Introduction
Stress affects various parts of our body and causes diverse physiological changes, which are manifested in symptoms such as headache, stomachache, heartburn, fatigue, overeating, or undereating. Severe and long-lasting adverse effects induced by stress include insomnia, anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder [
1,
2]. These physiological outcomes of psychological stress are mainly caused by stress hormones [
2]. Stress stimulates the hypothalamus to release corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) into the portal vein. CRH induces anterior pituitary to release adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). ACTH affects the adrenal cortex and increases synthesis and release of corticosteroids. Corticosteroids include glucocorticoids, which regulate glucose metabolism, and mineralocorticoids, which regulate water balance and blood pressure. The major glucocorticoid is cortisol in humans and corticosterone (CORT) in rodents. CORT delivered with blood causes diverse stress responses in tissues and returns to the hypothalamus and pituitary for a negative feedback on CRH and ACTH secretion [
3‐
6].
To recapitulate psychological stress in animal models, several procedures have been developed, including unpredictable chronic stress, chronic restraint stress (CRS), and chronic administration of CORT [
7‐
9]. CRS has been widely used as a model of chronic psychoemotional stress to induce depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors, learning and memory deficits, and hippocampal neuronal damage in mice [
10,
11]. One of the most vulnerable targets of stress is hippocampus, because it abundantly expresses both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors [
12,
13]. Stress changes hippocampal neural activity and synaptic plasticity, activates hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and decreases neuronal cell survival and neurogenesis [
14‐
16]. Prolonged exposure to CORT also causes hippocampal neuronal damage and impairs hippocampal neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and learning in neuronal cultures and in mice [
17‐
19].
Insulin signaling is important for the development and cognitive function of the hippocampus [
20‐
22]. Insulin receptor (IR) is abundantly distributed in the hippocampus, and insulin binds to IR to initiate insulin/IR signaling [
23]. Insulin signaling mediates neuronal development, feeding behavior, and cognitive processes [
24]. Attenuated insulin production and IR activity result in learning and memory formation deficits [
25], and deletion of brain IR leads to augmented anxiety, depressive-like behavior, and deficits in long-term memory [
26,
27]. Blockade of IR or downstream signaling molecules such as phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) impairs hippocampal memory function [
28,
29], whereas intrahippocampal insulin microinjection improves spatial memory [
29].
Activated IR recruits and phosphorylates substrate adaptors such as the family of insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins. IRS-1 is a major IR substrate and a key mediator in insulin signaling. IRS-1 acts as a docking protein between the IR and intracellular signaling molecules that mediate metabolism and growth [
30]. PI3K binds to activated IRS proteins and activates Akt kinase, which plays a critical role in cell survival. Akt also activates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which promotes protein synthesis and attenuates autophagy [
31‐
33]. To target the insulin signaling pathway for the improvement of cognitive function, previous studies have tested intranasal insulin delivery to healthy subjects and showed an improvement in learning and memory in mice [
34,
35] and in humans [
36,
37]. However, only a few studies associated CORT with insulin resistance in the brain [
38‐
40], and our understanding of the mechanisms of the effects of CORT on hippocampus, especially on insulin signaling in the hippocampus, is still lacking. Also, so far, there have been only a limited number of studies that examined the protective effects of insulin signaling potentiation against stress-induced hippocampal impairment [
41].
Another unanswered question is how CORT induces neurotoxicity. One possible mechanism is that it induces apoptosis [
17,
42]. However, it has not been thoroughly examined whether other modes of cell death, such as autophagic cell death, are also involved in CORT-induced neurotoxicity. Autophagy (self-eating) is an essential cellular process characterized by bulk degradation of unnecessary or dysfunctional intracellular components at basal state and under physiologically stress [
43]. Double-membrane structures, autophagosomes, engulf portions of the cytosol containing intracellular components and fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes where cargoes are degraded by acidic lysosomal hydrolases [
44]. Autophagy helps cells to cope with stress by providing metabolic intermediates and thereby contributes to cell survival [
44,
45]. On the other hand, excessive autophagy can lead to cell death [
46,
47]. Autophagic cell death is defined as cell death with increased autophagic flux without the features of apoptosis or necrosis, and when cell death is prevented by suppression of autophagy [
48‐
50].
Type II microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3-II) is a well-known biochemical marker of autophagy [
51,
52]. LC3 is proteolytically cleaved immediately after its synthesis and becomes LC3-I. Cytosolic LC3-I is recruited to the autophagosome membrane, where it is conjugated with phosphatidylethanolamine and is converted into LC3-II [
53]. The ubiquitin-binding protein p62 binds LC3-II and serves as a linker between LC3 and cargoes. Therefore, p62 is degraded together with the cargo molecules and a decrease in p62 level can be another marker of autophagy flux [
54].
In this study, we show that CRS impairs insulin signaling in the mouse hippocampus and thereby induces deficits in hippocampal function, whereas intranasal insulin delivery prevents insulin signaling impairment and repairs hippocampal deficits. CORT treatment of primary hippocampal neurons in vitro recapitulates the impairment of insulin signaling with an increase in autophagy.
Methods
Animals and CRS procedure
All procedures that involved laboratory animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the DGIST.
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 N mice were housed with a 12:12 h light-dark cycle (lights on 07:00 to 19:00) with 22–24°C temperature, 40–60% humidity, and food and water were supplied ad libitum. Four male mice were housed in each cage until six-weeks old, and individually housed for a week and handled daily for acclimation for another week before experiments. Mice were randomly divided into the control (Ctrl) and stressed groups. Mice of the stressed group were horizontally immobilized for 6 h/day (from 10:00 to 16:00) in the acrylic cylindrical flat-bottom head-first restrainer (Φ25 × {H}90 mm, Jeungdo Bio & Plant Co., Seoul, Korea) for 2 weeks in their home cages. Restrainer has several slots to restrain the mouse firmly according to the size of each mouse, and suppresses the physical movement of the limbs without causing pain. After being restrained, mice were released back into their home cages immediately. Non-restraint mice (Ctrl) remained in their home cages without CRS procedure, and both Ctrl and CRS mice could not access food and water during the period of CRS exposure. The weight of the mice was measured every week before the experiment.
Reagents and antibodies
Corticosterone (Sigma-Aldrich, 27840), staurosporine (STS; Cell Signaling Technology, 9953), bafilomycin A1 (Sigma-Aldrich, B1793), insulin-FITC (Sigma-Aldrich, I3661), methyl cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, M0512), sodium borohydride (Sigma-Aldrich, 213462), and insulin (Roche Diagnostics, 11 376 497 001) were purchased from the indicated companies. Antibodies against IR subunit β (3025), p-Akt-S473 (9271), Akt (9272), p-mTOR-S2448 (2971), mTOR (2972), and cleaved caspase-3 (C.Casp-3; 9664) were purchased form Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies against p-IRS1-Y612 (Invitrogen, 44-816G), IRS1 (Invitrogen, PA1–1057), GR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-56851), LC3 (Novus, NB100–2220), p62 (Sigma-Aldrich, P0067) and β-actin-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, SC-47778) were purchased from the indicated companies.
Hippocampal neuron culture
Primary hippocampal neurons were obtained from C57BL/6 N mice on embryonic day 17. Briefly, hippocampi were dissociated in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (Invitrogen, 14175–095) and maintained in a Neurobasal Medium (Gibco, 21103–049) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone, SV30010), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, 25030–081), and 2% B27 supplement (Invitrogen, 17504–044). After 3 days, one-third of the medium was replaced with medium containing cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (Sigma-Aldrich, C1768; final concentration, 3 μM). After 4 days, one-third of the medium was replaced with fresh medium without cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside and cultures were used for experiments on day 11 or 12 days.
Cell death assay
Cell death was assessed by dual staining of cells with the membrane-permeable dye Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen, H1399) to stain all cells and with the membrane-impermeable dye propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich, P4170) to stain dead cells. The percentage of cell death (%) was calculated by dividing the number of red-positive (PI) cells by that of blue-positive (Hoechst 33342) cells.
Confirmation of intranasal delivery of insulin into the hippocampus using insulin-FITC
Insulin-FITC reconstituted in 0.01 N HCl was diluted in 0.9% saline with 0.001% methyl cellulose and was delivered twice into both nares: the first dose 6 h and the second dose at 1 h before sacrifice (2.5 μg/24 μl each). Control animals received 0.9% saline with 0.001% methyl cellulose.
Intranasal delivery of insulin
Mice were hand-restrained in a supine position with the neck in extension and were not anesthetized. A total of 100 μg of insulin in 20 μl of vehicle (0.9% saline with 0.001% methyl cellulose) or the same volume of vehicle alone was delivered daily into both nares simultaneously 30 min before restraint stress for 7 days.
Nest-building assay
Two nestlets were added in each cage at 16:00 on the 13th day after restraint stress and scores were measured on the 14th day (09:50) before the start of restraint stress.
Y-maze assay
Y-maze test was used to evaluate spatial working memory of the mice. The test was performed in a Y-shaped maze with three white opaque plastic arms. Mice were placed into the center of the maze and were allowed to explore the three arms freely for 6 min. Each experiment was video recorded with EthoVision software (Noldus, EthoVision XT 11.5). After exploration, alternation (%) was calculated as the number of three consecutive arm entries divided by the number of possible alternations (total arm entries minus two).
CORT level measurement
Mouse blood serum samples were acquired on the 14th day 30 min after the end of stress from the submandibular vein using animal lancets. Blood CORT levels were measured using an ELISA kit (Enzo Life Sciences, ADI-900-097).
Preparation of hippocampal lysates
Mice were deeply anesthetized by injecting Zoletil (40 mg/kg) and Rompun (5 mg/kg) and sacrificed by decapitation. Brains were removed, dissected, and hippocampi were isolated on ice and stored in liquid nitrogen. Hippocampi were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, R0278) containing 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Sigma-Aldrich, 78830), 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma-Aldrich, D9779), 1× protease (Thermo Scientific, 87786) and phosphatase (Thermo Scientific, 78420) inhibitor cocktails by using a 1 ml syringe with 10 strokes, and were further disrupted with Bioruptor (Cosmobio, KRB-01) for 20 min. Following centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 10 min), the supernatants were harvested and the protein concentrations were measured using a BCA protein assay reagent (Thermo Scientific, 23224).
Western blotting analysis
Harvested hippocampal neurons were lysed in RIPA buffer containing 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT and 1× protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails for 20 min on ice. Following centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 10 min), protein concentrations were measured using the BCA protein assay reagent. Typically, 30 μg of total protein of hippocampal tissue or neuron lysates was loaded per well. Proteins were electro-transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, IPVH00010) in a semidry electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad). The membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibodies. After washing, the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. After washing, the membranes were processed for analysis using a chemiluminescence detection kit (Thermo Scientific, 34080).
Immunocytochemistry
Mouse hippocampal neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Affymetrix/USB, 10857). Following blocking with 0.5% BSA, the samples were incubated overnight with cleaved caspase-3 antibody at 1:1000 dilutions and then with an anti-rabbit Alexa 488 secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711–545-152). Samples were stained with Hoechst 33342 and visualized under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 700); images were analyzed using ZEN12 software (Carl Zeiss).
Tissue histology
Mice were anesthetized by Zoletil and Rompun injection and perfused with PBS, followed by 4% PFA. Brains were then removed, post-fixed in 4% PFA for 12 h and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose until they sank to the bottom of the tube. For fluorescence microscopy, brains were frozen in optimal cutting temperature compound and cryosectioned coronally with a 30 μm thickness. Brain section coordinates were based on the mouse brain atlas [
55]. The sections were free-floated in PBS, blocked with 0.1% sodium borohydride in PBS to reduce background autofluorescence, counter stained with Hoechst 33342, and mounted. FITC-tagged insulin was visualized by a slide scanner (Zeiss, Axio Scan.Z1) and images were analyzed using ZEN12 software.
