Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Insights into Imaging 1/2016

Open Access 01.02.2016 | Pictorial Review

CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know

verfasst von: Simon Nicolay, Rodrigo A. Salgado, Bharati Shivalkar, Paul L. Van Herck, Christiaan Vrints, Paul M. Parizel

Erschienen in: Insights into Imaging | Ausgabe 1/2016

Abstract

In the last decade, cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained mainstream acceptance for the noninvasive exclusion of significant coronary disease in a selected population. Improvements in electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered imaging techniques also allow, by extension, a proper evaluation of the complete heart anatomy. Given the increasing worldwide clinical implementation of cardiac CT for coronary artery evaluation, radiologists can, incidentally, be confronted with unfamiliar and previously unsuspected non-coronary cardiac pathologies, including congenital morphological defects. This presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) should not be overlooked, being the most common form of birth defect, with a total birth prevalence of 9.1 per 1000 live births worldwide [1]. The prevalence of adult patients with CHD is estimated to be 3000 per million adults [2]. Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most frequent subtypes of CHD, accounting together with atrial septal defects (ASDs) for nearly half of all CHD cases [1]. While some small defects are rarely symptomatic and can go undetected for life, others are clinically significant and require adequate and timely medical intervention. In this article, we present the CT imaging features of atrioventricular (AV) shunts, highlighting both their embryological origins and associated relevant clinical features.

Teaching points

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect.
Ventricular and atrial septal defects account for nearly half of CHD cases.
Atrioventricular defects can frequently be detected on a cardiac CT.
Radiologists must be able to identify clinically significant atrioventricular defects.

Introduction

In the last decade, cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained mainstream acceptance for the noninvasive exclusion of significant coronary disease in a selected population. Improvements in electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered imaging techniques also allow, by extension, a proper evaluation of the complete heart anatomy. Given the increasing worldwide clinical implementation of cardiac CT for coronary artery evaluation, radiologists can, incidentally, be confronted with unfamiliar and previously unsuspected non-coronary cardiac pathologies, including congenital morphological defects. This presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) should not be overlooked, being the most common form of birth defect, with a total birth prevalence of 9.1 per 1000 live births worldwide [1]. The prevalence of adult patients with CHD is estimated to be 3000 per million adults [2]. Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most frequent subtypes of CHD, accounting together with atrial septal defects (ASDs) for nearly half of all CHD cases [1]. While some small defects are rarely symptomatic and can go undetected for life, others are clinically significant and require adequate and timely medical intervention. In this article, we present the CT imaging features of atrioventricular (AV) shunts, highlighting both their embryological origins and associated relevant clinical features.

Concise overview of relevant embryology and anatomy

The development of atrial septation initiates 28–30 days after gestation, with key elements of this development shown in Figs. 1 and 2 [35]. In short, the AV canal develops together with atrial septation. Cells from the primitive endocardium migrate and form the endocardial cushions, which are swellings of connective tissue surrounding the AV canal (Figs. 3 and 4) [4, 5]. Septation of the primitive ventricle occurs simultaneously with atrial septation in the fifth to seventh week. Furthermore, it is closely related to the septation of the truncus and conus cordis, which leads to the formation of the future ventricular outflow tracts. The complete separation of both ventricles is the final result of these two processes (Figs. 5, 6, and 7) [4, 5].

Multimodality imaging of intracardiac shunts

The most used technique for intracardiac shunt evaluation is transthoracic and especially transoesophageal echocardiography, which is by many still considered the reference standard [6]. However, both CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be used to visualize intracardiac shunts [7, 8]. The choice between these imaging modalities often depends on the local expertise and available equipment. When further comparing CT versus MRI, MRI is a more complex technique but may provide functional cardiac information and may be able to quantify the degree of an AV shunt by volumetric measurements of the ventricles and flow quantification over the cardiac valves.
Furthermore, MRI has the advantage of not using radiation and can also be performed without the use of intravenous contrast administration. Conversely, CT has been proven to deliver exquisite anatomic visualization of cardiac anatomy in a short examination time with little physician input. While it is not customary to use CT for the visualization of intracardiac shunts, the use of ECG gating techniques during routine examinations targeted at the coronary arteries allows excellent simultaneous visualization of these congenital defects, as such, enhancing the value of the radiology report [8, 9]. When large, they can also be detected on non-ECG-gated CT examinations.

Atrial shunts

An ASD is defined as a persistent opening in the interatrial septum after birth, allowing communication between the left and the right atrium [5, 6]. When present, oxygenated blood shunts from the left atrium to the right atrium, the shunted volume depending on the size of the defect.
The reported birth prevalence of ASDs is 1.64 per 1000 live births, accounting for 13 % of all CHDs [1]. They account for 25–30 % of CHD cases diagnosed in adulthood [10]. Remarkably, most ASDs, even those with a large left-to-right shunt, go undiagnosed through most of one’s childhood and may only become symptomatic in the fifth decade or later. The exact age at which symptoms begin is highly variable and not exclusively related to the size of the shunt. With advancing age, the risk of developing exercise intolerance, atrial fibrillation or even decompensated right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension increases [11].
ASDs are detectable on both contrast-enhanced CT and MR examinations. While they can be appreciated on standard axial images, their presence and further characterization is often better appreciated on oblique, reformatted images perpendicular to the atrial septal plane.

Patent foramen ovale

During fetal life, a normal interatrial communication through the oval foramen exists, providing oxygenated blood from the inferior vena cava into the left atrium. As such, this communication is not a true ASD but a necessary passage tunnelled during embryologic development. It is commonly encountered in newborn babies. With advancing age, left atrial pressure increases, functionally closing the foramen ovale by pushing the septum primum flap against the septum secundum. In a vast majority of cases, normal development evolves to complete septal fusion. However, a failed fusion with persistent interatrial communication is called a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common finding found in up to 25 % of adults [12].
Reflecting the embryologic purpose of arteriovenous communication, a PFO has a vertical cranio-caudal orientation in the direction of the inferior vena cava, best seen on axial images or oblique images perpendicular to the atrial septum. Both the OP and secundum flap can then be identified, surrounded by dense intravenous contrast, as demonstrated in Fig. 8. A variable amount of dense contrast can often be seen flowing into the right atrium. Incomplete fusion does not necessary imply that an interatrial shunt exists, as the septum can be functionally closed with still identifiable septum flaps. This anatomic variation is called a probe PFO (Fig. 9).
PFO’s are mostly clinically silent, frequently seen during cardiac CT examination performed for unrelated reasons [8]. When large, they can also be detected on non-ECG gated CT examinations [13]. In asymptomatic patients with an incidental PFO, no medical or interventional therapy is advised. Furthermore, a potential benefit of having a PFO is facilitation of transseptal catheter passage in radiofrequency ablation procedures. The criteria for PFO closure are not standardized. Whether transcatheter PFO closure is considered superior to medical therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke is currently the subject of intense debate and research [14, 15].

Ostium primum defect

An OP defect is a less common type of ASD, accounting for 15 % of ASDs. They occur in the lower portion of the atrial septum near the AV valves. The embryological basis of this defect is shown in Fig. 10. In the presence of an OP defect, one should therefore always look for an associated valve defect, most frequently a cleft in the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve.
Since OP defects are often large they can easily be depicted on CT, revealing a large shunt flow, typically perpendicular to the interatrial septum. Oblique CT images allow detailed evaluation of the anatomy, such as the relationship with the AV valves and the absence of a flap, as illustrated in Fig. 11. As in all types of ASDs, surgical closure of the defect is indicated in those patients with a hemodynamically significant shunt that causes enlargement of the right heart structures. Suspicion of paradoxal embolism in the absence of other causes is also a valid indication for defect closure [16, 17].

Ostium secundum defect

Ostium secundum defects are the most frequent type of ASD, accounting for 75 % of all cases. They are found in the region of the fossa ovalis. The embryological basis of this ASD is illustrated in Fig. 12. Contrary to a PFO, an overlapping septal flap is lacking. As in OP defects, a shunt flow perpendicular to the axis of the interatrial septum is seen, in contrast to the more oblique cranio-caudal flow of a PFO, as demonstrated in Fig. 13.
Small defects are often asymptomatic and usually do not require treatment. Large defects, however, can initially cause volume overload of the right heart, eventually leading to pressure overload with dilatation of the right atrium and ventricle. As a consequence, right heart failure, pulmonary hypertension and right-to-left shunting may render this type of ASD to become symptomatic, usually in the fifth decade. This can be prevented by shunt closure, either surgically or endovasculary depending on the characteristics of the defect. Large defects and defects close to the edge of the interatrial wall are less suited for the endovascular approach since most closing devices cannot be anchored properly [16, 17].

Sinus venosus defect

Sinus venosus defects represent 4–11 % of atrial septum defects [18]. The name is derived from an abnormal absorption of the embryologic sinus venosus into the right atrium. In this defect, communication exists between one or more of the right pulmonary veins and the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium, called the superior vena cava type, as demonstrated in Fig. 14. Sometimes, only the superior vena cava is involved (Fig. 15). In fewer cases, this occurs just above the junction of the inferior vena cava and the right atrium (inferior sinus venosus defect) [19]. The presence of a sinus venosus defect may lead to volume and pressure overload of the right heart. Multiplanar CT reconstructions are very useful in the assessment of the complex anatomy of this type of ASD. Sinus venosus defects with significant hemodynamic impact need surgical correction to prevent further right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension [16, 17].

Ventricular shunts

A ventricular septum defect (VSD) is an abnormal opening in the VS [5], allowing communication between the ventricular cavities. In children, VSDs are the second most common CHD (34 %) with a birth incidence of 2.62 per 1000 live births [1]. Most of these are small and spontaneously resolve in childhood, the majority within the 1 year after birth [20]. VSDs may also be acquired after acute myocardial infarction, chest trauma, cardiac interventions, or endocarditis.
In the adult population, the prevalence is estimated to be 0.3 per 1000 [21], making it the second most common form of CHD after the bicuspid aortic valve.

Membranous VSD

Membranous VSDs are the most common type of VSD, accounting for 70–80 % of all cases. It is located in the upper part of the VS directly below the aortic valve and behind the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve (Fig. 16). Because of their proximity to the defect regurgitation of these valves may occur.
There are two main subtypes, a true defect that is confined to the membranous septum alone and defects that extend into the muscular septum. Untreated VSDs in adults are almost always small defects with little hemodynamic load on the heart, and no risk of pulmonary vascular disease. Their only risk is infective endocarditis or arrhythmias. The proportion of VSDs that are large and hemodynamically significant is assumed to form 20 % of all VSDs [22]. In large defects, there is usually a volume overload of the right ventricle, the pulmonary circulation and eventually the left atrium and left ventricle. If untreated, this leads to a left ventricular dilatation, systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Eventually, even pulmonary vascular disease and right-to-left shunting (Eisenmenger syndrome) will develop [5]. Most patients with these large defects born before 1960 would not have had effective surgical treatment and very few of them would be alive today. Therefore, those adults seen today are virtually all postoperative [5, 23].

Muscular VSD

These defects are confined to the muscular septum and account for 20 % of VSDs. The apical two thirds of the muscular septum is most frequently involved (Fig. 17). Multiple small defects (“Swiss cheese” septum) can occur and have the same hemodynamic effects as a single large defect [5]. Small and moderate VSDs in children frequently close entirely or sufficiently within the first 2 years making intervention unnecessary. They are often asymptomatic and have an excellent prognosis. When symptoms of heart failure or pulmonary vascular disease occur in neonates, often in case of large VSDs, surgical correction is recommended. Patients with an unclosed VSD are at risk for endocarditis and need a life-long prophylaxis. Adults with irreversible pulmonary damage and Eisenmenger syndrome are not eligible for closure of the defect, because right heart failure can be induced. Large defects with normal pulmonary vascular resistance, on the other hand, can still be treated with repair of the defect [24].

