Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016

19.02.2016

Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients

verfasst von: Santiago Sánchez-Cabús, Jean-Philippe Adam, Gabriella Pittau, Maximiliano Gelli, Antonio Sa Cunha

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Despite its proven feasibility and good results, the use of laparoscopy in left-sided pancreatic lesions is considered a challenging procedure, and therefore, its utilization is still low. In this paper, we aim to describe the early outcomes obtained after laparoscopic left pancreatectomies performed over 15 years.

Patients and methods

From 1997 until 2014, 115 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at CHU Bordeaux and Centre Hépato-Biliaire, which were prospectively recorded in a database. An analysis of this database was performed in order to evaluate preoperative, intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes.

Results

Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy with spleen conservation was performed in 64 patients (55.7 %). The median operative time was 220 min, and median blood loss was 200 ml. Conversion to open surgery was made in 15 (13 %) patients. Median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days, and overall postoperative complications occurred in 59 patients (51.3 %). Of these, 25.4 % were Clavien–Dindo grade III and above. The rate of clinical PF was 11.3 %. Three of the 64 patients with splenic preservation (4.7 %) developed a splenic infarction, and one of them needed splenectomy.

Conclusions

Results obtained after a long series of laparoscopic left pancreatectomy confirm its favorable outcomes and its association with a low postoperative morbidity rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng SSM et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 259:139–147CrossRefPubMed Ng SSM et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 259:139–147CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:289–295CrossRefPubMed Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:289–295CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun J et al (2012) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1699–1705PubMed Sun J et al (2012) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1699–1705PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian HL, Tian JH, Yang KH, Yi K, Li L (2011) The effects of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 12:254–260CrossRefPubMed Tian HL, Tian JH, Yang KH, Yi K, Li L (2011) The effects of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 12:254–260CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S et al (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis 14:e277–e296CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S et al (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Colorectal Dis 14:e277–e296CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz J (1998) Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 5:168–179PubMed Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz J (1998) Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Semin Laparosc Surg 5:168–179PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Masson B, Sa-Cunha A, Laurent C, Rault A, Collet D (2003) Les pancréatectomies laparoscopiques: À propos d’une expérience de 22 cas. Ann Chir 128:452–456CrossRefPubMed Masson B, Sa-Cunha A, Laurent C, Rault A, Collet D (2003) Les pancréatectomies laparoscopiques: À propos d’une expérience de 22 cas. Ann Chir 128:452–456CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunha AS, Masson B (2010) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic. J Visc Surg 147:e25–e31CrossRef Cunha AS, Masson B (2010) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic. J Visc Surg 147:e25–e31CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardin WA, Schleicher C, Senninger N, Mees ST (2014) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 259:e60CrossRefPubMed Mardin WA, Schleicher C, Senninger N, Mees ST (2014) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 259:e60CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Limongelli P, Belli A, Belli G (2014) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: do risk factors for pancreatic fistula differ between the 2 techniques? Ann Surg 259:e39CrossRefPubMed Limongelli P, Belli A, Belli G (2014) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: do risk factors for pancreatic fistula differ between the 2 techniques? Ann Surg 259:e39CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sui C-J, Li B, Yang J-M, Wang S-J, Zhou Y-M (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 35:1–8CrossRefPubMed Sui C-J, Li B, Yang J-M, Wang S-J, Zhou Y-M (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 35:1–8CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre J-M (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study. Surg Endosc 26:402–407CrossRefPubMed Mehta SS, Doumane G, Mura T, Nocca D, Fabre J-M (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study. Surg Endosc 26:402–407CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho CS et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 253:975–980CrossRefPubMed Cho CS et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 253:975–980CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nigri GR et al (2011) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25:1642–1651CrossRefPubMed Nigri GR et al (2011) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25:1642–1651CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Eom BW et al (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338CrossRefPubMed Eom BW et al (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooby DA et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248:438–446PubMed Kooby DA et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248:438–446PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Limongelli P et al (2012) Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1830–1836CrossRefPubMed Limongelli P et al (2012) Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 26:1830–1836CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc 26:1670–1674CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc 26:1670–1674CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M et al (2014) Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3879-x PubMed Braga M et al (2014) Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-014-3879-x PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutz DR et al (2014) Cost comparison analysis of open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 16:907–914CrossRef Rutz DR et al (2014) Cost comparison analysis of open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 16:907–914CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SH et al (2014) Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 28:2848–2855CrossRefPubMed Lee SH et al (2014) Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 28:2848–2855CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20:2343–2351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20:2343–2351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541CrossRefPubMed Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Soh YF et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: our institution’s 5-year experience. Asian J Surg 35:29–36CrossRefPubMed Soh YF et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: our institution’s 5-year experience. Asian J Surg 35:29–36CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 25:2360–2361CrossRefPubMed Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 25:2360–2361CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KB et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3364–3372CrossRefPubMed Song KB et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3364–3372CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, Bowers KA, Hutchins RR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas 41:993–1000CrossRefPubMed Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, Bowers KA, Hutchins RR (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas 41:993–1000CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou ZQ et al (2014) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: comparative study of spleen preservation with splenic vessel resection and splenic vessel preservation. World J Surg 38:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed Zhou ZQ et al (2014) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: comparative study of spleen preservation with splenic vessel resection and splenic vessel preservation. World J Surg 38:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan J-F et al (2014) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasms: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 20:13966–13972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yan J-F et al (2014) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplasms: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 20:13966–13972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricci C et al (2014) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:458–463CrossRefPubMed Ricci C et al (2014) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:458–463CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulucq JL et al (2005) Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution. Surg Endosc 19:1028–1034CrossRefPubMed Dulucq JL et al (2005) Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution. Surg Endosc 19:1028–1034CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Mabrut J-Y et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed Mabrut J-Y et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeh M et al (2011) High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem. World J Surg 35:1110–1117CrossRefPubMed Reeh M et al (2011) High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem. World J Surg 35:1110–1117CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522CrossRefPubMed Diener MK et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 102:4–15CrossRefPubMed Zhang H et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 102:4–15CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Pryor A, Means JR, Pappas TN (2007) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Surg Endosc 21:2326–2330CrossRefPubMed Pryor A, Means JR, Pappas TN (2007) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Surg Endosc 21:2326–2330CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Uranues S et al (2006) Laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic tail with splenic preservation. Am J Surg 192:257–261CrossRefPubMed Uranues S et al (2006) Laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic tail with splenic preservation. Am J Surg 192:257–261CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritz S et al (2014) Pancreatic main-duct involvement in branch-duct IPMNs. Ann Surg 260:848–856CrossRefPubMed Fritz S et al (2014) Pancreatic main-duct involvement in branch-duct IPMNs. Ann Surg 260:848–856CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato Y, Takahashi S, Gotohda N, Konishi M (2014) Risk factors for malignancy in branched-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas during the follow-up period. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2789-3 Kato Y, Takahashi S, Gotohda N, Konishi M (2014) Risk factors for malignancy in branched-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas during the follow-up period. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-014-2789-3
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka M et al (2012) International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:183–197CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M et al (2012) International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 12:183–197CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahora K et al (2014) Not all mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms behave like main-duct lesions: implications of minimal involvement of the main pancreatic duct. Surgery 156:611–621CrossRefPubMed Sahora K et al (2014) Not all mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms behave like main-duct lesions: implications of minimal involvement of the main pancreatic duct. Surgery 156:611–621CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang JY et al (2014) Validation of international consensus guidelines for the resection of branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:686–692CrossRefPubMed Jang JY et al (2014) Validation of international consensus guidelines for the resection of branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:686–692CrossRefPubMed
54.
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients
verfasst von
Santiago Sánchez-Cabús
Jean-Philippe Adam
Gabriella Pittau
Maximiliano Gelli
Antonio Sa Cunha
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4780-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.