Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Radiology
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2018

26.01.2018 | Breast

Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT

verfasst von: Xinbin Li, Hewei Gao, Zhiqiang Chen, Li Zhang, Xiaohua Zhu, Shengping Wang, Weijun Peng

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Microcalcifications are an important feature in the diagnosis of breast cancer, especially in the early stages. In this paper, a CT-based method is proposed to potentially distinguish benign and malignant breast diseases based on the distributions of microcalcifications using grating-based phase-contrast imaging on a conventional X-ray tube.

Methods

The method presented based on the ratio of dark-field signals to attenuation signals in CT images is compared with the existing method based on the ratio in projections, and the threshold for the classification of microcalcifications in the two types of breast diseases is obtained using our approach. The experiment was operated on paraffin-fixed specimens that originated from 20 female patients ranging from 27–65 years old.

Results

Compared with the method based on projection images (AUC = 0.87), the proposed method is more effective (AUC = 0.95) to distinguish the two types of diseases. The discrimination threshold of microcalcifications for the classification of diseases in CT images is found to be 3.78 based on the Youden index.

Conclusions

The proposed method can be further developed to improve the early diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy and reduce the clinical misdiagnosis rate of breast cancer.

Key Points

• Microcalcifications are of special importance to indicate early breast cancer.
• Grating-based phase-contrast imaging can improve the diagnosis of breast cancers.
• The method described here can better classify benign and malignant breast diseases.
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS (1991) Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 178:149–154CrossRefPubMed
4.
Brenner RJ, Pfaff JM (1996) Mammographic features after conservation therapy for malignant breast disease: Serial findings standardized by regression analysis. Am J Roentgenol 167:171–178CrossRef
5.
6.
Anton G, Bayer F, Beckmann MW, et al (2013) Grating-based darkfield imaging of human breast tissue. Z Med Phys 23:228–235CrossRefPubMed
7.
Radi MJ (1989) Calcium oxalate crystals in breast biopsies. An overlooked form of microcalcification associated with benign breast disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 113:1367–1369PubMed
8.
Johnson JM (1999) Histological Correlation of Microcalcifications in Breast Biopsy Specimens. Arch Surg 134:712CrossRefPubMed
9.
Haka AS, Shafer-Peltier KE, Fitzmaurice M, Crowe J, Dasari RR, Feld MS (2002) Identifying microcalcifications in benign and malignant breast lesions by probing differences in their chemical composition using raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res. 62:5375–5380PubMed
10.
Dahlstrom JE, Jain S (2001) Histological correlation of mammographically detected microcalcifications in stereotactic core biopsies. Pathology 33:444–448CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder SE, Wells CA, Zakhour HD (2004) Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 57:897–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Cai W, Ning R (2009) Dose efficiency consideration for volume-of-interest breast imaging using x-ray differential phase-contrast CT. Proc SPIE 7258:72584D–72584D–9CrossRef
13.
Stampanoni M, Wang Z, Thüring T, et al (2011) The first analysis and clinical evaluation of native breast tissue using differential phase-contrast mammography. Invest Radiol 46:801–806CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hauser N, Wang Z, Kubik-Huch RA, et al (2014) A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography. Invest Radiol 49:131–137CrossRefPubMed
15.
Sztrókay A, Herzen J, Auweter SD, et al (2013) Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up. Eur Radiol 23:381–387CrossRefPubMed
16.
Willner M, Herzen J, Grandl S, et al (2014) Quantitative breast tissue characterization using grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging. Phys Med Biol 59:1557–1571CrossRefPubMed
17.
Michette A, Buckley C (1993) X-ray science and technology
18.
Keyrilainen J, Bravin A, Fernandez M, Tenhunen M, Virkkunen P, Suortti P (2010) Phase-contrast X-ray imaging of breast. Acta Radiol 51:866–884CrossRefPubMed
19.
Bonse U, Hart M (1965) An X-ray interferometer. Appl Phys Lett 6:155–156CrossRef
20.
Takeda M, Ina H, Kobayashi S (1982) Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry. J Opt Soc Am 72:156CrossRef
21.
Momose A, Fukuda J (1995) Phase-contrast radiographs of nonstained rat cerebellar specimen. Med Phys 22:375–379CrossRefPubMed
22.
Davis TJ, Gao D, Gureyev TE, Stevenson AW, Wilkins SW (1995) Phase-contrast imaging of weakly absorbing materials using hard X-rays. Nature 373:595–598CrossRef
23.
Chapman D, Thomlinson W, Johnston RE, et al (1997) Diffraction enhanced x-ray imaging. Phys Med Biol 42:2015–2025CrossRefPubMed
24.
Snigirev A, Snigireva I, Kohn V, Kuznetsov S, Schelokov I (1995) On the possibilities of x-ray phase contrast microimaging by coherent high-energy synchrotron radiation. Rev Sci Instrum 66:5486–5492CrossRef
25.
Wilkins SW, Gureyev TE, Gao D, Pogany A, Stevenson AW (1996) Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays. Nature 384:335–338CrossRef
26.
Chen R, Liu P, Xiao T, Xu LX (2014) X-ray imaging for non-destructive microstructure analysis at SSRF. Adv Mater 26:7688–7691CrossRefPubMed
27.
David C, Nöhammer B, Solak HH, Ziegler E (2002) Differential x-ray phase contrast imaging using a shearing interferometer. Appl Phys Lett 81:3287–3289CrossRef
28.
Momose A (2003) Phase-sensitive imaging and phase tomography using X-ray interferometers. Opt Express 11:2303–2314CrossRefPubMed
29.
Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T, Bunk O, David C (2006) Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nat Phys 2:258–261CrossRef
30.
David C, Weitkamp T, Pfeiffer F, et al (2007) Hard X-ray phase imaging and tomography using a grating interferometer. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 62:626–630CrossRef
31.
Pfeiffer F (2012) Milestones and basic principles of grating-based x-ray and neutron phase-contrast imaging. AIP Conf Proc 1466:2–11CrossRef
32.
Coan P, Bravin A, Tromba G (2013) Phase-contrast x-ray imaging of the breast: recent developments towards clinics. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:494007CrossRef
33.
Roessl E, Daerr H, Koehler T, Martens G, van Stevendaal U (2014) Clinical boundary conditions for grating-based differential phase-contrast mammography. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 372:1–7CrossRef
34.
Fredenberg E, Danielsson M, Stayman JW, Siewerdsen JH, Aslund M, Åslund M (2012) Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach. Med Phys 39:5317–5335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Olivo A, Gkoumas S, Endrizzi M, et al (2013) Low-dose phase contrast mammography with conventional x-ray sources. Med Phys 40:90701CrossRef
36.
Morita T, Yamada M, Kano A, Nagatsuka S, Honda C, Endo T (2008) A comparison between film-screen mammography and full-field digital mammography utilizing phase contrast technology in breast cancer screening programs. Digital Mammography 2008:48–54
37.
Tanaka T, Honda C, Matsuo S, et al (2005) The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube. Invest Radiol 40:385–396CrossRefPubMed
38.
Michel T, Rieger J, Anton G, et al (2013) On a dark-field signal generated by micrometer-sized calcifications in phase-contrast mammography. Phys Med Biol 58:2713–2732CrossRefPubMed
39.
Wang Z, Hauser N, Singer G, et al (2014) Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography. Nat Commun 5:3797CrossRefPubMed
40.
Scherer KH (2016) Grating-Based X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography. Technical University of Munich, GermanyCrossRef
41.
Wang ZT, Kang KJ, Huang ZF, Chen ZQ (2009) Quantitative grating-based x-ray dark-field computed tomography. Appl Phys Lett 95:94105CrossRef
42.
43.
Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27:861–874CrossRef
44.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiol Illinois 143:29–36CrossRef
45.
Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 39:561–577PubMed
46.
47.
Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Liu A, Bondell H (2005) Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology 16:73–81CrossRefPubMed
48.
Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008) Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biometrical J. 50:419–430CrossRef
49.
50.
Grandl S, Scherer K, Sztrokay-Gaul A, et al (2015) Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 25:3659–3668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
52.
Liu J, Cai W, Ning R (2016) Evaluation of differential phase contrast cone beam CT imaging system. J Xray Sci Technol 25:357–372
53.
Ge Y, Li K, Garrett J, Chen GH (2014) Grating based x-ray differential phase contrast imaging without mechanical phase stepping. Opt Express 22:14246–14252CrossRefPubMed
54.
Kagias M, Wang Z, Villanueva-Perez P, Jefimovs K, Stampanoni M (2016) 2D-Omnidirectional Hard-X-Ray Scattering Sensitivity in a Single Shot. Phys Rev Lett 116:93902CrossRef
55.
Momose A, Yashiro W, Harasse S, Kuwabara H (2011) Four-dimensional X-ray phase tomography with Talbot interferometry and white synchrotron radiation: dynamic observation of a living worm. Opt Express 19:8423–8432CrossRefPubMed
56.
Wang Z, Huang Z, Zhang L, et al (2011) Low dose reconstruction algorithm for differential phase contrast imaging. J Xray Sci Technol 19:403–415PubMed
57.
Stutman D, Finkenthal M (2012) Glancing angle Talbot-Lau grating interferometers for phase contrast imaging at high x-ray energy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101:1–6CrossRef
58.
59.
Miao H, Chen L, Bennett EE, et al (2013) Motionless phase stepping in X-ray phase contrast imaging with a compact source. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:19268–19272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Bevins N, Zambelli J, Li K, Qi Z, Chen G-H (2012) Multicontrast x-ray computed tomography imaging using Talbot-Lau interferometry without phase stepping. Med Phys 39:424CrossRefPubMed
61.
62.
Xie H, Cai W, Yang L, Mao H, Tang X (2016) Reducing radiation dose in grating based x-ray phase contrast CT with twin-peaks in its phase stepping curves. Med Phys 43:5942–5950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT
verfasst von
Xinbin Li
Hewei Gao
Zhiqiang Chen
Li Zhang
Xiaohua Zhu
Shengping Wang
Weijun Peng
Publikationsdatum
26.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5158-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

European Radiology 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Head and Neck

MR-based radiomics signature in differentiating ocular adnexal lymphoma from idiopathic orbital inflammation

Breast

Editorial comment: cone-beam and phase contrast CT: new horizons in breast imaging?

Computed Tomography

Ischemic stroke enhancement using a variational model and the expectation maximization method

Interventional

Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection versus hepatic resection for 2.1–5.0 cm solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative multicentre study

Vascular-Interventional

CT analysis of the aorta in giant-cell arteritis: a case-control study

Cardiac

Automated estimation of image quality for coronary computed tomographic angiography using machine learning

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise