Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review 2/2007

01.04.2007 | Original Article

Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations

verfasst von: M. R. Weinzierl, P. Reinacher, J. M. Gilsbach, V. Rohde

Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The primary objective of neurophysiologic monitoring during surgery is to avoid permanent neurological injury resulting from surgical manipulation. To prevent motor deficits, either somatosensory (SSEP) or transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) are applied. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate if the combined use of SSEP and MEP might be beneficial. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was attempted in 100 consecutive procedures, including intracranial and spinal operations. Repetitive transcranial electric motor cortex stimulation was used to elicit MEP from muscles of the upper and lower limb. Stimulation of the tibial and median nerves was performed to record SSEP. Critical SSEP/MEP changes were defined as decreases in amplitude of more than 50% or increases in latency of more than 10% of baseline values. The operation was paused or the surgical strategy was modified in every case of SSEP/MEP changes. Combined SSEP/MEP monitoring was possible in 69 out of 100 operations. In 49 of the 69 operations (71%), SSEP/ MEP were stable, and the patients remained neurologically intact. Critical SSEP/ MEP changes were seen in six operations. Critical MEP changes with stable SSEP occurred in 12 operations. Overall, critical MEP changes were recorded in 18 operations (26%). In 12 of the 18 operations, MEP recovered to some extent after modification of the surgical strategy, and the patients either showed no (n = 10) or only a transient motor deficit (n = 2). In the remaining six operations, MEP did not recover and the patients either had a transient (n = 3) or a permanent (n = 3) motor deficit. Critical SSEP changes with stable MEP were observed in two operations; both patients did not show a new motor deficit. Our data again confirm that MEP monitoring is superior to SSEP monitoring in detecting impending impairment of the functional integrity of cerebral and spinal cord motor pathways during surgery. Detection of MEP changes and adjustment of the surgical strategy might allow to prevent irreversible pyramidal tract damage. Stable SSEP/MEP recordings reassure the surgeon that motor function is still intact and surgery can be continued safely. The combined SSEP/ MEP monitoring becomes advantageous, if one modality is not recordable.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Browning JL, Heizer ML, Baskin DS (1992) Variations in corticomotor and somatosensory evoked potentials: effects of temperature, halothane anesthesia, and arterial partial pressure of CO2. Anesth Analg 74:643–648PubMedCrossRef Browning JL, Heizer ML, Baskin DS (1992) Variations in corticomotor and somatosensory evoked potentials: effects of temperature, halothane anesthesia, and arterial partial pressure of CO2. Anesth Analg 74:643–648PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970PubMedCrossRef Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Adv Neurol 63:201–214PubMed Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Adv Neurol 63:201–214PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Deletis V, Camargo AB (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 49:1488–1489PubMedCrossRef Deletis V, Camargo AB (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 49:1488–1489PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Deletis V, Sala F (2001) The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord. Ann NY Acad Sci 939:137–144PubMedCrossRef Deletis V, Sala F (2001) The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord. Ann NY Acad Sci 939:137–144PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, Mahla M, Day AL (1991) Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef Friedman WA, Chadwick GM, Verhoeven FJ, Mahla M, Day AL (1991) Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 29:83–88PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA (1985) Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 63:296–300PubMed Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA (1985) Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 63:296–300PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gugino V, Chabot RJ (1990) Somatosensory evoked potentials. Int Anesthesiol Clin 28:154–164PubMedCrossRef Gugino V, Chabot RJ (1990) Somatosensory evoked potentials. Int Anesthesiol Clin 28:154–164PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland NR (1998) Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:439–446PubMedCrossRef Holland NR (1998) Subcortical strokes from intracranial aneurysm surgery: implications for intraoperative neuromonitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:439–446PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614PubMed Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kothbauer KF, Deletis V, Epstein FJ (1998) Intraoperative monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:54–55PubMedCrossRef Kothbauer KF, Deletis V, Epstein FJ (1998) Intraoperative monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:54–55PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Krieger D, Adams HP, Albert F, von Haken M, Hacke W (1992) Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: case report. Neurosurgery 31:145–150PubMedCrossRef Krieger D, Adams HP, Albert F, von Haken M, Hacke W (1992) Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: case report. Neurosurgery 31:145–150PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang EW, Beutler AS, Chesnut RM, Patel PM, Kennelly NA, Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Garfin SR (1996) Myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring using partial neuromuscular blockade in surgery of the spine. Spine 21:1676–1686PubMedCrossRef Lang EW, Beutler AS, Chesnut RM, Patel PM, Kennelly NA, Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Garfin SR (1996) Myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring using partial neuromuscular blockade in surgery of the spine. Spine 21:1676–1686PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T (1993) Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434–440PubMed Mizoi K, Yoshimoto T (1993) Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery 33:434–440PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ (1997) The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ (1997) The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1070PubMedCrossRef Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1070PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 100:389–399PubMedCrossRef Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 100:389–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 29:171–228PubMed Neuloh G, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring for the surgery of brain tumours and vascular malformations. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 29:171–228PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343PubMedCrossRef Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb JK (1999) Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:662–664PubMedCrossRef Pelosi L, Jardine A, Webb JK (1999) Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:662–664PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091PubMedCrossRef Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT (2004) Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 54:916–924PubMedCrossRef Quinones-Hinojosa A, Alam M, Lyon R, Yingling CD, Lawton MT (2004) Transcranial motor evoked potentials during basilar artery aneurysm surgery: technique application for 30 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 54:916–924PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohde V, Krombach GA, Baumert JH, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Weinzierl M, Gilsbach JM (2003) Measurement of motor evoked potentials following repetitive magnetic motor cortex stimulation during isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 91:487–492PubMedCrossRef Rohde V, Krombach GA, Baumert JH, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Weinzierl M, Gilsbach JM (2003) Measurement of motor evoked potentials following repetitive magnetic motor cortex stimulation during isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 91:487–492PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohde V, Will BE, Hahn G, Bien S, Zentner J (1999) Motor evoked potentials during embolization of arteriovenous malformations for the detection of ischemic complications. Zentralbl Neurochir 60:74–80PubMed Rohde V, Will BE, Hahn G, Bien S, Zentner J (1999) Motor evoked potentials during embolization of arteriovenous malformations for the detection of ischemic complications. Zentralbl Neurochir 60:74–80PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J (1993) Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219–226PubMedCrossRef Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J (1993) Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219–226PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, Stephen JP, Burke DJ (1996) Variability of motor evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation. Anesth Analg 82:744–749PubMedCrossRef Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, Stephen JP, Burke DJ (1996) Variability of motor evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation. Anesth Analg 82:744–749PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou HH, Kelly PJ (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 48:1075–1080PubMedCrossRef Zhou HH, Kelly PJ (2001) Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 48:1075–1080PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations
verfasst von
M. R. Weinzierl
P. Reinacher
J. M. Gilsbach
V. Rohde
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Neurosurgical Review / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-006-0061-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Neurosurgical Review 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.