Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2018

13.04.2018 | Editorial

Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

verfasst von: Johan H. C. Reiber, Amer Alaiti, Hiram G. Bezerra, Johan De Sutter, Paul Schoenhagen, Arthur E. Stillman, Nico R. L. Van de Veire

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Please, find below an overview of the most relevant papers in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging over the year 2017 for the different modalities. …
Literatur
1.
Sato T, Jose J, El-Mawardy M, Sulimov DS, Tölg R, Richardt G, Abdel-Wahab M (2017) Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:145–152PubMedCrossRef
2.
Jin Z-G, Zhang Z-Q, Jing L-M, Wei Y-J, Zhang J, Luo J-P, Liu Y, Han W, Yang Y, Liu H-l, Yang S-l, Ma D-X (2017) Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:153–160PubMedCrossRef
3.
Hinrichs JB, Murray T, Akin M, Lee M, Brehm MU, Wilhelmi M, Wacker FK, Rodt T (2017) Evaluation of a novel 3D perfusion angiography technique independent of pump injections for assessment of interventional treatment of peripheral vascular disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:295–301PubMedCrossRef
4.
Katz A, Shtub A, Solomonica A, Poliakov A (2017) Roguin A Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:303–310PubMedCrossRef
5.
Roy JR, Sun P, Ison G, Prasam AM, Ford T, Hopkins A, Ramsay DR, Weaver JC (2017) Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:771–778PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kozuma K, Kashiwabara K, Shinozaki T, Kozuma K, Oba K, Matsuyama Y (2017) Two-by-two cross-over study to evaluate agreement between versions of a quantitative coronary analysis system (QAngio XA). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:779–787PubMedCrossRef
7.
Shi W-Y, Gu J-P, Liu C-J, Lou W-S (2017) He X Dual compression is not an uncommon type of iliac vein compression syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1277–1285PubMedCrossRef
8.
Pan L-F, Chu KH, Sher H-F, Pan L-K (2017) Optimizing left anterior oblique (LAO) caudal imaging in coronary angiography using the Taguchi method: a phantom study with clinical verification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1287–1295PubMedCrossRef
9.
Iwachow P, Miechowicz I, Kalmucki P, Dziki B, Szyszka A, Baszko A, Siminiak T (2017) Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1297–1303PubMedCrossRef
10.
De Angelis C, Sardanelli F, Perego M, Ali M, Casilli F, Inglese L, Mauri G (2017) Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography as an option for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1655–1662PubMedCrossRef
11.
Fam JM, Ishibashi Y, Felix C, Zhang BC, Diletti R, Mieghem N van, Regar E, Domburg R van, Onuma Y, Geuns R-J van (2017) Conformability in everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds compared with metal platform coronary stents in long lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1863–1871PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Ge Z, Liu Z-Z, Kan J, Zhang J-J, Li S-J, Tian N-L, Ye F, Qian X-S, Yang S, Chen M-X, Rab T-S, Chen S-L (2017) Stent fracture is associated with a higher mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes treated by implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1873–1881PubMedCrossRef
13.
Yesin M, Cagdas M, Kalcik M, Uluganyan M, Efe SC, Rencuzogullari I, Karabag Y, Gursoy MO, Karakoyun S (2017) Comparison of syntax score and syntax score II to predict “no reflow phenomenon” in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1883–1889PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ramalho AR, Marques JS, Pêgo GM (2017) Disruption of bioresorbable vascular scaffold struts due to loss of radial integrity: insights from optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(3):311–312PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zeng Y, Cavalcante R, Tenekecioglu E, Suwannasom P, Sotomi Y, Collet C et al (2017) Comparative assessment of “plaque/media” change on three modalities of IVUS immediately after implantation of either everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold or everolimus-eluting metallic stent in Absorb II study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(4):441–449PubMedCrossRef
16.
Tenekecioglu E, Bourantas CV, Onuma Y, Serruys PW (2017) Sealing of calcified plaques after bioresorbable scaffold implantations: a five-year follow up. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(4):451–452PubMedCrossRef
17.
Shen L, Wu Y, Ge L, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Qian J et al (2017) A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1473–1481PubMedCrossRef
18.
Sato T, Jose J, El-Mawardy M, Sulimov DS, Tölg R, Richardt G et al (2017) Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):145–152PubMedCrossRef
19.
Sato T, Jose J, El-Mawardy M, Sulimov DS, Tölg R, Richardt G et al (2017) Neointimal response to everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted at bifurcating coronary segments: insights from optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):169–175PubMedCrossRef
20.
Costa JR, Chamié D, Abizaid AAC, Ribeiro E, Meireles GC, Prudente M et al (2017) Intravascular imaging comparison of two metallic limus-eluting stents abluminally coated with biodegradable polymers: IVUS and OCT results of the DESTINY trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):161–168PubMedCrossRef
21.
Ohtani H, Kimura S, Sugiyama T, Hishikari K, Misawa T, Mizusawa M et al (2017) Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):177–186PubMedCrossRef
22.
Sabbah M, Kadota K, El-Eraky A, Kamal HM, Abdellah A-T, El Hawary A (2017) Comparison of in-stent neoatherosclerosis and tissue characteristics between early and late in-stent restenosis in second-generation drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1463–1472PubMedCrossRef
23.
Song L, Mintz GS, Yin D, Yamamoto MH, Chin CY, Matsumura M et al (2017) Neoatherosclerosis assessed with optical coherence tomography in restenotic bare metal and first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(8):1115–1124PubMedCrossRef
24.
Takahara M, Kitahara H, Nishi T, Miura K, Miyayama T, Sugimoto K et al (2017) Very early tissue coverage after drug-eluting stent implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(1):25–30PubMedCrossRef
25.
Li Z, Wang L, Hu X, Zhang P, Chen Y, Liu X et al (2017) Intravascular ultrasound elastography analysis of the elastic mechanical properties of atherosclerotic plaque. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(11):1663–1671PubMedCrossRef
26.
Minami Y, Hoyt T, Phipps JE, Milner TE, Xing L, Lee H et al (2017) Lipid-lowering therapy stabilizes the complexity of non-culprit plaques in human coronary artery: a quantitative assessment using OCT bright spot algorithm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(4):453–461PubMedCrossRef
27.
Her A-Y, Cho KI, Singh GB, An DS, Jeong Y-H, Koo B-K et al (2017) Plaque characteristics and inflammatory markers for the prediction of major cardiovascular events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1445–1454PubMedCrossRef
28.
Timmins LH, Molony DS, Eshtehardi P, Rasoul-Arzrumly E, Lam A, Hung OY et al (2017) Quantification of the focal progression of coronary atherosclerosis through automated co-registration of virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound imaging data. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(1):13–24PubMedCrossRef
29.
Shiratori Y, Watanabe M, Suzuki N, Fukusato T, Kozuma K (2017) Quantified coronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography signal analysis for the evaluation of erythrocyte-rich thrombus: ex-vivo validation study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(5):587–594PubMedCrossRef
30.
Gnanadesigan M, Hussain AS, White S, Scoltock S, Baumbach A, Steen AFW van der et al (2017) Optical coherence tomography attenuation imaging for lipid core detection: an ex-vivo validation study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(1):5–11PubMedCrossRef
31.
Tenekecioglu E, Torii R, Bourantas C, Miyazaki Y, Collet C, Al-Lameé R et al (2017) The effect of strut thickness on shear stress distribution in a preclinical model. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(11):1675–1676PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Tenekecioglu E, Sotomi Y, Torii R, Bourantas C, Miyazaki Y, Collet C et al (2017) Strut protrusion and shape impact on endothelial shear stress: insights from pre-clinical study comparing mirage and absorb bioresorbable scaffolds. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(9):1313–1322PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Ryan N, Gonzalo N, Dingli P, Cruz OV, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Nombela-Franco L et al (2017) Intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention in ostial chronic total occlusions: a description of the technique and procedural results. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(6):807–813PubMedCrossRef
34.
Nakamura T, Okamura T, Fujimura T, Yamada J, Nao T, Tateishi H et al (2017) Serial changes in the three-dimensional aspect of the side-branch ostium jailed by a drug-eluting stent assessed by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(6):797–806PubMedCrossRef
35.
Nakamura D, Attizzani GF, Nishino S, Tanaka K, Soud M, Pereira GT et al (2017) New insight to estimate under-expansion after stent implantation on bifurcation lesions using optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(11):1677–1684PubMedCrossRef
36.
Ishihara M, Onoguchi M, Taniguchi Y et al (2017) Comparison of conventional and cadmium-sinc-telluride single-photon emission computed tomography for analysis of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging: an exploratory study in normal different databases for different ethnicities. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:2057PubMedCrossRef
37.
Lima R, Peclat T, Souza A et al (2017) Prognostic value of a faster, low-radiation myocardial perfusion SPECT protocol in a CZT camera. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:2049PubMedCrossRef
38.
39.
Nakanishi R, Osawa K, Ceponiene I et al (2017) The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR-CT): subanalysis from ACCURACY and VCT001 studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:2067PubMedCrossRef
40.
Lange P, Avramovic N, Frommeyer G et al (2017) Routine 18F-FDG PET/CT does not detect inflammation in the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1271–1276PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Lauridsen TK, Iversen KK, Ihleman N et al (2017) Clinical utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan vs 99 m TC-HMPA white blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography in extra-cardiac work-up of infective endocarditis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:751–760PubMedCrossRef
42.
Sengupta SP, Bansal M, Hofstra L, Sengupta PP, Narula J (2017) Gestational changes in left ventricular myocardial contractile function: new insights from two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:69–82PubMedCrossRef
43.
Cadeddu C, Piras A, Dessì M, Madeddu C, Mantovani G, Scartozzi M, Hagendorff A, Colonna P, Mercuro G (2017) Timing of the negative effects of trastuzumab on cardiac mechanics after anthracycline chemotherapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:197–207PubMedCrossRef
44.
Sitges M, Merino B, Butakoff C, de la Garza MS, Pare C, Montserrat S, Vidal B, Azqueta M, Sarquella G, Gutierrez JA, Canal R, Brugada J, Bijnens BH (2017) Characterizing the spectrum of right ventricular remodelling in response to chronic training. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:331–339PubMedCrossRef
45.
Dentamaro I, Vestito D, Michelotto E, De Santis D, Ostuni V, Cadeddu C, Colonna P (2017) Evaluation of left atrial appendage function and thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:491–498PubMedCrossRef
46.
Liu D, Hu K, Herrmann S, Cikes M, Ertl G, Weidemann F, Stork S, Nordbeck P (2017) Value of tissue Doppler-derived Tei index and two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging derived longitudinal strain on predicting outcome of patients with light-chain cardiac amyloidosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:837–845PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Tabassian M, Alessandrini M, Herbots L, Mirea O, Pagourelias ED, Jasaityte R, Engvall J, March LDE, Masetti G, D’hooge J (2017) Machine learning of the spatio-temporal characteristics of echocardiographic deformation curves for infarct classification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1159–1167PubMedCrossRef
48.
He JC, Zheng JY, Li X, Yang Y, Zhang B-Y, Chen Y, Li X-F, Liu Y-M, Cao Y, Zhao L, Li T-C (2017) Transthoracic contrast echocardiography using vitamin B6 and sodium bicarbonate as contrast agents for the diagnosis of patent foramen. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1125–1131PubMedCrossRef
49.
Scali MC, de Azevedo Bellagamba CC, Ciampi Q, Simova I, Pretto JL, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Dodi C, Caortigiani L, Zagatina A, Trambaiolo P, Torres MR, Citro R, Colonna P, Paterni M, Picano E (2017) Stress echocardiography with smartphone: real-time remote reading for regional wall motion. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1731–1736PubMedCrossRef
50.
Nadjiri J, Nieberler H, Hendrich E et al (2017) Performance of native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping to detect myocardial damage in patients with suspected myocarditis: a head-to-head comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:539–547. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10554-016-1029-3 PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
