nach oben

European Radiology

Erschienen in:

30.04.2018 | Cardiac

Cardiac implanted electronic devices and MRI safety in 2018—the state of play

verfasst von: Ryan Mark Shulman, Ben Hunt

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Traditionally, the presence of cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs) was a contra-indication to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Professional groups from around the world are releasing updated guidelines for the imaging of MR-conditional and legacy CIEDs, reflecting increasing evidence that this can be performed safely when strict protocols are followed.

Key Points

• The presence of a pacemaker or automatic implanted cardioverter defibrillator is no longer an absolute contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging.

• Strict protocols enable diagnostic quality images to be obtained with minimal risk.

• Close collaboration among radiologists, cardiologists and device manufacturer representatives is required.

Sommer T, Bauer W, Fischbach K et al (2017) MR imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Rofo 189:204–217CrossRef

Lowe MD, Plummer CJ, Manisty CH, Linker NJ, British Heart Rhythm Society (2015) Safe use of MRI in people with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart 101:1950–1953CrossRef

Indik JH, Gimbel JR, Abe H et al (2017) 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm 14:e97–e153CrossRef

Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329CrossRef

Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann WA, Gufler H, Weiler G (2005) Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace 7:353–365CrossRef

Di Leo G, Zanardo M, Schiaffino S, Secchi F, Sardanelli F (2017) Safety of MRI in patients with conditional or non-conditional pacemaker or other implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICED): a systematic review. Paper presented at: 103^rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting RSNA; 2017 Nov 26 - Dec 1; Chicago, IL, USA

Expert Panel on MR Safety, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501–530CrossRef

Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD et al (2017) Assessing the risks associated with MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med 376:755–764CrossRef

Friedman HL, Acker N, Dalzell C et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with recently implanted pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36:1090–1095CrossRef

10.

Baker KB, Tkach JA, Nyenhuis JA et al (2004) Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:315–320CrossRef

11.

Gimbel JR, Bailey SM, Tchou PJ, Ruggieri PM, Wilkoff BL (2005) Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28:1041–1046CrossRef

12.

Faulkner W (2016) New MRI safety labels & devices. Signals 5:1

13.

Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA et al (2017) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med 377:2555–2564CrossRef

14.

Mason S, Osborn JS, Dhar R et al (2017) Real world MRI experience with nonconditional and conditional cardiac rhythm devices after MagnaSafe. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:1468–1474CrossRef

15.

Do DH, Eyvazian V, Bayoneta AJ et al (2018) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices. Heart Rhythm 15:218–225CrossRef

16.

Hwang YM, Kim J, Lee JH et al (2016) Cardiac implantable electronic device safety during magnetic resonance imaging. Korean Circ J 46:804–810CrossRef

17.

Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH et al (2014) Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1284–1290CrossRef

18.

Miller JD, Nazarian S, Halperin HR (2016) Implantable electronic cardiac devices and compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:1590–1598CrossRef

19.

Shulman RM, Moodley M, Vaishnav M, Wright J (2018) Cardiac magnetic resonance with conditional pacemaker at three Tesla (3T) field strength. Cardiovascular Imaging Asia 2:28–30CrossRef

20.

Naehle CP, Meyer C, Thomas D et al (2008) Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations. Radiology 249:991–1001CrossRef

21.

Gimbel JR (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging of implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 31:795–801CrossRef

22.

Delfino JG, Viohl I, Woods TO (2017) Risks of MRI in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med 376:2495CrossRef

Titel: Cardiac implanted electronic devices and MRI safety in 2018—the state of play
verfasst von: Ryan Mark Shulman
Ben Hunt
Publikationsdatum: 30.04.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5396-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Cardiac implanted electronic devices and MRI safety in 2018—the state of play

Abstract

Key Points

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Key Points

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Comprehensive morphologic and functional imaging of heart transplant patients: first experience with dynamic perfusion CT

Minimisation of Signal Intensity Differences in Distortion Correction Approaches of Brain Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Surgery after FOLFIRINOX treatment for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: increase in tumour attenuation on CT correlates with R0 resection

Iodine concentration: a new, important characteristic of the spot sign that predicts haematoma expansion

Preoperative localisation of pulmonary ground-glass opacity using medical adhesive before thoracoscopic resection

Remote brain microhaemorrhages may predict haematoma in glioma patients treated with radiation therapy

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie