Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Urogynecology Journal
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2011

01.03.2011 | Original Article

Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

verfasst von: Axel Sauerwald, Inke Bruns, Barbara Peveling, Hendrik Brunke, Friedrich Wolff

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Several modifications of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SLF) are described.

Methods

This study presents a standardised SLF technique. Perioperative course and outcome are compared retrospectively after surgery is performed by experienced surgeons or by residents.

Results

Two hundred three SLF were analysed. Eight residents (LO) operated on 41 patients (5.1 ± 2.2). Six experienced surgeons (SO) operated on 162 patients (27.0 ± 25.7). Mean operating time was 67 ± 33 min. (LO 99 ± 45 min vs. SO 59 ± 22 min, p < 0.05). The overall morbidity rate was 7.8%. There was no significant difference regarding complications and outcomes between SO and LO.

Conclusions

Operation time was longer but outcomes were identical, and morbidity rate was not increased in the group of resident surgeons. In comparison to literature, complication rate was low. SLF should be part of residency programmes.
Literatur
1.
Amreich J (1951) Etiology and surgery of vaginal stump prolapses. Wien Klin Wochenschr 63(5):74–77PubMed
2.
Richter K (1967) The surgical treatment of the prolapsed vaginal fundus after uterine extirpation. A contribution on Amreich's the sacrotuberal vaginal fixation. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 27(10):941–954PubMed
3.
Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP (1996) Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(3 Pt 1):612–616CrossRefPubMed
4.
Beer M, Kuhn A (2005) Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119(2):144–155CrossRefPubMed
5.
Richter K, Albrich W (1981) Long-term results following fixation of the vagina on the sacrospinal ligament by the vaginal route (vaginaefixatio sacrospinalis vaginalis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 141(7):811–816PubMed
6.
Aigmueller T, Riss P, Dungl A, Bauer H (2008) Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(7):965–969CrossRefPubMed
7.
Mattox TF, Kelly T, Bhatia NN (1995) Modification of the Miya hook in vaginal colpopexy. J Reprod Med 40(10):681–683PubMed
8.
Salvat J, Slamani L, Vincent-Genod A, Walker D (1996) Sacrospinous ligament fixation by palpation: variation of the Richter procedure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 68(1–2):199–203CrossRefPubMed
9.
Lind LR, Choe J, Bhatia NN (1997) An in-line suturing device to simplify sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension. Obstet Gynecol 89(1):129–132CrossRefPubMed
10.
Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Roat T, Karram MM (1999) A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10(6):390–393CrossRefPubMed
11.
Chang WC, Huang SC, Sheu BC, Hsu WC, Torng PL, Chow SN et al (2006) Using Veronikis ligature carrier to simplify transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(6):721–725CrossRefPubMed
12.
Pohl JF, Frattarelli JL (1997) Bilateral transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: preliminary experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(6):1356–1361, discussion 1361CrossRefPubMed
13.
Cespedes RD (2000) Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 56(6 Suppl 1):70–75CrossRefPubMed
14.
Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Somunkiran A, Topuz S, Iyibozkurt C, Duras Doyran G et al (2007) Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(3):257–261CrossRefPubMed
15.
Faber VJ, van der VaH, Heggelman BG, Schraffordt Koops SE (2008) Serious complication 1 year after sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(9):1311–1313CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kaum HJ, Wolff F (2003) Die Amreich-Richter-Operation: Anatomische Grundlagen und operative Vorgehensweise. Frauenarzt 44(5):504–512
17.
Penalver M, Mekki Y, Lafferty H, Escobar M, Angioli R (1998) Should sacrospinous ligament fixation for the management of pelvic support defects be part of a residency program procedure? The University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(2):326–329CrossRefPubMed
18.
Carey MP, Slack MC (1994) Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101(6):536–540CrossRefPubMed
19.
Hewson AD (1998) Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38(3):318–324CrossRefPubMed
20.
Elghorori MR, Ahmed AA, Sadhukhan M, Al-Taher H (2002) Vaginal sacrospinous fixation: experience in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 22(6):658–662CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lovatsis D, Drutz HP (2002) Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13(5):308–313CrossRefPubMed
22.
Toglia MR, Fagan MJ (2008) Suture erosion rates and long-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension with braided polyester suture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(5):600, e1-4CrossRefPubMed
23.
Pollak J, Takacs P, Medina C (2007) Complications of three sacrospinous ligament fixation techniques. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(1):18–22CrossRefPubMed
24.
Lantzsch T, Goepel C, Wolters M, Koelbl H, Methfessel HD (2001) Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265(1):21–25CrossRefPubMed
25.
Boukerrou AM, Mesdagh BP, Ego AA, Lambaudie AE, Crepin AG, Robert BY et al (2005) An MRI comparison of anatomical changes related to surgical treatment of prolapse by vaginal or abdominal route. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 121(2):220–225CrossRef
26.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, and Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4
27.
Allahdin S, Glazener C, Bain C (2008) A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of polyglactin mesh, polydioxanone and polyglactin sutures for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(4):427–431CrossRefPubMed
28.
Alperin M, Sutkin G, Ellison R, Meyn L, Moalli P, Zyczynski H (2008) Perioperative outcomes of the Prolift pelvic floor repair systems following introduction to a urogynecology teaching service. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(12):1617–1622CrossRefPubMed
29.
Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P, Latthe PM (2008) Adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(12):1697–1706CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?
verfasst von
Axel Sauerwald
Inke Bruns
Barbara Peveling
Hendrik Brunke
Friedrich Wolff
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1341-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

In vitro and in vivo assessment of silver-coated polypropylene mesh to prevent infection in a rat model

Original Article

A novel approach to teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) exam

Original Article

Combined anterior trans-obturator mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with severe prolapse—a case series of 30 months follow-up

Original Article

The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse

Original Article

Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

Original Article

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of single-incision mid-urethral short tape procedure (MiniArc™ tape) for stress urinary incontinence under local anaesthesia

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

23.04.2024 Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit Nachrichten

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

23.04.2024 Depression antepartal oder postpartal Nachrichten

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise