Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2008

01.11.2008 | Original Research Article

Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram

verfasst von: Fatih C. Gundogan, Gungor Sobaci, Mehmet Z. Bayraktar

Erschienen in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Ausgabe 3/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Right eyes of 20 healthy adult subjects with uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 were studied. mfERG recordings were obtained in two sessions by using jet corneal electrodes. The responses were averaged over five retinal regions, the central hexagon (CH: 0.0–2.3°) and four concentric rings [ring 1 (R1: 2.3–7.4°), ring 2 (R2: 7.4–12.0°), ring 3 (R3: 12.0–19.4°), and ring 4 (R4: 19.4–30.0°)]. In the first session, recordings were repeated while the electrodes stayed in place (the first and the second recordings). Second sessions (third recordings) were performed 1 week later. Individual coefficient of variation (CV; standard deviation/mean) for P1 and N1 amplitudes and implicit times were calculated for the first to second and first to third recordings to assess intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability, respectively, and were evaluated by Wilcoxon-paired samples test. Regarding implicit time and amplitude of mfERG recordings, there was no significant difference between the first to second and first to third recordings (P > 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon test). CV values significantly decreased with eccentricity in both intra-sessional and inter-sessional comparisons (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). However, partial ring averaging showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between CV values for single hexagons in each ring. Intra-sessional CV values were significantly lower than corresponding inter-sessional values (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). Our results support the importance of electrode replacement on variability. The increased number of hexagons that are averaged is the main factor that explains the lower variability in the more peripheral rings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutter E, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res 32:433–446PubMedCrossRef Sutter E, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res 32:433–446PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115PubMedCrossRef Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Otto T, Bach M (1997) Retest variability and diurnal effects in the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 92:311–323CrossRef Otto T, Bach M (1997) Retest variability and diurnal effects in the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 92:311–323CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshii M, yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:122–127PubMedCrossRef Yoshii M, yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:122–127PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoyagi K, Kimura Y, Isono H, Akiyama H, Sugawara T (1998) Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 102:340–347PubMed Aoyagi K, Kimura Y, Isono H, Akiyama H, Sugawara T (1998) Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 102:340–347PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Ito Y, Tanikawa A (1996) Normal values of retinal response densities in multifocal electroretinogram. Nppon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 100:810–816 Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Ito Y, Tanikawa A (1996) Normal values of retinal response densities in multifocal electroretinogram. Nppon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 100:810–816
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski A, Allgayer R (2000) The effect of time of day and repeat reliability on the fast flicker multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 101:247–255PubMedCrossRef Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Palmowski A, Allgayer R (2000) The effect of time of day and repeat reliability on the fast flicker multifocal ERG. Doc Ophthalmol 101:247–255PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Meigen T, Friedrich A (2002) The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings. Ophthalmologe 99:713–718PubMedCrossRef Meigen T, Friedrich A (2002) The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings. Ophthalmologe 99:713–718PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Seiple W, Clemens CJ, Greenstein VC, Carr RE, Holopigian K (2004) Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields with retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 109:255–272PubMedCrossRef Seiple W, Clemens CJ, Greenstein VC, Carr RE, Holopigian K (2004) Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields with retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 109:255–272PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, Zhao K (2003) Multifocal electroretinographyin central serous chorio-retinopathy and assessment of the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 106:209–213PubMedCrossRef Zhang W, Zhao K (2003) Multifocal electroretinographyin central serous chorio-retinopathy and assessment of the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 106:209–213PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Parks S, Keating D, Evans AL, Williamson TH, Jay JL, Elliott AT (1996–1997) Comparison of repeatibility of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol 92:281–289 Parks S, Keating D, Evans AL, Williamson TH, Jay JL, Elliott AT (1996–1997) Comparison of repeatibility of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol 92:281–289
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock M, Andrassi M, Belitsky L, Lorenz B (1999) A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems. Doc Ophthalmol 97:157–178CrossRef Bock M, Andrassi M, Belitsky L, Lorenz B (1999) A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems. Doc Ophthalmol 97:157–178CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77–98CrossRef Keating D, Parks S, Evans A (2000) Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording. Doc Ophthalmol 100:77–98CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatibility and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17:530–535PubMedCrossRef Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatibility and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrode types. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 17:530–535PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(5):718–723PubMed Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(5):718–723PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100(2–3):115–137CrossRef Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100(2–3):115–137CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram
verfasst von
Fatih C. Gundogan
Gungor Sobaci
Mehmet Z. Bayraktar
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Ausgabe 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-008-9119-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2008

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

CME: Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Wird ein Glaukom chirurgisch behandelt, ist die anschließende Wundheilung von entscheidender Bedeutung. In diesem CME-Kurs lernen Sie, welche Pathomechanismen der Vernarbung zugrunde liegen, wie perioperativ therapiert und Operationsversagen frühzeitig erkannt werden kann.

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.