Erschienen in:
26.04.2019 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase
verfasst von:
Ji Hye Kwon, Jin Hee Kim, So Yeon Kim, Jae Ho Byun, Hyoung Jung Kim, Moon-Gyu Lee, Seung Soo Lee
Erschienen in:
European Radiology
|
Ausgabe 11/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Objectives
To compare focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI), and to assess diagnostic performance of the lesion contrast at arterial phase (AP) (ContrastAP) for differentiating between the two diseases.
Methods
Thirty-six patients with focal-type AIP and 72 patients with PDA were included. All included patients underwent CE-MRI with triple phases. The signal intensity (SI) of the mass and normal pancreas was measured at each phase, and the lesion contrast (SIpancreas/SImass) was compared between AIP and PDA groups. The sensitivity and specificity of ContrastAP using an optimal cutoff point were compared with those of key imaging features specific to AIP and PDA.
Results
The lesion contrast differed significantly between AIP and PDA groups at all phases of CE-MRI; the maximum difference was observed at AP. For AIP, the sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (87.5%) of ContrastAP (cutoff ≤ 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 38.9–88.9%; specificity, 48.6–95.8%), except for the halo sign. For PDA, the sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (94.4%) of ContrastAP (cutoff > 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 40.3–68.1%; specificity, 72.2–94.4%), except for the discrete mass.
Conclusions
Quantitative analysis of the lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at AP, was helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA. The diagnostic performance of ContrastAP was mostly comparable or higher than those of the key imaging features.
Key Points
• Diagnosis of focal-type AIP vs. PDA using imaging techniques is extremely challenging.
• Lesion contrast in the arterial-phase MRI differs significantly between focal-type AIP and PDA.
• Quantitative analysis of lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at the arterial phase, is helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA.