nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2011 | Chest

CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance

verfasst von: Ga Ram Kim, Jin Hur, Sang Min Lee, Hye-Jeong Lee, Yoo Jin Hong, Ji Eun Nam, Hua Sun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Byoung Wook Choi, Tae Hoon Kim, Kyu Ok Choe

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

We evaluated radiation doses, complication rates, and diagnostic accuracy for CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy (NAB) procedures of pulmonary lesions performed with or without fluoroscopic guidance.

Methods

A total of 142 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive CT-guided NAB with (Group I, n = 72) or without (Group II, n = 70) fluoroscopic guidance. Outcome measurements were patient and doctor radiation dose, and complication rate. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated based on 123 NAB results.

Results

The mean estimated effective patient radiation dose was 6.53 mSv in Group I and 2.72 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The mean estimated effective doctor dose was 0.054 mSv in Group I and 0.029 mSv in Group II (p < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly different between the two groups (13.4% versus 31.4%, p = 0.012). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing pulmonary lesions were 97.8%, 100% and 98.4% in group I and 95.3%, 100% and 89.5% in group II (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

CT fluoroscopy-guided NAB of pulmonary lesions provides high diagnostic accuracy and can be performed with significantly fewer complications. However, radiation exposure to both patient and doctor were significantly higher than conventional CT-guided NAB.

Bungay HK, Berger J, Traill ZC, Gleeson FV (1999) Pneumothorax post CT-guided lung biopsy: a comparison between detection on chest radiographs and CT. Br J Radiol 72:1160–1163PubMed

Hayashi N, Sakai T, Kitagawa M et al (1998) CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm: usefulness of the spring-operated core biopsy needle and frozen-section pathologic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:329–331PubMed

Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ (1996) Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology 198:371–375PubMed

vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Ho M et al (1988) Difficult thoracic lesions: CT-guided biopsy experience in 150 cases. Radiology 167:457–461PubMed

Daly B, Templeton PA (1999) Real-time CT fluoroscopy: evolution of an interventional tool. Radiology 211:309–315PubMed

Gianfelice D, Lepanto L, Perreault P, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Milette PC (2000) Value of CT fluoroscopy for percutaneous biopsy procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:879–884CrossRefPubMed

Meyer CA, White CS, Wu J, Futterer SF, Templeton PA (1998) Real-time CT fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1097–1101PubMed

Froelich JJ, Ishaque N, Regn J, Saar B, Walthers EM, Klose KJ (2002) Guidance of percutaneous pulmonary biopsies with real-time CT fluoroscopy. Eur J Radiol 42:74–79CrossRefPubMed

Kirchner J, Kickuth R, Laufer U, Schilling EM, Adams S, Liermann D (2002) CT fluoroscopy-assisted puncture of thoracic and abdominal masses: a randomized trial. Clin Radiol 57:188–192CrossRefPubMed

10.

Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF (1999) CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 212:673–681PubMed

11.

Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M et al (1998) Real-time CT-fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:735–740CrossRefPubMed

12.

Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS (1999) Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:637–644PubMed

13.

Heck SL, Blom P, Berstad A (2006) Accuracy and complications in computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided needle biopsies of lung masses. Eur Radiol 16:1387–1392CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF (2000) Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 216:180–184PubMed

15.

Kato R, Katada K, Anno H, Suzuki S, Ida Y, Koga S (1996) Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders. Radiology 201:576–578PubMed

16.

Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT (2001) CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 220:161–167PubMed

17.

(2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999, Luxembourg

18.

Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ (1976) Precise biopsy localization by computer tomography. Radiology 118:603–607PubMed

19.

Harter LP, Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Gross BH (1983) CT-guided fine-needle aspirations for diagnosis of benign and malignant disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140:363–367PubMed

20.

Carlson SK, Felmlee JP, Bender CE et al (2005) CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of the lung or upper abdomen with a breath-hold monitoring and feedback system: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Radiology 237:701–708CrossRefPubMed

21.

Yeow KM, See LC, Lui KW et al (2001) Risk factors for pneumothorax and bleeding after CT-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1305–1312CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hirose T, Mori K, Machida S, Tominaga K, Yokoi K, Adachi M (2000) Computed tomographic fluoroscopy-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Jpn J Clin Oncol 30:259–262CrossRefPubMed

23.

Yamagami T, Iida S, Kato T et al (2003) Usefulness of new automated cutting needle for tissue-core biopsy of lung nodules under CT fluoroscopic guidance. Chest 124:147–154CrossRefPubMed

24.

Yamagami T, Iida S, Kato T, Tanaka O, Nishimura T (2003) Combining fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy under CT fluoroscopy guidance: a better way to treat patients with lung nodules? AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:811–815PubMed

25.

Yeow KM, Tsay PK, Cheung YC, Lui KW, Pan KT, Chou AS (2003) Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of 631 procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:581–588PubMed

26.

Tsukada H, Satou T, Iwashima A, Souma T (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided automated needle biopsy of lung nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:239–243PubMed

27.

Jin KN, Park CM, Goo JM et al (2010) Initial experience of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules using C-arm cone-beam CT systems. Eur Radiol 20:2108–2115PubMed

28.

Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H et al (2010) Incidence of and risk factors for pneumothorax and chest tube placement after CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous lung biopsy: retrospective analysis of the procedures conducted over a 9-year period. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:809–814CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ko JP, Shepard JO, Drucker EA et al (2001) Factors influencing pneumothorax rate at lung biopsy: are dwell time and angle of pleural puncture contributing factors? Radiology 218:491–496PubMed

Titel: CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance
verfasst von: Ga Ram Kim
Jin Hur
Sang Min Lee
Hye-Jeong Lee
Yoo Jin Hong
Ji Eun Nam
Hua Sun Kim
Young Jin Kim
Byoung Wook Choi
Tae Hoon Kim
Kyu Ok Choe
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance