Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 1/2021

Open Access 01.12.2021 | COVID-19 | Research Letter

Distinct temporal characteristics of circulating alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury markers in ARDS with COVID-19

verfasst von: Kentaro Tojo, Natsuhiro Yamamoto, Takahiro Mihara, Miyo Abe, Takahisa Goto

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 1/2021

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
ARDS
acute respiratory distress syndrome
COVID-19
coronavirus disease
sRAGE
soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products
ANG-2
angiopoietin-2
SP-D
surfactant protein D
SARS-CoV-2
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
In the most severe cases, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that is characterised by alveolar epithelial and endothelial injuries [1]. There are several ARDS biomarkers, which reflect alveolar tissue injuries [2]. The level of circulating soluble form of receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) is correlated with type-1 alveolar epithelial injuries [3]. The elevation of angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2) indicates endothelial injury in patients with ARDS [4]. The increase in the circulating surfactant protein concentration indicates alveolar barrier disruption in ARDS cases [5]. Recently, Spadaro et al. reported that COVID-19 ARDS is characterised by increase in the circulating endothelial injury markers [6]. However, the detailed temporal characteristics of these markers remain unclear. In this preliminary study, we investigated the levels of circulating sRAGE, ANG-2, and surfactant protein D (SP-D) in serum samples of patients with COVID-19 with or without ARDS.
Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time polymerase chain reaction and admitted to Yokohama City University Hospital from January to August 2020 were included in this retrospective observational study (Ethics Reference Number: B200700100). Serum concentrations of sRAGE, ANG-2, and SP-D were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (human RAGE: DY1145; human ANG-2: DY623; human SP-D: DY1920; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). We compared the concentrations of these markers in patients with and without ARDS on hospital day 1 or 2. Moreover, we analysed temporal changes in these markers during the first 8 hospital days in those with ARDS. ARDS was diagnosed according to the Berlin Definition.
The data of those with and without ARDS were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. Temporal changes in the markers were analysed using the Friedman and post-hoc Dunn’s tests. The peak day for each biomarker was observed using the Kruskal–Wallis and post-hoc Dunn’s tests. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9.0 software (Graphpad Software, San Diego CA, USA). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
Eleven and ten patients with and without ARDS, respectively, all with COVID-19, were included. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1. ARDS diagnosis was made on hospital day 1 or 2. The initial serum levels of sRAGE and SP-D were significantly higher in the ARDS than in the non-ARDS group; however, no significant difference was observed in the ANG-2 levels (Table 1).
Table 1
Patient characteristics
 
Non-ARDS (n = 10)
ARDS (n = 11)
P value
Age, median (IQR), years
57 (30–72)
69 (64–76)
0.2428
Male/female, number
8/2
10/1
0.5865
APACHE2 score, median (IQR)
7 (4.75–9.75)
10 (9.00–14.00)
*0.0204
P/F ratio at admission, median (IQR)
395 (304–454)
155 (108–203)
*< 0.0001
Mechanical ventilation use, number
0
11
*< 0.0001
Laboratory data on admission, median (IQR)
 WBC count, cells/μL
4600 (2525–7925)
7000 (5800–9600)
0.1567
 Neutrophil count, cells/μL
2258 (1268–5416)
5628 (4292–7350)
*0.0430
 Lymphocyte count, cells/μL
1003 (674–1475)
643 (342–788)
*0.0048
 Platelet count, ×103 cells/μL
186 (86–317)
220 (176–287)
0.4262
 D-dimer, μg/mL
0.67 (0.00–1.04)
1.35 (0.65–2.52)
*0.0404
 CRP, mg/dL
0.98 (0.28–2.06)
14.62 (9.09–16.89)
*< 0.0001
 Creatinine, mg/dL
0.75 (0.63–0.87)
0.75 (0.59–0.89)
> 0.9999
 Total bilirubin, mg/dL
0.55 (0.40–0.78)
0.60 (0.50–1.00)
0.5661
Alveolar tissue injury marker levels on admission, median (IQR)
 sRAGE, pg/mL
896 (402–1718)
2328 (1404–4982)
*0.0079
 ANG-2, pg/mL
334 (65–781)
699 (405–2201)
0.1321
 SP-D, pg/mL
2407 (772–3833)
16,596 (6733–21,397)
*0.0062
ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, ANG-2 angiopoietin-2, SP-D surfactant protein D, sRAGE soluble form of receptor for advanced glycation end-products, WBC while blood cell, CRP c-reactive protein, IQR interquartile range
Analysis of temporal changes in these markers in 10 patients with ARDS, after excluding one patient with missing data, revealed that the serum sRAGE level peaked just after admission, and gradually decreased with hospital days (Fig. 1). Conversely, serum ANG-2 and SP-D levels did not significantly decrease during the first 8 hospital days and the peak timings of these markers were observed during a later disease stage (Fig. 1).
We showed that alveolar epithelial injury occurring at the very early disease stage, indicated by the increased sRAGE level, is a hallmark of COVID-19 ARDS. Conversely, the ANG-2 and SP-D levels peaked at later time points, suggesting that the endothelial injury and alveolar barrier disruption continued to exacerbate for several days after admission.
A study limitation was that the precise mechanism of sRAGE or ANG-2 release from the alveolar epithelial or endothelial cells remains unknown. However, the difference in the peak timing of these markers suggested distinct mechanisms for injury to each cell type. Additionally, it is possible that the initial alveolar epithelial injury might be a trigger of the subsequent exacerbation. Further investigations analysing temporal associations between these markers and inflammatory mediators could help identify the mechanisms underlying alveolar tissue injury. Moreover, the trajectory analysis of these markers linking clinical outcomes could help understand the detailed COVID-19 pathogenesis.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Department of Emergency Medicine (Prof. Ichiro Takeuchi), Department of Microbiology (Prof. Akihide Ryo), and Yokohama City University Centre for Novel and Exploratory Clinical Trials for collecting and providing the blood samples.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Yokohama City University Hospital (Approval Number: B200700100). The need for informed consent was waived by the institutional review boards because of the retrospective observational design of the study.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential competing interest.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Polak SB, Gool ICV, Cohen D, von der Thüsen JH, van Paassen J. A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19: a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:2128–38.CrossRef Polak SB, Gool ICV, Cohen D, von der Thüsen JH, van Paassen J. A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19: a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:2128–38.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. Crit Care. 2020;24:243.CrossRef van der Zee P, Rietdijk W, Somhorst P, Endeman H, Gommers D. A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality. Crit Care. 2020;24:243.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchida T, Shirasawa M, Ware LB, Kojima K, Hata Y, Makita K, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products is a marker of Type I cell injury in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care. 2006;173:1008–15.CrossRef Uchida T, Shirasawa M, Ware LB, Kojima K, Hata Y, Makita K, et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products is a marker of Type I cell injury in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care. 2006;173:1008–15.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Heijden M, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VWM, Groeneveld ABJ. Angiopoietin-2, permeability oedema, occurrence and severity of ALI/ARDS in septic and non-septic critically ill patients. Thorax. 2008;63:903.CrossRef van der Heijden M, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VWM, Groeneveld ABJ. Angiopoietin-2, permeability oedema, occurrence and severity of ALI/ARDS in septic and non-septic critically ill patients. Thorax. 2008;63:903.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan T, Nielsen LD, Allen MJ, Shannon KM, Shannon JM, Selman M, et al. Serum SP-D is a marker of lung injury in rats. Am J Physiol Lung C. 2002;282:L824–32.CrossRef Pan T, Nielsen LD, Allen MJ, Shannon KM, Shannon JM, Selman M, et al. Serum SP-D is a marker of lung injury in rats. Am J Physiol Lung C. 2002;282:L824–32.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Spadaro S, Fogagnolo A, Campo G, Zucchetti O, Verri M, Ottaviani I, et al. Markers of endothelial and epithelial pulmonary injury in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ICU patients. Crit Care. 2021;25:74.CrossRef Spadaro S, Fogagnolo A, Campo G, Zucchetti O, Verri M, Ottaviani I, et al. Markers of endothelial and epithelial pulmonary injury in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ICU patients. Crit Care. 2021;25:74.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Distinct temporal characteristics of circulating alveolar epithelial and endothelial injury markers in ARDS with COVID-19
verfasst von
Kentaro Tojo
Natsuhiro Yamamoto
Takahiro Mihara
Miyo Abe
Takahisa Goto
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
BioMed Central
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03596-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Critical Care 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Beutel versus Maschine: Beste Beatmungstechnik bei Herzstillstand gesucht

02.05.2024 Kardiopulmonale Reanimation Nachrichten

Stehen die Chancen auf eine Rückkehr der Spontanzirkulation nach Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand bei manueller oder maschineller Beatmung besser? Und unterscheidet sich das neurologische Outcome nach der Reanimation? Das belgische Herzstillstand-Register liefert die Daten für einen direkten Vergleich zwischen Beutel und Beatmungsgerät.

Tipps für den Umgang mit Behandlungsfehlern

01.05.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis es zu einem Zwischenfall kommt und ein Behandlungsfehler passiert. Doch wenn Ärztinnen und Ärzte gut vorbereitet sind, schaffen es alle Beteiligten den Umständen entsprechend gut durch diese Krise. 

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.