nach oben

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.09.2011 | Review

Cephalometric Methods of Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery

verfasst von: Olga-Elpis Kolokitha, Nikolaos Topouzelis

Erschienen in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Over the past decade the growing number of adult patients seeking for orthodontic treatment made orthognathic surgery popular. Surgical and orthodontic techniques have developed to the point where combined orthodontic and surgical treatment is now feasible to manage dentofacial deformity problems very satisfactorily. The prediction of orthognathic treatment outcome is an important part of orthognathic planning and the process of patient’ inform consent. The predicted results must be presented to the patients prior to treatment in order to assess the treatment’s feasibility, optimize case management and increase patient understanding and acceptance of the recommended treatment. Cephalometrics is a routine part of the diagnosis and treatment planning process and also allows the clinician to evaluate changes following orthognathic surgery. Traditionally cephalometry has been employed manually; nowadays computerized cephalometric systems are very popular. Cephalometric prediction in orthognathic surgery can be done manually or by computers, using several currently available software programs, alone or in combination with video images. Both manual and computerized cephalometric prediction methods are two-dimensional and cannot fully describe three-dimensional phenomena. Today, three-dimensional prediction methods are available, such as three-dimensional computerized tomography (3DCT), 3D magnetic resonance imaging (3DMRI) and surface scan/cone-beam CT. The aim of this article is to present and discuss the different methods of cephalometric prediction of the orthognathic surgery outcome.

Tucker MR (1995) Orthognathic surgery versus orthodontic camouflage in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:572–578PubMedCrossRef

Bailey LJ, Haltiwanger LH, Blakey GH, Proffit WR (2001) Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment: a current review. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 16:280–292

Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C (2007) The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension. Head Face Med 30:3–21

Proffit WR, White RP Jr (1990) Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 5:81–89

Musich DR (1994) Orthodontics orthognathic surgery: Principles of combined treatment. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL (eds) Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp 838–841

Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C (1996) Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 11:191–204

Olson RE, Laskin DM (1980) Expectations of patients from orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:283–295PubMed

Mayo KH, Vig KD, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ, Mayo KH (1991) Attitude variables of dentofacial deformity patients: demographic characteristics and associations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:594–602PubMedCrossRef

Finlay PM, Atkinson JM, Moos KF (1995) Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:9–14PubMedCrossRef

10.

Athanasiou AE, Melsen B, Eriksen J (1989) Concerns, motivation and experience of orthognathic surgery patients: A retrospective study of 152 patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 4:47–55

11.

Ostler S, Kiyak HA, Ostler S (1991) Treatment expectations versus outcomes among orthognathic surgery patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 6:247–255PubMed

12.

Rivera SM, Hatch JP, Dolce C, Bays RA, Van Sickels JE, Rugh JD (2000) Patients’ own reasons and patient-perceived recommendations for orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:134–140PubMedCrossRef

13.

Williams DM, Bentley R, Cobourne MT, Gibilaro A, Good S, Huppa C, Matthews NS, O’Higgins E, Patel S, Newton JT (2009) Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery: comparison with untreated controls. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:191–195PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kiyak HA, Bell R (1991) Psychosocial considerations in surgery and orthodontics. In: Proffit WR, White RP (eds) Surgical-orthodontic treatment. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp 71–89

15.

Scott AA, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Hoffman TJ, Rivera SM, Dolce C, Bays RA (2000) Psychosocial predictors of satisfaction among orthognathic surgery patients. Int JAdult Orthod Orthognath Surg 15:7–15

16.

Gerzanic L, Jagsch R, Watzke IM (2002) Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class II or class III malocclusion. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 17:75–81

17.

Lazaridou-Terzoudi T, Kiyak HA, Moore R, Athanasiou AE, Melsen B (2003) Long term assessment of psychologic outcomes of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:545–552PubMedCrossRef

18.

Hugo B, Becker S, Witt E (1996) Assessment of the combined orthodontic- surgical treatment from the patients’ point of view. J Orofac Orthop 57:88–101PubMedCrossRef

19.

Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Clark GM, Keeling SD, Tiner BD, Bays RA (1998) Health-related quality of life following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13:67–77

20.

Proffit WR, Sarver DM (2003) Treatment planning: Optimizing benefit to the patient In: Proffit WR, White RP Jr, Sarver DM (eds) Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. Mosby Inc, St Louis, pp 172–244

21.

Esperao PT, de Oliveira BH, de Oliveira Almeida MA, Kiyak HA, Miguel JA (2010) Oral health-related quality of life in orthognathic surgery patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:790–795PubMedCrossRef

22.

Sarver DM (1998) Videocephalometric treatment prediction. In: Sarver DM (ed) Estetics orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Mosby Inc, St Louis, pp 61–89

23.

Cohen MI (1965) Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 51:368–379PubMedCrossRef

24.

McNeill RW, Proffit WR, White RP (1972) Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod 42:154–164PubMed

25.

Henderson D (1974) The assessment, management of bony deformities of the middle, lower face. Br J Plast Surg 66:378–396

26.

Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Spiedel TM (1976) Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: Profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod 46:1–25PubMed

27.

Hohl TH, Wolford LM, Epker BN, Fonseca RJ (1978) Craniofacial osteotomies: A photocephalometric technique for the prediction and evaluation of tissue changes. Angle Orthod 48:114–125

28.

Fish LC, Epker BN (1980) Surgical-orthodontic cephalometric prediction tracing. J Clin Orthod 14:36–52PubMed

29.

Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ (1977) Bioprogressive therapy: Part 2-principles of the therapy. J Clin Ortodod 11:661–668

30.

Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ (1977) Bioprogressive therapy: Part 2-principles of the therapy. J Clin Ortodod 11:744–763

31.

Moshiri F, Jung ST, Sclaroff A, Marsh JL, Gay DW (1982) Orthognathic and craniofacial surgical diagnosis and treatment planning: A visual approach. J Clin Orthod 16:37–59PubMed

32.

Harris MC (1972) Soft tissue effects of surgical anterior maxillary retraction, thesis. University of Kentaki, Louisville

33.

Wolford LM, Hilliard FW, Dugan DJ (1985) Surgical treatment objective. A systematic approach to the prediction tracing. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp 54–74

34.

Proffit WR (1991) Treatment planning: The search for wisdom. In: Proffit WR, White RP (eds) Surgical orthodontic treatment. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, pp 142–191

35.

Jensen AC, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM (1992) Soft tissue changes associated with double jaw surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:266–275CrossRef

36.

Gossett CB, Preston CB, Dunford R, Lampasso J (2005) Prediction accuracy of computer-assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:609–617PubMedCrossRef

37.

Sarver DM (1998) The technology and mechanics of videocephalometrics. In: Sarver DM (ed) Estetics orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Mosby Inc, St Louis, pp 89–134

38.

Athanasiou AE, Kragskov J (1995) Computerized cephalometric systems. In: Athanasiou AE (ed) Orthodontic cephalometry. Mosby-Wolfe, London, pp 231–239

39.

Bhatia SN, Sowray JH (1984) A computer-aided design for orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:237–253PubMedCrossRef

40.

Engel GA, Quan RE, Chaconas ST (1979) Soft tissue change as a result of maxillary surgery. A preliminary study. Am J Orthod 75:291–300PubMedCrossRef

41.

Harradine NWT, Burnie DJ (1985) Computerized prediction of the results of orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 13:245–249PubMedCrossRef

42.

Walters H, Walters HD (1986) Computerized planning of maxillofacial osteotomies: The program and its clinical applications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:178–189PubMedCrossRef

43.

Freihofer HPM (1984) Latitude and limitations of midface movements. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:393–413PubMedCrossRef

44.

Kaipatur N, Al-Thomali Y, Flores-Mir C (2009) Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery hard tissue response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1628–1639PubMedCrossRef

45.

Seeholzer H, Walker R (1991) Orthodontic and oral surgical treatment planning by computer, for example, the dentofacial planners (I). Quintessenz 42:59–67PubMed

46.

