Background
Of the 171 post-transcriptional modifications of RNA, including 5-methylcytosine (m
5C), 7-methylguanosine (m
7G), m
1G, m
2G, and m
6G, N
1-methyladenosine (m
1A) and N
6-methyladenosine (m
6A) have been identified in living organisms [
1]. m
6A is one of the most prominent and abundant internal modifications in eukaryotic mRNA and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), accounting for 0.2–0.4% of the total adenosine residues and half of the total ribonucleotides in mammalian RNA [
2‐
4]. Similar to dynamic and reversible epigenetic modifications of genomic DNA and proteins, m
6A RNA modification is a reversible process in mammalian cells, which may be regulated by three vital factors, namely the methyltransferases, demethylases, and binding proteins, which are also known as writers, erasers, and readers, respectively. They can add, remove, or read an m
6A site [
5,
6]. m
6A modifications are related to various biological functions, such as RNA splicing, translocation, stability, and translation [
7,
8], as well as multiple dysregulated biological processes, including aberrant proliferation, promotion of tumor metastasis, and inhibition of apoptosis [
9‐
12].
Tumor progression is attributed to multiple genetic and epigenetic variations in tumor cells [
8]. However, increasing evidence has shown that evading tumor surveillance is a hallmark of tumor development [
13]. The immunogenic interaction between the host tissues and the tumors, and the ability of the tumor to evade immune recognition could determine the prognosis of patients [
14]. Immunotherapy targeting immunological checkpoints, such as programmed cell death 1 (
PD-1), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (
PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (
CTLA-4), has been used as a potential therapeutic strategy for cancers. As cancers are not solely neoplastic cells, they contain the tumor microenvironment (TME), which can be divided into immune and non-immune infiltrates, such as cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells (DCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), endothelial cells, and stromal cells [
15]. The TME is a highly complex ecosystem, and various biological behaviors change through direct and indirect interactions with the TME components. Thus, it is important to clarify the immune infiltration at the tumor site and the biomarkers associated with TME, which might help to individually evaluate patients who could benefit from immunotherapies and will broaden our understanding of tumor immunity.
Bladder cancer (BCa) is more common in men than in women, and ranks 4th in incidence and 8th in mortality among the male population, according to the latest published cancer statistics [
16]. Approximately 75% of patients with newly diagnosed BCa are non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and 25% are muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) [
17]. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), which can activate human innate and adaptive immune responses, intravesical instillation is the current gold standard clinical treatment for NMIBC. Meanwhile,
anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is the hotspot for advanced MIBC, and the response rate of immunotherapies is determined by various conditions, including tumor immunity and cancer cell immunogenicity [
18,
19]. Recent studies have revealed an interaction between m
6A modification and the TME. A study by Jiang et al. revealed that when co-cultured with M2 macrophages, the expression levels of alkB homolog 5 (
ALKBH5) and the toll-like receptor (
TLR)-4 increased in ovarian cancer cells, and
TLR4 upregulated
ALKBH5 expression and increased Nanog expression via mRNA demethylation [
20]. Moreover,
TNF-α inhibits the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by repressing fat mass and obesity‐associated protein (
FTO) expression and
FTO-mediated demethylation of Nanog mRNA levels and decreasing Nanog mRNA expression levels [
21]. Zhang et al. integrated gastric cancer samples to establish m
6A modification patterns and scoring systems, and found that TME characteristics were highly consistent with the patterns, suggesting that m
6A modification played an insignificant role in tumor immunity in gastric cancer [
22].
However, the above studies only investigated one or two m6A regulators and did not investigate the connection between m6A regulators and tumor immunity. Therefore, in this study, we comprehensively investigated the tumor immune landscape associated with m6A regulators, established a set of scoring patterns, and evaluated the prognostic value of this pattern for individual patients.
Discussion
Although several studies have explored the m6A regulators in tumorigenesis and tumor development, the comprehensive analysis of m6A regulators with tumor immune landscape in bladder cancer has been poorly investigated. Here, we reveal that distinct clusters and risk groups are associated with tumor immunity and have prognostic value for patients with BCa. Furthermore, PD-L1 is identified as a potential target of IGF2BP3, and IGF2BP3 can regulate both total and membrane-bound PD-L1 expression levels.
Modified RNA bases have been discovered for over six decades. After the first RNA demethylase (
FTO) was identified, the research field was revived, and the formation of m
6A is a reversible process [
6,
36]. The m
6A regulators can be divided into three functional groups: writers, erasers, and readers. Writing is the process of adding methylated modifications to RNA, including
METTL3,
METTL14,
METTL16,
KIAA1429,
WTAP,
RBM15,
RBM15B,
CBLL1, and
ZC3H13 [
5,
22,
24], while the reversible process is mediated by erasers, including the
FTO and
ALKBH5. Moreover, m
6A indirectly affects RNA processing by recruiting specific reader proteins, including nuclear m
6A readers,
YTHDC-1,
HNRNPA2B1,
HNRNPC, etc., and cytoplasmic m
6A readers,
YTHDF-1/2/3 and
YTHDC2.Increasing evidence has shown that m
6A regulators play a crucial role in various pathophysiological processes, including circadian rhythms, spermatogenesis, DNA damage response, tumorigenesis, and tumor progression [
37‐
40].
The TME consists of immune cells and non-immune cells, which could play a crucial role in tumor growth and progression, and tumor-infiltrated immune cells are highly associated with tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, and metastasis [
41]. Meanwhile, the imbalance between tumor cell growth and elimination might activate immunosurveillance. As the understanding of complexity of TME has deepened, more evidence has shown that tumor-infiltrating cells play either tumor-suppressive or tumor-promoting roles, thus influencing cancer initiation and progression. For instance, M1 macrophages mainly produce pro-inflammatory cytokines that potentiate the anti-tumor immune response, while M2 macrophages promote ECM deposition and immunosuppression [
42]. Therefore, understanding the crosstalk between TME and tumor cells might be useful for assessing the prognosis and improving the response rate of immunotherapy for individual patients with various cancers.
Bladder cancer is highly correlated with immunotherapy, including
anti-PD-L1 and
anti-CTLA4 becomes a hotspot in advanced BCa treatment. The Food and Drug Agency (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted accelerated approval to atezolizumab and pembrolizumab as first-line metastatic cisplatin-unfit BCa. However,
anti-PD-L1 treatment showed limited efficacy in the first-line phase III clinical trials [
43], with a relatively low response rate of approximately 20% [
44]. Moreover, several studies have recently demonstrated that
PD-1 and
PD-L1 expression are not reliable biomarkers for predicting the benefits of immunotherapy [
45,
46]. A retrospective study demonstrated that patients progressing to frontline
PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy were even at risk of early death, excluding them from experiencing potential benefit from subsequent systemic treatment [
47].
Several studies have demonstrated the function of m
6A regulators in bladder cancer. For instance, methyltransferase-like (
METTL)-3 might act as an oncogene by interacting with the DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8 (
DGCR8) and accelerating the pri-miR221/222 maturation to promote tumor proliferation [
48]. Meanwhile,
METTL3 plays a role in BCa progression by promoting the cancer cell growth and invasion by regulating a network that involves the
AF4/FMR2 family member 4 (
AFF4), nuclear factor-kappa B (
NF-κB), and
Myc [
49]. Another mechanism of the m
6A regulator
METTL3/ YTH N
6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein (
YTHDF2) mA axis directly degrades the mRNAs of SET domain containing 7 (
SETD7) and Kruppel-like factor 4 (
KLF4), contributing to the progression of BCa [
50]. Analysis of the expression levels of
METTL3 and
CDCP1 in patients with BCa revealed that
METTL3 and
CDCP1 were strongly upregulated in the tumor samples, and the
METTL3-CDCP1 axis could increase the tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion [
51].
Most studies have focused on m
6A regulators or immunotherapy. However, the correlation between m
6A regulators and tumor immunity has not been fully recognized, and only a few studies have demonstrated the potential relationship between m
6A regulators and TME anti-tumor immune responses in various cell types, such as gastric cancer, melanoma, and dendritic cells [
22,
52,
53]. Here, we first identified two distinct m
6A clusters and constructed a risk score pattern based on m
6A regulators to reveal the potential pathways and functional processes, predict the prognosis of patients with BCa, and investigate the correlation between m
6A regulators and tumor immunity. Moreover, we analyzed one of the m
6A regulators in pattern,
IGF2BP3, and identified its expression level, prognostic value, and association with
PD-L1. Clarifying the role of risk score pattern with TME will contribute to broadening the understanding of TME antitumor immune response and suggest appropriate effective immunotherapy strategies for individual BCa patients.
