density on breast tumor conspicuity and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 29:1215–1221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
Metadaten
Titel
Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis
verfasst von
Joao V. Horvat
Manuela Durando
Soledad Milans
Sujata Patil
Jessica Massler
Girard Gibbons
Dilip Giri
Katja Pinker
Elizabeth A. Morris
Sunitha B. Thakur
Publikationsdatum
12.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5202-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

European Radiology 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.