Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 4/2023

18.08.2023 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate

verfasst von: Sukhpreet Kaur Virk, Tejinder Kaur Gumber, Amit Dhawan, Ramandeep Singh Bhullar, Sarika Kapila

Erschienen in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims and Objectives

To compare the efficacy of titanium 2.0-mm curved locking strut plate and 2.0-mm straight locking miniplate with regard to their intraoperative use and the stability of fixation achieved both, clinically and radiographically.

Materials and Methods

Forty patients with 62 sites of mandibular fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation were included in the study. The sample was divided into two groups of twenty patients each depending upon whether patient received three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate (group A) or 2.0-mm straight locking miniplates (group B). Mouth opening, teeth in the fracture line, degree of displacement, time taken, neurosensory and bite force evaluation were done preoperatively, 1st, 7th day, 2nd week, 4th week, 6th week and 12th week postoperatively.

Results

Positive correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative bite force values at subsequent follow-up weeks. At 3rd month evaluation, the change in bite force from the previous follow-up visit was significantly greater in group A (locking strut plate) than group B (locking miniplate) in the incisor, left molar and right molar region. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding time taken (P < 0.016) depicting less time taken for placement of three-dimensional 2.0-mm locking curved strut plate(group A) 20.30 ± 4.85 min as compared to 27.30 ± 6.82 min for fixation with 2.0 mm straight locking miniplates in group B.