Although the prognostic value of the m
6A cluster was limited, the m
6A cluster was associated with tumor grade, and two clusters showed significantly distinct pathway enrichment. Cluster 1 was characterized by metabolism, and cluster 2 was characterized by DNA damage. And the clusters based on m
6A regulator expression could provide a few fresh outlooks for further study. Moreover, the correlation analysis revealed that the most significant positive and negative relevance were
METTL3 with
YTHDF3 and
IGF2BP2, respectively, showing different functions in BCa. The function of m
6A regulators primarily depends on reader proteins.
YTHDF2 could induce mRNA degradation and
YTHDF1 and
YTHDF3 could initiate mRNA translation, while the
IGF2BP family could enhance the stability of target mRNA [
54‐
57]. A comprehensive analysis of m
6A regulators revealed that the mRNA expression of
METTL4 and
YTHDF3 was higher in high-grade tumors than in low-grade tumors, and
YTHDC1 was upregulated in the I/II stage, compared to the III/IV stage [
58].
Furthermore, the risk score pattern based on 6 m
6A regulators revealed its prognostic value for OS in patients with BCa, and the risk score pattern was highly associated with pathological features, such as T status, M status, N status, and tumor grade. Moreover, in the present study, we found an association between risk score pattern and TME. High immune score, high stromal score, high ESTIMATE score, and low tumor purity were found in the high-risk score group. We next found that the expression and mutation of individual m
6A regulators in the risk score pattern was associated with immune cells and immune checkpoints, which could underlie part of the mechanism of the risk score pattern. A nomogram was constructed to evaluate the prognostic value of individual patients for predicting 3- and 5-year survival times. If the physicians were able to estimate whether individual patients had shorter or longer than the median OS according to their expression of m
6A regulators in tumor tissues, it would be useful for patients with different treatment strategies [
59].
IGF2BP3 was highly expressed in the high-risk group, and a recent study demonstrated that
IGF2BP3 could be regarded as an independent prognostic factor in NMIBC, which could present a subgroup of patients with high probability of relapse, progression, and metastasis [
60]. A comprehensive study has reported that the expression of
IGF2BP3 was detected in 76 different normal tissue types and 3889 cancer samples from 95 different tumor categories,
IGF2BP3 overexpression has been found in various cancer types, and
IGF2BP3 is typically associated with aggressive tumor features [
61].
IGF2BP3 has been shown to directly interact with
ULBP2 mRNA, thereby reducing
ULBP2 surface expression.
IGF2BP3 indirectly interacts with MICB. The
IGF2BP3-mediated pathway leads to impaired NK cell recognition of transformed cells to facilitate tumor immune escape [
62]. In the present study, we found a positive correlation between
IGF2BP3 and
PD-L1, and
IGF2BP3 could regulate total and membrane-bound
PD-L1 expression levels in BCa cells, which implies the potential role of
IGF2BP3 in
anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.
This study has several limitations. First, because of the limited clinical database on BCa, only TCGA patients with clinical characteristics were included. Second, immunohistochemical staining of m6A regulators was obtained from the public database, and the protein levels of m6A regulators will be explored in further studies. Third, our nomogram only underwent internal validation; it could be more powerful to obtain an external validation with a large multicenter cohort. Despite considering the limitations of the present study, our findings provide novel insights for m6A regulator clusters, risk score based on m6A regulators, and identified the association between tumor immunity and m6A regulators.
In summary, the present study investigated the cluster and prognosis of m6A regulators in BCa and found that the expression of m6A regulators is highly correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. We also constructed a risk score pattern and nomogram to evaluate the OS of patients with BCa. Moreover, we illustrated the relationship between m6A regulators and the TME. Therefore, our study provides important ideas for improving the clinical outcomes of patients with BCa, which may be used to develop different immunotherapies based on the expression levels of m6A regulators.