Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2012

01.12.2012

Clinical applications of 18F-FDG PET in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors

verfasst von: Anna Maria De Gaetano, Vittoria Rufini, Paola Castaldi, Anna Maria Gatto, Laura Filograna, Alessandro Giordano, Lorenzo Bonomo

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The assessment of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors is commonly achieved by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance. The 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) detects increased glucose metabolism associated with neoplastic lesions, provides high accuracy in most cancer imaging applications and is now widely used in clinical practice. However, PET is not always useful and accurate knowledge of appropriate indications is essential for a proper clinical management. 18F-FDG is transported into cells and phosphorylated by the enzyme hexokinase to 18F-FDG-6-phosphate, which cannot proceed down the glycolytic pathway and therefore is accumulated in the malignant tissue. PET allows accurate quantification of FDG uptake in tissue, and previous studies have demonstrated that standardized uptake values provide highly reproducible parameters of tumor glucose use (Weber et al., J Nucl Med 40:1771–1777, 1999). The recent development and diffusion of hybrid PET–CT scanners allows functional and anatomic data to be obtained in a single examination, improving lesion localization and resulting in significant diagnostic improvement (Wahl, J Nucl Med 45:82S–95S, 2004). Moreover, CT can be performed diagnostically with the use of intravenous and oral contrast and simultaneous PET–contrast-enhanced CT scanning appears to be an efficient method in cancer evaluation. However, in most centers, a low-dose CT is routinely performed without contrast media infusion.
Proper patient preparation, scanning protocol, combined assessment of PET and CT data, and the evaluation of conventional imaging findings are essential to define disease and to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. The role of PET and PET–CT in malignancies of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas is here reviewed; normal patterns, representative cases, and common pitfalls are also presented.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thodtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M (1999) Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:1771–1777PubMed Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thodtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M (1999) Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:1771–1777PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahl RL (2004) Why nearly all PET of abdominal and pelvic cancers will be performed as PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45:82S–95SPubMed Wahl RL (2004) Why nearly all PET of abdominal and pelvic cancers will be performed as PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45:82S–95SPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Delbeke D, Martin WH, Sandler MP, et al. (1998) Evaluation of benign vs malignant hepatic lesions with positron emission tomography. Arch Surg 133(5):510–515PubMedCrossRef Delbeke D, Martin WH, Sandler MP, et al. (1998) Evaluation of benign vs malignant hepatic lesions with positron emission tomography. Arch Surg 133(5):510–515PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman RL, Burke M, Young NA, Solomides CC, Bibbo M (2002) Diagnostic utility of Glut-1 and CA 15–3 in discriminating adenocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in liver tumors biopsied by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 96(1):53–57PubMedCrossRef Zimmerman RL, Burke M, Young NA, Solomides CC, Bibbo M (2002) Diagnostic utility of Glut-1 and CA 15–3 in discriminating adenocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in liver tumors biopsied by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 96(1):53–57PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, et al. (1995) In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with [18F]FDG-PET. J Nucl Med 36(10):1811–1817PubMed Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, et al. (1995) In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with [18F]FDG-PET. J Nucl Med 36(10):1811–1817PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MA, Combs CS, Brunt EM, et al. (2000) Positron emission tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 32:792–797PubMedCrossRef Khan MA, Combs CS, Brunt EM, et al. (2000) Positron emission tomography scanning in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 32:792–797PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwata Y, Shiomi S, Sasaki N, et al. (2000) Clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography scanning with fluorine- 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the diagnosis of liver tumors. Ann Nucl Med 14:121–126PubMedCrossRef Iwata Y, Shiomi S, Sasaki N, et al. (2000) Clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography scanning with fluorine- 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in the diagnosis of liver tumors. Ann Nucl Med 14:121–126PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin JA, Park JW, An M, et al. (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 12:546–552PubMed Shin JA, Park JW, An M, et al. (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography for evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 