Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2019

10.08.2018 | Original Article

Factors Associated with Long-Term Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

verfasst von: Olga A. Lavryk, Luca Stocchi, Tracy L. Hull, Emre Gorgun, Sherief Shawki, Jeremy M. Lipman, Stefan D. Holubar, Conor P. Delaney, Scott R. Steele

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim

The aim of this study was to analyze factors associated with quality of life (QoL) after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA).

Methods

Patients who underwent IPAA (1983–2015) and replied to QoL questionnaire were identified from an IRB-approved prospectively maintained IPAA-database. QoL was assessed using Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Patient cohort was divided in two groups: overall QoL score ≤ 0.7 (low) and > 0.7 (high). Demographics, perioperative morbidity, and functional results were analyzed.

Results

A total of 4059 patients replied to the questionnaire at the most recent follow-up and were included. A total of 2889 (71%) had overall QoL > 0.7 (group 1) and 1170 (29%) patients had overall QoL ≤ 0.7 (group 2). Patients in group 1 had lower rates of early (44.6 vs. 50.4%, p = 0.003) and late (55.7 vs. 64.5%, p < 0.003) postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher rates of pouch failure among patients with lower QoL. Pouchitis, obstruction, fistulas, higher number of stools, and IPAA performed during the most recent decade (2005–2015) were significantly associated with lower QoL (≤ 0.7), while S-pouch configuration was associated with higher QoL (> 0.7).

Conclusion

Patient’s characteristics and minimal perioperative complications impact patient’s QoL following IPAA not only in the short term, but also in the long term.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazio V W, O'Riordain M G, Lavery I C et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999; 230: N4 575–84; discussion 584-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fazio V W, O'Riordain M G, Lavery I C et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999; 230: N4 575–84; discussion 584-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazio V W, Kiran R P, Remzi F H et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013; 257: 679–685.CrossRefPubMed Fazio V W, Kiran R P, Remzi F H et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013; 257: 679–685.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berndtsson I, Oresland T. Quality of life before and after proctocolectomy and IPAA in patients with ulcerative proctocolitis--a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5: 173–179.CrossRefPubMed Berndtsson I, Oresland T. Quality of life before and after proctocolectomy and IPAA in patients with ulcerative proctocolitis--a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5: 173–179.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuruvilla K, Osler T, Hyman N H. A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 1131–1137.CrossRefPubMed Kuruvilla K, Osler T, Hyman N H. A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 1131–1137.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Raviram S, Rajan R, Sindhu R S et al. Quality of life, social impact and functional outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015; 34: 252–255.CrossRefPubMed Raviram S, Rajan R, Sindhu R S et al. Quality of life, social impact and functional outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015; 34: 252–255.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abolfotouh S, Rautio T, Klintrup K et al. Predictors of quality-of-life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017: 1:1–8. Abolfotouh S, Rautio T, Klintrup K et al. Predictors of quality-of-life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017: 1:1–8.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy P B, Khot Z, Vogt K N et al. Quality of Life After Total Proctocolectomy With Ileostomy or IPAA: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58: 899–908.CrossRefPubMed Murphy P B, Khot Z, Vogt K N et al. Quality of Life After Total Proctocolectomy With Ileostomy or IPAA: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58: 899–908.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berndtsson I E, Carlsson E K, Persson E I et al. Long-term adjustment to living with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54: 193–199.CrossRefPubMed Berndtsson I E, Carlsson E K, Persson E I et al. Long-term adjustment to living with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54: 193–199.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 433–41; discussion 442-5.PubMedPubMedCentral Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 433–41; discussion 442-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney C P, Remzi F H, Gramlich T et al. Equivalent function, quality of life and pouch survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 43–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delaney C P, Remzi F H, Gramlich T et al. Equivalent function, quality of life and pouch survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 43–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coffey J C, Winter D C, Neary P et al. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: an evaluation of diet and other factors using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 30–38.PubMed Coffey J C, Winter D C, Neary P et al. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: an evaluation of diet and other factors using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 30–38.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Holubar S, Hyman N. Continence alterations after ilel pouch-anal anastomosis do not diminish quality of life. Dis Col rectum, 2003; 46 (11). 1489–91.CrossRef Holubar S, Hyman N. Continence alterations after ilel pouch-anal anastomosis do not diminish quality of life. Dis Col rectum, 2003; 46 (11). 1489–91.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiran R P, Delaney C P, Senagore A J et al. Prospective assessment of Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) as a novel marker of quality of life and disease activity in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 1783–1789.CrossRefPubMed Kiran R P, Delaney C P, Senagore A J et al. Prospective assessment of Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) as a novel marker of quality of life and disease activity in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 1783–1789.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifarth C, Borner L, Siegmund B et al. Impact of staged surgery on quality of life in refractory ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 643–649.CrossRefPubMed Seifarth C, Borner L, Siegmund B et al. Impact of staged surgery on quality of life in refractory ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 643–649.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Limongelli P et al. The effect of pelvic septic complications on function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single center experience. Am Surg. 2010; 76: 428–435.PubMed Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Limongelli P et al. The effect of pelvic septic complications on function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single center experience. Am Surg. 2010; 76: 428–435.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chessin D B, Gorfine S R, Bub D S et al. Septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy do not impair functional outcome: long-term follow-up from a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1312–1317.CrossRefPubMed Chessin D B, Gorfine S R, Bub D S et al. Septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy do not impair functional outcome: long-term follow-up from a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008; 51: 1312–1317.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiely J M, Fazio V W, Remzi F H et al. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 387–392.CrossRefPubMed Kiely J M, Fazio V W, Remzi F H et al. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012; 55: 387–392.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Turina M, Pennington C J, Kimberling J et al. Chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: effect on quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006; 10: 600–606.CrossRefPubMed Turina M, Pennington C J, Kimberling J et al. Chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: effect on quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006; 10: 600–606.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkek A, Remzi F, Hammel J. Effect of small bowel obstruction on functional outcome and quality of life in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: 10-year follow-up study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23(1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed Erkek A, Remzi F, Hammel J. Effect of small bowel obstruction on functional outcome and quality of life in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: 10-year follow-up study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23(1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Carmon E, Keidar A, Ravid A et al. The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5: 228–232.CrossRefPubMed Carmon E, Keidar A, Ravid A et al. The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. 2003; 5: 228–232.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mennigen R, Senninger N, Bruewer M et al. Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012; 397: 37–44.CrossRefPubMed Mennigen R, Senninger N, Bruewer M et al. Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012; 397: 37–44.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko C.Y., Rusin, L.C., Schoetz, D.J., Jr, Moreau, L., Coller, J.C., Murray, J.J., Roberts, P.L., Marcello, P.W. Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: the association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery. J Surg Res. 2001, 98, 2, 102–107.CrossRefPubMed Ko C.Y., Rusin, L.C., Schoetz, D.J., Jr, Moreau, L., Coller, J.C., Murray, J.J., Roberts, P.L., Marcello, P.W. Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: the association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery. J Surg Res. 2001, 98, 2, 102–107.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Remzi FH, Lavryk OA, Ashburn JH at al. Restorative proctocolectomy: an example of how surgery evolves in response to paradigm shifts in care. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1003–101.CrossRefPubMed Remzi FH, Lavryk OA, Ashburn JH at al. Restorative proctocolectomy: an example of how surgery evolves in response to paradigm shifts in care. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1003–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Factors Associated with Long-Term Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis
verfasst von
Olga A. Lavryk
Luca Stocchi
Tracy L. Hull
Emre Gorgun
Sherief Shawki
Jeremy M. Lipman
Stefan D. Holubar
Conor P. Delaney
Scott R. Steele
Publikationsdatum
10.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3904-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.