Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2024

Open Access 05.09.2023 | Original Article

Enhanced recovery after robotic ventral hernia repair: factors associated with overnight stay in hospital

verfasst von: M. Marckmann, P.-M. Krarup, N. A. Henriksen, M. W. Christoffersen, K. K. Jensen

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols lead to reduced post-operative stay and improved outcomes after most types of abdominal surgery. Little is known about the optimal post-operative protocol after robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR), including the potential limits of outpatient surgery. We report the results of an ERAS protocol after RVHR aiming to identify factors associated with overnight stay in hospital, as well as patient-reported pain levels in the immediate post-operative period.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing RVHR. Patients were included in a prospective database, registering patient characteristics, operative details, pain and fatigue during the first 3 post-operative days and pre- and 30-day post-operative hernia-related quality of life, using the EuraHS questionnaire.

Results

A total of 109 patients were included, of which 66 (61%) underwent incisional hernia repair. The most performed procedure was TARUP (robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair) (60.6%) followed by bilateral roboTAR (robotic transversus abdominis release) (19.3%). The mean horizontal fascial defect was 4.8 cm, and the mean duration of surgery was 141 min. In total, 78 (71.6%) patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and factors associated with overnight stay were increasing fascial defect area, longer duration of surgery, and transverse abdominis release. There was no association between post-operative pain and overnight hospital stay. The mean EuraHS score decreased significantly from 38.4 to 6.4 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

An ERAS protocol after RVHR was associated with a high rate of outpatient procedures with low patient-reported pain levels.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Robotic approach for ventral hernia repair is a rapidly emerging approach with promising results in recent years compared to open standard approaches [16]. Since the introduction, surgeons worldwide are using the robotic approach for an increasing amount of abdominal wall procedures and the indication for robotic repair, thus, widens. One key advantage of robotic ventral hernia repair seems to be a reduced length of post-operative hospital stay, which can be compared to the enhanced recovery after various other surgical procedures when traditional open surgery was replaced by minimally invasive approaches [7].
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve post-operative outcomes after most types of abdominal surgery [8, 9]. In recent years, enhanced recovery after open abdominal wall reconstruction procedures has reportedly decreased length of stay with no change in the incidence of readmissions or post-operative complications [10, 11]. However, little is known about the optimal post-operative protocol after robotic ventral hernia repair, including the potential limits of outpatient surgery.
In the current study, we report the results of an ERAS protocol after robotic ventral hernia repair, with the aim to identify factors associated with overnight stay in the hospital, as well as patient-reported pain levels in the immediate post-operative period.

Methods

This was a prospective single-center cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing robotic ventral hernia repair at a university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. All patients were seen in the outpatient clinic and underwent computed tomography scan as part of the pre-operative planning.

ERAS pathway

The ERAS protocol used in the current study was built on evidence-based measures to improve post-operative recovery of patients after abdominal surgery [12]. The main concepts of the protocol are summarized in Fig. 1. Pre-operatively, patients were educated on expected same-day discharge as well as the expected post-operative levels of pain and fatigue. Smoking cessation was desired; however, patients with recurring hernia incarceration or severe pain were allowed to undergo surgery without smoking cessation. Similarly, weight loss to body mass index < 35 kg/m2 was desirable but not mandatory. On the morning of surgery, patients were given 1 g of paracetamol and 600 mg ibuprofen. Intraoperatively, goal-directed fluid therapy was used, and high-dose glucocorticoid (Solu-Medrol 125 mg iv) was administered [13]. Urinary catheter was only applied in case of surgery duration above 3 h, and if so, removed immediately after surgery. Post-operatively, patients were mobilized within 2 h and started early enteral feeding. The expected discharge was at latest 8 pm on the day of surgery and patients were given paracetamol 1 g × 4 and ibuprofen 400 mg × 3 for seven and three days, respectively. In addition, a total of six tablets of 10 mg morphine were given to the patient, with instructions to only use if neccesitated by severe pain. Discharge criteria for patients were: (1) ability to dress independently, (2) ability to manage personal hygiene, (3) acceptable pain level (< 5 on a 10 level Numeric Rating Scale during activity), (4) patient acceptance of discharge, (5) oral food and liquid intake, and 6) transcutaneous saturation > 0.92 without oxygen supplement. The surgical procedures were performed in accordance with what was previously described in detail [14].

Data collection

Pre-operatively registered variables included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and type of ventral hernia (primary/incisional). Data collected intra- and post-operatively were fascial defect size, duration of surgery, type of procedure performed, and complications within 30 days post-operatively graded by the Clavien–Dindo score.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was length of post-operative hospital stay, categorized as 0 or > 0 days. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission and post-operative complications, defined as any deviation from the standard post-operative course within the first 30 post-operative days. Patient-reported hernia-related quality of life was assessed using the EuraHS questionnaire and registered pre-operatively on the day of surgery and 30 days (± 3 days) post-operatively. In addition, patient-reported fatigue as well as pain in supine position and during movement were registered using a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 and repeated throughout the first three post-operative days at 8 am and 8 pm each day.

Statistics

Patients who were discharged on the day of surgery were compared with those requiring overnight or longer stays. Categorical variables were shown as n (%) and compared across groups using the Chi-square test. Numerical variables were shown as mean (standard deviation (SD)) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) and compared across the two groups using Student’s t test or or Mann Whitney U test. In a subgroup analysis using similar statistics, only patients undergoing a TAR procedure were included. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The study was approved by the Regional Data Protection Agency of the Capitol Region of Denmark (ref. P-2021-58) and patients gave written consent to inclusion in the study at the time of operative planning.

Results

In the period from March 4, 2021, to December 22, 2022, a total number of 109 patients underwent robotic ventral hernia repair at our institution. Overall, 78 (71.6%) were discharged on the day of surgery whereas the rest required overnight stay with a median (IQR) length of stay (LOS) of 1 (1) day. The two groups were comparable regarding age, BMI, ASA score, and smoking status including insignificant differences of 24 (30%) patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2 requiring overnight stay vs. 7 (24.1%) with a BMI > 35 (P = 0.719), and 7 (19.4%) patients actively smoking vs. 24 (32.9%) non-smokers requiring overnight stay (P = 0.216). In the group of patients discharged the same day, there were more males compared to the group of patients with overnight stay (52 (66.7%) vs. 13 (41.9%), P = 0.031).
Overall, 66 (60.6%) and 43 (39.4%) of all the patients underwent incisional hernia repair and umbilical or epigastric hernia repair, respectively. There were significantly more patients with incisional hernia that stayed overnight compared with primary ventral hernia repair (26 (83.9%) vs. 40 (51.3%), P = 0.003). The mean horizontal fascial defect was 4.8 cm with significant smaller defects in the group with same-day discharge, which was also the case regarding vertical defect size and total defect area (P < 0.001 for all three parameters, see Table 1). Mean duration of surgery was 141 (± 97.2) min with longer operating times for patients who stayed overnight (185 ± 90.6 min vs. 123.3 ± 94.7 min, P = 0.002).
Table 1
Baseline data comparing patients that stayed in hospital overnight with patients who were discharged same day of surgery after robotic ventral hernia repair
 
Overnight stay [n = 31]
Same-day discharge [n = 78]
P
Age
 Mean (SD)
62.2 (14.3)
57.6 (12.4)
0.069
Sex
 Female
18 (58.1)
26 (33.3)
0.031
ASA
 I
3 (9.7)
10 (12.8)
0.333
 II
17 (54.8)
51 (65.4)
 III
11 (35.5)
17 (21.8)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 Median (range)
30 (18.4;46.1)
31 (21.7;44.6)
0.528
 Current smoker
7 (22.6)
29 (37.2)
0.216
 Non-smoker
24 (77.4)
49 (62.8)
Type of hernia
 Incisional
26 (83.9)
40 (51.3)
0.003
 Primary ventral
5 (16.1)
38 (48.7)
Vertical defect, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
9.2 (6.4)
5.6 (4.5)
 < 0.001
Horizontal defect, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
6.4 (3.7)
4.2 (2.7)
 < 0.001
Area of defect, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
77.5 (82.3)
33.1 (53.4)
 < 0.001
Surgery duration, minutes
 Mean (SD)
185 (90.6)
123.3 (94.7)
0.002
Mesh dimensions, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
433.4 (298.4)
252.0 (173.0)
 < 0.001
Clavien–Dindo score
 0
25 (80.6)
73 (93.6)
0.071
 I
6 (19.4)
4 (5.1)
 3B
0
1 (1.3)
Type of procedure
 TAPP
2 (6.5)
5 (6.4)
0.002
 RoboTAR
13 (41.9)
8 (10.3)
 TARUP
16 (51.6)
55 (70.5)
 eTEP
0 (0.0)
9 (11.5)
 Retromuscular
0 (0.0)
1 (1.3)
Transversus abdominis release
 TAR
15 (48.4)
15 (19.2)
0.005
Type of TAR
 None
16 (51.6)
63 (80.8)
 < 0.001
 Bilateral
12 (38.7)
7 (9.0)
 Unilateral
3 (9.7)
8 (10.2)
Length of stay, days
 Median (IQR)
1.0 (1)
0 (0)
 < 0.001
Readmission
2 (6.5)
2 (2.6)
0.682
SD standard deviation, IQR Interquartile range, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists score, TAPP transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis repair, RoboTAR robotic transversus abdominis release, TARUP robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair, eTEP extended totally extraperitoneal repair
The most performed procedure was robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP) (65.1%) and there was a significant difference in the type of procedure performed when comparing patients discharged the same day and patients staying overnight. Robotic transversus abdominis release (RoboTAR) was performed in 13 cases (41.9%) of the patients staying overnight compared to 8 (10.8%) in the group of patients discharged the same day (P = 0.002). In total, 27.5% of all the patients underwent either a unilateral or bilateral TAR procedure. Patients undergoing a TAR procedure accounted for nearly 50% of the cases who stayed overnight compared to approximately 20% in the same-day surgery group yielding a significant difference (15 (48.4%) vs. 15 (19.2%), P = 0.005).
Finally, 94 (86.2%) of the patients experienced no post-operative complications and there was no significant difference between the two groups with referral to Clavien–Dindo score (P = 0.071). One patient required operative reintervention on day five due to complete rupture of both posterior and anterior rectus sheath, resulting in small bowel obstruction. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy with suture of both layers and onlay mesh repair, without need for bowel resection, and recovered uneventfully. A total number of four (3.7%) patients were readmitted during the first 30 post-operative days, and there was no statistically significant difference in these numbers when comparing the two groups (6.5% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.682).
The patient-reported pain and fatigue during the first three post-operative days is shown in Fig. 2. The mean patient-reported levels of pain at rest and during activity on the evening of surgery were comparable between patients discharged the same day and those requiring overnight stay (1.4 vs. 1.1, P = 0.275) and (3.4 vs. 3.8, P = 0.353), respectively. The mean level of fatigue was also comparable between the two groups (2.8 vs. 2.4, P = 0.387). Figure 3 illustrates pain and fatigue stratified by TAR procedure (yes/no). The patient-reported EuraHS score for all patients decreased significantly at 30-day follow-up (mean 38.4 ± 13.9 vs. 6.4 ± 8.3, P < 0.001). EuraHS scores stratified by type of hernia are shown in Fig. 4.
Subgroup analysis on patients who all underwent a TAR procedure, including a horizontal defect size of > 7 cm, showed that 50% of these required overnight stay. In this group, RoboTAR procedure accounted for 13 (86.7%) vs. 8 (53.3%) in the group of patients with same-day discharge; however, this finding was not statistically significant (P = 0.111), see Table 2.
Table 2
Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent transversus abdominis release comparing same-day discharge with those requiring overnight stay
 
Overnight stay [n = 15]
Same-day discharge [n = 15]
P
Age
 Mean (SD)
61.3 (14.7)
60.9 (12.6)
0.936
Sex
 Female
7 (46.7)
10 (66.7)
0.461
ASA
 I
1 (6.7)
0 (0.0)
0.357
 II
10 (66.7)
13 (86.7)
 III
4 (26.6)
2 (13.3)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 Median (range)
28 (21.6;46.1)
29.7 (21.7;38.3)
0.419
Smoking
 Current
4 (26.7)
5 (33.3)
0.656
 Never
4 (26.7)
2 (13.3)
 Previous
7 (46.6)
8 (53.3)
Type of hernia
 Incisional
14 (93.3)
14 (93.3)
1.000
 Primary ventral
1 (6.7)
1 (6.7)
Vertical defect, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
14 (5.7)
11.9 (6.2)
0.324
Horizontal defect
 Mean (SD)
9.5 (2.8)
8.6 (3.2)
0.410
Area of defect, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
140.7 (77.5)
113.5 (81.0)
0.347
Surgery duration, minutes
 Mean (SD)
262.7 (55.7)
229.3 (170.3)
0.470
Mesh area, centimeters
 Mean (SD)
689.1 (220.0)
477.9 (249.7)
0.014
Clavien–Dindo score
 0
13 (86.7)
15 (100.0)
0.464
 I
2 (13.3)
0 (0.0)
Type of procedure
 RoboTAR
13 (86.7)
8 (53.3)
0.111
 TARUP
2 (13.3)
7 (46.7)
Length of stay, days
 Median (IQR)
1.0 (2)
0 (0.0)
 < 0.001
Readmission
1 (6.7)
0 (0.0)
 > 0.99
SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists score, RoboTAR robotic transversus abdominis release, TARUP robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair

Discussion

Same-day discharge is possible in patients undergoing robotic ventral hernia repair with the use of an ERAS protocol. Incisional hernia repairs, the use of a TAR procedure, and larger horizontal defect size were associated with overnight stay in hospital.
The mean length-of-stay was 1.6 days in the current study, which is slightly lower than other studies examining outcomes for robotic hernia repair, all of which did not report to follow an ERAS protocol [1519]. The use of an ERAS pathway in the current study may explain this difference, as supported by other studies’ findings of shorter LOS in open hernia repair comparing ERAS groups with non-ERAS groups [10]. A single retrospective study on robotic hernia repair had a similar same-day discharge rate, but this solely included cases who underwent TAPP inguinal hernia repair [20]. Local traditions and different reimbursement systems may also explain reasons for longer stay in the hospital in some countries.
To our knowledge, this is the first study on robotic ventral hernia repair in an ERAS protocolled setting. The literature on predictors of length of stay for patients undergoing non-robotic surgery is limited. Akinci et al. retrospectively examined 1170 hernia repairs from 2005 to 2010 and found increasing length of procedure as an independent predictive risk factor for longer hospital stay, echoing our findings [21]. The same study reported type of repair as a significant predictor, but only for primary ventral hernias, and not inguinal or incisional. Our results pointed to the same association regarding type of repair; however, the procedures involved in the current study were of other types, namely since our study setting exclusively considered robotic approaches with newer retromuscular techniques and TAR included. In a previous cohort of patients undergoing open incisional hernia repair at our institution, pain and lack of bowel function were found to be causes of prolonged LOS, not comparable to the current study [22].
In accordance with previously published results, we found that most of the patients who stayed overnight underwent incisional hernia repair reflecting the higher complexity of these procedures compared to primary ventral hernia repair [23].
Female sex has been reported to be associated with increased LOS after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an association we also found [24]. We do, however, hypothesize that this association is merely coincidental, and to a higher degree reflect that females of the current study had more complex repairs performed. In the same study, Kurian et al. concluded increasing mesh size as an independent risk factor for longer hospital stay, which is in line with our analysis, again reflecting increased dissection to lead to increased risk of overnight stay. This notion was also supported by the fact that the significant majority of patients who required overnight stay underwent a TAR procedure, and furthermore, of all TAR patients, the roboTAR/bilateral TAR procedure had a higher representation in the group of patients staying overnight, with the insignificance most likely explained by type-II error. For patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, an increased duration of surgery was also significantly correlated with LOS [25].
Our study showed that patient-reported post-operative pain levels were low and not associated with prolonged hospital stay. A tendency toward increased pain after a TAR procedure was noted; however, there were too few observations to conclude on this. Regarding pain in the group who required overnight stay, the results showed slightly higher levels at rest compared to the patients discharged the same day of surgery; however, this trend was not conclusive in general. One aim of ERAS protocols is to decrease patient-reported pain, and the current results support that our ERAS protocol lives up to this aim [26, 27].
The patient-reported quality of life improved significantly for the entire cohort. However, we did find that patients undergoing incisional hernia repair did not seem to improve to the same degree as those undergoing primary ventral hernia repair. This may be explained by the previous surgical trauma to the abdominal wall, as well as the—most often—extended dissection in incisional compared to primary ventral hernia repair. The quality of life of patients undergoing robotic incisional hernia repair may improve further beyond the first 30 post-operative days, which we intend on examining in future studies.
ERAS pathways within abdominal surgery remain a field of complexity, and there are different opinions on whether the aim should be a general generic ERAS protocol applying to all patients, or if individualized protocols would be more appropriate [2831]. This notion, and the fact that robotic surgery and ERAS protocols are rapidly evolving and gaining broader fields, highly approves the importance and relevance of this study.
A strength of this study is the prospective design, including the patient-reported outcomes, which we consider important in an analysis of a fast-track surgery setup. Optimal ERAS protocols for ventral hernia repair include weight loss for obese patients and complete smoking cessation. In the current study, patients with severe pain or intermittent bowel obstruction due to the hernia underwent surgery without weight loss or smoking cessation, which may have impacted on the results. We had no information about potential further analgesic requirement after the first three post-operative days and although opioids are optimally completely avoided in post-operative analgetic treatment, the protocol in the current study allowed only a limited amount of morphine, thus marginalizing the risk of subsequent opioid overuse. In the current study, we examined the outcomes of the total peri-operative care-bundle, including the described pre- and post-operative analgesic regimen, leaving any further need for analgesics as a potential limitation to our study.

Conclusion

In the current study, an ERAS protocol after RVHR was associated with a high rate of outpatient procedures with low patient-reported pain scores. Risk factors of overnight stay in hospital include incisional hernia repair, TAR procedure, longer operating times, and larger mesh dimensions. Patients expected to carry these attributes should be given more attention pre-operatively, and future studies examining ERAS protocols in a robotic setting should be prospective with a focus on patient individualized pre-habilitation within this patient group.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

MM and MWC have no conflicts of interest to declare. KKJ: paid speaker and consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Conmed and Medtronic. NH: has received speaker fees from Medtronic and Gore. PMK: paid speaker and consultant for Intuitive Surgical.

Ethical approval, Human and animal rights and Informed consent

This study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. All patients gave informed consent to chart review.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dauser B, Hartig N, Vedadinejad M, Kirchner E, Trummer F, Herbst F (2021) Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off? J Robot Surg 15(1):45–52CrossRefPubMed Dauser B, Hartig N, Vedadinejad M, Kirchner E, Trummer F, Herbst F (2021) Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off? J Robot Surg 15(1):45–52CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner JG, Alrefai S, Vy M, Mabe M, Del Prado PAR, Clingempeel NL (2018) Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 32(2):727–734CrossRefPubMed Bittner JG, Alrefai S, Vy M, Mabe M, Del Prado PAR, Clingempeel NL (2018) Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 32(2):727–734CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin-del-Campo LA, Weltz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW (2018) Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc 32(2):840–845CrossRefPubMed Martin-del-Campo LA, Weltz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW (2018) Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc 32(2):840–845CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracale U, Corcione F, Neola D, Castiglioni S, Cavallaro G, Stabilini C et al (2021) Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hernia 25(6):1471–1480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bracale U, Corcione F, Neola D, Castiglioni S, Cavallaro G, Stabilini C et al (2021) Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hernia 25(6):1471–1480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J et al (2018) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia society quality collaborative. Ann Surg 267(2):210CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J et al (2018) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia society quality collaborative. Ann Surg 267(2):210CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Henriksen NA, Jensen KK, Muysoms F (2019) Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 23(1):17–27CrossRef Henriksen NA, Jensen KK, Muysoms F (2019) Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 23(1):17–27CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayuso SA, Katzen MM, Aladegbami BG, Nayak RB, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT et al (2022) Nationwide readmissions analysis of minimally invasive versus open ventral hernia repair: a retrospective population-based study. Am Surg 88(3):463–470CrossRefPubMed Ayuso SA, Katzen MM, Aladegbami BG, Nayak RB, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT et al (2022) Nationwide readmissions analysis of minimally invasive versus open ventral hernia repair: a retrospective population-based study. Am Surg 88(3):463–470CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440CrossRefPubMed Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau CSM, Chamberlain RS (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve patient outcomes and recovery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 41(4):899–913CrossRefPubMed Lau CSM, Chamberlain RS (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve patient outcomes and recovery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 41(4):899–913CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen KK, Dressler J, Baastrup NN, Kehlet H, Jørgensen LN (2019) Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction reduces length of postoperative stay: an observational cohort study. Surgery 165(2):393–397CrossRefPubMed Jensen KK, Dressler J, Baastrup NN, Kehlet H, Jørgensen LN (2019) Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction reduces length of postoperative stay: an observational cohort study. Surgery 165(2):393–397CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lode L, Oma E, Henriksen NA, Jensen KK (2021) Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35(2):514–523CrossRefPubMed Lode L, Oma E, Henriksen NA, Jensen KK (2021) Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35(2):514–523CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (2009) Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15(4):355–358CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H (2009) Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15(4):355–358CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen KK, Brøndum TL, Leerhøy B, Belhage B, Hensler M, Arnesen RB et al (2020) Preoperative, single, high-dose glucocorticoid administration in abdominal wall reconstruction: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Surgery 167(4):757–764CrossRefPubMed Jensen KK, Brøndum TL, Leerhøy B, Belhage B, Hensler M, Arnesen RB et al (2020) Preoperative, single, high-dose glucocorticoid administration in abdominal wall reconstruction: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Surgery 167(4):757–764CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekmann JR, Christoffersen MW, Jensen KK (2022) Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation? Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 26(5):1315–1323CrossRef Ekmann JR, Christoffersen MW, Jensen KK (2022) Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation? Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 26(5):1315–1323CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M et al (2017) Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc 31(3):1342–1349CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M et al (2017) Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc 31(3):1342–1349CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Belyansky I, Reza Zahiri H, Sanford Z, Weltz AS, Park A (2018) Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 22(5):837–847CrossRefPubMed Belyansky I, Reza Zahiri H, Sanford Z, Weltz AS, Park A (2018) Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 22(5):837–847CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolachalam R, Dickens E, D’Amico L, Richardson C, Rabaza J, Gamagami R et al (2018) Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study. Surg Endosc 32(1):229–235CrossRefPubMed Kolachalam R, Dickens E, D’Amico L, Richardson C, Rabaza J, Gamagami R et al (2018) Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study. Surg Endosc 32(1):229–235CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrell ALG, Morrell AC, Cavazzola LT, Pereira GSS, Mendes JM, Abdalla RZ et al (2021) Robotic assisted eTEP ventral hernia repair: Brazilian early experience. Hernia 25(3):765–774CrossRefPubMed Morrell ALG, Morrell AC, Cavazzola LT, Pereira GSS, Mendes JM, Abdalla RZ et al (2021) Robotic assisted eTEP ventral hernia repair: Brazilian early experience. Hernia 25(3):765–774CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos DA, Limmer AR, Gibson HM, Ledet CR (2021) The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs—a qualitative review of the literature. Surg Endosc 35(1):456–466CrossRefPubMed Santos DA, Limmer AR, Gibson HM, Ledet CR (2021) The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs—a qualitative review of the literature. Surg Endosc 35(1):456–466CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, Rabaza J, Gonzalez A (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30(9):4042–4048CrossRefPubMed Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, Rabaza J, Gonzalez A (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30(9):4042–4048CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Akinci M, Ergul Z, Kaya O, Kulah B, Kulacoglu H (1990) 2012 Predictors for duration of hospital stay after abdominal wall hernia repairs. Chir Buchar Rom 107(1):47–51 Akinci M, Ergul Z, Kaya O, Kulah B, Kulacoglu H (1990) 2012 Predictors for duration of hospital stay after abdominal wall hernia repairs. Chir Buchar Rom 107(1):47–51
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Skovgaards DM, Diab HMH, Midtgaard HG, Jørgensen LN, Jensen KK (2021) Causes of prolonged hospitalization after open incisional hernia repair: an observational single-center retrospective study of a prospective database. Hernia 25(4):1027–1034CrossRefPubMed Skovgaards DM, Diab HMH, Midtgaard HG, Jørgensen LN, Jensen KK (2021) Causes of prolonged hospitalization after open incisional hernia repair: an observational single-center retrospective study of a prospective database. Hernia 25(4):1027–1034CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2013) Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective Nationwide study. World J Surg 37(10):2273–2279CrossRefPubMed Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2013) Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective Nationwide study. World J Surg 37(10):2273–2279CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurian A, Gallagher S, Cheeyandira A, Josloff R (2010) Predictors of in-hospital length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Surg Endosc 24(11):2789–2792CrossRefPubMed Kurian A, Gallagher S, Cheeyandira A, Josloff R (2010) Predictors of in-hospital length of stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Surg Endosc 24(11):2789–2792CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sibia US, MacDonald JH, King PJ (2016) Predictors of hospital length of stay in an enhanced recovery after surgery program for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(10):2119–2123CrossRefPubMed Sibia US, MacDonald JH, King PJ (2016) Predictors of hospital length of stay in an enhanced recovery after surgery program for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(10):2119–2123CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT, Lee KHK, Grant MC, Zavadsky TL et al (2016) Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg 103(5):564–571CrossRefPubMed Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT, Lee KHK, Grant MC, Zavadsky TL et al (2016) Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg 103(5):564–571CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarin A, Litonius ES, Naidu R, Yost CS, Varma MG, Chen LL (2016) Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 16(1):55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sarin A, Litonius ES, Naidu R, Yost CS, Varma MG, Chen LL (2016) Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 16(1):55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim K, Standaert D (2020) Enhanced recovery after surgical repair of incisional hernias. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 24(1):3–8CrossRef Slim K, Standaert D (2020) Enhanced recovery after surgical repair of incisional hernias. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 24(1):3–8CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4 Suppl 2):151S-159SCrossRefPubMed Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4 Suppl 2):151S-159SCrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleppe KL, Greenberg JA (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: rationale and components. Surg Clin North Am 98(3):499–509CrossRefPubMed Kleppe KL, Greenberg JA (2018) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: rationale and components. Surg Clin North Am 98(3):499–509CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sartori A, Botteri E, Agresta F, Gerardi C, Vettoretto N, Arezzo A et al (2021) Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 25(2):501–521CrossRefPubMed Sartori A, Botteri E, Agresta F, Gerardi C, Vettoretto N, Arezzo A et al (2021) Should enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways be preferred over standard practice for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 25(2):501–521CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Enhanced recovery after robotic ventral hernia repair: factors associated with overnight stay in hospital
verfasst von
M. Marckmann
P.-M. Krarup
N. A. Henriksen
M. W. Christoffersen
K. K. Jensen
Publikationsdatum
05.09.2023
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02871-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Hernia 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.