Introduction
Sevoflurane, a volatile anesthetic, has commonly been used during surgery, including tumor resection, as it allows for rapid and predictable recovery relative to intravenously administered anesthetics [
1‐
3]. However, growing in vitro evidence suggests that sevoflurane potentially plays a role in the progression of tumors [
4,
5]. Sevoflurane-exposed HepG2, a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, exhibits accelerated proliferation under conditions of high glucose and insulin [
6]. Sevoflurane also elicits accelerated growth of cultured glioma stem cells through upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF; Ref [
7]). Another volatile anesthetic, isoflurane, reportedly activates the HIF signaling pathway and promotes proliferation and migration of the renal cancer cell line RCC4 [
8]. Isoflurane also suppresses apoptosis in colon cancer cell lines via a caveolin-1-dependent mechanism [
9].
In contrast, other studies have suggested anti-tumorigenic effects of sevoflurane [
10‐
12]. It has been demonstrated that sevoflurane attenuates the invasion of colon and lung cancer cells by suppressing the expression of metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) [
13,
14], and induces apoptosis in Caco-2 and HEp-2 cells [
12]. The growth of leukemia stem/progenitor cells is hampered by sevoflurane exposure via the suppression of Wnt/β-catenin activity [
15]. As such, sevoflurane has been shown to exert diverse effects on the oncogenic properties of cancer cells, and a number of molecules and biological processes are reportedly involved in altered cell functions induced by sevoflurane. However, it remains to be fully elucidated whether or not differential proliferation of cancer cells after sevoflurane exposure is governed by a fundamental key determinant that is globally applicable to various types of cancer.
In this study, we exposed eight human cancer cell lines of multiple origins as well as a non-cancerous breast epithelial cell line to 1–3% (v/v) sevoflurane, and analyzed its impact on cell proliferation. In addition, we investigated Matrigel invasion, early apoptosis, and cell death in a series of cancer cell lines exposed to sevoflurane, and determined whether these biological processes are correlated with the proliferation of cancer cell lines.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, reagents, and antibodies
The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231; colon cancer cell lines HCT116, HT-29, and RKO; lung cancer cell line NCI-H1299; and a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF10A, were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). The human breast cancer cell line MCF7, colon cancer cell line DLD-1, and lung cancer cell line A549 were obtained from the National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO; Osaka, Japan). MCF10A cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle’s medium/nutrient mixture F-12 (D-MEM/F-12; NacalaiTesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 5% horse serum (Biowest, Nuaille, France), 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 10 μg/mL insulin, 0.5 μg/mL hydrocortisone, and 0.1 μg/mL cholera toxin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell lines other than MCF10A were cultured in D-MEM (NacalaiTesque) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Atlas Biologicals, Ft. Collins, CO, USA) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (NacalaiTesque). Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), except when the cells were exposed to sevoflurane. Cells were reseeded every 3–4 days prior to reaching confluence.
Sevoflurane exposure
Cell lines were plated in tissue culture plates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland) with their respective media and placed in a CO2 incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific). At 24 h post seeding, adherence of the cells to the wells and the confluency between 40 and 80% were confirmed by phase-contrast microscopy. Cells were then subjected to 2–8 h exposure to 1–3% (v/v) sevoflurane (Maruishi Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) with 5% CO2 in atmospheric air at a flow rate of 0.5 L/min, at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator (ASTEC, Fukuoka, Japan). The specific time courses of sevoflurane exposure in respective experiments are schematically shown in the corresponding figures. The concentrations of sevoflurane and CO2 in the incubator were monitored using a Vamos Plus Anaesthetic Gas analyzer (Dräger, Lubeck, Germany). After exposure to sevoflurane, cells were transferred to a CO2 incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) pre-set to a standard culture condition, and further incubated until they were examined in assays. Untreated controls were prepared by seeding the cells to tissue culture plates together with the other samples, left unexposed to sevoflurane, incubated, and examined in parallel with the other samples.
Proliferation assay
Cell lines were seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates at a density of 4 × 104 cells/cm2 in 1.0 mL media, exposed to 1–3% (v/v) sevoflurane for predetermined periods of time, and then incubated for 48 h. In the experiments in which 1% sevoflurane was applied, cell lines were dissociated with trypsin (Nacalai Tesque) and enumerated using a Coulter counter (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). When cell lines were treated with 1.5–3.0% sevoflurane, confluency of the cells was assessed using the Incucyte Zoom live-cell microscopy incubator system (Essen BioScience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) as a surrogate for cell number. During assays, the exponential growth of untreated control cells, as well as the proliferation of cells without reaching confluence in any condition, was confirmed by phase-contrast microscopy.
Cell invasion assay
Cell invasion to Matrigel was assessed using Transwell cell culture chambers with 8.0 μm pores (Corning, Oneonta, NY, USA). The Transwell inserts were coated with 200 μL/well of 300 μg/mL Matrigel (Corning) and air dried for 2 h at 37 °C in a regular CO2 incubator. Filters in the Transwell inserts were reconstituted with serum-free D-MEM immediately before use. Cells were incubated with or without 1% sevoflurane in a CO2 incubator for 4 h, dissociated with trypsin, and seeded in triplicate into the Transwell inserts (5 × 104 cells/well). The lower compartment was filled with D-MEM supplemented with 5% FBS. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2, the filters were fixed using 0.5% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet in PBS. The migration through Matrigel was scored under microscopy at a magnification of 40× (AXIO, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany).
Detection of early apoptosis and cell death
Cells seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates at a density of 8 × 104 cells/well were exposed to 1–3% sevoflurane and dissociated and collected after 24 h of incubation. Collected cells were washed with PBS once, stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Annexin V (100-fold dilution; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Aichi, Japan) for 20 min, again washed once with PBS, and then stained with 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD; 500-fold dilution; AAT Bioquest, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for 15 min. The ratios of FITC-positive and 7-AAD-positive cells were determined using flow cytometry in a Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed using Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter).
Immunoblotting
Cells seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates at 6 × 104 cells/well were exposed to 1% sevoflurane in air for the predetermined duration, and incubated for 24 h with or without the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (20 µM; AdooQBioScience, Irvine, CA, USA). Whole-cell extracts were lysed by sonication in RIPA buffer (NacalaiTesque), and protein concentration in each extract was determined using a BCA protein assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal amounts of protein (50 µg) were resolved via SDS-PAGE using Real Gel plate (Bio Craft, Tokyo, Japan), electro-transferred to an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and probed with primary and horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies used in this study are anti-caspase-3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:2000 dilution; Medical & Biological Laboratories). Chemiluminescent signals were captured and imaged using Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as mean ± SD values; n represents the number of times an independent assay was performed. One-way-ANOVA and Scheffe’s post-hoc test were performed for cell proliferation, Annexin-V, and 7-AAD assays, whereas two-sided Student’s t-test was applied for cell invasion assays. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Discussion
In this study, we found an acceleration of cell growth upon exposure to clinically relevant 1% (v/v) sevoflurane in six out of eight human cancer cell lines. In contrast, the last two cancer cell lines, A549 and MCF-7, and a non-cancerous cell line MCF10A, exhibited suppressed cell growth under the same experimental condition. The growth-suppressed cell lines but not growth-accelerated cell lines demonstrated reduced Matrigel invasion, enhanced early apoptotic changes, and increased cell death, upon exposure to 1% sevoflurane. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report indicating a solid correlation between apoptosis and hampered cell growth post sevoflurane exposure, in multiple cancer cell lines derived from various organ origins. This study suggests that the differential induction of apoptosis is, at least in part, responsible for the distinct growth properties among individual cell lines post sevoflurane exposure. However, the possibility remains that sevoflurane not only perturbs apoptosis but also increases or reduces the proliferation capacity per se of individual cell lines, both of which can explain the observed up/downregulation of cell number by sevoflurane.
Previous studies have demonstrated that in vitro exposure of cells to sevoflurane results in differential induction of apoptosis depending on the cellular context. Sevoflurane was shown to trigger apoptotic changes in several types of noncancerous and cancerous cells, including fetal neural stem cells and the Caco-2, HEp-2, A549, and H4 cell lines [
11,
14,
17]. Halothane, another volatile anesthesia, was also shown to elicit apoptosis in several cancer cell lines, including Caco-2, HEp-2 and A549 [
11,
18]. In contrast, Jaura et al. demonstrated that sera derived from patients who received sevoflurane and opioids reduce apoptosis when added to MDA-MB-231 cell culture [
5]. In addition, apoptotic cells were increased in HT29 but reduced in HCT116 after isoflurane exposure [
9], despite the fact that these cancer cell lines originate from the same tissue. These previous findings as well as our data in this study collectively demonstrate that individual cancer cell lines exhibit differential apoptotic changes after sevoflurane exposure, whereas noncancerous cells may generally exhibit increased apoptosis [
16,
19]. It is speculated that the intrinsic susceptibility to sevoflurane has been lost from a subset of cancer cell lines as a consequence of their gaining the ability to evade apoptosis, which had been acquired during oncogenesis through the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes within the genome [
20].
The experimental results obtained in this study were largely consistent with previous reports studying cell proliferation and apoptosis after sevoflurane exposure; this includes the phenotypic changes observed in MDA-MB-231 [
4] and A549 [
14,
18] in response to sevoflurane exposure. A previous study showed enhancement of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in MCF7 cells upon exposure to sevoflurane [
4], which is somewhat inconsistent with our observation. However, as the previous study did not assess the induction of apoptosis after sevoflurane exposure, its findings provide no argument regarding the probable correlation between proliferation and apoptosis in sevoflurane-exposed cancer cells as suggested by our study. The disparities in growth properties of sevoflurane-exposed MCF7 cells between that study and ours are likely to be a result of differences in experimental design, including the approach and duration of sevoflurane exposure and cell culture condition during and post exposure.
The molecular mechanisms underlying sevoflurane-induced apoptosis remain largely unclear. It has been suggested that the activation of c-JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK), a well-characterized mediator of apoptotic signaling [
21], plays an important role in the induction of apoptosis after sevoflurane exposure [
19]. Apoptosis induced by isoflurane was shown to be suppressed via a mechanism depending on caveolin-1, a protein composing caveola membrane, in colon cancer cell lines [
9]. Collectively, volatile anesthetics seem to induce apoptosis primarily by activating cellular apoptotic signaling, rather than by causing DNA damage in the genome which triggers p53-mediated apoptosis. However, it remains unclear how the apoptotic signaling is initiated by volatile anesthetics, and further studies are warranted to fully understand the apoptotic process elicited by volatile anesthetics as well as the genetic alterations of cancer cells permitting the evasion of apoptosis. The evaluation of sevoflurane-induced apoptosis in animal models and patient samples will provide additional insight into this topic in preclinical and clinical settings. In the future, these studies could enable us to predict whether individual tumors are responsive to sevoflurane-induced apoptosis by examining preoperative biopsy specimens. Such efforts will eventually lead to safe, personalized use of volatile anesthetics for cancer treatment without concern for tumor progression.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Mr. Minoru Tanaka in the Division of Medical Research Engineering, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, for assistance with flow cytometry. This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15K15569 to TH, 16K10932 to YK, 15K20042 to SM], as well as the Program to supporting research activities of female researchers from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, 2016–2018 (to YK). This study constitutes the doctoral thesis of T.H.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.