Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs & Aging 2/2007

01.02.2007 | Original Research Article

Functional Outcomes of Drug Treatment in Alzheimer’s Disease

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Richard A. Hansen, Gerald Gartlehner, Kathleen N. Lohr, Daniel I. Kaufer

Erschienen in: Drugs & Aging | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Patient functioning is an important outcome in Alzheimer’s disease, but treatment-related improvements in patient function are difficult to quantify because a number of different scales are used in its measurement.

Objective

To evaluate systematically the evidence relating to patient functioning as an outcome measure in the drug treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Data were obtained by searching MEDLINE®, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 through to December 2005 for studies assessing functional outcomes with donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine in Alzheimer’s disease. Reference lists were searched manually and pharmaceutical manufacturers were invited to submit dossiers. Trained reviewers abstracted data and assessed the internal validity (quality) of trials using predefined criteria. Standardised effect sizes (i.e. Cohen’s standardised mean difference [d]) for various functional outcome scales and pooled mean incidence and 95% CIs for adverse events were calculated and summarised qualitatively and quantitatively. Meta regression was used to explore potential heterogeneity.

Results

Overall, the standardised effect size for functional outcome measures was small (d = 0.1–0.4) among included studies. However, effect sizes consistently favoured drug treatment over placebo. For all drugs, pooled standardised effect sizes were consistent in both short (<24 weeks; d = 0.25; 95% CI 0.13, 0.37) and long trials (≥24 weeks; d = 0.29; 95% CI 0.22, 0.36). The pooled effect size was not significantly affected by parameters such as disease severity, age, gender and drug dose. Adverse events were generally limited to gastrointestinal problems, weight loss and dizziness, all of which were reported in <20% of patients on average.

Conclusions

Standardised estimates of effect size across diverse functional outcome measures for drug treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease were small and the data reflect only a modest trend favouring active treatment over placebo. However, given the current lack of other effective treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, this trend supports the clinical benefits of these treatments with regard to this important health outcome.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366(9503): 2112–7PubMedCrossRef Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366(9503): 2112–7PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001191 Birks J, Grimley Evans J, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001191
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001747 Olin J, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001747
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001190 Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001190
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Qizilbash N, Whitehead A, Higgins J, et al. Cholinesterase inhibition for Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis of the tacrine trials. Dementia Trialists’ Collaboration. JAMA 1998; 280(20): 1777–82PubMedCrossRef Qizilbash N, Whitehead A, Higgins J, et al. Cholinesterase inhibition for Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis of the tacrine trials. Dementia Trialists’ Collaboration. JAMA 1998; 280(20): 1777–82PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Areosa SA, Sherriff F. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003154 Areosa SA, Sherriff F. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003154
7.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: NICE, 2005 National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: NICE, 2005
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331(7512): 321–7PubMedCrossRef Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331(7512): 321–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger G, Bernhardt T, Weimer E, et al. Longitudinal study on the relationship between symptomatology of dementia and levels of subjective burden and depression among family caregivers in memory clinic patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005; 18(3): 119–28PubMedCrossRef Berger G, Bernhardt T, Weimer E, et al. Longitudinal study on the relationship between symptomatology of dementia and levels of subjective burden and depression among family caregivers in memory clinic patients. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005; 18(3): 119–28PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox DM. Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan–Feb; 24(1): 114–22CrossRef Fox DM. Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 Jan–Feb; 24(1): 114–22CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 (3 Suppl.): 21–35PubMedCrossRef Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 (3 Suppl.): 21–35PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001 NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ, 2001CrossRef Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ, 2001CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1988 Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1988
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, 1981 Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, 1981
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997; 315(7121): 1533–7PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997; 315(7121): 1533–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov; 12(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov; 12(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4): 1088–101PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4): 1088–101PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53(11): 1119–29PubMedCrossRef Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53(11): 1119–29PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullock R, Touchon J, Bergman H, et al. Rivastigmine and donepezil treatment in moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer’s disease over a 2-year period. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(8): 1317–27PubMedCrossRef Bullock R, Touchon J, Bergman H, et al. Rivastigmine and donepezil treatment in moderate to moderately-severe Alzheimer’s disease over a 2-year period. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21(8): 1317–27PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RW, Soininen H, Hager K, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week study comparing the effects of donepezil and galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19(1): 58–67PubMedCrossRef Jones RW, Soininen H, Hager K, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week study comparing the effects of donepezil and galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19(1): 58–67PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcock G, Howe I, Coles H, et al. A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(10): 777–89PubMedCrossRef Wilcock G, Howe I, Coles H, et al. A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(10): 777–89PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson DG, Passmore AP, Bullock R, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week, comparative study of donepezil and rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56(6): 441–6PubMed Wilkinson DG, Passmore AP, Bullock R, et al. A multinational, randomised, 12-week, comparative study of donepezil and rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2002; 56(6): 441–6PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9427): 2105–15PubMedCrossRef Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9427): 2105–15PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10(3): 237–44PubMedCrossRef Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10(3): 237–44PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 481–8PubMedCrossRef Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 481–8PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001; 57(4): 613–20PubMedCrossRef Feldman H, Gauthier S, Hecker J, et al. A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001; 57(4): 613–20PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11(6): 299–313PubMedCrossRef Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11(6): 299–313PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7(6): 293–303PubMed Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7(6): 293–303PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(9): 1021–31PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(9): 1021–31PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50(1): 136–45PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50(1): 136–45PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tariot PN, Cummings JL, Katz IR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease in the nursing home setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(12): 1590–9PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Cummings JL, Katz IR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease in the nursing home setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49(12): 1590–9PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 489–95PubMedCrossRef Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 489–95PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2261–8PubMedCrossRef Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Wessel T, et al. Galantamine in AD: a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2261–8PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockwood K, Mintzer J, Truyen L, et al. Effects of a flexible galantamine dose in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71(5): 589–95PubMedCrossRef Rockwood K, Mintzer J, Truyen L, et al. Effects of a flexible galantamine dose in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71(5): 589–95PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2269–76PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54(12): 2269–76PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcock GK, Lilienfeld S, Gaens E. Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1445–9PubMedCrossRef Wilcock GK, Lilienfeld S, Gaens E. Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1445–9PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson D, Murray J. Galantamine: a randomized, double-blind, dose comparison in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16(9): 852–7PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson D, Murray J. Galantamine: a randomized, double-blind, dose comparison in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16(9): 852–7PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Agid Y, Dubois B, Anand R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1998; 59(12): 837–45CrossRef Agid Y, Dubois B, Anand R, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1998; 59(12): 837–45CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Corey-Bloom JR, Anand JV, Veach J, et al. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65 Corey-Bloom JR, Anand JV, Veach J, et al. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENA 713 (rivastigmine tartrate), a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 1998; 1: 55–65
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosier M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318(7184): 633–8 Rosier M, Anand R, Cicin-Sain A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: international randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999; 318(7184): 633–8
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(14): 1333–41PubMedCrossRef Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(14): 1333–41PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(3): 317–24PubMedCrossRef Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(3): 317–24PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Brodaty H, Corey-Bloom J, Potocnik FC, et al. Galantamine prolonged-release formulation in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20(2–3): 120–32PubMedCrossRef Brodaty H, Corey-Bloom J, Potocnik FC, et al. Galantamine prolonged-release formulation in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 20(2–3): 120–32PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Morganroth J, Graham S, Hartman R, et al. Electrocardiograph-ic effects of rivastigmine. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42(5): 558–68PubMedCrossRef Morganroth J, Graham S, Hartman R, et al. Electrocardiograph-ic effects of rivastigmine. J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 42(5): 558–68PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn NR, Pearce GL, Shakir SA. Adverse effects associated with the use of donepezil in general practice in England. J Psychopharmacol 2000; 14(4): 406–8PubMedCrossRef Dunn NR, Pearce GL, Shakir SA. Adverse effects associated with the use of donepezil in general practice in England. J Psychopharmacol 2000; 14(4): 406–8PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Grimley Evans J, Wilcock G, Birks J. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of AD. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 351–69CrossRef Grimley Evans J, Wilcock G, Birks J. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of AD. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 351–69CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: EMEA, 1997 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.eu.int [Accessed 2006 Sep 5] The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. London: EMEA, 1997 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​emea.​eu.​int [Accessed 2006 Sep 5]
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Food and Drug Administration. Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting, July 7, 1989. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, 1989 Food and Drug Administration. Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting, July 7, 1989. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, 1989
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31(1): 115–23PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, et al. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31(1): 115–23PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Functional Outcomes of Drug Treatment in Alzheimer’s Disease
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Richard A. Hansen
Gerald Gartlehner
Kathleen N. Lohr
Daniel I. Kaufer
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2007
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs & Aging / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724020-00007

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Drugs & Aging 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.