Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021

09.01.2021 | COVID-19 | Miscellaneous Zur Zeit gratis

Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendation for future resource utilisation

verfasst von: Aleix Rovira, Stephen Tricklebank, Pavol Surda, Stephen Whebell, Joe Zhang, Arun Takhar, Elizabeth Yeung, Kathleen Fan, Imran Ahmed, Phillip Hopkins, Deborah Dawson, Jonathan Ball, Ram Kumar, Waqas Khaliq, Ricard Simo, Asit Arora

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic placed an unprecedented demand on critical care services for the provision of mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy formation facilitates liberation from mechanical ventilation with advantages for both the patient and wider critical care resource, and can be performed using both percutaneous dilatational and surgical techniques. We compared outcomes in those patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy to those undergoing surgical tracheostomy and make recommendations for provision of tracheostomy services in any future surge.

Methods

Multicentre multidisciplinary retrospective observational cohort study including 201 patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis admitted to an ICU in one of five NHS Trusts within the South London Adult Critical Care Network who required mechanical ventilation and subsequent tracheostomy.

Results

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was performed in 124 (62%) of patients, and surgical tracheostomy in 77 (38%) of patients. There was no difference between percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy in either the rate of peri-operative complications (16.9 vs. 22.1%, p = 0.46), median [IQR(range)] time to decannulation [19.0 (15.0–30.2 (5.0–65.0)] vs. 21.0 [15.5–36.0 (5.0–70.0) days] or mortality (13.7% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.84). Of the 172 patients that were alive at follow-up, two remained ventilated and 163 were decannulated.

Conclusion

In patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis that require tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation, there was no difference in outcomes between those patients that had percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy compared with those that had surgical tracheostomy. Planning for future surges in COVID-19-related critical care demands should utilise all available resource and expertise.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ 330:1243–1246CrossRef Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ 330:1243–1246CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K (2013) Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA 309:2121–2129CrossRef Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K (2013) Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA 309:2121–2129CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Siempos II, Ntaidou TK, Filippidis FT, Choi AMK (2015) Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality and pneumonia of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 3:150–158CrossRef Siempos II, Ntaidou TK, Filippidis FT, Choi AMK (2015) Effect of early versus late or no tracheostomy on mortality and pneumonia of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 3:150–158CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieszkowska A, Combes A, Luyt C-E et al (2005) Impact of tracheotomy on sedative administration, sedation level, and comfort of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 33:2527–2533CrossRef Nieszkowska A, Combes A, Luyt C-E et al (2005) Impact of tracheotomy on sedative administration, sedation level, and comfort of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 33:2527–2533CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC (1999) Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 27:1617–1625CrossRef Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC (1999) Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 27:1617–1625CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M (2006) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 10:R55CrossRef Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M (2006) Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 10:R55CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pappas S, Maragoudakis P, Vlastarakos P et al (2011) Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:323–330CrossRef Pappas S, Maragoudakis P, Vlastarakos P et al (2011) Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:323–330CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Silvester W, Goldsmith D, Uchino S et al (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med 34:2145–2152CrossRef Silvester W, Goldsmith D, Uchino S et al (2006) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized controlled study with long-term follow-up. Crit Care Med 34:2145–2152CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver ER, Gist A, Gillespie MB (2007) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy: an updated meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 117:1570–1575CrossRef Oliver ER, Gist A, Gillespie MB (2007) Percutaneous versus surgical tracheotomy: an updated meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 117:1570–1575CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Brass P, Hellmich M, Ladra A, Ladra J, Wrzosek A (2016) Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD008045PubMed Brass P, Hellmich M, Ladra A, Ladra J, Wrzosek A (2016) Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD008045PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118:1412–1418CrossRef Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118:1412–1418CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins KM, Punthakee X (2007) Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 117:447–454CrossRef Higgins KM, Punthakee X (2007) Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 117:447–454CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng E, Fee WE (2000) Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:803–807CrossRef Cheng E, Fee WE (2000) Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:803–807CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P (2014) Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 18:544CrossRef Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Guenther U, Vargas M, Pelosi P (2014) Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 18:544CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henríquez C, et al. (2020) Systematic review of international guidelines for tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Oral Oncol 108:104844CrossRef Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henríquez C, et al. (2020) Systematic review of international guidelines for tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Oral Oncol 108:104844CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Takhar A, Walker A, Tricklebank S et al (2020) Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:2173–2184CrossRef Takhar A, Walker A, Tricklebank S et al (2020) Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:2173–2184CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipton G, Stewart M, McDermid R et al (2020) Multispecialty tracheostomy experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102:343–347CrossRef Lipton G, Stewart M, McDermid R et al (2020) Multispecialty tracheostomy experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102:343–347CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH (2020) Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Haematol 7:e438–e440CrossRef Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH (2020) Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Haematol 7:e438–e440CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat The ARDS definition task force (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 307:2526–2533 The ARDS definition task force (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 307:2526–2533
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Marini JJ, Gattinoni L (2020) Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA 323:2329–2330CrossRef Marini JJ, Gattinoni L (2020) Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA 323:2329–2330CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendation for future resource utilisation
verfasst von
Aleix Rovira
Stephen Tricklebank
Pavol Surda
Stephen Whebell
Joe Zhang
Arun Takhar
Elizabeth Yeung
Kathleen Fan
Imran Ahmed
Phillip Hopkins
Deborah Dawson
Jonathan Ball
Ram Kumar
Waqas Khaliq
Ricard Simo
Asit Arora
Publikationsdatum
09.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Schlagwort
COVID-19
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06597-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.