Ventricle septum diverticulum

Ventricle septum diverticulum is not a true VSD but it can be a mimicker, so it is worth mentioning. This is a rare congenital malformation that is defined as an out pouching of one of the ventricles into the interventricular septum, as shown in Fig. 18 [25].

Rare VSDs

A supracristal VSD is a rare type (5–8 %) and is located beneath the aortic and pulmonic valves and connects the aorta with the right ventricular outflow tract. It is often associated with aortic valve prolapse. A second uncommon VSD (8–10 %) is situated posterior to the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve. It is usually associated with an AV septal defect or anomalous insertion of the chordae tendinae of the AV valves.

Imaging after intervention

Different devices are available today for closure of clinically significant intracardiac shunts. They not only differ in architecture but also in imaging compatibility, such as artefact production on CT. This is nicely illustrated in three different ASD closure devices in Fig. 19. Devices used for VSD closure are comparable with those used in ASD closure (Fig. 20). The choice of device and access route depends largely on the location and morphology of the shunt to be treated. Transoesophageal echocardiography remains the golden standard in this pre-procedural assessment, but CT is found to give equal information [8, 9]. Transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography, however, remain the reference standard for detection and follow-up of residual shunts [26, 27]. In post-procedural follow-up too, CT can still play an important role, i.e. in detecting complications at the site of intervention but also along the access route, e.g. pseudoaneurysm formation at the puncture site.

Conclusion

Noninvasive cardiac CT imaging is becoming increasingly common in daily practice. But there is more to see than just the coronary arteries. Clinically important structural heart defects can be detected as well. Knowledge of this kind of pathology is the key to detection, which eventually increases the value of the radiological report. In this article, we give an overview of common types of congenital disease, the AV shunts. We try to emphasize which defects are clinically important and which are insignificant.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247CrossRefPubMed van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Bom T, Bouma BJ, Meijboom FJ, Zwinderman AH, Mulder BJ (2012) The prevalence of adult congenital heart disease, results from a systematic review and evidence based calculation. Am Heart J 164(4):568–575CrossRefPubMed van der Bom T, Bouma BJ, Meijboom FJ, Zwinderman AH, Mulder BJ (2012) The prevalence of adult congenital heart disease, results from a systematic review and evidence based calculation. Am Heart J 164(4):568–575CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadler TW (2015) Langman’s medical embryology, 13th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Sadler TW (2015) Langman’s medical embryology, 13th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lilly LS (2011) Pathophysiology of heart disease : a collaborative project of medical students and faculty, 5th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia Lilly LS (2011) Pathophysiology of heart disease : a collaborative project of medical students and faculty, 5th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat White HD, Halpern EJ, Savage MP (2013) Imaging of adult atrial septal defects with CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(12):1342–1345CrossRefPubMed White HD, Halpern EJ, Savage MP (2013) Imaging of adult atrial septal defects with CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(12):1342–1345CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saremi F, Channual S, Raney A et al (2008) Imaging of patent foramen ovale with 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 249(2):483–492CrossRefPubMed Saremi F, Channual S, Raney A et al (2008) Imaging of patent foramen ovale with 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 249(2):483–492CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johri AM, Rojas CA, El-Sherief A et al (2011) Imaging of atrial septal defects: echocardiography and CT correlation. Heart 97(17):1441–1453CrossRefPubMed Johri AM, Rojas CA, El-Sherief A et al (2011) Imaging of atrial septal defects: echocardiography and CT correlation. Heart 97(17):1441–1453CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsey JB, Hillis LD (2007) Clinical update: atrial septal defect in adults. Lancet 369(9569):1244–1246CrossRefPubMed Lindsey JB, Hillis LD (2007) Clinical update: atrial septal defect in adults. Lancet 369(9569):1244–1246CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb G, Gatzoulis MA (2006) Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and overview. Circulation 114(15):1645–1653CrossRefPubMed Webb G, Gatzoulis MA (2006) Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and overview. Circulation 114(15):1645–1653CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E et al (2005) Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(9):1768–1776CrossRefPubMed Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E et al (2005) Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(9):1768–1776CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Revel MP, Faivre JB, Letourneau T et al (2008) Patent foramen ovale: detection with nongated multidetector CT. Radiology 249(1):338–345CrossRefPubMed Revel MP, Faivre JB, Letourneau T et al (2008) Patent foramen ovale: detection with nongated multidetector CT. Radiology 249(1):338–345CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE et al (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368(12):1092–1100CrossRefPubMed Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE et al (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368(12):1092–1100CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsanos AH, Spence JD, Bogiatzi C et al (2014) Recurrent stroke and patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45(11):3352–3359CrossRefPubMed Katsanos AH, Spence JD, Bogiatzi C et al (2014) Recurrent stroke and patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45(11):3352–3359CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM et al (2010) ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 31(23):2915–2957CrossRefPubMed Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM et al (2010) ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 31(23):2915–2957CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(23):143–263CrossRef Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(23):143–263CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Attenhofer Jost CH, Connolly HM, Danielson GK et al (2005) Sinus venosus atrial septal defect: long-term postoperative outcome for 115 patients. Circulation 112(13):1953–1958CrossRefPubMed Attenhofer Jost CH, Connolly HM, Danielson GK et al (2005) Sinus venosus atrial septal defect: long-term postoperative outcome for 115 patients. Circulation 112(13):1953–1958CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Praagh S, Carrera ME, Sanders SP, Mayer JE, Van Praagh R (1994) Sinus venosus defects: unroofing of the right pulmonary veins--anatomic and echocardiographic findings and surgical treatment. Am Heart J 128(2):365–379CrossRefPubMed Van Praagh S, Carrera ME, Sanders SP, Mayer JE, Van Praagh R (1994) Sinus venosus defects: unroofing of the right pulmonary veins--anatomic and echocardiographic findings and surgical treatment. Am Heart J 128(2):365–379CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Warnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK et al (2001) Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(5):1170–1175CrossRefPubMed Warnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK et al (2001) Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(5):1170–1175CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman JI, Kaplan S, Liberthson RR (2004) Prevalence of congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 147(3):425–439CrossRefPubMed Hoffman JI, Kaplan S, Liberthson RR (2004) Prevalence of congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 147(3):425–439CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitsis AA, Visouli AN, Kelpis TG et al (2008) Diverticulum of the left ventricle: etiology and surgical treatment. Heart Surg Forum 11(2):75–77CrossRef Pitsis AA, Visouli AN, Kelpis TG et al (2008) Diverticulum of the left ventricle: etiology and surgical treatment. Heart Surg Forum 11(2):75–77CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat von Bardeleben RS, Richter C, Otto J et al (2009) Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm. Int J Cardiol 134(1):33–41CrossRef von Bardeleben RS, Richter C, Otto J et al (2009) Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm. Int J Cardiol 134(1):33–41CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafi NA, McKay RG, Kiernan FJ, Silverman IE, Ahlquist M, Silverman DI (2009) Determinants and clinical significance of persistent residual shunting in patients with percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure devices. Int J Cardiol 137(3):314–316CrossRefPubMed Shafi NA, McKay RG, Kiernan FJ, Silverman IE, Ahlquist M, Silverman DI (2009) Determinants and clinical significance of persistent residual shunting in patients with percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure devices. Int J Cardiol 137(3):314–316CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know
verfasst von
Simon Nicolay
Rodrigo A. Salgado
Bharati Shivalkar
Paul L. Van Herck
Christiaan Vrints
Paul M. Parizel
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Insights into Imaging / Ausgabe 1/2016
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0452-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Insights into Imaging 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.