Statistical analysis
All data were obtained from at least three independent experiments and are presented as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-test. Unpaired t test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, or two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test were also used in experiments, as indicated in the figure legends. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrated that CORT induces cell death in mouse hippocampal neurons with the characteristics of autophagy rather than apoptosis. CORT was neurotoxic and impaired insulin signaling; namely, it reduced the levels of p-IRS1-Y608, p-Akt-S473, and p-mTOR-S2448 and increased the expression of IRβ. We also observed that CRS impaired insulin signaling in the mouse hippocampus, as revealed by reduced levels of p-IRS1-Y608, p-Akt-S473, and p-mTOR-S2448. Of interest, intranasal insulin delivery to CRS mice restored impaired insulin signaling and rescued hippocampal cognitive deficits, indicating that dysregulated insulin signaling underlies defective hippocampal function following psychological stress.
It remains elusive how CORT causes neuronal damage. CORT reportedly induces apoptosis in primary hippocampal neurons [
42,
64,
65], although the incidence of apoptosis in rodent chronic stress models is rare despite hippocampal volume shrinkage and neuronal loss after physiological stress [
66‐
68]. Interestingly, we observed an increase in autophagy flux, but failed to detect activation of caspase-3 in CORT-treated neurons. Moreover, a pan-caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD-FMK, did not prevent cell death after CORT treatment (data not shown). Further studies using genetic knockout mouse models with neuron-specific deletion of autophagy genes will be required to prove the autophagic nature of CORT- and CRS-induced neurotoxicity.
The molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of CORT on insulin signaling in the hippocampus are poorly understood [
38‐
40]. In this study, we revealed that CORT impaired insulin signaling in the hippocampus, which notably reduced the phosphorylation of IRS1 on Y608. This residue is considered as a PI3K-binding site [
69]. Therefore, the Y608 residue of IRS1 may be a primary target of CORT in the insulin signaling cascade.
It is an interesting question why insulin signaling is impaired in the hippocampus under psychological stress. Acute psychological stress using inescapable foot shock has no effect on the IR–IRS1–Akt pathway in the brain [
70]. Therefore, different models of stress as well as duration and strength of stress could yield different outcomes in terms of hippocampal insulin signaling.
Moosavi et al. demonstrated that CRS impaired spatial performance of mice in the Morris water maze and a high dose of insulin microinjected into the hippocampus prevented this deficit [
41]. However, intrahippocampal insulin microinjection is invasive and may result in infection and secondary tissue damage. Here, we used a less aversive and non-invasive intranasal insulin delivery procedure and confirmed successful delivery of insulin to the hippocampus within a few hours and enhanced insulin signaling in the hippocampus. Intranasal insulin administration also effectively recovered hippocampal functions, including spatial working memory and nesting behavior. This suggests that intranasal insulin administration can be a simple and convenient strategy for the therapy of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease which are also accompanied by the impairment of insulin signaling. Furthermore, intranasal insulin delivery in CRS-treated mice reduced the loss of body weight, suggesting additional benefits for other hippocampal functions, although this may be an indirect effect. On the basis of these results, we suggest that intranasal insulin delivery to the hippocampus can be applied to various neuropsychiatric disorders and neurodegenerative conditions, as it is effective for stress relief and neuroprotection, and is less aversive and easy to apply, although there is a possibility that insulin may act in other brain regions as well as hippocampus.
Although we have demonstrated that CORT impairs insulin signaling in hippocampal neurons in vitro, we have not confirmed whether CRS impairs insulin signaling in hippocampal neurons in vivo, as hippocampal tissue contains many types of cells including neural stem cells, neurons, and glia. Hence, it needs to be evaluated in which types of hippocampal cells insulin signaling is affected by CRS. Other unanswered questions include whether autophagy occurs in hippocampal neurons in vivo or how IRS1 phosphorylation on -Y608 is regulated. Nevertheless, our results indicate the potential involvement of autophagy in psychological stress-induced neuropathology and the effectiveness of insulin for neuroprotection and cure of hippocampal cognitive dysfunction.