12:546–552PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiomi S, Nishiguchi S, Ishizu H, et al. (2001) Usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose for predicting outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1877–1880PubMedCrossRef Shiomi S, Nishiguchi S, Ishizu H, et al. (2001) Usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose for predicting outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1877–1880PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JD, Yun M, Lee JM, et al. (2004) Analysis of gene expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinomas with regard to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern on positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:1621–1630PubMedCrossRef Lee JD, Yun M, Lee JM, et al. (2004) Analysis of gene expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinomas with regard to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern on positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:1621–1630PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW (2003) [11C]-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med 44:213–221PubMed Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW (2003) [11C]-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med 44:213–221PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Beheshti M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. (2006) Comparison of (11) C-acetate positron emission tomography and (67) Gallium citrate scintigraphy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 26:920–927PubMedCrossRef Li S, Beheshti M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. (2006) Comparison of (11) C-acetate positron emission tomography and (67) Gallium citrate scintigraphy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 26:920–927PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang KH, Choi DJ, Lee SY, Lee MK, Choe W (2009) Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas using [11C]acetate and [18F]FDG PET/CT: A preliminary study. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1195–1198PubMedCrossRef Hwang KH, Choi DJ, Lee SY, Lee MK, Choe W (2009) Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas using [11C]acetate and [18F]FDG PET/CT: A preliminary study. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1195–1198PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kameyama R, et al. (2008) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 49(8):1245–1248PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kameyama R, et al. (2008) Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 49(8):1245–1248PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo S, Hatano E, Higashi T, et al. (2007) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts tumor differentiation, P-glycoprotein expression, and outcome after resection in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:427–433PubMedCrossRef Seo S, Hatano E, Higashi T, et al. (2007) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts tumor differentiation, P-glycoprotein expression, and outcome after resection in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:427–433PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kong YH, Han CJ, Lee SD, et al. (2004) Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose is useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 10:279–287PubMed Kong YH, Han CJ, Lee SD, et al. (2004) Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose is useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 10:279–287PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang SH, Suh KS, Lee HW, et al. (2006) The role of (18)F-FDG-PET imaging for the selection of liver transplantation candidates among hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Transpl 12:1655–1660PubMedCrossRef Yang SH, Suh KS, Lee HW, et al. (2006) The role of (18)F-FDG-PET imaging for the selection of liver transplantation candidates among hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Transpl 12:1655–1660PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim YK, Lee KW, Cho SY, et al. (2010) Usefulness 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in posttransplant patients. Liver transplantation 16:767–772PubMedCrossRef Kim YK, Lee KW, Cho SY, et al. (2010) Usefulness 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in posttransplant patients. Liver transplantation 16:767–772PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun L, Guan YS, Pan WM, et al. (2009) Metabolic restaging of hepatocellular carcinoma using whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. World J Hepatol 1(1):90–97PubMedCrossRef Sun L, Guan YS, Pan WM, et al. (2009) Metabolic restaging of hepatocellular carcinoma using whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. World J Hepatol 1(1):90–97PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HO, Kim JS, Shin YM, et al. (2010) Evaluation of metabolic characteristics and viability of lipiodolized hepatocellular carcinomas using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 51(12):1849–1856PubMedCrossRef Kim HO, Kim JS, Shin YM, et al. (2010) Evaluation of metabolic characteristics and viability of lipiodolized hepatocellular carcinomas using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 51(12):1849–1856PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, et al. (1994) Value of fluorine-18-FDG-PET to monitor hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional therapy. J Nucl Med 35:1965–1969PubMed