Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Skeletal Radiology
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 5/2018

30.11.2017 | Scientific Article

Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review

verfasst von: Nicola Krähenbühl, Maxwell W. Weinberg, Nathan P. Davidson, Megan K. Mills, Beat Hintermann, Charles L. Saltzman, Alexej Barg

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Forty-two articles were included and subdivided into three groups: group one consists of studies using conventional radiographs (22 articles), group two includes studies using computed tomography (CT) scans (15 articles), and group three comprises studies using magnet resonance imaging (MRI, 9 articles).The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement method, number of participants and ankles included, average age of participants, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the measurement technique. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality.

Results

The three most common techniques used for assessment of the syndesmosis in conventional radiographs are the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), the tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS). Regarding CT scans, the tibio-fibular width (axial images) was most commonly used. Most of the MRI studies used direct assessment of syndesmotic integrity. Overall, the included studies show low probability of bias and are applicable in daily practice.

Conclusions

Conventional radiographs cannot predict syndesmotic injuries reliably. CT scans outperform plain radiographs in detecting syndesmotic mal-reduction. Additionally, the syndesmotic interval can be assessed in greater detail by CT. MRI measurements achieve a sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100%; however, correlating MRI findings with patients’ complaints is difficult, and utility with subtle syndesmotic instability needs further investigation. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was satisfactory.
Literatur
1.
2.
Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, Linklater J, Black DA, Nicholson LL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):323–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10(6):325–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Ryan PM, Rodriguez RM. Outcomes and return to activity after operative repair of chronic latent syndesmotic instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(2):192–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rammelt S, Obruba P. An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(6):601–14.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):653–60.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zalavras C, Thordarson D. Ankle syndesmotic injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(6):330–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
van Dijk CN, Longo UG, Loppini M, Florio P, Maltese L, Ciuffreda M, et al. Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1200–16.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Clanton TO, Williams BT, Backus JD, Dornan GJ, Liechti DJ, Whitlow SR, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the individual ligament contributions to syndesmotic stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(1):66–75.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Schuberth JM, Jennings MM, Lau AC. Arthroscopy-assisted repair of latent syndesmotic instability of the ankle. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(8):868–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Kim JH, Gwak HC, Lee CR, Choo HJ, Kim JG, Kim DY. A comparison of screw fixation and suture-button fixation in a syndesmosis injury in an ankle fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(5):985–90.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hunt KJ, Goeb Y, Behn AW, Criswell B, Chou L. Ankle joint contact loads and displacement with progressive syndesmotic injury. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(9):1095–103.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ramsey PL, Hamilton W. Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(3):356–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Bartonicek J. Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(5–6):379–86.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Sora MC, Strobl B, Staykov D, Forster-Streffleur S. Evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis: a plastination slices study. Clin Anat. 2004;17(6):513–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q, Yeasting RA. Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(2):142–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Magan A, Golano P, Maffulli N, Khanduja V. Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Br Med Bull. 2014;111(1):101–15.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Lilyquist M, Shaw A, Latz K, Bogener J, Wentz B. Cadaveric analysis of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):882–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hermans JJ, Beumer A, de Jong TA, Kleinrensink GJ. Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat. 2010;217(6):633–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Williams BT, Ahrberg AB, Goldsmith MT, Campbell KJ, Shirley L, Wijdicks CA, et al. Ankle syndesmosis: a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):88–97.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Vienne P, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Medial collateral ligament complex of the ankle: MR appearance in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology. 2007;242(3):817–24.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Boss AP, Hintermann B. Anatomical study of the medial ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(6):547–53.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Knupp M, Lang TH, Zwicky L, Lotscher P, Hintermann B. Chronic ankle instability (medial and lateral). Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(4):679–88.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Hintermann B, Golano P. The anatomy and function of the deltoid ligament. Tech Foot Ankle. 2014;13:67–72.CrossRef
26.
Milner CE, Soames RW. The medial collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint: anatomical variations. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(5):289–92.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Niesing R, Entius CA, Ginai AZ, Mulder PG, et al. Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:227–34.CrossRef
28.
Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, Iwata A, Kawasaki K, Tobita M, et al. Arthroscopic diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):836–43.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Helfet DL, et al. Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:216–21.CrossRef
30.
Jeong MS, Choi YS, Kim YJ, Kim JS, Young KW, Jung YY. Deltoid ligament in acute ankle injury: MR imaging analysis. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(5):655–63.CrossRef
31.
Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):788–92.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hermans JJ, Wentink N, Beumer A, Hop WC, Heijboer MP, Moonen AF, et al. Correlation between radiological assessment of acute ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury on MRI. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41(7):787–801.CrossRef
34.
Schoennagel BP, Karul M, Avanesov M, Bannas P, Gold G, Grossterlinden LG, et al. Isolated syndesmotic injury in acute ankle trauma: comparison of plain film radiography with 3T MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(10):1856–61.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Ishida J, et al. Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003;227(1):155–61.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Takao M, Ochi M, Oae K, Naito K, Uchio Y. Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: the role of arthroscopy of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85(3):324–9.CrossRef
37.
Leeds HC, Ehrlich MG. Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):490–503.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Harper MC, Keller TS. A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(3):156–60.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, Olson EJ, Popovic NA. The tibiofibular syndesmosis: evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):847–56.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Brage ME, Bennett CR, Whitehurst JB, Getty PJ, Toledano A. Observer reliability in ankle radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(6):324–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, Zwipp H. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):392–7.CrossRefPubMed
42.
DeAngelis JP, Anderson R, DeAngelis NA. Understanding the superior clear space in the adult ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(4):490–3.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Marmor M, Hansen E, Han HK, Buckley J, Matityahu A. Limitations of standard fluoroscopy in detecting rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis in an ankle fracture model. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(6):616–22.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Shah AS, Kadakia AR, Tan GJ, Karadsheh MS, Wolter TD, Sabb B. Radiographic evaluation of the normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(10):870–6.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Grenier S, Benoit B, Rouleau DM, Leduc S, Laflamme GY, Liew A. APTF: anteroposterior tibiofibular ratio, a new reliable measure to assess syndesmotic reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(4):207–11.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Choi Y, Kwon SS, Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SY, Lee KM. Preoperative radiographic and CT findings predicting syndesmotic injuries in supination-external rotation-type ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(14):1161–7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Chen Y, Qiang M, Zhang K, Li H, Dai H. A reliable radiographic measurement for evaluation of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a multi-detector computed tomography study in adults. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Peterson KS, Chapman WD, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Maintenance of reduction with suture button fixation devices for ankle syndesmosis repair. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):679–84.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Feller R, Borenstein T, Fantry AJ, Kellum RB, Machan JT, Nickisch F, et al. Arthroscopic quantification of syndesmotic instability in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):436–44.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Yeung TW, Chan CY, Chan WC, Yeung YN, Yuen MK. Can pre-operative axial CT imaging predict syndesmosis instability in patients sustaining ankle fractures? Seven years’ experience in a tertiary trauma center. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(6):823–9.CrossRef
51.
Tang CW, Roidis N, Vaishnav S, Patel A, Thordarson DB. Position of the distal fibular fragment in pronation and supination ankle fractures: a CT evaluation. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(7):561–6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Elgafy H, Semaan HB, Blessinger B, Wassef A, Ebraheim NA. Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Skelet Radiol. 2010;39(6):559–64.CrossRef
53.
Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, et al. Malreduction of syndesmosis: are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury. 2011;42(10):1073–6.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):433–8.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Knops SP, Kohn MA, Hansen EN, Matityahu A, Marmor M. Rotational malreduction of the syndesmosis: reliability and accuracy of computed tomography measurement methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(10):1403–10.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Nault ML, Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme GY, Leduc S. CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(11):638–41.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Lepojarvi S, Pakarinen H, Savola O, Haapea M, Sequeiros RB, Niinimaki J. Posterior translation of the fibula may indicate malreduction: CT study of normal variation in uninjured ankles. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(4):205–9.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Malhotra G, Cameron J, Toolan BC. Diagnosing chronic diastasis of the syndesmosis: a novel measurement using computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):483–8.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Mendelsohn ES, Hoshino CM, Harris TG, Zinar DM. CT characterizing the anatomy of uninjured ankle syndesmosis. Orthopedics. 2014;37(2):e157–60.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Kotwal R, Rath N, Paringe V, Hemmadi S, Thomas R, Lyons K. Targeted computerised tomography scanning of the ankle syndesmosis with low dose radiation exposure. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45(3):333–8.CrossRef
61.
Kocadal O, Yucel M, Pepe M, Aksahin E, Aktekin CN. Evaluation of reduction accuracy of suture-button and screw fixation techniques for syndesmotic injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(12):1317–25.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Nault ML, Gascon L, Hebert-Davies J, Leduc S, Laflamme GY, Kramer D. Modification of distal tibiofibular relationship after a mild syndesmotic injury. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017a;10(2):133–8.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Nault ML, Hebert-Davies J, Yen YM, Shore B, Jarrett DY, Kramer DE. Variation of syndesmosis anatomy with growth. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(4):e41–4.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Nault ML, Marien M, Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme GY, Pelsser V, Rouleau DM, et al. MRI quantification of the impact of ankle position on syndesmosis anatomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2017b;38(2):215–9.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Chun KY, Choi YS, Lee SH, Kim JS, Young KW, Jeong MS, et al. Deltoid ligament and tibiofibular syndesmosis injury in chronic lateral ankle instability: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 3T and comparison with arthroscopy. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(5):1096–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Han SH, Lee JW, Kim S, Suh JS, Choi YR. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging and comparative analysis of operative treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(3):336–42.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Kim S, Huh YM, Song HT, Lee SA, Lee JW, Lee JE, et al. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging. Radiology. 2007;242(1):225–35.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Warner SJ, Garner MR, Schottel PC, Hinds RM, Loftus ML, Lorich DG. Analysis of PITFL injuries in rotationally unstable ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(4):377–82.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Pettrone FA, Gail M, Pee D, Fitzpatrick T, Van Herpe LB. Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(5):667–77.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Chaput V. Les fractures malleolaires du cou-de-pieds et les accidents du travaill. Paris: Masson & Cie; 1907.
71.
Pakarinen H, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Leppilahti J, et al. Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(22):2057–61.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Stoffel K, Wysocki D, Baddour E, Nicholls R, Yates P. Comparison of two intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis: cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2646–52.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG. The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(2):107–11.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Cherney SM, Spraggs-Hughes AG, McAndrew CM, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ. Incisura morphology as a risk factor for syndesmotic malreduction. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(7):748–54.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Vasarhelyi A, Lubitz J, Gierer P, Gradl G, Rosler K, Hopfenmuller W, et al. Detection of fibular torsional deformities after surgery for ankle fractures with a novel CT method. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1115–21.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Lucas DE, Watson BC, Simpson GA, Berlet GC, Hyer CF. Arthroscopic evaluation of syndesmotic instability and malreduction. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016.
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review
verfasst von
Nicola Krähenbühl
Maxwell W. Weinberg
Nathan P. Davidson
Megan K. Mills
Beat Hintermann
Charles L. Saltzman
Alexej Barg
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2823-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Skeletal Radiology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the editor

Response to: Periosteal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the tibia

Scientific Article

Quantitative mapping of glenohumeral cartilage in asymptomatic subjects using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging

Test Yourself: Answer

Test yourself: weakness and wasting of forearm

Test Yourself: Question

Test yourself: weakness and wasting of forearm

Scientific Article

MRI in chronic groin pain: sequence diagnostic reliability compared to systematic surgical assessment

Case Report

Intraarticular calcifying aponeurotic fibroma of the wrist: mimicking gout or calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise