Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2007

01.10.2007 | Gastrointestinal

Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system

verfasst von: A. Graser, F. T. Kolligs, T. Mang, C. Schaefer, S. Geisbüsch, M. F. Reiser, C. R. Becker

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms help to detect colonic polyps at CT colonography (CTC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CAD versus an expert reader in CTC. One hundred forty individuals (67 men, 73 women; mean age, 59 years) underwent screening 64-MDCT colonography after full cathartic bowel cleansing without fecal tagging. One expert reader interpreted supine and prone scans using a 3D workstation with integrated CAD used as “second reader.” The system’s sensitivity for the detection of polyps, the number of false-positive findings, and its running time were evaluated. Polyps were classified as small (≤5 mm), medium (6–9 mm), and large (≥10 mm). A total of 118 polyps (small, 85; medium, 19; large, 14) were found in 56 patients. CAD detected 72 polyps (61%) with an average of 2.2 false-positives. Sensitivity was 51% (43/85) for small, 90% (17/19) for medium, and 86% (12/14) for large polyps. For all polyps, per-patient sensitivity was 89% (50/56) for the radiologist and 73% (41/56) for CAD. For large and medium polyps, per-patient sensitivity was 100% for the radiologist, and 96% for CAD. In conclusion, CAD shows high sensitivity in the detection of clinically significant polyps with acceptable false-positive rates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3):893–904PubMedCrossRef Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3):893–904PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E et al (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16(10):2275–2283PubMedCrossRef Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E et al (2006) Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 16(10):2275–2283PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG et al (2006) CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 16(8):1745–1749PubMedCrossRef Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG et al (2006) CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 16(8):1745–1749PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida H, Dachman AH (2005) CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 30(1):26–41PubMedCrossRef Yoshida H, Dachman AH (2005) CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 30(1):26–41PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12(1):77–81PubMedCrossRef Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12(1):77–81PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M et al (2002) Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225(2):391–399PubMedCrossRef Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M et al (2002) Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225(2):391–399PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM et al (2001) Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219(1):51–59PubMed Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM et al (2001) Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219(1):51–59PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22(4):963–979PubMed Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22(4):963–979PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129(6):1832–1844PubMedCrossRef Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129(6):1832–1844PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(3):695–701PubMedCrossRef Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(3):695–701PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogoni L, Cathier P, Dundar M et al (2005) Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need. Br J Radiol 78(suppl_1):S57–S62PubMedCrossRef Bogoni L, Cathier P, Dundar M et al (2005) Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need. Br J Radiol 78(suppl_1):S57–S62PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14)1713–1719PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291(14)1713–1719PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456)305–311PubMed Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456)305–311PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin KN, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 16(10):2284–2291PubMedCrossRef Jin KN, Lee JM, Kim SH et al (2006) The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 16(10):2284–2291PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mang TG, Schaefer-Prokop C, Maier A et al (2005) Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(6):1582–1589PubMedCrossRef Mang TG, Schaefer-Prokop C, Maier A et al (2005) Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(6):1582–1589PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (2003) Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 229(1):109–118PubMedCrossRef Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (2003) Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 229(1):109–118PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gokturk SB, Tomasi C, Acar B et al (2001) A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12):1251–1260PubMedCrossRef Gokturk SB, Tomasi C, Acar B et al (2001) A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12):1251–1260PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jerebko AK, Malley JD, Franaszek M et al (2003) Multiple neural network classification scheme for detection of colonic polyps in CT colonography data sets. Acad Radiol 10(2):154–160PubMedCrossRef Jerebko AK, Malley JD, Franaszek M et al (2003) Multiple neural network classification scheme for detection of colonic polyps in CT colonography data sets. Acad Radiol 10(2):154–160PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, Pineau B, Santago P (2005) Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography. J Digit Imaging 18(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef Li H, Pineau B, Santago P (2005) Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography. J Digit Imaging 18(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AD, Pickhardt PJ, Gopal DV et al (2006) Venous malformations mimicking multiple mucosal polyps on screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1113–1115PubMedCrossRef Lee AD, Pickhardt PJ, Gopal DV et al (2006) Venous malformations mimicking multiple mucosal polyps on screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1113–1115PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system
verfasst von
A. Graser
F. T. Kolligs
T. Mang
C. Schaefer
S. Geisbüsch
M. F. Reiser
C. R. Becker
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0579-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2007

European Radiology 10/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.