Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2022

06.08.2021 | Breast

Five-year annual incidence and clinico-molecular features of breast cancer after the last negative screening mammography at age 68–69

verfasst von: Lauro Bucchi, Alessandra Ravaioli, Flavia Baldacchini, Orietta Giuliani, Silvia Mancini, Rosa Vattiato, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Cinzia Campari, Debora Canuti, Enza Di Felice, Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi, Stefano Ferretti, Nicoletta Bertozzi, Fabio Falcini, on behalf of the Emilia-Romagna Region Workgroup for Mammography Screening Evaluation

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer recommendation for triennial screening of women aged 70–74 is based on very weak evidence. A cohort of Italian women who had their last biennial screening mammography at age 68–69 was followed up for 5 years, assumed to represent the interval to another hypothetical screening mammography, in order to determine the annual proportional incidence of interval breast cancer.

Methods

The cohort included 118,370 women. They had their last mammography between 1997 and 2008. Incident breast cancers were identified by record-linking the cohort with the regional breast cancer registry. The expected incidence in the age range 65–74 was estimated with an age-period-cohort model. The number of interval cancers was divided by the expected number to obtain their proportional incidence.

Results

Overall, there were 298,658 woman-years at risk with 371 interval cancers versus 988.8 expected. In the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth interval year, the proportional incidence was 0.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.06–0.13), 0.32 (0.25–0.39), 0.60 (0.49–0.73), 0.75 (0.60–0.92), and 0.81 (0.60–1.07), respectively. Between the second and the fifth year, tumour stage and molecular subtype did not change significantly.

Conclusion

Though not supported by these findings, the proposal of triennial screening for women aged 70–74 merits further research, because the 95% confidence interval of the third-year proportional incidence of interval cancer included 0.50—the maximum limit considered acceptable for women aged 50–69.

Key Points

• The third-year incidence of breast cancer relative to the expected one was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.73).
• Between the second and the fifth year, tumour stage and molecular subtype did not change significantly (p >0.10).
• The proposal of a 3-year screening interval at age 70–74 merits further evaluation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Falcini F, Baraldi GP et al (2003) Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience. J Med Screen 10:134–138CrossRef Bucchi L, Falcini F, Baraldi GP et al (2003) Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience. J Med Screen 10:134–138CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F et al (2019) Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting. Eur Radiol 29:5517–5527CrossRef Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F et al (2019) Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting. Eur Radiol 29:5517–5527CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravaioli A, Foca F, Colamartini A et al (2010) Incidence, detection, and tumour stage of breast cancer in a cohort of Italian women with negative screening mammography report recommending early (short-interval) rescreen. BMC Med 8:11CrossRef Ravaioli A, Foca F, Colamartini A et al (2010) Incidence, detection, and tumour stage of breast cancer in a cohort of Italian women with negative screening mammography report recommending early (short-interval) rescreen. BMC Med 8:11CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Foca F, Ravaioli A et al (2009) Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy among patients with high-risk breast cancer detected by mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:559–566CrossRef Bucchi L, Foca F, Ravaioli A et al (2009) Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy among patients with high-risk breast cancer detected by mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:559–566CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Giuliani O, Mancini S, Puliti D et al (2016) Patterns and determinants of receipt of follow-up mammography and/or clinical examination in a cohort of Italian breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158:543–551CrossRef Giuliani O, Mancini S, Puliti D et al (2016) Patterns and determinants of receipt of follow-up mammography and/or clinical examination in a cohort of Italian breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158:543–551CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortesi L, Baldassarri B, Ferretti S et al (2020) A regional population-based hereditary breast cancer screening tool in Italy: first 5-year results. Cancer Med 9:2579–2589CrossRef Cortesi L, Baldassarri B, Ferretti S et al (2020) A regional population-based hereditary breast cancer screening tool in Italy: first 5-year results. Cancer Med 9:2579–2589CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Foca F, Colamartini A, Falcini F, Naldoni C (2008) Incidence of interval breast cancers after 650,000 negative mammographies in 13 Italian health districts. J Med Screen 15:30–35CrossRef Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Foca F, Colamartini A, Falcini F, Naldoni C (2008) Incidence of interval breast cancers after 650,000 negative mammographies in 13 Italian health districts. J Med Screen 15:30–35CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravaioli A, Mancini S, Naldoni C, Falcini F, Ferretti S, Bucchi L (2016) Coping with problems that flaw the estimate of mammography sensitivity in population-based screening programmes: the Italian perspective. Public Health 136:178–180CrossRef Ravaioli A, Mancini S, Naldoni C, Falcini F, Ferretti S, Bucchi L (2016) Coping with problems that flaw the estimate of mammography sensitivity in population-based screening programmes: the Italian perspective. Public Health 136:178–180CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F et al (2021) Incidence of interval breast cancer among women aged 45-49 in an organised mammography screening setting. J Med Screen 28:207–209 Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F et al (2021) Incidence of interval breast cancer among women aged 45-49 in an organised mammography screening setting. J Med Screen 28:207–209
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sassoli de Bianchi P, Ravaioli A, Ferretti S et al (2017) Extension of the target age range of mammography screening programme and governance of mammography practice in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy). Epidemiol Prev 41:38–45PubMed Sassoli de Bianchi P, Ravaioli A, Ferretti S et al (2017) Extension of the target age range of mammography screening programme and governance of mammography practice in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy). Epidemiol Prev 41:38–45PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Muratov S, Canelo-Aybar C, Tarride JE et al (2020) Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators. BMC Cancer 20:795CrossRef Muratov S, Canelo-Aybar C, Tarride JE et al (2020) Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators. BMC Cancer 20:795CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Broeders M, Nyström L, Ascunce N et al (2006) Epidemiological guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening. In: Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 15–56 Broeders M, Nyström L, Ascunce N et al (2006) Epidemiological guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening. In: Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 15–56
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Puliti D, Ravaioli A et al (2008) Breast screening: axillary lymph node status of interval cancers by interval year. Breast 17:477–483CrossRef Bucchi L, Puliti D, Ravaioli A et al (2008) Breast screening: axillary lymph node status of interval cancers by interval year. Breast 17:477–483CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A et al (2018) Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States: summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer 142:44–56CrossRef Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A et al (2018) Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States: summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer 142:44–56CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Engholm G, Lönnberg S, Khan S, Bray F (2014) 50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence. Br J Cancer 111:965–969CrossRef Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Engholm G, Lönnberg S, Khan S, Bray F (2014) 50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence. Br J Cancer 111:965–969CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Baldacchini F, Mancini S et al (2019) Estimating the impact of an organised screening programme on cervical cancer incidence: a 26-year study from northern Italy. Int J Cancer 144:1017–1026PubMed Bucchi L, Baldacchini F, Mancini S et al (2019) Estimating the impact of an organised screening programme on cervical cancer incidence: a 26-year study from northern Italy. Int J Cancer 144:1017–1026PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Buiatti E, Barchielli A, Bartolacci S et al (2003) The impact of organised screening programmes on the stage-specific incidence of breast cancer in some Italian areas. Eur J Cancer 39:1776–1782CrossRef Buiatti E, Barchielli A, Bartolacci S et al (2003) The impact of organised screening programmes on the stage-specific incidence of breast cancer in some Italian areas. Eur J Cancer 39:1776–1782CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Mancini S et al (2020) Detection by screening introduces biases into survival estimates for luminal A-like breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 146:1764–1766CrossRef Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Mancini S et al (2020) Detection by screening introduces biases into survival estimates for luminal A-like breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 146:1764–1766CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aapro M, Wildiers H (2012) Triple-negative breast cancer in the older population. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 6):vi52–vi55CrossRef Aapro M, Wildiers H (2012) Triple-negative breast cancer in the older population. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 6):vi52–vi55CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacklyn G, Howard K, Irwig L, Houssami N, Hersch J, Barratt A (2017) Impact of extending screening mammography to older women: information to support informed choices. Int J Cancer 141:1540–1550CrossRef Jacklyn G, Howard K, Irwig L, Houssami N, Hersch J, Barratt A (2017) Impact of extending screening mammography to older women: information to support informed choices. Int J Cancer 141:1540–1550CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mack DS, Lapane KL (2019) Screening mammography among older women: a review of United States guidelines and potential harms. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 28:820–826CrossRef Mack DS, Lapane KL (2019) Screening mammography among older women: a review of United States guidelines and potential harms. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 28:820–826CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246:376–383CrossRef Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246:376–383CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Song SY, Park B, Hong S, Kim MJ, Lee EH, Jun JK (2019) Comparison of digital and screen-film mammography for breast-cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer 22:311–325CrossRef Song SY, Park B, Hong S, Kim MJ, Lee EH, Jun JK (2019) Comparison of digital and screen-film mammography for breast-cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Breast Cancer 22:311–325CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Puliti D, Bucchi L, Mancini S et al (2017) Advanced breast cancer rates in the epoch of service screening: the 400,000 women cohort study from Italy. Eur J Cancer 75:109–116CrossRef Puliti D, Bucchi L, Mancini S et al (2017) Advanced breast cancer rates in the epoch of service screening: the 400,000 women cohort study from Italy. Eur J Cancer 75:109–116CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Giudici F, Bortul M, Clagnan E et al (2020) Early effects of attendance to the Friuli Venezia Giulia (Northern Italy) mammography screening programme on the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer: a cohort study. Epidemiol Prev 44(2-3):145–153PubMed Giudici F, Bortul M, Clagnan E et al (2020) Early effects of attendance to the Friuli Venezia Giulia (Northern Italy) mammography screening programme on the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer: a cohort study. Epidemiol Prev 44(2-3):145–153PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Five-year annual incidence and clinico-molecular features of breast cancer after the last negative screening mammography at age 68–69
verfasst von
Lauro Bucchi
Alessandra Ravaioli
Flavia Baldacchini
Orietta Giuliani
Silvia Mancini
Rosa Vattiato
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Cinzia Campari
Debora Canuti
Enza Di Felice
Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi
Stefano Ferretti
Nicoletta Bertozzi
Fabio Falcini
on behalf of the Emilia-Romagna Region Workgroup for Mammography Screening Evaluation
Publikationsdatum
06.08.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08129-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

European Radiology 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.