Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2006

01.12.2006

Binaural Unmasking with Bilateral Cochlear Implants

verfasst von: Christopher J. Long, Robert P. Carlyon, Ruth Y. Litovsky, Daniel H. Downs

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 4/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Nearly 100,000 deaf patients worldwide have had their hearing restored by a cochlear implant (CI) fitted to one ear. However, although many patients understand speech well in quiet, even the most successful experience difficulty in noisy situations. In contrast, normal-hearing (NH) listeners achieve improved speech understanding in noise by processing the differences between the waveforms reaching the two ears. Here we show that a form of binaural processing can be achieved by patients fitted with an implant in each ear, leading to substantial improvements in signal detection in the presence of competing sounds. The stimulus in each ear consisted of a narrowband noise masker, to which a tonal signal was sometimes added; this mixture was half-wave rectified, lowpass-filtered, and then used to modulate a 1000-pps biphasic pulse train. All four CI users tested showed significantly better signal detection when the signal was presented out of phase at the two ears than when it was in phase. This advantage occurred even though subjects only received information about the slowly varying sound envelope to be presented, contrary to previous reports that waveform fine structure dominates binaural processing. If this advantage generalizes to multichannel situations, it would demonstrate that envelope-based CI speech-processing strategies may allow patients to exploit binaural unmasking in order to improve speech understanding in noise. Furthermore, because the tested patients had been deprived of binaural hearing for eight or more years, our results show that some sensitivity to time-varying interaural cues can persist over extended periods of binaural deprivation.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Akeroyd MA, Summerfield AQ. Integration of monaural and binaural evidence of vowel formants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:3394–3406, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Akeroyd MA, Summerfield AQ. Integration of monaural and binaural evidence of vowel formants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:3394–3406, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1026–1036, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1026–1036, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bronkhorst A, Plomp R. The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1508–1517, 1998.PubMedCrossRef Bronkhorst A, Plomp R. The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1508–1517, 1998.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlyon RP, Deeks JM. Limitations on rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1009–1025, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Carlyon RP, Deeks JM. Limitations on rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:1009–1025, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cochlear Limited. Nucleus Technical Reference (Manual Z43470 Issue I), 1999. Cochlear Limited. Nucleus Technical Reference (Manual Z43470 Issue I), 1999.
Zurück zum Zitat Culling JF, Colburn HS. Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:517–527, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Culling JF, Colburn HS. Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:517–527, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Durlach N, Colburn H. Binaural phenomena. In: Carterette E and Friedman M (eds.) Handbook of Perception, Volume IV: Hearing. New York, Academic Press, pp. 365–466, 1978. Durlach N, Colburn H. Binaural phenomena. In: Carterette E and Friedman M (eds.) Handbook of Perception, Volume IV: Hearing. New York, Academic Press, pp. 365–466, 1978.
Zurück zum Zitat Eddington D, Poon B, Noel V. Changes in fusion and localization performance when transitioning from monolateral to bilateral listening, Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses; Pacific Grove, California, 2005. Eddington D, Poon B, Noel V. Changes in fusion and localization performance when transitioning from monolateral to bilateral listening, Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses; Pacific Grove, California, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Florentine M. Relation between lateralization and loudness in asymmetrical hearing losses. J. Am. Audiol. Soc. 1:243–251, 1976.PubMed Florentine M. Relation between lateralization and loudness in asymmetrical hearing losses. J. Am. Audiol. Soc. 1:243–251, 1976.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin SJ, Bernstein LR, Ingham NJ, McAlpine D. Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. J. Neurophysiol. 93:3463–3478, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Griffin SJ, Bernstein LR, Ingham NJ, McAlpine D. Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. J. Neurophysiol. 93:3463–3478, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsh IJ. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20:536–544, 1948.CrossRef Hirsh IJ. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20:536–544, 1948.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hofman PM, Van Riswick JG, Van Opstal AJ. Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nat. Neurosci. 1:417–421, 1998.PubMedCrossRef Hofman PM, Van Riswick JG, Van Opstal AJ. Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nat. Neurosci. 1:417–421, 1998.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hogan SC, Meyer SE, Moore DR. Binaural unmasking returns to normal in teenagers who had otitis media in infancy. Audiol. Neurootol. 1:104–111, 1996.CrossRef Hogan SC, Meyer SE, Moore DR. Binaural unmasking returns to normal in teenagers who had otitis media in infancy. Audiol. Neurootol. 1:104–111, 1996.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 130:648–655, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Peters R, Lake J, Johnstone P, Yu G. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 130:648–655, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:1565–1574, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:1565–1574, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Vandali AE. A new portable sound processor for the University-of-Melbourne nucleus limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:3367–3371, 1992.PubMedCrossRef McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Vandali AE. A new portable sound processor for the University-of-Melbourne nucleus limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:3367–3371, 1992.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nuetzel J, Hafter E. Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: spectral effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69:1112–1118, 1981.CrossRef Nuetzel J, Hafter E. Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: spectral effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69:1112–1118, 1981.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer AR, Shackleton TM. The physiological basis of the binaural masking level difference. Acta Acustica 88:312–319, 2002. Palmer AR, Shackleton TM. The physiological basis of the binaural masking level difference. Acta Acustica 88:312–319, 2002.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson K, Gatehouse S. Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1183–1190, 1995.PubMedCrossRef Robinson K, Gatehouse S. Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1183–1190, 1995.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen S. Temporal Information in speech: acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects. In: Carlyon R, Darwin C and Russell I (eds.) Processing of Complex Sounds by the Auditory System. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 73–79, 1992. Rosen S. Temporal Information in speech: acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects. In: Carlyon R, Darwin C and Russell I (eds.) Processing of Complex Sounds by the Auditory System. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 73–79, 1992.
Zurück zum Zitat Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 25:197–204, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 25:197–204, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shackleton TM, Arnott RH, Palmer AR. Sensitivity to interaural correlation of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1–16, 2005. Shackleton TM, Arnott RH, Palmer AR. Sensitivity to interaural correlation of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1–16, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 416:87–90, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 416:87–90, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van der Par Z, Kohlrausch A. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1671–1680, 1997.PubMedCrossRef van der Par Z, Kohlrausch A. A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1671–1680, 1997.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel R. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 9:234–246, 2004.CrossRef van Hoesel R. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 9:234–246, 2004.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Hoesel R, Tyler R. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:1617–1630, 2003.PubMedCrossRef van Hoesel R, Tyler R. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:1617–1630, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vollmer M, Leake PA, Beitel RE, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL. Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 93:3339–3355, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Vollmer M, Leake PA, Beitel RE, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL. Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 93:3339–3355, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238, 1991.PubMedCrossRef Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238, 1991.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zurek PM. Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In: Hockberg I (ed.) Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, pp. 255–276, 1993. Zurek PM. Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In: Hockberg I (ed.) Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, pp. 255–276, 1993.
Metadaten
Titel
Binaural Unmasking with Bilateral Cochlear Implants
verfasst von
Christopher J. Long
Robert P. Carlyon
Ruth Y. Litovsky
Daniel H. Downs
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-006-0049-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2006

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Hörschwäche erhöht Demenzrisiko unabhängig von Beta-Amyloid

29.05.2024 Hörstörungen Nachrichten

Hört jemand im Alter schlecht, nimmt das Hirn- und Hippocampusvolumen besonders schnell ab, was auch mit einem beschleunigten kognitiven Abbau einhergeht. Und diese Prozesse scheinen sich unabhängig von der Amyloidablagerung zu ereignen.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.