Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Cardiology 2/2019

10.11.2018 | Original Article

Birth Location of Infants with Critical Congenital Heart Disease in California

verfasst von: Neha J. Purkey, David M. Axelrod, Doff B. McElhinney, Joseph Rigdon, FeiFei Qin, Manisha Desai, Andrew Y. Shin, Valerie Y. Chock, Henry C. Lee

Erschienen in: Pediatric Cardiology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics classifies neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from level I to IV based on the acuity of care each unit can provide. Birth in a higher level center is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in high-risk populations. Congenital heart disease accounts for 25–50% of infant mortality related to birth defects in the U.S., but recent data are lacking on where infants with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) are born. We used a linked dataset from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development to access ICD-9 diagnosis codes for all infants born in California from 2008 to 2012. We compared infants with CCHD to the general population, identified where infants with CCHD were born based on NICU level of care, and predicted level IV birth among infants with CCHD using logistic regression techniques. From 2008 to 2012, 6325 infants with CCHD were born in California, with 23.7% of infants with CCHD born at a level IV NICU compared to 8.4% of the general population. Level IV birth for infants with CCHD was associated with lower gestational age, higher maternal age and education, the presence of other congenital anomalies, and the diagnosis of a single ventricle lesion. More infants with CCHD are born in a level IV NICU compared to the general population. Future studies are needed to determine if birth in a lower level of care center impacts outcomes for infants with CCHD.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gortmaker S, Sobol A, Clark C et al (1985) The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:517–524CrossRefPubMed Gortmaker S, Sobol A, Clark C et al (1985) The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:517–524CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cifuentes J, Bronstein J, Phibbs CS et al (2002) Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics 109:745–751CrossRefPubMed Cifuentes J, Bronstein J, Phibbs CS et al (2002) Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics 109:745–751CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH (1996) The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 276:1054–1059CrossRefPubMed Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH (1996) The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 276:1054–1059CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1890–1900CrossRefPubMed Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1890–1900CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2010) Racial differences by gestational age in neonatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects—United States, 2003–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59:1208–1211 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2010) Racial differences by gestational age in neonatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects—United States, 2003–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59:1208–1211
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson LL, Harvey-Wilkes K, D’Alton ME (2000) Congenital heart disease: the impact of delivery in a tertiary care center on SNAP scores (scores for neonatal acute physiology). Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:184–191CrossRefPubMed Simpson LL, Harvey-Wilkes K, D’Alton ME (2000) Congenital heart disease: the impact of delivery in a tertiary care center on SNAP scores (scores for neonatal acute physiology). Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:184–191CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson C, Dawson A, Grosse SD et al (2013) Hospitalizations, costs, and mortality among infants with critical congenital heart disease: how important is timely detection?: How important is timely critical congenital heart disease detection? Birt Defects Res A 97:664–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23165 CrossRef Peterson C, Dawson A, Grosse SD et al (2013) Hospitalizations, costs, and mortality among infants with critical congenital heart disease: how important is timely detection?: How important is timely critical congenital heart disease detection? Birt Defects Res A 97:664–672. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bdra.​23165 CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat SAS Institute (2017) Version 9.3, Cary, NC SAS Institute (2017) Version 9.3, Cary, NC
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RK, Jerman J (2014) Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 46:3–14CrossRefPubMed Jones RK, Jerman J (2014) Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 46:3–14CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Copel JA, Pilu G, Kleinman CS (1986) Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: associations and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1121–1132CrossRefPubMed Copel JA, Pilu G, Kleinman CS (1986) Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: associations and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1121–1132CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Birth Location of Infants with Critical Congenital Heart Disease in California
verfasst von
Neha J. Purkey
David M. Axelrod
Doff B. McElhinney
Joseph Rigdon
FeiFei Qin
Manisha Desai
Andrew Y. Shin
Valerie Y. Chock
Henry C. Lee
Publikationsdatum
10.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Pediatric Cardiology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-2019-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Pediatric Cardiology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

Erhöhtes Risiko fürs Herz unter Checkpointhemmer-Therapie

28.05.2024 Nebenwirkungen der Krebstherapie Nachrichten

Kardiotoxische Nebenwirkungen einer Therapie mit Immuncheckpointhemmern mögen selten sein – wenn sie aber auftreten, wird es für Patienten oft lebensgefährlich. Voruntersuchung und Monitoring sind daher obligat.

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.