Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Abdominal Radiology
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2017

09.08.2016 | Pictorial Essay

Contrast media for fluoroscopic examinations of the GI and GU tracts: current challenges and recommendations

verfasst von: Michael P. Federle, Tracy A. Jaffe, Peter L. Davis, Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary, Marc S. Levine

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

One of the significant challenges facing radiologists who perform and interpret studies of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems have been periodic interruptions in the availability of barium and iodinated contrast media specially formulated for gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) studies. These interruptions are due to the US Food and Drug Administration’s recent requirement for more stringent documentation of the safety and efficacy of contrast media and the consolidation among contrast manufacturers. Therefore, radiologists may be required to recommend an alternative means of evaluation, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or endoscopy, or they may need to substitute a different formulation of a contrast agent not specifically developed for GI or GU use, for example the utilization of an agent designed and marketed for vascular use. This article reviews the current status of fluoroscopic contrast media, and provides suggestions and recommendations for the optimal and alternative use of contrast media formulations.
Literatur
1.
Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH (2008) Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians. J Am Coll Radiol 5:744–747CrossRefPubMed
2.
Boyajian DA, Margulis AR (2008) The GI fluoroscopy suite in the early twenty-first century. Abdom Imaging 33:200–206CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
5.
Ott DJ, Gelfand DW (1983) Gastrointestinal contrast agents. Indications, uses, and risks. JAMA 249:2380–2384CrossRefPubMed
6.
Seltzer SE, Jones B, McLaughlin GC (1979) Proper choice of contrast agents in emergency gastrointestinal radiology. CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 12:79–99PubMed
7.
Miller RE, Skucas J (1977) Radiographic contrast agents. Baltimore: University Park Press
8.
Davidson JC, Einstein DM, Herts BR, et al. (1999) Comparison of two barium suspensions for dedicated small-bowel series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:379–382CrossRefPubMed
9.
Thoeni RF (1987) Radiography of the small bowel and enteroclysis. A perspective. Invest Radiol 22:930–936CrossRefPubMed
10.
Abbas S, Bissett IP, Parry BR (2007) Oral water soluble contrast for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004651
11.
Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, et al. (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 97:470–478CrossRefPubMed
12.
Rubesin SE, Levine MS (2003) Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1095–1115CrossRefPubMed
13.
Buecker A, Wein BB, Neurburg JM, Guenther RW (1997) Esophageal perforation: comparison of use of aqueous and barium-containing contrast media. Radiology 202:683–686CrossRefPubMed
14.
Tanomkiat W, Galassi W (2000) Barium sulfate as a contrast medium for evaluation of postoperative anastomotic leaks. Acta Radiol 41:482–485CrossRefPubMed
15.
Swanson JO, Levine MS, Redfern RO, Rubesin SE (2003) Usefulness of high-density barium for detection of leaks after esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy, and total laryngectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:415–420CrossRefPubMed
16.
Gelfand DW, Ott DJ, Hunt TH (1981) Gastrointestinal complications of radiologic procedures. In: Meyers MA, Ghahremani GG (eds) Iatrogenic gastrointestinal complications. New York: NY, Springer-Verlag, pp 91–122CrossRef
17.
de Feiter PW, Soeters PB, Dejong CH (2006) Rectal perforations after barium enema: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 49:261–271CrossRefPubMed
18.
Biondo S, Pares D, Mora L, et al. (2003) Randomized clinical study of gastrografin administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90:542–546CrossRefPubMed
19.
Burge J, Abbas SM, Roadley G, et al. (2005) Randomized controlled trial of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction. ANZ J Surg 75:672–674CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kapoor S, Jain G, Sewkani A, et al. (2006) Prospective evaluation of oral Gastrografin in postoperative small bowel obstruction. J Surg Res 131:256–260CrossRefPubMed
21.
Di Saverio, Catena F, Ansaloni L, et al. (2008) Water-soluble contrast medium (Gastrografin) value in adhesive small intestine obstruction (ASIO): a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. World J Surg 32:2293–2304CrossRef
22.
Culp WC (1975) Relief of severe fecal impactions with water-soluble contrast enemas. Radiology 115:9–12CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gelfand DW, Ott DJ (1982) Barium sulfate suspensions: an evaluation of available products. AJR Am J Roentgenol 138:935–941CrossRefPubMed
24.
Laufer I, Levine MS (eds) (1992) Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology, 2nd edn. WB Saunders: Philadelphia
25.
Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS, et al. (1988) Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology 169:141–143CrossRefPubMed
26.
Stordahl A (1989) Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental study. J Oslo City Hosp 39:3–22PubMed
27.
James AE Jr, Montali RJ, Chaffee V, Strecker EP, Vessal K (1975) Barium or gastrografin: which contrast media for diagnosis of esophageal tears? Gastroenterology 68:1103–1113PubMed
28.
Vessal K, Montali RJ, Larson SM, Chaffee V, James AE Jr (1975) Evaluation of barium and gastrografin as contrast media for the diagnosis of esophageal ruptures or perforations. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 123:307–319CrossRefPubMed
29.
Levine MS (2015) Miscellaneous abnormalities of the esophagus. In: Gore RM, Levine MS (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, pp 412–437
30.
Wylie R, Hyams JS, Kay M (eds) (2016) Pediatric gastrointestinal and liver disease, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier
31.
Butt J, Hentges D, Pelican G, et al. (1978) Bacteremia during barium enema study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:715–718CrossRefPubMed
32.
Le Frock J, Ellis CA, Klainer AS, Weinstein L (1975) Transient bacteremia associated with barium enema. Arch Intern Med 135:835–837CrossRefPubMed
33.
Schimmel DH, Hanelin LG, Cohen S, Goldberg HI (1977) Bacteremia and the barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 128:207–208CrossRefPubMed
34.
Arpurt JP, Caroli-Bosc FX, Harris A, Delmont J (1992) Reflux of air or barium into the biliary ducts. Gastroenterology 103:1989–1990CrossRefPubMed
35.
Walsham A, Larsen J (2008) Adverse effects of barium sulfate in the biliary tract. Diagn Interv Radiol 14:94–96PubMed
36.
Zeman RK, Burrell MI (1987) The postoperative biliary tract. Gallbladder and bile duct imaging: a clinical radiologic approach. New York: Churchill Livingston, pp 593–676
37.
Hunter TB, Fajardo LL (1987) Outline of radiographic contrast agents. Appl Radiol 16:137–158
38.
Hanson JA, Borre C, Rivers G (1998) What is your diagnosis? Foreign body obstruction of the duodenum with reflux of barium sulfate into the gallbladder and intrahepatic bile ducts. J Am Vet Med Assoc 213:1257–1258PubMed
39.
Foley MJ, Ghahremani GG, Rogers LF (1982) Reappraisal of contrast media used to detect upper gastrointestinal perforations: comparison of ionic water-soluble media with barium sulfate. Radiology 144:231–237CrossRefPubMed
40.
Reich SB (1969) Production of pulmonary edema by aspiration of water-soluble nonabsorbable contrast media. Radiology 92:367–370CrossRefPubMed
41.
Horton KM, Fishman EK, Gayler B (2008) The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:207–209CrossRefPubMed
42.
Eisenberg RL, Hedgcock MW, Shanser JD, et al. (1979) Iodine absorption from the gastrointestinal tract during Hypaque-enema examination. Radiology 133:597–599CrossRefPubMed
43.
Rosen RS, Jacobson G (1965) Visible urinary tract excretion following oral administration of water-soluble contrast media. Radiology 84:1031–1032CrossRefPubMed
44.
Halme L, Edgren J, von Smitten K, Linden H (1993) Increased urinary excretion of iohexol after enteral administration in patients with ileal Crohn’s disease. a new test for disease activity. Acta Radiol 34:237–241PubMed
45.
Marinelli DL, Mintz MC (1987) Absorption and excretion of dilute Gastrografin during computed tomography in pseudomembranous colitis. J Comput Tomogr 11:236–238CrossRefPubMed
46.
Miller SH (1997) Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:959–961CrossRefPubMed
47.
Gmeinwieser J, Erhardt W, Reimann HJ, et al. (1990) Side effects of water-soluble contrast agents in upper gastrointestinal tract. Invest Radiol 25(suppl 1):S27–S28CrossRefPubMed
48.
Sable RA, Rosenthal WS, Siegel J, Ho R, Jankowski RH (1983) Absorption of contrast medium during ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 28:801–806CrossRefPubMed
49.
Moskovitz AH, Bush WH Jr, Horvath KD (2001) Anaphylactoid reaction to intraoperative cholangiogram. report of a case, review of literature, and guidelines for prevention. Surg Endosc 15:1227CrossRefPubMed
50.
Clement O, Webb JAW (2014) Acute adverse reactions to contrast media: mechanisms and prevention. In: Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (eds) Contrast media. Safety issues and ESUR guidelines, 3rd edn. Germany: Springer, p 57
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Pasternak JJ, Williamson EE (2012) Clinical pharmacology, uses, and adverse reactions of iodinated contrast agents: a primer for the non-radiologist. Mayo Clin Proc 87:390–402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic contrast media. a report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628CrossRefPubMed
57.
Bova JG, Jurdi RA, Bennett WF (1993) Antispasmodic drugs to reduce discomfort and colonic spasm during barium enemas: comparison of oral hyoscyamine, i.v. glucagon, and no drug. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:965–968CrossRefPubMed
58.
Thoeni RF, Margulis AR (1988) The state of radiographic technique in the examination of the colon: a survey in 1987. Radiology 167:7–12CrossRefPubMed
59.
Harned RK, Stelling CB, Williams S, Wolf GL (1976) Glucagon and barium enema examinations: a controlled clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:981–984CrossRefPubMed
60.
Chernish SM, Maglinte DD (1990) Glucagon: common untoward reactions—review and recommendations. Radiology 177:145–146CrossRefPubMed
61.
Chernish SM, Maglinte DD, Brunelle RL (1988) The laboratory response to glucagon dosages used in gastrointestinal examinations. Invest Radiol 23:847–852CrossRefPubMed
62.
63.
Scian LF, Westermann CD, Verdesca AS, et al. (1960) Adrenocortical and medullary effects of glucagon. Amer J Physiol. 199:867–870PubMed
64.
Lawrence AM (1965) A new provocative test for pheochromocytoma (abstract). Ann Intern Med. 63:905–906CrossRef
65.
66.
Sewell DD, Kodsi AB, Caligiuri MP, Jeste DV (1994) Metoclopramide and tardive dyskinesia. Biol Psychiatry 36:630–632CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Contrast media for fluoroscopic examinations of the GI and GU tracts: current challenges and recommendations
verfasst von
Michael P. Federle
Tracy A. Jaffe
Peter L. Davis
Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary
Marc S. Levine
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0861-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Abdominal Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Guest editor’s introduction: cholangiopathies: review and update

Pictorial Essay

Heterotopic pancreatic rests: imaging features, complications, and unifying concepts

OriginalPaper

Prostate cancer bone metastases on staging prostate MRI: prevalence and clinical features associated with their diagnosis

OriginalPaper

Pediatric cholangiopathies: diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tract

Pictorial Essay

Nonmalignant gastric causes of acute abdominal pain on MDCT: a pictorial review

OriginalPaper

Findings of ulceration and severe stricture on MRE can predict prognosis of Crohn’s disease in patients treated with anti-TNF treatment

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise