Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 1/2023

07.10.2022 | Review Article

Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

verfasst von: Haomin Lin, Jinchang Zhang, Xujia Li, Yuanquan Li, Song Su

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Branch of Biliary Surgery, C.S.o.S.C.M.A. and S. 2022 Chinese Medical Doctor Association in Chinese Committee of Biliary, [Consensus on the surgical management of benign gallbladder diseases(2021 edition)]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 60(1): p. 4–9. Branch of Biliary Surgery, C.S.o.S.C.M.A. and S. 2022 Chinese Medical Doctor Association in Chinese Committee of Biliary, [Consensus on the surgical management of benign gallbladder diseases(2021 edition)]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 60(1): p. 4–9.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu MH et al (2020) Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol 26(22):2967–2986CrossRef Yu MH et al (2020) Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases. World J Gastroenterol 26(22):2967–2986CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SS, Donahue TR (2018) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 319(17):1834CrossRef Kim SS, Donahue TR (2018) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 319(17):1834CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerard J et al (2018) Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases. Surg Endosc 32(9):3943–3948CrossRef Gerard J et al (2018) Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases. Surg Endosc 32(9):3943–3948CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaughan, J., K.S. Gurusamy, and B.R. Davidson 2013 Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (7): p. CD006798. Vaughan, J., K.S. Gurusamy, and B.R. Davidson 2013 Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (7): p. CD006798.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hajibandeh S et al (2021) Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence). Updates Surg 73(2):451–471CrossRef Hajibandeh S et al (2021) Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence). Updates Surg 73(2):451–471CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Warsi A et al (2021) Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution of a new technique. BMC Surg 21(1):391CrossRef Warsi A et al (2021) Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution of a new technique. BMC Surg 21(1):391CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanford DE (2019) An update on technical aspects of cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 99(2):245–258CrossRef Sanford DE (2019) An update on technical aspects of cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 99(2):245–258CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zarbaliyev E et al (2021) When should i use an additional port at the time of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 32(6):668–674CrossRef Zarbaliyev E et al (2021) When should i use an additional port at the time of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 32(6):668–674CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Melling N et al (2019) Robotic cholecystectomy: first experience with the new Senhance robotic system. J Robot Surg 13(3):495–500CrossRef Melling N et al (2019) Robotic cholecystectomy: first experience with the new Senhance robotic system. J Robot Surg 13(3):495–500CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Han C et al (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(11):4377–4392CrossRef Han C et al (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(11):4377–4392CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan X et al (2017) Minilaparoscopic versus single incision cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Surg 17(1):91CrossRef Tan X et al (2017) Minilaparoscopic versus single incision cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Surg 17(1):91CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abd Ellatif ME et al (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27(6):1896–1906CrossRef Abd Ellatif ME et al (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27(6):1896–1906CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorgensen LN et al (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101(4):347–355CrossRef Jorgensen LN et al (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101(4):347–355CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lirici MM et al (2011) Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg 202(1):45–52CrossRef Lirici MM et al (2011) Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg 202(1):45–52CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lurje G et al (2015) Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). Ann Surg 262(5):728–734CrossRef Lurje G et al (2015) Cosmesis and body image in patients undergoing single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). Ann Surg 262(5):728–734CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S (2013) Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100(3):339–349CrossRef Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S (2013) Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 100(3):339–349CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinan H et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22(1):12–16CrossRef Sinan H et al (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22(1):12–16CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee PC et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97(7):1007–1012CrossRef Lee PC et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97(7):1007–1012CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dabbagh N et al (2015) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial study. J Res Med Sci 20(12):1153–1159CrossRef Dabbagh N et al (2015) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized clinical trial study. J Res Med Sci 20(12):1153–1159CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorgami Z et al (2014) A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg 27(3):147–154CrossRef Khorgami Z et al (2014) A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg 27(3):147–154CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11(3):358–362 Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK (2007) Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 11(3):358–362
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrabissa A et al (2016) Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 30(7):3089–3097CrossRef Pietrabissa A et al (2016) Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 30(7):3089–3097CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudsi OY et al (2017) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31(8):3242–3250CrossRef Kudsi OY et al (2017) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31(8):3242–3250CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Grochola LF et al (2019) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 33(5):1482–1490CrossRef Grochola LF et al (2019) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 33(5):1482–1490CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito E et al (2019) Quality of life after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Surgery 165(2):353–359CrossRef Ito E et al (2019) Quality of life after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Surgery 165(2):353–359CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirza AA, Asif M, Sukh N, Saeed A, Jamil K, Zaidi AH (2017) Outcome of three ports versus four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of mean operative time, hospital stay and pain. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 13(2):169–172 Mirza AA, Asif M, Sukh N, Saeed A, Jamil K, Zaidi AH (2017) Outcome of three ports versus four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of mean operative time, hospital stay and pain. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 13(2):169–172
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma PK, Mehta KS (2017) Three port versus standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a prospective study. JK Sci 17(1):38–42 Sharma PK, Mehta KS (2017) Three port versus standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a prospective study. JK Sci 17(1):38–42
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Eroler E, Dilektasli E, Tihan D, Duman U, Bayam EM, Erol FM et al (2016) Reducing one port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does that really make a diference? Int J Clin Exp Med 9(6):11558–11565 Eroler E, Dilektasli E, Tihan D, Duman U, Bayam EM, Erol FM et al (2016) Reducing one port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does that really make a diference? Int J Clin Exp Med 9(6):11558–11565
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner CA et al (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330(6):403–408CrossRef Steiner CA et al (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330(6):403–408CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaillard M et al (2015) New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 7(10):243–248CrossRef Gaillard M et al (2015) New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 7(10):243–248CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang W, Sun X, Wei F (2021) Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review. Updates Surg 73(6):2039–2046CrossRef Wang W, Sun X, Wei F (2021) Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review. Updates Surg 73(6):2039–2046CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisanu A et al (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1790–1801CrossRef Pisanu A et al (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1790–1801CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Pucher PH et al (2018) Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc 32(5):2175–2183CrossRef Pucher PH et al (2018) Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc 32(5):2175–2183CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
verfasst von
Haomin Lin
Jinchang Zhang
Xujia Li
Yuanquan Li
Song Su
Publikationsdatum
07.10.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Updates in Surgery 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Foreword

Foreword

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.