Seeholzer H, Walker R (1991) Orthodontic and oral surgical treatment planning by computer, for example, the dentofacial planners (II). Quintessenz 2:257–262

47.

Coursley RRJ, Grant E (2004) The accuracy of preoperative orthognathic predictions. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:96–104CrossRef

48.

Power G, Breckon J, Sherriff M, McDonald F (2005) Dolphin imaging software: An analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:619–626PubMedCrossRef

49.

Kusnoto B (2007) Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning. Clin Plast Surg 34:417–422PubMedCrossRef

50.

Sarver DM, Johnston MW, Matukas VJ (1988) Video imaging for planning and counseling in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:939–945PubMedCrossRef

51.

Talahashi I, Talahashi T, Hamada M, Kawamoto T, Kinoshita Z, Kubo Y, Kakudo K, Shirasu R (1989) Application of video surgery to orthodontic diagnosis. Int j Orthod Orthogn Surg 4:219–222

52.

Sarver DM, Johnston MW (1990) Video imaging: techniques for superimposition of cephalometric radiography and profile images. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:241–248PubMed

53.

Grubb JE (1992) Computer assisted orthognathic surgical treatment planning: a case report. Angle Orthod 62:227–234PubMed

54.

Sarver DM (1998) Videocephalometric treatment prediction. In: Sarver DM (ed) Estetics orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Mosby Inc, St Louis, pp 89–134

55.

Sarver DM (1993) Video imaging, a computer facilitated approach to communication and planning in orthognathic surgery. Br J Orthod 20:187–191PubMed

56.

Phillips C (1984) Photocephalometry: errors of projection and landmark location. Am J Orthod 86:233–243PubMedCrossRef

57.

Rakosi T (2010) Therapeutic diagnosis. In: Racosi T, Graber TM (eds) Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatment. Thieme, New York, pp 1–17

58.

Pospisil OA (1987) Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 15:79–83PubMedCrossRef

59.

Konstiantos KA, O’Reilly MT, Close J (1994) The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after Le Fort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner (computer software). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 105:241–249CrossRef

60.

Eales EA, Newton C, Jones ML, Sugar A (1994) The accuracy of computerized prediction of the soft tissue profile: a study of 25 patients treated by means of the Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 9:141–152

61.

Eales EA, Jones ML, Newton C, Sugar AW (1995) A study of the accuracy of predicted soft tissue changes produced by a computer software package (COG 3.4) in a series of patients treated by the Le Fort I osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:362–369PubMedCrossRef

62.

Sameshima GT, Kawakami RK, Kaminishi RM, Sinclair PM (1997) Predicting soft tissue changes in maxillary impaction surgery: A comparison of two video imaging systems. Angle Orthod 67:347–354PubMed

63.

Csaszar GR, Brüker-Csaszar B, Niederdellmann H (1999) Prediction of soft tissue profiles in orthodontic surgery with the dentofacial planner. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14:285–290

64.

Jones RM, Khambay BS, McHugh S, Ayoub AF (2007) The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:900–908PubMedCrossRef

65.

Kolokitha OE, Athanasiou AE, Tuncay O (1996) Validity of computerized predictions of dentoskeletal and soft tissue profile changes after mandibular setback and maxillary impaction osteotomies. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 11:137–154

66.

Curtis TJ, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Southard TE (2000) Accuracy of a computerized method of predicting soft tissue changes from orthognathic surgery. J Clin Orthod 34:524–530PubMed

67.

Jacobson R, Sarver DM (2001) The predictability of maxillary repositioning in Le Fort I orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:142–154CrossRef

68.

Kolokitha OE (2007) Validity of a manual soft tissue profile prediction method following mandibular setback osteotomy. Eur J Dent 1:202–211PubMed

69.

Donatsky O, Bjørn-Jørgensen J, Hermund NU, Nielsen H, Holmqvist-Larsen M, Nerder PH (2010) Immediate postoperative outcome of orthognathic surgical planning, and prediction of positional changes in hard and soft tissue, independently of the extent and direction of the surgical corrections required. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (in press)

70.

