Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2014

01.10.2014 | Clinical Investigation

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Screws for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Low Back Pain

verfasst von: Stefano Marcia, Luca Saba, Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti, Stefano Marini, Emanuele Piras, Mariangela Marras, Salvatore Masala, Bassem Georgy

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to demonstrate the efficacy of a percutaneous screws system in the treatment of lumbar pain caused by high-level disc degeneration combined with facet joint hypertrophy and canal stenosis especially in the L5–S1 levels.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients (25 males, 13 females, mean age 63 years) with lumbar pain and/or neuralgia-claudication were treated with interpeduncular dynamic screws. Diagnosis was based on clinical\medical history evaluation and X-ray, CT, and MR examinations. All patients completed the visual analogic scale (VAS) for evaluation of clinical efficacy and pain measurement both before and after (1 month and after 2 years) the procedure. Patients also were given the Oswestry disability index (ODI) before and after treatment. The area of the neuroforamina also was measured.

Results

Thirty-eight intervertebral spaces were treated. The VAS pain scale showed a reduction of pain symptoms at 1 month and after 2 years (VAS pre 8.7 ± 1.1; after 1 month 5.1 ± 2.2; after 2 years 6.5 ± 2.1; p = 0.001). ODI also showed improvement (pre 56.7 ± 18.6 %; after 1 month: 31.9 ± 26.3%; after 2 years: 42 ± 24.2 %, p = 0.001). The study showed a widening of the neuroforaminal area of 15.5 % in the right neuroforamen and 17 % in the left ones (right foraminal area pre 0.94 mm2, post 1.08 mm2; left foramina area pre 0.95 mm2, post 1.11 mm2). In addition, the spinal canal area displayed a statistically significant reduction (pre = 1.97 and post = 2.23; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our study indicates that patients treated with dynamic screws have VAS pain reduction as well as ODI improvement. Moreover, we found a statistically significant widening of the neuroforaminal area.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG (2005) Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(16 Suppl):S73–S78CrossRef Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG (2005) Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(16 Suppl):S73–S78CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(1):26–32CrossRef Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(1):26–32CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Hida K, Seki T et al (2004) An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(1):72–77PubMedCrossRef Lee J, Hida K, Seki T et al (2004) An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(1):72–77PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiavone AM (2003) The use of disc assistance prostheses in degenerative lumbar pathology: indications, technique, and results. Ital J Spinal Disord 3:213–220 Schiavone AM (2003) The use of disc assistance prostheses in degenerative lumbar pathology: indications, technique, and results. Ital J Spinal Disord 3:213–220
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization device in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56PubMedCrossRef Sengupta DK (2004) Dynamic stabilization device in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 35:43–56PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T et al (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):418–423PubMedCrossRef Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T et al (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):418–423PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(17):1873–1878CrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(17):1873–1878CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grönblad M, Lukinmaa A, Konttinen YT (1990) Chronic low-back pain: intercorrelation of repeated measures for pain and disability. Scand J Rehabil Med 22(2):73–77PubMed Grönblad M, Lukinmaa A, Konttinen YT (1990) Chronic low-back pain: intercorrelation of repeated measures for pain and disability. Scand J Rehabil Med 22(2):73–77PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Little DG, MacDonald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(19):2139–2143CrossRef Little DG, MacDonald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(19):2139–2143CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dipp J (2008) Feasibility study of a novel facet based percutaneous dynamic stabilization device: early results. Clin Orthop 389:137–143 Dipp J (2008) Feasibility study of a novel facet based percutaneous dynamic stabilization device: early results. Clin Orthop 389:137–143
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sangiorgio SN, Sheikh H, Borkowski SL et al (2011) Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(19):E1251–E1258CrossRef Sangiorgio SN, Sheikh H, Borkowski SL et al (2011) Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(19):E1251–E1258CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11:164–169 Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11:164–169
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerges FJ, Lipsitz SR, Nedeljkovic SS (2010) A systematic review on the effectiveness of the Nucleoplasty procedure for discogenic pain. Pain Phys 13:117–132 Gerges FJ, Lipsitz SR, Nedeljkovic SS (2010) A systematic review on the effectiveness of the Nucleoplasty procedure for discogenic pain. Pain Phys 13:117–132
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen D, Fay LA, Lok J et al (1995) Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:74–79CrossRef Chen D, Fay LA, Lok J et al (1995) Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:74–79CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shabat S, David R, Folman Y (2012) Nucleoplasty is effective in reducing both mechanical and radicular low back pain: a prospective study in 87 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(6):329–332PubMedCrossRef Shabat S, David R, Folman Y (2012) Nucleoplasty is effective in reducing both mechanical and radicular low back pain: a prospective study in 87 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(6):329–332PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu H, Zhou XZ, Cheng MH et al (2011) The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty for protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc at a two-year follow-up. Int Orthop 35(11):1677–1682PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zhu H, Zhou XZ, Cheng MH et al (2011) The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty for protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc at a two-year follow-up. Int Orthop 35(11):1677–1682PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Masala S, Tarantino U, Nano G, Iundusi R, Fiori R, Da Ros V, Simonetti G (2013) Lumbar spinal stenosis minimally invasive treatment with bilateral transpedicular facet augmentation system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36(3):738–747PubMedCrossRef Masala S, Tarantino U, Nano G, Iundusi R, Fiori R, Da Ros V, Simonetti G (2013) Lumbar spinal stenosis minimally invasive treatment with bilateral transpedicular facet augmentation system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36(3):738–747PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadaten
Titel
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Screws for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Low Back Pain
verfasst von
Stefano Marcia
Luca Saba
Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti
Stefano Marini
Emanuele Piras
Mariangela Marras
Salvatore Masala
Bassem Georgy
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0786-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.