Conclusion

The findings were suggestive that the both systems had better adaptation during fixation, comparable radiographic reduction and increased stability in postoperative period. However, 3D locking strut plate took relatively lesser operative time, offered good rigidity and better stabilization of fractured segments in three dimensions along with significant improvement in the masticatory bite force postoperatively.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B (1973) Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1:79–84CrossRefPubMed Michelet FX, Deymes J, Dessus B (1973) Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1:79–84CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14–21CrossRefPubMed Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14–21CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM (2005) Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(2):209–214CrossRefPubMed Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM (2005) Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(2):209–214CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Meram AT, Olate S, Palmieri CF Jr (2018) Is the three-dimensional strut plate an adequate fixation technique for mandibular symphysis fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76(1):140–145CrossRefPubMed Meram AT, Olate S, Palmieri CF Jr (2018) Is the three-dimensional strut plate an adequate fixation technique for mandibular symphysis fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76(1):140–145CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JL, Rowe NL (1994) Rowe and Williams’ Maxillofacial Injuries, vol 1, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 284 Williams JL, Rowe NL (1994) Rowe and Williams’ Maxillofacial Injuries, vol 1, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 284
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shetty V, Atchison K, Der-Matirosian C, Wang J, Belin TR (2007) The mandible injury severity score: development and validity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(4):663–670CrossRefPubMed Shetty V, Atchison K, Der-Matirosian C, Wang J, Belin TR (2007) The mandible injury severity score: development and validity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(4):663–670CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman L (1998) A clinical evaluation of the long-term outcome of patients treated for bilateral fracture of the mandibular condyles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36(3):176–179CrossRefPubMed Newman L (1998) A clinical evaluation of the long-term outcome of patients treated for bilateral fracture of the mandibular condyles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36(3):176–179CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchena JM, Padwa BL, Kaban LB (1998) Sensory abnormalities associated with mandibular fractures: incidence and natural history. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56(7):822–825CrossRefPubMed Marchena JM, Padwa BL, Kaban LB (1998) Sensory abnormalities associated with mandibular fractures: incidence and natural history. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56(7):822–825CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins CP, Pirinjian-Leonard G, Tolas A, Alcalde R (2004) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62(11):1392–1395CrossRefPubMed Collins CP, Pirinjian-Leonard G, Tolas A, Alcalde R (2004) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62(11):1392–1395CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi BH, Kim HJ, Kim MK, Han SG, Huh JY, Kim BY, Zhu SJ, Jung JH (2005) Management of mandibular angle fractures using the mandibular angle reduction forceps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(3):257–261CrossRefPubMed Choi BH, Kim HJ, Kim MK, Han SG, Huh JY, Kim BY, Zhu SJ, Jung JH (2005) Management of mandibular angle fractures using the mandibular angle reduction forceps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(3):257–261CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buch K, Mottalib A, Nadgir RN, Fujita A, Sekiya K, Ozonoff A, Sakai O (2016) Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location. Emerg Radiol 23(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed Buch K, Mottalib A, Nadgir RN, Fujita A, Sekiya K, Ozonoff A, Sakai O (2016) Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location. Emerg Radiol 23(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Moraissi EA, Mounair RM, El-Sharkawy TM, El-Ghareeb TI (2015) Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(3):316–321CrossRefPubMed Al-Moraissi EA, Mounair RM, El-Sharkawy TM, El-Ghareeb TI (2015) Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(3):316–321CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M (2002) Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(11):1319–1326CrossRefPubMed Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M (2002) Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(11):1319–1326CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Principle and stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 52(1):21–24CrossRefPubMed Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Principle and stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 52(1):21–24CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittenberg JM, Mukherjee DP, Smith BR, Kruse RN (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26(1):68–73CrossRefPubMed Wittenberg JM, Mukherjee DP, Smith BR, Kruse RN (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26(1):68–73CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore E, Bayrak S, Moody M, Key JM, Vural E (2013) Hardware removal rates for mandibular angle fractures: comparing the 8-hole strut and Champy plates. J Craniofac Surg 24(1):163–165CrossRefPubMed Moore E, Bayrak S, Moody M, Key JM, Vural E (2013) Hardware removal rates for mandibular angle fractures: comparing the 8-hole strut and Champy plates. J Craniofac Surg 24(1):163–165CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg S, Pape HD (1992) Teeth in the fracture line. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21(3):145–146CrossRefPubMed Berg S, Pape HD (1992) Teeth in the fracture line. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21(3):145–146CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang KO, Pandilwar PK, Shenoi SR, Budhraja NJ, Ingole P, Kolte VS, Garg A (2018) Evaluation of teeth in line of mandibular fractures treated with stable internal fixation. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17:164–168CrossRefPubMed Bang KO, Pandilwar PK, Shenoi SR, Budhraja NJ, Ingole P, Kolte VS, Garg A (2018) Evaluation of teeth in line of mandibular fractures treated with stable internal fixation. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17:164–168CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Khavanin N, Jazayeri H, Xu T, Pedreira R, Lopez J, Reddy S, Shamliyan T, Peacock ZS, Dorafshar AH (2019) Management of teeth in the line of mandibular angle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(6):1393–1402CrossRefPubMed Khavanin N, Jazayeri H, Xu T, Pedreira R, Lopez J, Reddy S, Shamliyan T, Peacock ZS, Dorafshar AH (2019) Management of teeth in the line of mandibular angle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(6):1393–1402CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Malanchuk VO, Kopchak AV (2007) Risk factors for development of infection in patients with mandibular fractures located in the tooth-bearing area. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 35(1):57–62CrossRef Malanchuk VO, Kopchak AV (2007) Risk factors for development of infection in patients with mandibular fractures located in the tooth-bearing area. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 35(1):57–62CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh V, Puri P, Arya S, Malik S, Bhagol A (2012) Conventional versus 3-dimensional miniplate in management of mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(3):450–455CrossRefPubMed Singh V, Puri P, Arya S, Malik S, Bhagol A (2012) Conventional versus 3-dimensional miniplate in management of mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(3):450–455CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vashistha A, Singh M, Chaudhary M, Agarwal N, Kaur G (2017) Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 7(1):42–48CrossRefPubMed Vashistha A, Singh M, Chaudhary M, Agarwal N, Kaur G (2017) Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 7(1):42–48CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey V, Bhutia O, Nagori SA, Seith A, Roychoudhury A (2016) Management of mandibular angle fractures using a 1.7 mm 3-dimensional strut plate. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 6(1):36–41CrossRef Pandey V, Bhutia O, Nagori SA, Seith A, Roychoudhury A (2016) Management of mandibular angle fractures using a 1.7 mm 3-dimensional strut plate. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 6(1):36–41CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Moraissi EA, El-Sharkawy TM, El-Ghareeb TI, Chrcanovic BR (2014) Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(6):708–716CrossRefPubMed Al-Moraissi EA, El-Sharkawy TM, El-Ghareeb TI, Chrcanovic BR (2014) Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(6):708–716CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sybil D, Gopalkrishnan K (2013) Assessment of masticatory function using bite force measurements in patients treated for mandibular fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 6(4):247–250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sybil D, Gopalkrishnan K (2013) Assessment of masticatory function using bite force measurements in patients treated for mandibular fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 6(4):247–250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh G, Mishra M, Gaur A, Pathak D (2019) Comparison of bite force in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with 3-dimensional locking miniplate and standard miniplates. Traumaxilla 1(1):7–10CrossRef Singh G, Mishra M, Gaur A, Pathak D (2019) Comparison of bite force in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with 3-dimensional locking miniplate and standard miniplates. Traumaxilla 1(1):7–10CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinra PK, Jayakumar K, Soumithran CS, Michael MJ, Passi D, Singh M (2017) Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 8(1):34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kinra PK, Jayakumar K, Soumithran CS, Michael MJ, Passi D, Singh M (2017) Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 8(1):34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Saxena S, Giri KY, Sharma P, Niranjanaprasad IB, Dandriyal R, Abhishek K, Vishal G (2022) Comparative assessment of clinical and quality of life outcomes in mandibular angle fractures treated with standard and three-dimensional mini-plates. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 21(4):1386–1392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saxena S, Giri KY, Sharma P, Niranjanaprasad IB, Dandriyal R, Abhishek K, Vishal G (2022) Comparative assessment of clinical and quality of life outcomes in mandibular angle fractures treated with standard and three-dimensional mini-plates. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 21(4):1386–1392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaushik S, Ali I, Dubey M, Bajpai N (2020) 2 mm conventional miniplates with three-dimensional strut plate in mandibular fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg 10(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaushik S, Ali I, Dubey M, Bajpai N (2020) 2 mm conventional miniplates with three-dimensional strut plate in mandibular fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg 10(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Budhraja NJ, Shenoi RS, Badjate SJ, Bang KO, Ingole PD, Kolte VS (2018) Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional miniplates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg 8(1):73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Budhraja NJ, Shenoi RS, Badjate SJ, Bang KO, Ingole PD, Kolte VS (2018) Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional miniplates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg 8(1):73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerbier S, Kuenz J, Hauptmann S, Hoogendijk CF, Liebehenschel N, Schön R, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R (2010) Clinical aspects of a 20-mm locking plate system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 38(7):501–504CrossRef Sauerbier S, Kuenz J, Hauptmann S, Hoogendijk CF, Liebehenschel N, Schön R, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R (2010) Clinical aspects of a 20-mm locking plate system for mandibular fracture surgery. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 38(7):501–504CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate
verfasst von
Sukhpreet Kaur Virk
Tejinder Kaur Gumber
Amit Dhawan
Ramandeep Singh Bhullar
Sarika Kapila
Publikationsdatum
18.08.2023
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Elektronische ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01996-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 4/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.