Doherty JU, Kort S, Mehran R, Schoenhagen P, Soman P. (2017) ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery., American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(13):1647–1672PubMedCrossRef
78.
Marwan M, Achenbach S, Korosoglou G, Schmermund A, Schneider S, Bruder O, Hausleiter J, Schroeder S, Barth S, Kerber S, Leber A, Moshage W, Senges J (2017) German cardiac CT registry: indications, procedural data and clinical consequences in 7061 patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10554-017-1282-0 PubMedCrossRef
79.
Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, Cheezum M, Choi AD, Han BK, Marwan M, Naoum C, Norgaard BL, Rubinshtein R, Schoenhagen P, Villines T, Leipsic J. (2016) SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(6):435–449PubMedCrossRef
80.
81.
Cao Q, Broersen A, de Graaf MA, Kitslaar PH, Yang G, Scholte AJ, Lelieveldt BPF, Reiber JHC, Dijkstra J (2017) Automatic identification of coronary tree anatomy in coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(11):1809–1819PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Morishita H, Morimoto T, Taylor CA, Kanao S, Koizumi K, Kozawa S, Morihiro K, Watanabe H, Tazaki J, Imai M, Saito N, Shizuta S, Ono K, Togashi K, Kimura T (2017) Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):271–281PubMedCrossRef
83.
Bischoff B, Deseive S, Rampp M, Todica A, Wermke M, Martinoff S, Massberg S, Reiser MF, Becker HC, Hausleiter J (2017) Myocardial ischemia detection with single-phase CT perfusion in symptomatic patients using high-pitch helical image acquisition technique. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(4):569–576PubMedCrossRef
84.
Feger S, Shaban A, Lukas S, Kendziorra C, Rief M, Zimmermann E, Dewey M (2017) Temporal averaging for analysis of four-dimensional whole-heart computed tomography perfusion of the myocardium: proof-of-concept study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(3):371–382PubMedCrossRef
85.
Pelgrim GJ, Das M, van Tuijl S, van Assen M, Prinzen FW, Stijnen M, Oudkerk M, Wildberger JE, Vliegenthart R (2017) Validation of myocardial perfusion quantification by dynamic CT in an ex-vivo porcine heart model. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(11):1821–1830PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Symons R, Cork TE, Lakshmanan MN, Evers R, Davies-Venn C, Rice KA, Thomas ML, Liu CY, Kappler S, Ulzheimer S, Sandfort V, Bluemke DA, Pourmorteza A (2017) Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(8):1253–1261PubMedCrossRef
87.
Lee HJ, Im DJ, Youn JC, Chang S, Suh YJ, Hong YJ, Kim YJ, Hur J, Choi BW (2017) Assessment of myocardial delayed enhancement with cardiac computed tomography in cardiomyopathies: a prospective comparison with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(4):577–584PubMedCrossRef
88.
Tanabe Y, Kido T, Kurata A, Fukuyama N, Yokoi T, Kido T, Uetani T, Vembar M, Dhanantwari A, Tokuyasu S, Yamashita N, Mochizuki T (2017) Impact of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction on myocardial late iodine enhancement in computed tomography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(10):1609–1618PubMedCrossRef
89.
Goitein O, Fink N, Hay I, Di Segni E, Guetta V, Goitein D, Brodov Y, Konen E, Glikson M (2017) Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(5):739–747PubMedCrossRef
90.
Collet C, Sotomi Y, Cavalcante R, Asano T, Miyazaki Y, Tenekecioglu E, Kistlaar P, Zeng Y, Suwanasson P, de Winter RJ, Nieman K, Serruys PW, Onuma Y (2017) Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for bioresorbable scaffold luminal investigation: a comparison with optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(3):431–439PubMedCrossRef
91.
Tu S, Hu F, Cai W, Xiao L, Zhang L, Zheng H, Jiang Q, Chen L (2017) Visualizing polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds with three-dimensional image reconstruction using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(5):731–737PubMedCrossRef
92.
93.
Hernández-Enríquez M, Brugaletta S, Andreu D, Macià-Muñoz G, Castrejón-Subirá M, Fernández-Suelves S, Hernández-Obiols M, Dantas AP, Freixa X, Martin-Yuste V, Camara O, Sabaté M (2017) Three-dimensional printing of an aortic model for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: possible clinical applications. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(2):283–285PubMedCrossRef
94.
Tu S, van de Hoef TP, Kim Y-H, Escaned J, Wijns W (2017) Whence we came, whither we go? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):957–959PubMedCrossRef
