Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology 6/2012

01.12.2012 | Original Article

Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis

verfasst von: Robin B. Levenson, Marc A. Camacho, Erin Horn, Amina Saghir, Daniel McGillicuddy, Leon D. Sanchez

Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effect of eliminating routine oral contrast use for abdominopelvic (AP) computed tomography (CT) on emergency department (ED) patient throughput and diagnosis. Retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing AP CT during 2-month periods prior to and following oral contrast protocol change in an urban, tertiary care ED. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, prior gastrointestinal tract-altering surgery, or lean body habitus continued to receive oral contrast. Oral contrast was otherwise eliminated from the AP CT protocol. Patients were excluded if they would not have typically received oral contrast, regardless of the intervention. Data recorded include patient demographics, ED length of stay (LOS), time from order to CT, 72-h ED return, and repeat imaging. Two thousand and one ED patients (1,014 before and 987 after protocol change) underwent AP CT during the study period. Six hundred seven pre-intervention and 611 post-intervention were eligible for oral contrast and included. Of these, 95 % received oral contrast prior to the intervention and 42 % thereafter. After the intervention, mean ED LOS among oral contrast eligible patients decreased by 97 min, P < 0.001. Mean time from order to CT decreased by 66 min, P < 0.001. No patient with CT negative for acute findings had additional subsequent AP imaging within 72 h at our institution that led to a change in diagnosis. Eliminating routine oral contrast use for AP CT in the ED may be successful in decreasing LOS and time from order to CT without demonstrated compromise in acute patient diagnosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. AJR 171:559–564PubMed Lee SI, Chew FS (1998) Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. AJR 171:559–564PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR 174:1391–1396PubMed Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR 174:1391–1396PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190:474–478PubMedCrossRef Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR (2005) A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg 190:474–478PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucy BC, Ozonoff A, Jordan JD, Ratevosian J, Ulrich AS, Rathley NK, Mitchell PM, Rebholz C, Feldman JA, Rhea JT (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR 193:1282–1288PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucy BC, Ozonoff A, Jordan JD, Ratevosian J, Ulrich AS, Rathley NK, Mitchell PM, Rebholz C, Feldman JA, Rhea JT (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR 193:1282–1288PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN, Ozonoff A, Lucey BC, Soto JA (2010) Influence of body habitus on use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 17:445–453PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN, Ozonoff A, Lucey BC, Soto JA (2010) Influence of body habitus on use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 17:445–453PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamanagatti S, Vashisht S, Kapoor A, Chumber S, Bal S (2007) Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 48:80–87PubMed Gamanagatti S, Vashisht S, Kapoor A, Chumber S, Bal S (2007) Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 48:80–87PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK, Gerber JL, Senagore AJ (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34:699–703PubMedCrossRef Hill BC, Johnson SC, Owens EK, Gerber JL, Senagore AJ (2010) CT scan for suspected acute abdominal process: impact of combinations of IV, oral, and rectal contrast. World J Surg 34:699–703PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane MJ, Lui DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMed Lane MJ, Lui DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 168:405–409PubMed Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 168:405–409PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 160:763–766PubMed Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 160:763–766PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information. Radiology 205:43–47PubMed Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1997) Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information. Radiology 205:43–47PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102PubMedCrossRef Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12:99–102PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180:133–136PubMedCrossRef Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J (2000) The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180:133–136PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 2006:150–157 Yee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 2006:150–157
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyunh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J, Blank F, Lee SY, Smithline HA (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10:310–313 Hyunh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J, Blank F, Lee SY, Smithline HA (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10:310–313
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17:267–273PubMedCrossRef Schuur JD, Chu G, Sucov A (2010) Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay. Emerg Radiol 17:267–273PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis
verfasst von
Robin B. Levenson
Marc A. Camacho
Erin Horn
Amina Saghir
Daniel McGillicuddy
Leon D. Sanchez
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Emergency Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1059-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Emergency Radiology 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.