Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Letter to the Editor

ChatGPT: when the artificial intelligence meets standardized patients in clinical training

verfasst von: Xiaoni Liu, Chaoling Wu, Rui Lai, Hai Lin, Yiying Xu, Yuansheng Lin, Weilong Zhang

Erschienen in: Journal of Translational Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2023

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
Xiaoni Liu and Chaoling Wu have contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
SP
Standardized patients
Letter to the editor:
Standardized patients (SP) were an effective and important program to help medical students develop communication skills [1]. Compared with the low-fidelity manikin, the SP group had significantly higher test scores and communication skills [2]. Artificial intelligence (AI) helps guide medical decisions that benefit individuals and populations and provides insights for optimizing various systems such as public health [3]. Since the release of the chat robot ChatGPT, this artificial intelligence technology has clearly had a significant impact on the way humans work [4]. Due to the importance of SP in clinical training and education, we collected 10 patient histories related to clinical training and education using ChatGPT, and evaluated them by senior physicians to verify the accuracy of the information generated by ChatGPT simulating SP.
We provided 10 cases (11 to 15 questions for each case) to ChatGPT (ChatGPT-3.5-turbo, mode) and collected the medical histories of these 10 patients through ChatGPT simulating SP. Based on the answers provided by ChatGPT to each question, then we asked 5 senior physicians to evaluate their accuracy. Senior physicians independently evaluated the accuracy score (0–10 points) of each case and summarized them together.
We used the standardized training exam for resident doctors in Jiangxi Province as an example, and drew the flowchart of SP and ChatGPT simulating SP training respectively (Fig. 1A). Compared with real SP, ChatGPT simulating SP could eliminate the need for complex steps 1–6, meaning that ChatGPT simulating SP did not need to prepare medical records or additional training and could be used directly, saving a lot of time, manpower and resources. After evaluation of 5 senior physicians, out of 10 cases, 2 were rated as 10 points and 6 were rated as 9 points, the remaining 2 cases were rated as 8 points (Fig. 1B). ChatGPT simulating SP played a good role in all stages of consultation. For example, case 4 had 13 questions and an evaluation score of 10 (Fig. 2). Firstly, ChatGPT simulating SP was highly intelligent. When ChatGPT met different cases, it could quickly combine the patient's chief complaints and give appropriate and correct answers. Secondly, ChatGPT simulating SP responses were colloquial. When ChatGPT was responding to a doctor’s query, it answered the questions in a tone close to that of the patient, such as in questions 2 and 6. Thirdly, ChatGPT simulating SP’s responses were vivid and accurate. When ChatGPT described symptoms, it would use vivid words and answer accurately, as demonstrated in question 7. However, ChatGPT simulating SP’s responses were mechanical and rigid occasionally when we asked more than one question at a time, such as in cases 9 and 12. The descriptions of symptoms reached the level of our clinical skills training and SP simulation in the test station. In general, ChatGPT can simulate the complete medical record interrogation mode without disconnection and can be applied to the SP interrogation mode.
In the past few years, ChatGPT has already impacted and made progress in many fields, such as healthcare and education [5]. Nevertheless, ChatGPT has not been reported on simulating SP. In our study, ChatGPT had several advantages in simulating SP. ChatGPT simulating SP was able to combine themes and responded intelligently, colloquially, vividly and accurately, enabling it to play various patient roles. However, there were also some drawbacks, such as ChatGPT simulation of SP's responses being mechanical and rigid occasionally.
Therefore, our results showed that ChatGPT simulating SP could assist in clinical training and education, thereby more effectively guiding doctors' clinical skills, optimizing the education system, and improving medical skills. Meanwhile, it could alleviate the problem of human resource shortage when training real SP. Of course, the problems and limitations of ChatGPT simulating SP required us to maintain criticism, continuously improve and optimize during the use process.
In the future, we look forward to ChatGPT being applied as an SP in our medical education and training. Of course, to ensure the optimal integration of artificial intelligence-based learning tools in medical education, further research and evaluation are still needed.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kucukkelepce GE, Dinc L, Elcin M. Effects of using standardized patients on nursing students’ moral skills. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(7):1587–602.CrossRefPubMed Kucukkelepce GE, Dinc L, Elcin M. Effects of using standardized patients on nursing students’ moral skills. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(7):1587–602.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Altun S, Tastan S. Low-fidelity simulation vs. standardized patients in prevention and management of pressure injury education. J Tissue Viability. 2022;31(4):643–8.CrossRefPubMed Altun S, Tastan S. Low-fidelity simulation vs. standardized patients in prevention and management of pressure injury education. J Tissue Viability. 2022;31(4):643–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorr DA, Adams L, Embí P. Harnessing the promise of artificial intelligence responsibly. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1347–8.CrossRefPubMed Dorr DA, Adams L, Embí P. Harnessing the promise of artificial intelligence responsibly. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1347–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dis EAM, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting CL. ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature. 2023;614(7947):224–6.CrossRefPubMed van Dis EAM, Bollen J, Zuidema W, van Rooij R, Bockting CL. ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature. 2023;614(7947):224–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Preiksaitis C, Sinsky CA, Rose C. ChatGPT is not the solution to physicians’ documentation burden. Nat Med. 2023;29(6):1296–7.CrossRefPubMed Preiksaitis C, Sinsky CA, Rose C. ChatGPT is not the solution to physicians’ documentation burden. Nat Med. 2023;29(6):1296–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
ChatGPT: when the artificial intelligence meets standardized patients in clinical training
verfasst von
Xiaoni Liu
Chaoling Wu
Rui Lai
Hai Lin
Yiying Xu
Yuansheng Lin
Weilong Zhang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Translational Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1479-5876
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04314-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Journal of Translational Medicine 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

RAS-Blocker bei Hyperkaliämie möglichst nicht sofort absetzen

14.05.2024 Hyperkaliämie Nachrichten

Bei ausgeprägter Nierenfunktionsstörung steigen unter der Einnahme von Renin-Angiotensin-System(RAS)-Hemmstoffen nicht selten die Serumkaliumspiegel. Was in diesem Fall zu tun ist, erklärte Prof. Jürgen Floege beim diesjährigen Allgemeinmedizin-Update-Seminar.

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Battle of Experts: Sport vs. Spritze bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes

11.05.2024 DDG-Jahrestagung 2024 Kongressbericht

Im Battle of Experts traten zwei Experten auf dem Diabeteskongress gegeneinander an: Die eine vertrat die Auffassung „Sport statt Spritze“ bei Adipositas und Typ-2-Diabetes, der andere forderte „Spritze statt Sport!“ Am Ende waren sie sich aber einig: Die Kombination aus beidem erzielt die besten Ergebnisse.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.