Kaipatur NR, Flores-Mir C (2009) Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery soft tissue response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:751–759PubMedCrossRef

71.

Harrell WE Jr, Hatcher DC, Bolt RL (2002) In search of anatomic truth: 3-dimensional digital modelling and the future. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:325–330CrossRef

72.

Popat H, Richmond ST (2010) New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. J Ortho 37:62–71CrossRef

73.

Gateno J (2011) New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:606–622PubMedCrossRef

74.

Bergensen EO (1980) Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables fro linear measurements. Angle Orthod 50:230–244

75.

Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U (1983) The cephalometric projection: part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 12:101–108PubMed

76.

Hwang H-S, Hwang CH, Lee K-H, Kang B-C (2006) Maxillofacial 3- dimensional image for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Dentofacial Orthop 130:779–785CrossRef

77.

Cutting CC, Bookstein FL, Crayson B, Fellingham L, McCarthy JG (1986) Three-dimensional computer assisted design of craniofacial surgical procedures: optimization and interaction with cephalometric and CT-based models. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:877–887PubMedCrossRef

78.

Moss JP, Grindrod SR, Linney AD, Janes D (1988) A computer system for the interactive planning and prediction of maxillofacial surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 94:469–475CrossRef

79.

Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Berge SJ (2010) Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013

80.

Groeve PD, Schutyser F, Cleynen–Breugel JV, Suetens P (2001) Registration of 3D photographs with spiral CT images for soft tissue simulation in maxillofacial surgery. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2208:991–996CrossRef

81.

Khambay B, Nebel JC, Bowman J, Walker F, Hadley DM, Ayoub A (2002) 3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3DCT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. A pilot study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 17:331–341PubMed

82.

Maal TJ, Plooij JM, Rangel FA, Mollemans W, Schutyser FA, Berge SJ (2008) The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:641–646PubMedCrossRef

83.

Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F, Neyt N, Casselman J, Schutyser F (2009) A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 20:297–307PubMedCrossRef

84.

Swenner GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F (2009) Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2080–2092CrossRef

85.

Swennen GR, Schutyser FAC (2006) Three-dimensional virtual approach to diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillofacial deformity. In: Bell WH, Guerrero CA (eds) Distraction osteogenesis of the facial skeleton. BC Decker Inc, Hamilton

86.

Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B, Kamaci S, Kocadereli I (2007) Use of three-dimensional medical modeling methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 18:740–747PubMedCrossRef

87.

Ayoub AF, Xiao Y, Khambay B, Siebert JP, Hadley D (2007) Towards building a photo–realistic virtual human face for craniomaxillofacial diagnosis and treatment planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:423–428PubMedCrossRef

88.

Nakasima A, Terajima M, Mori N, Hoshino Y, Tokumori K, Aoki Y, Hashimoto S (2005) Three-dimensional computer-generated head model reconstructed from cephalograms, facial photographs, and dental cast models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:282–292PubMedCrossRef

89.

Van Vlijmen OJ (2010) A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:156–160PubMedCrossRef

90.

Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S (1997) Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:111–116PubMedCrossRef

91.

Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Landellotti L, Amadori S, Sarti A, Marchetti C (2010) Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1471–1479PubMedCrossRef

92.

Mollemans W, Schutyser F, Nadjmi N, Maes F, Suetens P (2007) Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: from computational strategies to a complete clinical validation. Med Image Anal 11:282–301PubMedCrossRef

93.

Proffit WR (2000) The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 12:46–49PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Cephalometric Methods of Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery
verfasst von: Olga-Elpis Kolokitha
Nikolaos Topouzelis
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0228-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

A Rare Case of Orbital Cellulitis Followed by Therapeutic(Orthodontic) Extraction

The Role of Systemic Condition in the Management of Maxillofacial Infections

Congenital Nasopharyngeal Teratoma with a Cleft Palate: Case Report and a 7 Year Follow Up

Are People Aware of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in India?

Management of Medical Records: Facts and Figures for Surgeons

Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma

Update Chirurgie