Torizuka T, Tamaki N, Inokuma T, et al. (1994) Value of fluorine-18-FDG-PET to monitor hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional therapy. J Nucl Med 35:1965–1969PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YK, Hsieh DS, Liao CS, et al. (2005) Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained serum AFP elevation in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Anticancer Res 25:4719–4725PubMed Chen YK, Hsieh DS, Liao CS, et al. (2005) Utility of FDG-PET for investigating unexplained serum AFP elevation in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Anticancer Res 25:4719–4725PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson GS, Brinkmann F, Soulen MC, Alavi A, Zhuang H (2003) FDG positron emission tomography in the surveillance of hepatic tumors treated with radiofrequency ablation. Clin Nucl Med 28(3):192–197PubMed Anderson GS, Brinkmann F, Soulen MC, Alavi A, Zhuang H (2003) FDG positron emission tomography in the surveillance of hepatic tumors treated with radiofrequency ablation. Clin Nucl Med 28(3):192–197PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugiyama M, Sakahara H, Torizuka T, et al. (2004) 18F-FDG PET in the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 39:961–968PubMedCrossRef Sugiyama M, Sakahara H, Torizuka T, et al. (2004) 18F-FDG PET in the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 39:961–968PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagaoka S, Itano S, Ishibashi M, et al. (2006) Value of fusing PET plus CT images in hepatocellular carcinoma and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma patients with extrahepatic metastases: preliminary findings. Liver Int 26:781–788PubMedCrossRef Nagaoka S, Itano S, Ishibashi M, et al. (2006) Value of fusing PET plus CT images in hepatocellular carcinoma and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma patients with extrahepatic metastases: preliminary findings. Liver Int 26:781–788PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaoka T, Aikata H, Takaki S, et al. (2009) FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 39(2):134–142PubMedCrossRef Kawaoka T, Aikata H, Takaki S, et al. (2009) FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 39(2):134–142PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun L, Guan YS, Pan WM, et al. (2007) Positron emission tomography/computer tomography in guidance of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis management. World J Gastroenterol 13:5413–5415PubMed Sun L, Guan YS, Pan WM, et al. (2007) Positron emission tomography/computer tomography in guidance of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis management. World J Gastroenterol 13:5413–5415PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Farley DR, Weaver AL, Nagorney DM (1995) ‘‘Natural history’’ of unresected cholangiocarcinoma: patient outcome after noncurative intervention. Mayo Clin Proc 70:425–429PubMedCrossRef Farley DR, Weaver AL, Nagorney DM (1995) ‘‘Natural history’’ of unresected cholangiocarcinoma: patient outcome after noncurative intervention. Mayo Clin Proc 70:425–429PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. (2001) Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 234:507–517PubMedCrossRef Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. (2001) Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 234:507–517PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kluge R, Schmidt F, Caca K, et al. (2001) Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer. Hepatology 33(5):1029–1035PubMedCrossRef Kluge R, Schmidt F, Caca K, et al. (2001) Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer. Hepatology 33(5):1029–1035PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon CM, Bang S, Chung JB, et al. (2008) Usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differential diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:759–765PubMedCrossRef Moon CM, Bang S, Chung JB, et al. (2008) Usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differential diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:759–765PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Akhurst T, et al. (2008) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography influences management decisions in patients with biliary cancer. J Am Coll Surg 206(1):57–65PubMedCrossRef Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Akhurst T, et al. (2008) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography influences management decisions in patients with biliary cancer. J Am Coll Surg 206(1):57–65PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, et al. (2004) Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 8(1):90–97PubMedCrossRef Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, et al. (2004) Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 8(1):90–97PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, et al. (2002) Clinical role of (18)F-FDG PET for initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(8):1047–1054PubMedCrossRef Kato T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, et al. (2002) Clinical role of (18)F-FDG PET for initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(8):1047–1054PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Broering DC, et al. (2001) FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 22:1277–1285PubMedCrossRef Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Broering DC, et al. (2001) FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 22:1277–1285PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowsky H, Wildbrett P, Husarik DB, et al. (2006) Impact of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography on staging and management of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 45(1):43–50PubMedCrossRef Petrowsky H, Wildbrett P, Husarik DB, et al. (2006) Impact of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography on staging and management of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 45(1):43–50PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim MH, Lee TY, et al. (2008) Clinical role of 18F-FDG PET–CT in suspected and potentially operable cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective study compared with conventional imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 103(5):1145–1151PubMedCrossRef Kim JY, Kim MH, Lee TY, et al. (2008) Clinical role of 18F-FDG PET–CT in suspected and potentially operable cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective study compared with conventional imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 103(5):1145–1151PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos-Font C, Santiago Chinchilla A, Rodríguez-Fernández A, et al. (2009) Gallbladder cancer staging with 18F-FDG PET–CT. Rev Esp Med Nucl 28(2):74–77PubMedCrossRef Ramos-Font C, Santiago Chinchilla A, Rodríguez-Fernández A, et al. (2009) Gallbladder cancer staging with 18F-FDG PET–CT. Rev Esp Med Nucl 28(2):74–77PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez-Fernández A, Gómez-Río M, Llamas-Elvira JM, et al. (2004) Positron-emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for gallbladder cancer diagnosis. Am J Surg 188(2):171–175PubMedCrossRef Rodríguez-Fernández A, Gómez-Río M, Llamas-Elvira JM, et al. (2004) Positron-emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose for gallbladder cancer diagnosis. Am J Surg 188(2):171–175PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM, et al. (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings. Radiology 206(3):755–760PubMed Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM, et al. (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings. Radiology 206(3):755–760PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Arulampalam TH, Francis DL, Visvikis D, Taylor I, Ell PJ (2004) FDG-PET for the pre-operative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(3):286–291PubMedCrossRef Arulampalam TH, Francis DL, Visvikis D, Taylor I, Ell PJ (2004) FDG-PET for the pre-operative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(3):286–291PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Truant S, Huglo D, Hebbar M, et al. (2005) Prospective evaluation of the impact of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography of resectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 92(3):362–369PubMedCrossRef Truant S, Huglo D, Hebbar M, et al. (2005) Prospective evaluation of the impact of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography of resectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 92(3):362–369PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE, et al. (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41(7):1177–1189PubMed Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE, et al. (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41(7):1177–1189PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, Warren RS, Thoeni RF (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224(3):748–756PubMedCrossRef Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, Warren RS, Thoeni RF (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224(3):748–756PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EFI, et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis-meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EFI, et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis-meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, et al. (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240(6):1027–1034PubMedCrossRef Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, et al. (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240(6):1027–1034PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, et al. (2007) Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 48(4):369–378PubMedCrossRef Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, et al. (2007) Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 48(4):369–378PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos E, Valls C, Martinez L, et al. (2011) Preoperative staging of patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Does PET/CT really add something to multidetector CT? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2654–2661PubMedCrossRef Ramos E, Valls C, Martinez L, et al. (2011) Preoperative staging of patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Does PET/CT really add something to multidetector CT? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2654–2661PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitola JV, Delbeke D, Sandler MP, et al. (1996) Positron emission tomography to stage suspected metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver. Am J Surg 171(1):21–26PubMedCrossRef Vitola JV, Delbeke D, Sandler MP, et al. (1996) Positron emission tomography to stage suspected metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver. Am J Surg 171(1):21–26PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Schüssler-Fiorenza CM, Mahvi DM, Niederhuber J, Rikkers LF, Weber SM (2004) Clinical risk score correlates with yield of PET scan in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 8(2):150–157PubMedCrossRef Schüssler-Fiorenza CM, Mahvi DM, Niederhuber J, Rikkers LF, Weber SM (2004) Clinical risk score correlates with yield of PET scan in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 8(2):150–157PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Purandare NC, Rangarajan V, Shah SA, et al. (2011) Therapeutic response to radiofrequency ablation of neoplastic lesions: FDG PET/CT findings. Radiographics 31(1):201–213PubMedCrossRef Purandare NC, Rangarajan V, Shah SA, et al. (2011) Therapeutic response to radiofrequency ablation of neoplastic lesions: FDG PET/CT findings. Radiographics 31(1):201–213PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Ogunbiyi OA, et al. (2000) Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 43:759–770PubMedCrossRef Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Ogunbiyi OA, et al. (2000) Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 43:759–770PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA (2000) FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. AJR 174:1005–1008PubMed Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA (2000) FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. AJR 174:1005–1008PubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, et al. (1992) Intratumoral distribution of F18-fluoro-deoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by micro-autoradiography. J Nucl Med 33:1972–1980PubMed Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, et al. (1992) Intratumoral distribution of F18-fluoro-deoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by micro-autoradiography. J Nucl Med 33:1972–1980PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Donadon M, Bona S, Montorsi M, Torzilli G (2010) FDG-PET positive granuloma of the liver mimicking local recurrence after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology 57(97):138–139PubMed Donadon M, Bona S, Montorsi M, Torzilli G (2010) FDG-PET positive granuloma of the liver mimicking local recurrence after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology 57(97):138–139PubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Akhurst T, Kates TJ, Mazumdar M, et al. (2005) Recent chemotherapy reduces the sensitivity of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8713–8716PubMedCrossRef Akhurst T, Kates TJ, Mazumdar M, et al. (2005) Recent chemotherapy reduces the sensitivity of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8713–8716PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat de Geus-Oei LF, Vriens D, van Laarhoven HW, van der Graaf WT, Oyen WJ (2009) Monitoring and predicting response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):43S–54SPubMedCrossRef de Geus-Oei LF, Vriens D, van Laarhoven HW, van der Graaf WT, Oyen WJ (2009) Monitoring and predicting response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):43S–54SPubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Wray CJ, Ahmad SA, Matthews JB, Lowy AM (2005) Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice. Gastroenterology 128:1626–1641PubMedCrossRef Wray CJ, Ahmad SA, Matthews JB, Lowy AM (2005) Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice. Gastroenterology 128:1626–1641PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, et al. (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, et al. (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Reske SN, Grillenberger KG, Glatting G, et al. (1997) Overexpression of glucose transporter 1 and increased FDG uptake in pancreatic carcinoma. J Nucl Med 38:1344–1348PubMed Reske SN, Grillenberger KG, Glatting G, et al. (1997) Overexpression of glucose transporter 1 and increased FDG uptake in pancreatic carcinoma. J Nucl Med 38:1344–1348PubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Pakzad F, Groves AM, Ell PJ (2006) The role of positron emission tomography in the management of pancreatic cancer. Semin Nucl Med 36:248–256PubMedCrossRef Pakzad F, Groves AM, Ell PJ (2006) The role of positron emission tomography in the management of pancreatic cancer. Semin Nucl Med 36:248–256PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Higashi T, Tamaki N, Torizuka T, et al. (1998) FDG uptake, GLUT-1 glucose transporter and cellularity in human pancreatic tumors. J Nucl Med 39:1727–1735PubMed Higashi T, Tamaki N, Torizuka T, et al. (1998) FDG uptake, GLUT-1 glucose transporter and cellularity in human pancreatic tumors. J Nucl Med 39:1727–1735PubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Diederichs CG, Staib L, Vogel J, et al. (2000) Values and limitations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses. Pancreas 20:109–116PubMedCrossRef Diederichs CG, Staib L, Vogel J, et al. (2000) Values and limitations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses. Pancreas 20:109–116PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, et al. (2001) A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med 42(suppl 5):1S–93SPubMed Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, et al. (2001) A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med 42(suppl 5):1S–93SPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Schick V, Franzius C, Beyna T, et al. (2008) Diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT evaluating solid pancreatic lesions versus endosonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with intraductal ultrasonography and abdominal ultrasound. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1775–1785PubMedCrossRef Schick V, Franzius C, Beyna T, et al. (2008) Diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT evaluating solid pancreatic lesions versus endosonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with intraductal ultrasonography and abdominal ultrasound. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1775–1785PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppänem MP, et al. (2009) A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 250:957–963PubMedCrossRef Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppänem MP, et al. (2009) A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 250:957–963PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Bares R, Klever P, Hauptmann S, et al. (1994) F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in vivo evaluation of pancreatic glucose metabolism for detection of pancreatic cancer. Radiology 192:79–86PubMed Bares R, Klever P, Hauptmann S, et al. (1994) F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in vivo evaluation of pancreatic glucose metabolism for detection of pancreatic cancer. Radiology 192:79–86PubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimny M, Bares R, Fass J, et al. (1997) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a report of 106 cases. Eur J Nucl Med 24:678–682PubMed Zimny M, Bares R, Fass J, et al. (1997) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a report of 106 cases. Eur J Nucl Med 24:678–682PubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Lytras D, Connor S, Bosonnet L, et al. (2005) Positron emission tomography does not add to computed tomography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 22:55–62PubMedCrossRef Lytras D, Connor S, Bosonnet L, et al. (2005) Positron emission tomography does not add to computed tomography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 22:55–62PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Inokuma T, Tamaki N, Torizuka T, et al. (1995) Evaluation of pancreatic tumors with positron emission tomography and F-18 18 fluorodeoxyglucose: comparison with CT and US. Radiology 195:345–352PubMed Inokuma T, Tamaki N, Torizuka T, et al. (1995) Evaluation of pancreatic tumors with positron emission tomography and F-18 18 fluorodeoxyglucose: comparison with CT and US. Radiology 195:345–352PubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Koyama K, Okamura T, Kawabe J, et al. (2001) Diagnostic usefulness of FDG PET for pancreatic mass lesions. Ann Nucl Med 15:217–224PubMedCrossRef Koyama K, Okamura T, Kawabe J, et al. (2001) Diagnostic usefulness of FDG PET for pancreatic mass lesions. Ann Nucl Med 15:217–224PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang S, Chung HW, Park SW, et al. (2006) The clinical usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:923–929PubMedCrossRef Bang S, Chung HW, Park SW, et al. (2006) The clinical usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:923–929PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Serrano OK, Chaudhry MA, Leach SD (2010) The role of PET scanning in pancreatic cancer. Adv Surg 44:313–325PubMedCrossRef Serrano OK, Chaudhry MA, Leach SD (2010) The role of PET scanning in pancreatic cancer. Adv Surg 44:313–325PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Okano S, Kakinoki K, Akamoto S, et al. (2011) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 17(2):231–235PubMedCrossRef Okano S, Kakinoki K, Akamoto S, et al. (2011) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 17(2):231–235PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo S, Doi R, Machimoto T (2008) Contribution of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the diagnosis of early pancreatic carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:634–639PubMedCrossRef Seo S, Doi R, Machimoto T (2008) Contribution of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the diagnosis of early pancreatic carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:634–639PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Pery C, Maurette G, Ansequer C, et al. (2010) Role and limitations of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of patients with pancreatic lesions. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34:465–474PubMedCrossRef Pery C, Maurette G, Ansequer C, et al. (2010) Role and limitations of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of patients with pancreatic lesions. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 34:465–474PubMedCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong HS, Yun M, Cho A, et al. (2010) The utility of F18 FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Clin Nucl Med 35:776–779PubMedCrossRef Hong HS, Yun M, Cho A, et al. (2010) The utility of F18 FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Clin Nucl Med 35:776–779PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperti C, Pasquali C, Decet G, et al. (2005) F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cysts: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 9(1):22–28PubMedCrossRef Sperti C, Pasquali C, Decet G, et al. (2005) F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cysts: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 9(1):22–28PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassan M, Pizzi S, Sperti C, et al. (2008) 18F-FDG PET findings and GLUT-1 expression in IPMNs of the pancreas. J Nucl Med 49:2070PubMedCrossRef Fassan M, Pizzi S, Sperti C, et al. (2008) 18F-FDG PET findings and GLUT-1 expression in IPMNs of the pancreas. J Nucl Med 49:2070PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperti C, Bissoli S, Pasquali C, et al. (2007) 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography enhances computed tomography diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg 246:932–939PubMedCrossRef Sperti C, Bissoli S, Pasquali C, et al. (2007) 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography enhances computed tomography diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg 246:932–939PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomimaru Y, Takeda Y, Tatsumi M, et al. (2010) Utility of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Oncol Rep 24(3):613–620PubMed Tomimaru Y, Takeda Y, Tatsumi M, et al. (2010) Utility of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Oncol Rep 24(3):613–620PubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2005) Dual phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:389–397PubMedCrossRef Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Nakamoto Y, et al. (2005) Dual phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:389–397PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NQ, Bartholomeusz DF (2011) 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of pancreatic cancer: is the contrast or a better-designed trial needed? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:613–618PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NQ, Bartholomeusz DF (2011) 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of pancreatic cancer: is the contrast or a better-designed trial needed? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:613–618PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi H, Nishiyama Y, Otani T, et al. (2008) Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in surgery for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 14(1):64–69PubMedCrossRef Wakabayashi H, Nishiyama Y, Otani T, et al. (2008) Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in surgery for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 14(1):64–69PubMedCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel K, Heinrich S, Bhure U, et al. (2008) Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the respectability of pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med 49:1408–1413PubMedCrossRef Strobel K, Heinrich S, Bhure U, et al. (2008) Contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-stop-shop imaging for assessing the respectability of pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med 49:1408–1413PubMedCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Yokoe K, et al. (2005) Contribution of whole body FDG-PET to the detection of distant metastases in pancreatic cancer. Ann Nucl Med 19:491–497PubMedCrossRef Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Yokoe K, et al. (2005) Contribution of whole body FDG-PET to the detection of distant metastases in pancreatic cancer. Ann Nucl Med 19:491–497PubMedCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schafer M, et al. (2005) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg 242:235–243PubMedCrossRef Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schafer M, et al. (2005) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg 242:235–243PubMedCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed Frohlich A, Diederichs CG, Staib L, et al. (1999) Detection of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 40:250–255PubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuwatani M, Kawakami H, Eto K, et al. (2009) Modalities for evaluating chemotherapeutic efficacy and survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: comparison between FDG-PET, CT, and serum tumor markers. Intern Med 48:867–875PubMedCrossRef Kuwatani M, Kawakami H, Eto K, et al. (2009) Modalities for evaluating chemotherapeutic efficacy and survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: comparison between FDG-PET, CT, and serum tumor markers. Intern Med 48:867–875PubMedCrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Maisey NR, Webb A, Flux GD, et al. (2000) FDG-PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study. Br J Cancer 83(3):287–293PubMedCrossRef Maisey NR, Webb A, Flux GD, et al. (2000) FDG-PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study. Br J Cancer 83(3):287–293PubMedCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf J, Lopez Hanninen E, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/RM. Pancreatology 5:266–272PubMedCrossRef Ruf J, Lopez Hanninen E, Oettle H, et al. (2005) Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/RM. Pancreatology 5:266–272PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical applications of 18F-FDG PET in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors
verfasst von
Anna Maria De Gaetano
Vittoria Rufini
Paola Castaldi
Anna Maria Gatto
Laura Filograna
Alessandro Giordano
Lorenzo Bonomo
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9845-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Abdominal Radiology 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

PET kann infarktgefährdete Koronararterien entdecken

04.06.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Der Nachweis aktiver Plaques mittels 18F-Natriumfluorid-PET hilft nicht nur, infarktgefährdete Patienten, sondern auch infarktgefährdete Koronararterien zu erkennen. Von einer gezielten Behandlung vulnerabler Plaques ist man trotzdem weit entfernt.

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.