95.
96.
Chu M, Dai N, Yang J, Westra J, Tu S (2017) A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional fl ow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):975–990PubMedCrossRef
97.
Hennigan B, Johnson N, McClure J, Corcoran D, Watkins S, Berry C, Oldroyd KG (2017) Validation of the “smart” minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):991–997PubMedCrossRef
98.
Meimoun P, Clerc J, Ardourel D, Djou U, Martis S, Botoro T, Elmkies F, Zemir H, Luycx-Bore A, Boulanger J (2017) Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):999–1007CrossRef
99.
Yang DH, Kim Y-H (2017) CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1009–1020CrossRef
100.
Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Stuijfzand WJ, Knaapen P (2017) Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1021–1031CrossRef
101.
van de Hoef TP, Echavarría-Pinto M, Escaned J, Piek JJ (2017) Coronary flow capacity: concept, promises, and challenges. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1033–1039CrossRef
102.
Mejía-Rentería H, van der Hoeven N, van de Hoef TP, Heemelaar J, Ryan N, Lerman A, van Royen N, Escaned J (2017) Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1041–1059CrossRef
103.
Broyd CJ, Rigo F, Davies J (2017) Non-invasive coronary wave intensity analysis. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1061–1068CrossRef
104.
Kamphuis VP, Westenberg JJM, van der Palen RLF, Blom NA, de Roos A, van der Geest R, Elbaz MSM, Roest AAW (2017) Unravelling cardiovascular disease using four dimensional fl ow cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1069–1081CrossRef
105.
Li S, Chin C, Thondapu V, Poon EKW, Monty JP, Li Y, Ooi ASH, Tu S, Barlis P (2017) Numerical and experimental investigations of the flow–pressure relation in multiple sequential stenoses coronary artery. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1083–1088CrossRef
106.
Eshtehardi P, Brown AJ, Bhargava A, Costopoulos C, Hung OY, Corban MT, Hosseini H, Gogas BD, Giddens DP, Samady H (2017) High wall shear stress and high-risk plaque: an emerging concept. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1089–1099CrossRef
107.
Huang D, Muramatsu T, Li Y, Yang W, Nagahara Y, Chu M, Kitslaar P, Sarai M, Ozaki Y, Chatzizisis YS, Yan F, Reiber JHC, Wu R, Pu J, Tu S (2017) Assessment of endothelial shear stress in patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses using coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1101–1110CrossRef
108.
Wu X, von Birgelen C, Wijns W, Tu S (2017) Superficial wall stress assessed from 4-D analysis of coronary angiography in vivo. J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1111–1112CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
verfasst von
Johan H. C. Reiber
Amer Alaiti
Hiram G. Bezerra
Johan De Sutter
Paul Schoenhagen
Arthur E. Stillman
Nico R. L. Van de Veire
Publikationsdatum
13.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1349-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Measurement of cardiac valve and aortic blood flow velocities in stroke patients: a comparison of 4D flow MRI and echocardiography

Editorial

Superficial wall stress: the long awaited comprehensive biomechanical parameter to objectify and quantify our intuition

Original Paper

Normal pulmonary artery and branch pulmonary artery sizes in children

Original Paper

Myocardial perfusion in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 PET/CT

Images in CV Applications

Atypical presentation of a primary cardiac malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

Original Paper

Influence of iterative reconstruction on coronary calcium scores at multiple heart rates: a multivendor phantom study on state-of-the-art CT systems

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Strenge Blutdruckeinstellung lohnt auch im Alter noch

30.04.2024 Arterielle Hypertonie Nachrichten

Ältere Frauen, die von chronischen Erkrankungen weitgehend verschont sind, haben offenbar die besten Chancen, ihren 90. Geburtstag zu erleben, wenn ihr systolischer Blutdruck < 130 mmHg liegt. Das scheint selbst für 80-Jährige noch zu gelten.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Dihydropyridin-Kalziumantagonisten können auf die Nieren gehen

30.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Im Vergleich zu anderen Blutdrucksenkern sind Kalziumantagonisten vom Diyhdropyridin-Typ mit einem erhöhten Risiko für eine Mikroalbuminurie und in Abwesenheit eines RAS-Blockers auch für ein terminales Nierenversagen verbunden.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise