Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 10/2005

01.10.2005 | Gastrointestinal

Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography

verfasst von: Adrian Spreng, Peter Netzer, Joerg Mattich, Hans-Peter Dinkel, Peter Vock, Hanno Hoppe

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To compare the clinical importance of extracolonic findings at intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. IV contrast medium-enhanced (n=72) and non-enhanced (n=30) multidetector CT colonography was performed in 102 symptomatic patients followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The impact of extracolonic findings on further work up and treatment was assessed by a review of patient records. Extracolonic findings were divided into two groups: either leading to further work up respectively having an impact on therapy or not. A total of 303 extracolonic findings were detected. Of those, 71% (215/303) were found on IV contrast-enhanced CT, and 29% (88/303) were found on non-enhanced CT colonography. The extracolonic findings in 25% (26/102) of all patients led to further work up or had an impact on therapy. Twenty-two of these patients underwent CT colonography with IV contrast enhancement, and four without. The percentage of extracolonic findings leading to further work up or having an impact on therapy was higher for IV contrast-enhanced (31%; 22/72) than for non-enhanced (13%; 4/30) CT scans (P=0.12). IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography produced more extracolonic findings than non-enhanced CT colonography. A substantially greater proportion of findings on IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography led to further work up and treatment than did non-enhanced CT colonography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechthold RE, Scharling ES, Grishaw EK, Shifrin RY (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Roentgenol 162:104 Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechthold RE, Scharling ES, Grishaw EK, Shifrin RY (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Roentgenol 162:104
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMed Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Brennan DD, MacMathuna P, Fenlon HM (2003) Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:2264–2270CrossRefPubMed Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Brennan DD, MacMathuna P, Fenlon HM (2003) Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:2264–2270CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2004) CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025–1033CrossRefPubMed Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, Bartram CI (2004) CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025–1033CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, Quattropani C, Mattich J, Dinkel H-P (2004) Prospective evaluation of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single instiutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1924–1935CrossRefPubMed Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, Quattropani C, Mattich J, Dinkel H-P (2004) Prospective evaluation of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single instiutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1924–1935CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TEM, Laurberg S (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 52:1744–1747CrossRefPubMed Ginnerup Pedersen B, Rosenkilde M, Christiansen TEM, Laurberg S (2003) Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 52:1744–1747CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng CS, Doyle TC, Courtney HM, Campbell GA, Freeman AH, Dixon AK (2004) Extracolonic findings in patients undergoing abdomino–pelvic CT for suspected colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient. Clin Radiol 59:421–430CrossRefPubMed Ng CS, Doyle TC, Courtney HM, Campbell GA, Freeman AH, Dixon AK (2004) Extracolonic findings in patients undergoing abdomino–pelvic CT for suspected colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient. Clin Radiol 59:421–430CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellstrom M, Svensson E, Lasson A (2004) Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Am J Roentgenol 182:631–638 Hellstrom M, Svensson E, Lasson A (2004) Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Am J Roentgenol 182:631–638
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Mendelson RM, Forbes GM (2004) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3009–3012CrossRef Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Mendelson RM, Forbes GM (2004) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3009–3012CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara AK, Daniel Johnson C, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed Hara AK, Daniel Johnson C, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, Ahlquist DA (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916PubMed Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, Ahlquist DA (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124:911–916PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Panicek DM, Giess CS, Schwartz LH (1997) Qualitative assessment of liver for fatty infiltration on contrast-enhanced CT: is muscle a better standard of reference than spleen? J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:699–705CrossRefPubMed Panicek DM, Giess CS, Schwartz LH (1997) Qualitative assessment of liver for fatty infiltration on contrast-enhanced CT: is muscle a better standard of reference than spleen? J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:699–705CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771PubMed Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bartelsman JF, Bossuyt PM, Lameris JS, Stoker J (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bartelsman JF, Bossuyt PM, Lameris JS, Stoker J (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL, Vonthein R, Stueker D, Kroll M, Luz O, Claussen CD, Vogl TJ (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236–2241PubMed Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL, Vonthein R, Stueker D, Kroll M, Luz O, Claussen CD, Vogl TJ (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236–2241PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel H-P (2004) Virtual Colon Dissection with CT colonography compared to axial reading and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158 Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel H-P (2004) Virtual Colon Dissection with CT colonography compared to axial reading and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Luboldt W, Kroll M, Wetter A, Toussaint TL, Hoepffner N, Holzer K, Kluge A, Vogl TJ (2004) Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:2228–2235CrossRefPubMed Luboldt W, Kroll M, Wetter A, Toussaint TL, Hoepffner N, Holzer K, Kluge A, Vogl TJ (2004) Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:2228–2235CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Luboldt W, Tryon C, Kroll M, Toussaint TL, Holzer K, Hoepffner N, Vogl TJ (2005) Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume. Eur Radiol 15:247–253CrossRefPubMed Luboldt W, Tryon C, Kroll M, Toussaint TL, Holzer K, Hoepffner N, Vogl TJ (2005) Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume. Eur Radiol 15:247–253CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrucci JT (2001) Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy-promise, polyps, politics. Am J Roentgenol 177:975–988 Ferrucci JT (2001) Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy-promise, polyps, politics. Am J Roentgenol 177:975–988
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, MacCarty RL, Ahlquist DA, Reed JE, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, Harmsen WS (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 168:1181–1184 Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, Harmsen WS (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 168:1181–1184
Metadaten
Titel
Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography
verfasst von
Adrian Spreng
Peter Netzer
Joerg Mattich
Hans-Peter Dinkel
Peter Vock
Hanno Hoppe
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2005
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 10/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2798-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2005

European Radiology 10/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.