Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2014

01.10.2014 | Clinical Investigation

Efficacy of Radiation Safety Glasses in Interventional Radiology

verfasst von: Bart D. van Rooijen, Michiel W. de Haan, Marco Das, Carsten W. K. P. Arnoldussen, R. de Graaf, Wim H. van Zwam, Walter H. Backes, Cécile R. L. P. N. Jeukens

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the reduction of the eye lens dose when wearing protective eyewear in interventional radiology and to identify conditions that optimize the efficacy of radiation safety glasses.

Methods

The dose reduction provided by different models of radiation safety glasses was measured on an anthropomorphic phantom head. The influence of the orientation of the phantom head on the dose reduction was studied in detail. The dose reduction in interventional radiological practice was assessed by dose measurements on radiologists wearing either leaded or no glasses or using a ceiling suspended screen.

Results

The different models of radiation safety glasses provided a dose reduction in the range of a factor of 7.9–10.0 for frontal exposure of the phantom. The dose reduction was strongly reduced when the head is turned to the side relative to the irradiated volume. The eye closest to the tube was better protected due to side shielding and eyewear curvature. In clinical practice, the mean dose reduction was a factor of 2.1. Using a ceiling suspended lead glass shield resulted in a mean dose reduction of a factor of 5.7.

Conclusions

The efficacy of radiation protection glasses depends on the orientation of the operator’s head relative to the irradiated volume. Glasses can offer good protection to the eye under clinically relevant conditions. However, the performance in clinical practice in our study was lower than expected. This is likely related to nonoptimized room geometry and training of the staff as well as measurement methodology.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez JM, Ten JI (1998) Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol 71(849):954–960PubMedCrossRef Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez JM, Ten JI (1998) Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol 71(849):954–960PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Koukorava C, Carinou E, Simantirakis G, Vrachliotis TG, Archontakis E, Tierris C et al (2011) Doses to operators during interventional radiology procedures: focus on eye lens and extremity dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 144(1–4):482–486PubMedCrossRef Koukorava C, Carinou E, Simantirakis G, Vrachliotis TG, Archontakis E, Tierris C et al (2011) Doses to operators during interventional radiology procedures: focus on eye lens and extremity dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 144(1–4):482–486PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ et al (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41(1–2):1–322PubMedCrossRef Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ et al (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41(1–2):1–322PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2-4):1-332 The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2-4):1-332
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima E, Neriishi K, Minamoto A (2006) A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000-2002: a threshold analysis. Health Phys 90(2):154–160PubMedCrossRef Nakashima E, Neriishi K, Minamoto A (2006) A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000-2002: a threshold analysis. Health Phys 90(2):154–160PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, Fujiwara S, Akahoshi M, Mishima HK et al (2007) Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res 168(4):404–408PubMedCrossRef Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, Fujiwara S, Akahoshi M, Mishima HK et al (2007) Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res 168(4):404–408PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M (2010) Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res 174(4):490–495PubMedCrossRef Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M (2010) Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res 174(4):490–495PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Doody MM et al (2008) Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol 168(6):620–631PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Doody MM et al (2008) Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol 168(6):620–631PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ (2010) Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(6):826–834PubMedCrossRef Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ (2010) Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(6):826–834PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Kleiman NJ (2011) Radiation and cataract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147(1–2):300–304PubMedCrossRef Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Kleiman NJ (2011) Radiation and cataract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147(1–2):300–304PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dorr W, Graw J, Muirhead CR, Edwards AA et al (2009) Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res 172(1):1–9PubMedCrossRef Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dorr W, Graw J, Muirhead CR, Edwards AA et al (2009) Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res 172(1):1–9PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Chumak VV, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C et al (2007) Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat Res 167(2):233–243PubMedCrossRef Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Chumak VV, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C et al (2007) Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat Res 167(2):233–243PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ (2008) Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248(3):945–953PubMedCrossRef Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ (2008) Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248(3):945–953PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore WE, Ferguson G, Rohrmann C (1980) Physical factors determining the utility of radiation safety glasses. Med Phys 7(1):8–12PubMedCrossRef Moore WE, Ferguson G, Rohrmann C (1980) Physical factors determining the utility of radiation safety glasses. Med Phys 7(1):8–12PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman M, Maity A, Wang SJ (2011) Inferences for the ratio: Fieller’s interval, log ratio, and large sample based confidence intervals. Asta Adv Stat Anal 95(3):313–323CrossRef Sherman M, Maity A, Wang SJ (2011) Inferences for the ratio: Fieller’s interval, log ratio, and large sample based confidence intervals. Asta Adv Stat Anal 95(3):313–323CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Galster M, Guhl C, Uder M, Adamus R (2013) Exposition of the operator’s eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Rofo 185(5):474–481PubMedCrossRef Galster M, Guhl C, Uder M, Adamus R (2013) Exposition of the operator’s eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Rofo 185(5):474–481PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Geber T, Gunnarsson M, Mattsson S (2011) Eye lens dosimetry for interventional procedures—relation between the absorbed dose to the lens and dose at measurement positions. Radiat Meas 46:1248–1251CrossRef Geber T, Gunnarsson M, Mattsson S (2011) Eye lens dosimetry for interventional procedures—relation between the absorbed dose to the lens and dose at measurement positions. Radiat Meas 46:1248–1251CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Challa K, Warren SG, Danak S, Bates MC (2009) Redundant protective barriers: minimizing operator occupational risk. J Interv Cardiol 22(3):299–307PubMedCrossRef Challa K, Warren SG, Danak S, Bates MC (2009) Redundant protective barriers: minimizing operator occupational risk. J Interv Cardiol 22(3):299–307PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeder M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Wolber T, Ammann P, Roelli H, Rohner F et al (2006) Impact of a lead glass screen on scatter radiation to eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(1):18–23PubMedCrossRef Maeder M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Wolber T, Ammann P, Roelli H, Rohner F et al (2006) Impact of a lead glass screen on scatter radiation to eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(1):18–23PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dahm JB (2002) Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding. Am J Cardiol 89(1):44–49PubMedCrossRef Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dahm JB (2002) Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding. Am J Cardiol 89(1):44–49PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Germano JJ, Day G, Gregorious D, Natarajan V, Cohen T (2005) A novel radiation protection drape reduces radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided electrophysiology procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 17(9):469–472PubMed Germano JJ, Day G, Gregorious D, Natarajan V, Cohen T (2005) A novel radiation protection drape reduces radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided electrophysiology procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 17(9):469–472PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawdy JM, Gocha MD, Olshove V, Chisolm JL, Hill SL, Phillips A et al (2009) Radiation protection during hybrid procedures: innovation creates new challenges. J Invasive Cardiol 21(9):437–440PubMed Sawdy JM, Gocha MD, Olshove V, Chisolm JL, Hill SL, Phillips A et al (2009) Radiation protection during hybrid procedures: innovation creates new challenges. J Invasive Cardiol 21(9):437–440PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy of Radiation Safety Glasses in Interventional Radiology
verfasst von
Bart D. van Rooijen
Michiel W. de Haan
Marco Das
Carsten W. K. P. Arnoldussen
R. de Graaf
Wim H. van Zwam
Walter H. Backes
Cécile R. L. P. N. Jeukens
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0766-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.