Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences 12/2017

01.12.2017 | Original Article

CSF RBC count in successful first-attempt lumbar puncture: the interest of atraumatic needle use

verfasst von: Dimitri Renard, Eric Thouvenot

Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze CSF red blood cell (RBC) count from first-attempt lumbar punctures and to analyze parameters associated with first-attempt lumbar punctures and hemorrhagic lumbar puncture. This is a prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent lumbar puncture for any reason other than suspected acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Analyzed parameters were the following: age, indication for lumbar puncture, aPTT ratio, PTT, platelet count, patient’s position, needle type (atraumatic/standard), needle diameter, person performing lumbar puncture (medical student/resident/attending physician), number of lumbar levels punctured, necessity of needle repositioning, CSF RBC and white blood cell count, and protein level. Lumbar puncture resulting in RBC count > 5 RBC/mm2 was classified as hemorrhagic lumbar puncture (different cut-offs were studied: > 5/> 10/> 100/> 500/> 1000 RBC). In total, 169 elective lumbar punctures in 165 different patients were included. First-attempt lumbar puncture occurred in 22% > 5 RBC, in 19.5% > 10 RBC, in 4.5% > 100 RBC, in 3% > 500 RBC, and 1.5% > 1000 RBC count. First-attempt lumbar puncture was associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture for each of the RBC count cut-offs (OR for non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture in first-attempt lumbar puncture 2.8, 95% CI 1.4–5.7). The presence of a hemorrhagic disorder (concerning cerebral amyloid angiopathy in all patients) and higher aPTT ratio were associated with hemorrhagic lumbar puncture. Atraumatic needle use was associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture for RBC count cut-offs ≤ 5 and ≤ 10 RBC (OR for non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture in atraumatic needle use 2.5 [95% CI 1.3–4.8] and 2.2 [95% CI 1.1–4.4], respectively). First-attempt lumbar puncture and hemorrhagic lumbar puncture were not associated with other parameters. Slightly elevated CSF RBC count after first-attempt lumbar puncture occurs relatively frequently, but is even more frequent in non-first-attempt lumbar puncture. Atraumatic needle use is associated with non-hemorrhagic lumbar puncture.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Glatstein MM, Zucker-Toledano M, Arik A et al (2011) Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture: experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 50:1005–1009CrossRef Glatstein MM, Zucker-Toledano M, Arik A et al (2011) Incidence of traumatic lumbar puncture: experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 50:1005–1009CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard SC, Gajjar AJ, Cheng C et al (2002) Risk factors for traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA 288:2001–2007CrossRefPubMed Howard SC, Gajjar AJ, Cheng C et al (2002) Risk factors for traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA 288:2001–2007CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Strupp M, Schueler O, Straube A et al (2001) “Atraumatic” Sprotte needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture headaches. Neurology 57:2310–2312CrossRefPubMed Strupp M, Schueler O, Straube A et al (2001) “Atraumatic” Sprotte needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture headaches. Neurology 57:2310–2312CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelzer N, Vandersteene J, Bekooij TJ et al (2014) Are atraumatic spinal needles as efficient as traumatic needles for lumbar puncture? Neurol Sci 35:1997–1999CrossRefPubMed Pelzer N, Vandersteene J, Bekooij TJ et al (2014) Are atraumatic spinal needles as efficient as traumatic needles for lumbar puncture? Neurol Sci 35:1997–1999CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavi R, Yarnitsky D, Rowe JM et al (2006) Standard vs atraumatic Whitacre needle for diagnostic lumbar puncture: a randomized trial. Neurology 67:1492–1494CrossRefPubMed Lavi R, Yarnitsky D, Rowe JM et al (2006) Standard vs atraumatic Whitacre needle for diagnostic lumbar puncture: a randomized trial. Neurology 67:1492–1494CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Czuczman AD, Thomas LE, Boulanger AB et al (2013) Interpreting red blood cells in lumbar puncture: distinguishing true subarachnoid hemorrhage from traumatic tap. Acad Emerg Med 20:247–256CrossRefPubMed Czuczman AD, Thomas LE, Boulanger AB et al (2013) Interpreting red blood cells in lumbar puncture: distinguishing true subarachnoid hemorrhage from traumatic tap. Acad Emerg Med 20:247–256CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pappano D (2010) “Traumatic tap” proportion in pediatric lumbar puncture. Pediatr Emerg Care 26:487–489CrossRefPubMed Pappano D (2010) “Traumatic tap” proportion in pediatric lumbar puncture. Pediatr Emerg Care 26:487–489CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas SR, Jamieson DR, Muir KW (2000) Randomised controlled trial of atraumatic versus standard needles for diagnostic lumbar puncture. BMJ 321:986–990CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas SR, Jamieson DR, Muir KW (2000) Randomised controlled trial of atraumatic versus standard needles for diagnostic lumbar puncture. BMJ 321:986–990CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
CSF RBC count in successful first-attempt lumbar puncture: the interest of atraumatic needle use
verfasst von
Dimitri Renard
Eric Thouvenot
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Neurological Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Elektronische ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3142-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Neurological Sciences 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.