Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Dysphagia
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 1/2017

18.01.2017 | Review

History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years

verfasst von: Susan E. Langmore

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Back in 1988, when the first description of the FEES procedure was published [1], otolaryngologists had just started to use fiberoptic laryngoscopes in their practice. Prior to fiberoptic technology, laryngoscopy was performed with a mirror or more invasive direct laryngoscopy instruments. The first fiberoptic laryngoscope is generally credited to Sawashima and Hirose in 1968. It transformed the practice of laryngoscopy by allowing a transnasal approach with the patient conscious during the procedure and providing a view of the vocal folds during natural speech. …
Literatur
1.
Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):216–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Langmore S. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 2001. p. 263.
3.
Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100(8):678–81.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Willging JP. Endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32(Suppl):S107–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Wu CH, et al. Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(3):396–401.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Kaye GM, Zorowitz RD, Baredes S. Role of flexible laryngoscopy in evaluating aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106(8):705–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Perie S, et al. Role of videoendoscopy in assessment of pharyngeal function in oropharyngeal dysphagia: comparison with videofluoroscopy and manometry. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(11 Pt 1):1712–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Schroter-Morasch H, et al. Values and limitations of pharyngolaryngoscopy (transnasal, transoral) in patients with dysphagia. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1999;51(4–5):172–82.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Madden C, et al. Comparison between videofluoroscopy and milk-swallow endoscopy in the assessment of swallowing function. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000;25(6):504–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Noordally SO, et al. A study to determine the correlation between clinical, fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing after prolonged intubation. Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26(4):457–62.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Rao N, et al. Gold-standard? Analysis of the videofluoroscopic and fiberopting endoscopic swallow examinations. J Appl Res. 2003;3:89–96 (Journal Article).
12.
Kelly AM, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Clin otolaryngol. 2006;31(5):425–32.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Pisegna JM, Langmore SE. Parameters of instrumental swallowing evaluations: describing a diagnostic dilemma. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):462–72.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Aviv JE, et al. The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST): an analysis of 500 consecutive evaluations. Dysphagia. 2000;15(1):39–44.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Aviv JE, et al. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing: patient characteristics and analysis of safety in 1,340 consecutive examinations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(3):173–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Nacci A, et al. Complications with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in 2,820 examinations. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(1):37–45.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Warnecke T, et al. The safety of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2009;40(2):482–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Bastian RW, Riggs LC. Role of sensation in swallowing function. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(12):1974–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hartnick CJ, et al. Pediatric fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(11):996–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN. Topical nasal anesthesia for transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, cross-over study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(4):452–4.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lester S, et al. The effects of topical anesthetic on swallowing during nasoendoscopy. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(7):1704–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Fife TA, et al. Use of topical nasal anesthesia during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in dysphagic patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(3):206–11.PubMedCrossRef
24.
O’Dea MB, et al. Effect of lidocaine on swallowing during FEES in patients with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(7):537–44.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Warnecke T, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with simultaneous Tensilon application in diagnosis and therapy of myasthenia gravis. J Neurol. 2008;255(2):224–30.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Warnecke T, et al. Off and on state assessment of swallowing function in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(9):1033–4.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Warnecke T, et al. Endoscopic characteristics and levodopa responsiveness of swallowing function in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 2010;25(9):1239–45.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Warnecke T, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale predicts outcome after acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(3):283–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Dziewas R, et al. FEES in the stroke unit: recommendations for implementation in the clinical routine. Nervenarzt. 2013;84(6):705–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Dziewas R, et al. Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke—development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Baijens LW, et al. FEES protocol derived estimates of sensitivity: aspiration in dysphagic patients. Dysphagia. 2014;29(5):583–90.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Fuller SC, et al. Validation of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(3):391–4.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Murray J, et al. The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):99–103.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Pluschinski P, et al. Validation of the secretion severity rating scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(10):3215–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Donzelli J, et al. Predictive value of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions for aspiration during video nasal endoscopic evaluation of the swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(5):469–75.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Miloro KV, Pearson WG Jr, Langmore SE. Effortful pitch glide: a potential new exercise evaluated by dynamic MRI. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(4):1243–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Aviv JE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2001;80(8):553-6–558.
38.
Aviv JE, et al. Laryngeal adductor reflex and pharyngeal squeeze as predictors of laryngeal penetration and aspiration. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(2):338–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Aviv JE, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls. Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):87–92.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Ulualp S, et al. Assessment of laryngopharyngeal sensation in children with dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):2291–5.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Link DT, et al. Pediatric laryngopharyngeal sensory testing during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: feasible and correlative. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(10 Pt 1):899–905.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Suskind DL, et al. Improved infant swallowing after gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: a function of improved laryngeal sensation? Laryngoscope. 2006;116(8):1397–403.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Aviv JE, et al. Laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(11):1000–6.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Phua SY, et al. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and cough have impaired laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity. Thorax. 2005;60(6):488–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Amin MR, et al. Sensory testing in the assessment of laryngeal sensation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(7):528–34.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Kaneoka A, et al. A comparison of 2 methods of endoscopic laryngeal sensory testing: a preliminary study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(3):187–93.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Leder SB, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) with and without blue-dyed food. Dysphagia. 2005;20(2):157–62.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Marvin S, Gustafson S, Thibeault S. Detecting aspiration and penetration using FEES with and without food dye. Dysphagia. 2016;31(4):498–504.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Takahashi N, et al. Videoendoscopic assessment of swallowing function to predict the future incidence of pneumonia of the elderly. J Oral Rehab. 2012;39(6):429–37.CrossRef
50.
Hey C, et al. Improved efficiency in swallowing diagnostics using an electronic documentation system. HNO. 2010;58(7):686–91.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Hey C, et al. A documentation system to save time and ensure proper application of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES®). Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(4):201–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Hey C, et al. Penetration-aspiration: is their detection in FEES® reliable without video recording? Dysphagia. 2015;30(4):418–22.PubMedCrossRef
53.
54.
Verdonschot RJ, et al. The relationship between fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing outcome and symptoms of anxiety and depression in dysphagic patients. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(5):E199–207.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Florie M, et al. Relationship between swallow-specific quality of life and fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing findings in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E1848–56.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Chen AY, et al. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed
57.
Baijens LW, et al. Identifying patterns of FEES-derived swallowing trajectories using group-based trajectory model. Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):529–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
59.
Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(4):308–15.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Butler SG, et al. Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(6):480–3.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Smith CH, et al. Incidence and patient characteristics associated with silent aspiration in the acute care setting. Dysphagia. 1999;14(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Langmore S, et al. A closer look at residue in the post-radiated HNC population, in Dysphagia Research Society annual meeting. Denver; 2016.
63.
Kendall KA, et al. Timing of swallowing events after single-modality treatment of head and neck carcinomas with radiotherapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(8 Pt 1):767–75.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Perlman AL, Grayhack JP, Booth BM. The relationship of vallecular residue to oral involvement, reduced hyoid elevation, and epiglottic function. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(4):734–41.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Dejaeger E, et al. Mechanisms involved in postdeglutition retention in the elderly. Dysphagia. 1997;12(2):63–7.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Olsson R, et al. Combined videomanometric identification of abnormalities related to pharyngeal retention. Acad Radiol. 1997;4(5):349–54.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Pauloski BR, et al. Relationship between manometric and videofluoroscopic measures of swallow function in healthy adults and patients treated for head and neck cancer with various modalities. Dysphagia. 2009;24(2):196–203.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Tohara H, et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability in fibroptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(12):884–91.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Park WY, et al. Adding endoscopist-directed flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study increased the detection rates of penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Gut Liver. 2015;9(5):623–8.PubMed
70.
Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28(3):135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Farneti D, et al. The Pooling-score (P-score): inter- and intra-rater reliability in endoscopic assessment of the severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(2):105–10.PubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Kaneoka AS, et al. The Boston residue and clearance scale: preliminary reliability and validity testing. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2013;65(6):312–7.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Neubauer PD, Rademaker AW, Leder SB. The yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale: an anatomically defined and image-based tool. Dysphagia. 2015;30(5):521–8.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Pisegna JM, Langmore S. Rethinking residue: determining the perceptual continuum of residue on FEES to enable better measurement, in Dysphagia Research Society annual meeting. Portland; 2017.
75.
Van Daele DJ, et al. Timing of glottic closure during swallowing: a combined electromyographic and endoscopic analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(6):478–87.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Ohmae Y, et al. Timing of glottic closure during normal swallow. Head Neck. 1995;17(5):394–402.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Robbins J, et al. Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages. Gastroenterology. 1992;103(3):823–9.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Tracy JF, et al. Preliminary observations on the effects of age on oropharyngeal deglutition. Dysphagia. 1989;4(2):90–4.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Palmer JB, et al. Coordination of mastication and swallowing. Dysphagia. 1992;7(4):187–200.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Palmer JB. Bolus aggregation in the oropharynx does not depend on gravity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(6):691–6.PubMedCrossRef
81.
82.
Nagy A, et al. Timing differences between cued and noncued swallows in healthy young adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28(3):428–34.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Dua KS, et al. Coordination of deglutitive glottal function and pharyngeal bolus transit during normal eating. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(1):73–83.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Leder SB. Serial fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing evaluations in the management of patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(10):1264–9.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Denk DM, Kaider A. Videoendoscopic biofeedback: a simple method to improve the efficacy of swallowing rehabilitation of patients after head and neck surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1997;59(2):100–5.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Manor Y, et al. Video-assisted swallowing therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19(2):207–11.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Ajemian MS, et al. Routine fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing following prolonged intubation: implications for management. Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):434–7.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Skoretz SA, Flowers HL, Martino R. The incidence of dysphagia following endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. Chest. 2010;137(3):665–73.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Scheel R, et al. Endoscopic assessment of swallowing after prolonged intubation in the ICU setting. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(1):43–52.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Hafner G, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in intensive care unit patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(4):441–6.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Agarwal J, et al. Objective assessment of swallowing function after definitive concurrent (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2011;26(4):399–406.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Patterson M, et al. Functional swallowing outcomes in nasopharyngeal cancer treated with IMRT at 6 to 42 months post-radiotherapy. Dysphagia. 2014;29(6):663–70.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Dworkin JP, et al. Swallowing function outcomes following nonsurgical therapy for advanced-stage laryngeal carcinoma. Dysphagia. 2006;21(1):66–74.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Deutschmann MW, et al. Fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): predictor of swallowing-related complications in the head and neck cancer population. Head Neck. 2013;35(7):974–9.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Leder SB, et al. Tracheotomy tube occlusion status and aspiration in early postsurgical head and neck cancer patients. Dysphagia. 1998;13(3):167–71.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Teguh DN, et al. Results of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing vs. radiation dose in the swallowing muscles after radiotherapy of cancer in the oropharynx. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89(1):57–63.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Bax L, et al. Speech-language pathologist-led fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: functional outcomes for patients after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(3):e195–200.PubMedCrossRef
98.
99.
Leder SB, Ross DA. Confirmation of no causal relationship between tracheotomy and aspiration status: a direct replication study. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):35–9.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Srinet P, et al. A biomechanical study of hyoid bone and laryngeal movements during swallowing comparing the blom low profile voice inner cannula and passy-muir one way tracheotomy tube speaking valves. Dysphagia. 2015;30(6):723–9.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Rodrigues B, et al. Silent saliva aspiration in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2011;26(1):138–41.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Sampaio M, et al. Wet voice as a sign of penetration/aspiration in Parkinson’s disease: does testing material matter? Dysphagia. 2014;29(5):610–5.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Ollivere B, et al. Swallowing dysfunction in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis: aetiology and outcomes. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(1):38–41.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Pilz W, et al. Swallowing assessment in myotonic dystrophy type 1 using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24(12):1054–62.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Ponfick M, Linden R, Nowak DA. Dysphagia–a common, transient symptom in critical illness polyneuropathy: a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing study. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):365–72.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Seidler TO, et al. Dysphagia caused by ventral osteophytes of the cervical spine: clinical and radiographic findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(2):285–91.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Leder SB, Karas DE. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in the pediatric population. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(7):1132–6.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Leder SB, Baker KE, Goodman TR. Dysphagia testing and aspiration status in medically stable infants requiring mechanical ventilation via tracheotomy. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(4):484–7 quiz 488.PubMed
109.
Willette S, et al. Fiberoptic examination of swallowing in the breastfeeding infant. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(7):1681–6.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Reynolds J, Carroll S, Sturdivant C. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: a multidisciplinary alternative for assessment of infants with dysphagia in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016;16(1):37–43.PubMedCrossRef
111.
da Silva AP, Neto JFL, Santoro PP. Comparison between videofluoroscopy and endoscopic evaluation of swallowing for the diagnosis of dysphagia in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(2):204–9.PubMedCrossRef
112.
113.
114.
Butler SG, et al. Penetration and aspiration in healthy older adults as assessed during endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(3):190–8.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Todd JT, et al. Stability of aspiration status in healthy adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122(5):289–93.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Association ASLH, Scope of practice in speech language pathology. ASLH Association, Editor: Rockville; 2001.
117.
Association ASLH, Use of endoscopy by speech-language-pathologists: position statement, ASLH Association, Editor. 2008.
118.
Association ASLH Role of the speech language pathologist in the performance and interpretation of endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: Guildelines, in Position Report, ASLH Association, editor; 2004.
119.
Therapists, R.C.o.S.a.L., Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES): The role of speech and language therapy; RCSLT Position Paper 2014, R.C.o.S.a.L. Therapy, editor: 2 White Hart Yard, London SE1 1NX; 2014.
120.
Dziewas R, et al. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
121.
Baijens LW, et al. European Society for Swallowing Disorders—European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
122.
Langmore S, Pisegna JM How accurate are clinicians’ ratings of residue?, in Dysphagia Research Society annual meeting. Portland; 2017.
123.
Pisegna JM, et al. Measuring residue: Quantifying vallecular residue on FEES and MBS, in European Society of Swallowing Disorders. Milan; 2006.
124.
Pisegna JM, Langmore S. Double jeopardy: FEES vs fluoro simultaneous stare down, in advanced practices in voice and dysphagia. NV: Las Vegas; 2016.
125.
Langmore S, Pisegna JM, Simultaneous studies: FEES and fluoro evaluations, in American Speech Language Hearing Association annual meeting. Denver; 2016.
Metadaten
Titel
History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years
verfasst von
Susan E. Langmore
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9775-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Dysphagia 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Review

25 Years of Dysphagia Rehabilitation: What Have We Done, What are We Doing, and Where are We Going?

Review

History and Evolution of the Barium Swallow for Evaluation of the Pharynx and Esophagus

Review

Advances with Neonatal Aerodigestive Science in the Pursuit of Safe Swallowing in Infants: Invited Review

Review

History of the Use and Impact of Compensatory Strategies in Management of Swallowing Disorders

Abstracts

6th ESSD Congress Milan 2016 Abstract Book

Original Article

Pharyngeal Pressure and Timing During Bolus Transit

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise